

Is a Turkish sports club refusing to pay a foreign athlete’s contractual bonus? A 2026 guide covering football bonuses, match fees, performance bonuses, evidence, formal payment demands, interest, termination, TFF and FIFA claims.
Foreign professional athletes playing in Turkey are frequently paid through compensation packages containing much more than a basic monthly salary.
A professional contract may provide:
Guaranteed Salary – Signing Bonus – Appearance Bonus – Match Fee – Win Bonus – Goal Bonus – Assist Bonus – Clean-Sheet Bonus – Championship Bonus – Promotion Bonus – European Qualification Bonus – Loyalty Bonus – Performance Bonus.
Problems arise when the athlete satisfies the contractual conditions but the Turkish club refuses or delays payment.
For example, a foreign footballer’s contract may provide:
Promotion Bonus: EUR 150,000.
The club wins promotion.
The player satisfies the contractual requirements.
The EUR 150,000 becomes due, but the club does not pay.
The central question is:
How can a foreign athlete recover an unpaid contractual bonus from a Turkish sports club?
In principle, a bonus that has validly accrued under the athlete’s contract can constitute an enforceable monetary claim. The key issues are proving the contractual basis, demonstrating that the bonus condition was satisfied, establishing when the payment became due and pursuing the claim before the correct dispute-resolution body.
For professional footballers, recent TFF decisions demonstrate that bonus receivables are not theoretical claims. The TFF Arbitration Board continued deciding disputes involving player and technical-staff bonus receivables in 2026. (tff.org)
A bonus is additional remuneration payable when contractual conditions are satisfied.
Unlike fixed salary, a bonus is frequently linked to a particular event.
Examples include:
Player Makes 20 Appearances → EUR 100,000
Club Wins Promotion → EUR 150,000
Player Scores 10 Goals → EUR 50,000
Club Wins Championship → EUR 200,000
Player Remains with Club Until Season End → EUR 75,000.
Once the agreed condition has occurred, the bonus may become a mature contractual receivable depending on the wording of the agreement.
Suppose the athlete receives:
Annual Guaranteed Salary: EUR 800,000
plus
Performance Bonus: Maximum EUR 300,000.
The EUR 800,000 does not depend on sporting performance if it is genuinely guaranteed.
The additional EUR 300,000 may depend on specific contractual conditions.
The athlete must therefore establish exactly what triggered the bonus.
Professional football contracts may contain several bonus categories.
These commonly include:
Signing Bonus
Appearance Bonus
Starting XI Bonus
Match Fee
Win Bonus
Goal Bonus
Assist Bonus
Clean-Sheet Bonus
Promotion Bonus
Championship Bonus
Cup-Winning Bonus
European Qualification Bonus
Loyalty Bonus
Performance Bonus.
Each bonus should be analyzed separately.
A signing bonus is commonly agreed as part of the economic package offered to convince the player to join the club.
For example:
Signing Bonus: EUR 300,000
payable:
EUR 150,000 on Registration
and
EUR 150,000 on 1 January.
If the second installment is not paid, the player should determine whether it has become due and whether any contractual condition remains outstanding.
An appearance bonus may depend on the player participating in a specified number of matches.
For example:
10 Official Matches: EUR 50,000
20 Official Matches: Additional EUR 75,000
30 Official Matches: Additional EUR 100,000.
The contract should specify what qualifies as an appearance.
Some contracts distinguish between:
Starting a Match
and
Entering as a Substitute.
Suppose the contract states:
EUR 5,000 for Every League Match Started.
If the player starts 15 qualifying matches, the potential claim may be:
15 × EUR 5,000 = EUR 75,000.
Official match records can become critical evidence.
Match fees may operate differently from milestone bonuses.
A contract may provide:
EUR 8,000 Per League Appearance.
If the player appears in 22 qualifying matches:
22 × EUR 8,000 = EUR 176,000.
TFF decisions have repeatedly dealt with match-fee receivables as monetary claims, including disputes in which the maturity and interest commencement dates of individual components required separate consideration. (tff.org)
Some clubs promise additional remuneration for victories.
The contract may provide:
EUR 3,000 for Each League Win in Which Player Participates.
The player should calculate:
Qualifying Matches × Contractual Bonus Amount.
Club announcements and internal bonus schedules can also become relevant depending on how the bonus was created.
A striker may receive:
10 Goals = EUR 50,000
15 Goals = Additional EUR 75,000
20 Goals = Additional EUR 100,000.
Official competition statistics can usually provide strong evidence that the sporting threshold was achieved.
The next question becomes whether the contractual wording imposes any additional conditions.
The same approach can apply to assists.
However, the contract should clearly identify the source used to determine official statistics.
Different data providers can occasionally classify the same sporting event differently.
Clear contractual drafting prevents disputes.
Goalkeepers and defenders may have clean-sheet bonuses.
For example:
EUR 4,000 Per Qualifying Clean Sheet.
Disputes can arise where the player:
starts the match,
is substituted,
concedes no goal while playing,
but the team later concedes.
The contract should determine what constitutes a qualifying clean sheet.
Promotion bonuses are particularly common where a player joins a lower-division club.
For example:
Promotion to Top Division: EUR 200,000.
If promotion occurs, the player may claim that the contractual condition has been satisfied.
The club may nevertheless dispute whether additional conditions applied, such as minimum appearances.
A championship bonus can be significant.
Suppose:
League Championship Bonus: EUR 250,000.
The player participates throughout the season.
The club wins the league.
The athlete should identify when the EUR 250,000 becomes payable under the contract.
Foreign players at top-flight clubs may receive bonuses for:
Champions League Qualification
Europa League Qualification
Conference League Qualification.
The wording should identify precisely what counts as “qualification.”
Is the bonus triggered by league position?
Successful completion of qualifying rounds?
Entry into the league phase?
Ambiguous drafting can produce substantial disputes.
A loyalty bonus may become payable if the player remains under contract until a particular date.
For example:
EUR 150,000 if Player Remains Registered with Club on 30 June 2027.
The player should carefully examine what happens if the club terminates the contract before that date.
The result may depend heavily on the clause.
Not every bonus originates directly from the player’s individual contract.
A club may announce:
EUR 1 Million Promotion Bonus Pool for the Team.
The player may claim an allocated share.
The legal question then becomes whether the announcement created an enforceable entitlement and how the athlete’s share was determined.
Evidence is essential.
This is one of the most difficult categories.
A club president may tell the team:
“Win this match and every player gets EUR 20,000.”
The team wins.
Later, the club says:
“That was only motivational talk.”
The athlete must prove that a legally enforceable bonus promise existed.
Written contractual provisions are substantially safer.
Modern sports disputes frequently involve electronic communications.
A sporting director may write in the team group:
“Management confirms EUR 10,000 per player if we win Saturday.”
The team wins.
The message may become relevant evidence.
The original communication should be preserved.
The player’s agent may also possess important evidence.
For example, before signing the contract, the sporting director sends the agent:
“EUR 100,000 promotion bonus is confirmed.”
If the final contractual documents do not clearly contain the same provision, the evidentiary and regulatory analysis becomes more complicated.
The player should preserve the entire negotiation record.
Foreign footballers should be particularly cautious about bonus arrangements that are intentionally kept outside the contractual documentation submitted through the applicable football regulatory framework.
Current TFF professional football rules regulate the contractual documentation concerning remuneration and impose restrictions concerning undisclosed supplementary agreements.
Therefore, a player should not assume that every informal side letter will be treated in exactly the same way as a properly documented contractual bonus.
The date and regulatory status of the agreement matter.
Before demanding payment, answer four questions:
Was There a Valid Bonus Agreement?
Was the Condition Satisfied?
Has the Bonus Become Due?
Has the Club Already Paid Any Part of It?
Only then should the final claim amount be calculated.
Contract:
EUR 150,000 if Club Is Promoted.
Club wins promotion on 25 May.
Contract states payment is due:
Within 30 Days After Promotion Is Confirmed.
The athlete should calculate the maturity date from the contractual wording.
A payment demand sent before maturity may be strategically different from one sent after the debt becomes overdue.
The date on which a bonus becomes payable can affect:
Default
Interest
Formal Payment Demand
Termination Analysis
Claim Calculation.
TFF Arbitration Board practice illustrates that interest commencement dates can be separately analyzed even where the underlying bonus receivable is accepted. (tff.org)
An unpaid bonus claim may potentially include interest.
But the applicable interest type and commencement date depend on the contractual and legal circumstances.
The player should therefore not simply calculate:
Bonus + Random Interest Percentage.
The due date and procedural history must be established.
Recent TFF Arbitration Board decisions provide useful practical confirmation.
In February 2026, the Board considered a football dispute involving a TRY 250,000 bonus receivable and specifically addressed the applicable interest commencement date. (tff.org)
The same body has also reviewed disputes containing separate bonus and match-fee claims. (tff.org)
For foreign players, the practical lesson is straightforward:
Bonus claims should be calculated, documented and pursued as distinct monetary receivables rather than treated as minor additions to salary.
A common defense is:
“The bonus was discretionary.”
The contract must then be examined.
Compare:
“Player shall receive EUR 100,000 if the club is promoted.”
with:
“Club may, at its discretion, award an additional promotion bonus.”
These clauses are materially different.
The exact wording can determine whether payment became mandatory.
The athlete may respond that the bonus was included in a signed contract or formally communicated by authorized representatives.
The club may argue that internal approval was missing.
The authority of the person making the commitment and the formal contractual structure should therefore be investigated.
This is perhaps the most common substantive dispute.
Suppose the contract provides:
EUR 100,000 Promotion Bonus if Player Participates in at Least 50% of League Matches.
The club argues that the player participated in only 48%.
The player argues that substitute appearances should also count.
The dispute turns on contractual interpretation and official match records.
Does appearance mean:
Starting XI?
Entering the Match?
Being Named on the Match Sheet?
Playing a Minimum Number of Minutes?
A poorly drafted bonus clause can create a major financial dispute.
Suppose:
20 Appearances = EUR 100,000.
The player reaches 19 appearances and then suffers a serious injury.
Unless the contract contains another mechanism, the player may not automatically satisfy a condition requiring 20 appearances.
This illustrates why the exact wording matters.
A more complicated situation arises where the club deliberately prevents satisfaction of the condition.
For example:
25 Appearances = EUR 200,000 Bonus.
The player reaches 24.
Management then removes him from the squad.
An executive tells his agent:
“If he plays once more, we owe EUR 200,000.”
This evidence could become extremely important.
The player should preserve the communication and the complete chronology.
The player should document:
Performance Before Exclusion
Number of Appearances
Timing
Coach Statements
Management Communications
Bonus Threshold
Transfer or Salary Disputes.
A sudden exclusion immediately before a valuable bonus threshold deserves careful investigation.
Another scenario:
The club owes a EUR 150,000 championship bonus.
Management says:
“We will pay it only if you accept a 30% salary reduction next season.”
The athlete should distinguish the already-accrued bonus from negotiations concerning future remuneration.
A mature existing receivable should not automatically disappear because the player refuses to amend future contractual terms.
The club may say:
“Sign mutual termination and we will pay your bonus.”
The player should calculate the complete claim before signing.
The termination agreement may contain a full release covering much more than the unpaid bonus.
Suppose:
Outstanding Salary: EUR 200,000
Promotion Bonus: EUR 150,000
Match Fees: EUR 75,000
Remaining Contract Value: EUR 900,000.
The player’s financial position should not be reduced to:
“Club owes me a EUR 150,000 bonus.”
The total contractual exposure may be substantially larger.
The payment demand should clearly identify:
Contractual Provision
Bonus Type
Triggering Event
Date Condition Was Satisfied
Amount Due
Maturity Date
Currency
Outstanding Balance.
A precise demand is generally more effective than:
“Please pay my bonuses.”
Depending on the sport, contract and legal remedy contemplated, formal notification requirements can be highly important.
For professional footballers considering contractual termination because of unpaid remuneration, the current TFF framework contains specific procedural requirements.
Therefore, the player should not assume that an informal WhatsApp demand is sufficient for every legal purpose.
This is crucial.
The existence of an unpaid bonus does not automatically mean that the athlete can immediately terminate the entire professional contract.
Termination depends on:
Nature of the Payment
Amount
Maturity
Contract
Applicable Federation Rules
Notice Procedure
Cure Requirements
Seriousness of the Breach.
A bonus-recovery claim and a contract-termination claim are related but distinct questions.
The situation becomes more serious where the club owes multiple categories of remuneration.
For example:
Salary Arrears: EUR 240,000
Match Fees: EUR 80,000
Promotion Bonus: EUR 150,000.
Total:
EUR 470,000.
The entire overdue-remuneration position should be calculated before deciding whether to pursue only payment or also consider termination.
Suppose the contractual bonus is:
EUR 200,000.
The club pays:
EUR 75,000.
The outstanding balance is:
EUR 125,000.
The player should document that the partial payment has not been accepted as full settlement unless that is genuinely the agreement.
The club may transfer part of the bonus and ask the player to sign:
“All bonus rights have been fully settled.”
A foreign athlete should not sign such a document without understanding its consequences.
It may waive the remaining claim.
Bank records can prove:
Amount Paid
Payment Date
Currency
Payment Description.
They can also demonstrate that no payment corresponding to the disputed bonus was received.
The player should retain complete statements rather than isolated screenshots.
Depending on the forum and procedural rules, the club’s financial and contractual records may also become relevant.
For example, the club may have recorded the bonus as payable internally even while denying the player’s claim.
The evidentiary strategy should be determined according to the competent tribunal.
For sporting-condition bonuses, official records can be particularly important.
These may establish:
Appearances
Starts
Goals
Competition Results
League Position
Promotion
Championship.
The athlete should build the claim around objective records whenever possible.
Messages announcing bonuses should also be preserved.
Relevant evidence can include:
Team Group Messages
Sporting Director Emails
President Announcements
Agent Communications
Written Bonus Schedules.
The original files should be retained wherever possible.
Other players, coaches, agents or club personnel may know about a bonus arrangement.
Witness evidence can be relevant depending on the applicable procedural framework.
However, a written contractual provision is generally much easier to establish than an undocumented verbal promise.
Foreign athletes frequently have bonuses denominated in:
EUR
USD
or another currency.
The contract should be reviewed to determine:
Payment Currency
Conversion Mechanism
Payment Date
Whether the Claim Is Gross or Net.
Currency disputes can materially affect the amount recoverable.
Suppose the contract provides:
EUR 100,000 Net Promotion Bonus.
That is different from:
EUR 100,000 Gross Promotion Bonus.
Tax and withholding treatment can affect what the player should actually receive.
The wording must be checked.
If the club argues that the difference represents tax or statutory withholding, the player should request documentation showing the calculation and payment.
A tax explanation should not simply be accepted without verification.
If the club claims that a payment was made through an agent, the athlete should examine:
Who Was Entitled to Receive the Money?
Was the Agent Authorized?
What Was the Payment For?
Was It Player Remuneration or Agent Commission?
A club should not automatically characterize an unrelated agent payment as satisfaction of the athlete’s bonus.
For professional football disputes, TFF dispute-resolution mechanisms may be relevant depending on the applicable jurisdictional rules and contractual framework.
The TFF’s 2026 Arbitration Board decisions demonstrate active adjudication of bonus and other football-related receivables. (tff.org)
The appropriate claim should identify every monetary component separately.
A foreign footballer’s dispute with a Turkish club may contain an international dimension.
Depending on the applicable regulatory framework, FIFA’s dispute-resolution system may therefore become relevant.
However:
Foreign Nationality Alone Does Not Automatically Mean FIFA Has Jurisdiction.
The correct forum should be established before filing.
The jurisdiction analysis should examine:
Player Nationality
Club
International Dimension
Contractual Dispute Clause
Applicable TFF Rules
Applicable FIFA Rules
Nature of the Claim.
Filing in the wrong forum can delay recovery significantly.
For athletes outside professional football, the correct dispute forum may differ substantially.
A foreign basketball player, volleyball player or athlete in another sport should not automatically use the TFF framework.
The applicable federation rules, contract, arbitration provisions and Turkish legal framework must be reviewed.
A foreign basketball player’s contract may provide:
Playoff Qualification Bonus: USD 50,000.
If the club qualifies but refuses payment, the player should establish:
Contractual Basis → Trigger → Maturity → Evidence → Correct Forum.
The underlying recovery logic resembles other contractual claims, but the procedural route may differ from football.
A foreign volleyball player may have:
Championship Bonus
Cup Bonus
European Competition Bonus.
Again, the athlete must identify the governing contractual and federation framework before commencing proceedings.
Depending on the legal relationship, dispute-resolution clause, existence of an enforceable decision and applicable federation rules, Turkish enforcement mechanisms may eventually become relevant.
However, the athlete should first determine whether the underlying claim must be adjudicated through a federation body, arbitration mechanism or court.
The correct procedural sequence is essential.
A player may win the bonus dispute but still face collection problems if the club does not voluntarily pay.
Therefore, recovery strategy should consider:
Claim → Decision → Finality Where Required → Enforcement → Club Assets → Regulatory Consequences.
A legal victory and actual collection are not always the same thing.
If the club is experiencing severe financial problems, delay can increase collection risk.
The athlete should investigate whether:
Other Players Are Unpaid
Club Accounts Face Enforcement
Management Is Seeking Settlements
The Club Is Restructuring Debt.
Early action may be strategically important.
The parties may negotiate.
For example:
Bonus Claim: EUR 200,000
Club offers:
EUR 150,000 Immediate Payment.
Whether this is attractive depends on:
Strength of Evidence
Time Required for Proceedings
Collection Risk
Interest
Player’s Continuing Relationship with Club.
Settlement should be evaluated commercially as well as legally.
A club may propose:
EUR 50,000 Now
EUR 50,000 in 30 Days
EUR 50,000 in 60 Days
EUR 50,000 in 90 Days.
The agreement should address default.
If the club misses the second installment, the player should know whether the entire remaining balance immediately becomes due.
Where the club already failed to pay once, accepting another unsecured promise can create obvious risk.
Depending on the circumstances, the athlete may consider negotiating appropriate payment security.
The settlement should be designed for actual collection, not merely signature.
The fact that the player’s contract has expired does not automatically mean an already-accrued bonus disappears.
Suppose the player earned a championship bonus during his final season.
His contract expires one month later.
The club still has not paid.
The player should determine the applicable limitation period and dispute procedure and pursue the matured receivable promptly.
Similarly, a transfer to another club does not necessarily erase previously accrued bonus rights.
The transfer documentation and any settlement or release signed when leaving the club should be examined.
A full release may materially affect the claim.
Before signing mutual termination, the player should ensure that the agreement expressly addresses the unpaid bonus.
For example:
Outstanding Promotion Bonus: EUR 150,000
should not disappear inside vague language such as:
“The parties have no further claims.”
The settlement should identify what is being paid and what is being waived.
A foreign athlete should preserve:
Professional Contract
Bonus Clause
Supplementary Contractual Documents
Official Match Records
Competition Results
Player Statistics
Team Bonus Announcements
Messages
Emails
Agent Correspondence
Bank Statements
Payment Receipts
Club Settlement Offers
Formal Payment Demands
Proof of Notification
Termination Documents
Transfer or Mutual Termination Agreements.
The evidence should be organized before proceedings begin.
For each claim, identify:
Bonus Type → Contractual Condition → Condition Satisfied? → Trigger Date → Due Date → Amount → Amount Paid → Outstanding Balance.
Example:
Promotion Bonus → Promotion Achieved → Yes → 20 May → Due 20 June → EUR 150,000 → EUR 0 Paid → EUR 150,000 Outstanding.
This can substantially simplify the claim.
Do not simply state:
“Club owes EUR 400,000.”
Break it down.
For example:
Salary: EUR 150,000
Match Fees: EUR 60,000
Promotion Bonus: EUR 100,000
Signing Payment: EUR 90,000
Total: EUR 400,000.
Different amounts may have different due dates and interest calculations.
Foreign footballers should use current regulations rather than old templates.
The TFF amended the Professional Footballers’ Status and Transfers framework in May 2026 and again in June 2026. (tff.org)
The current published regulatory text also contains transitional provisions relevant to contractual documentation and professional football disputes. (tff.org)
Accordingly, the regulatory version applicable to the player’s contract and dispute date should be verified before filing a claim or terminating the contract.
A foreign footballer’s contract provides:
EUR 200,000 Promotion Bonus.
The club is promoted.
The player satisfies every contractual condition.
No payment is made.
The player should establish the maturity date, formally claim the EUR 200,000, preserve promotion and contractual evidence and pursue the receivable before the competent forum if payment is not made.
The player is entitled to:
EUR 7,500 Per Appearance.
He makes:
20 Qualifying Appearances.
Total:
EUR 150,000.
Club pays EUR 50,000.
Potential outstanding balance:
EUR 100,000.
Official match records and bank statements can provide the foundation of the claim.
The player claims 25 appearances.
The club says only 18 qualify because substitute appearances are excluded.
The contract does not define “appearance.”
This becomes a contractual interpretation dispute.
The precise wording and surrounding evidence become critical.
A player needs one additional appearance to earn EUR 250,000.
Management removes him from the squad immediately before the threshold.
The player’s agent receives a message indicating the club wants to avoid the bonus.
This evidence should be preserved immediately.
The club owes EUR 120,000 in bonuses.
Management says:
“We will pay only if you sign mutual termination and waive the rest of your contract.”
The player should calculate the bonus together with all other contractual claims before deciding whether the settlement is commercially acceptable.
The club accepts that EUR 180,000 is owed but asks for six monthly installments.
If the player agrees, the settlement should clearly identify:
Installment Dates
Currency
Interest
Default
Acceleration
Remaining Claim.
Do not replace one uncertain receivable with another vague promise.
A foreign athlete seeking an unpaid bonus should generally follow this sequence:
Review Contract → Identify Bonus Clause → Confirm Triggering Condition → Gather Official Sporting Evidence → Determine Maturity Date → Calculate Exact Amount → Check Partial Payments → Preserve Communications → Send Appropriate Formal Demand → Determine Correct Federation or Tribunal → Claim Bonus and Applicable Interest → Assess Whether Other Salary Is Also Unpaid → Consider Termination Only If Legally Justified → Obtain Decision → Enforce if Club Does Not Pay.
The objective should be actual recovery, not merely establishing that the athlete was right.
Foreign athletes should seek legal review quickly where the club denies a clearly written bonus, changes the bonus conditions after the event, refuses to provide payment calculations, claims a verbal waiver, asks the athlete to sign a full release, deliberately prevents the player reaching an appearance threshold, conditions bonus payment on accepting a salary reduction, uses the bonus to force mutual termination or repeatedly promises payment without honoring agreed dates.
These situations can materially increase both legal and collection risks.
Potentially yes. If the bonus was validly agreed, the contractual condition was satisfied and payment became due, it may constitute an enforceable monetary receivable.
The contract, bonus clause, official sporting records, messages, bank statements, payment records and any formal demands are particularly important.
Yes, where the contractual requirements have been satisfied. TFF decisions have addressed match-fee receivables and their individual interest commencement dates. (tff.org)
Potentially. The applicable interest and commencement date depend on the contract, maturity and relevant legal framework. Recent TFF decisions show that the interest start date can be separately analyzed. (tff.org)
Recovery can become more difficult. The athlete must prove both the existence and terms of the promise, while football-specific regulatory requirements concerning contractual documentation may also affect the analysis.
Not automatically. If the bonus had already accrued, the contract and any later transfer, termination or release documents should be examined.
Potentially in some circumstances, but non-payment of one bonus does not automatically create an immediate termination right. The applicable termination rules, amount, maturity, notice and cure requirements must be reviewed.
The club may propose a settlement, but the athlete should not waive larger contractual rights merely to receive money that may already be due without first calculating the complete financial position.
No. The correct forum depends on the international dimension, contractual provisions and applicable TFF and FIFA rules.
Potentially yes. Contract expiration does not automatically eliminate an accrued monetary claim, although procedural deadlines and any releases or settlements must be examined.
An unpaid bonus can represent a substantial part of a professional athlete’s compensation. It should not be treated as an informal promise simply because the amount depends on sporting performance.
Where the contractual condition has been satisfied, the athlete should identify the exact bonus provision, triggering event, maturity date, amount, evidence and competent dispute-resolution forum.
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign professional footballers and other international athletes with monetary claims against Turkish sports clubs. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with unpaid bonuses, match fees, signing payments, overdue salaries, performance bonuses, promotion and championship bonuses, formal payment demands, settlement negotiations, contract termination, compensation claims, TFF proceedings and FIFA-related international disputes.
The strongest recovery strategy is generally to calculate each receivable separately, preserve objective sporting evidence, establish the exact due date and begin the correct recovery procedure before the club’s financial position deteriorates further.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey