

How can foreign athletes recover unpaid performance bonuses from Turkish sports clubs? A 2026 guide covering appearance, goal, win, promotion and championship bonuses, evidence, interest, TFF and FIFA disputes.
Performance bonuses can represent a substantial part of the compensation earned by foreign professional athletes competing in Turkey.
A foreign footballer may negotiate a relatively modest guaranteed salary while expecting significant additional income from appearance fees, goals, assists, clean sheets, victories, promotion, championships or European qualification.
Problems arise when the athlete believes the contractual condition has been satisfied but the Turkish club refuses to pay.
The club may argue that the athlete did not reach the required threshold, that the bonus was discretionary, that substitute appearances do not count, that the player was injured, that the bonus required board approval or that the athlete waived the payment when leaving the club.
The financial consequences can be substantial.
For example:
Guaranteed Salary: EUR 800,000
20-Appearance Bonus: EUR 100,000
30-Appearance Bonus: EUR 150,000
Championship Bonus: EUR 200,000
European Qualification Bonus: EUR 100,000.
A dispute over variable compensation can therefore involve hundreds of thousands of euros.
The central legal question is:
When does a performance bonus become legally payable, and what can a foreign athlete do if a Turkish sports club refuses to pay it?
For professional footballers, 2026 TFF Arbitration Board decisions continue to demonstrate that bonus and match-fee receivables are treated as substantive monetary claims and that even the applicable interest commencement date may be examined separately for individual receivables.
A performance bonus is remuneration that becomes payable when a contractually defined sporting or commercial condition occurs.
Unlike guaranteed salary, payment normally depends on satisfaction of a specified condition.
Examples include:
Number of Appearances
Starting XI Appearances
Minutes Played
Goals Scored
Assists
Clean Sheets
Match Victories
League Position
Promotion
Championship
Cup Victory
European Qualification
Avoiding Relegation
Individual Sporting Awards.
The exact wording of the contract is therefore critical.
Suppose a foreign footballer has:
Guaranteed Salary: EUR 1 Million
and
Potential Performance Bonuses: EUR 400,000.
The EUR 1 million is contractually guaranteed if the agreement provides it as fixed remuneration.
The additional EUR 400,000 may become payable only when the specified sporting conditions are satisfied.
A dispute over the bonus should not automatically affect the guaranteed salary.
Appearance-related bonuses are among the most common performance incentives.
A contract may provide:
10 Appearances: EUR 50,000
20 Appearances: Additional EUR 75,000
30 Appearances: Additional EUR 100,000.
The first question is whether the player actually reached the relevant threshold.
The second is what the contract means by an “appearance.”
This can become surprisingly controversial.
Does an appearance mean:
Starting the Match?
Entering as a Substitute?
Playing Any Number of Minutes?
Playing at Least 45 Minutes?
Being Included on the Match Sheet?
These concepts are not necessarily interchangeable.
If the contract simply states:
“20 official appearances”
without further definition, interpretation can become central to the dispute.
A different clause may expressly require the player to start.
For example:
EUR 5,000 for Every League Match Started in the Starting XI.
If the player starts 18 qualifying matches:
18 × EUR 5,000 = EUR 90,000.
Official match records can provide strong evidence.
Suppose the contract states:
25 League Appearances = EUR 100,000.
The player starts 20 matches and enters five as a substitute.
The club argues that only starts count.
The player argues that all actual appearances qualify.
The precise wording of the bonus clause becomes decisive.
Some contracts avoid appearance disputes by using minutes.
For example:
1,500 League Minutes = EUR 75,000
2,500 League Minutes = Additional EUR 100,000.
Official competition statistics should then be collected.
The athlete should independently verify the calculation rather than relying entirely on the club’s figures.
A striker may negotiate:
10 Goals: EUR 50,000
15 Goals: Additional EUR 75,000
20 Goals: Additional EUR 100,000.
If the player scores 15 qualifying goals, the contract determines whether he receives:
EUR 75,000
or
EUR 125,000.
The distinction depends on whether the thresholds are cumulative.
Consider:
10 Goals – EUR 50,000
15 Goals – EUR 75,000
20 Goals – EUR 100,000.
Does a player scoring 20 goals receive:
EUR 100,000
or
EUR 225,000?
A well-drafted contract should answer this explicitly.
Poor drafting can create a major dispute.
A bonus may apply only to:
League Matches
or may include:
Domestic Cup
European Competition
Super Cup
Playoffs.
Suppose a player scores:
8 League Goals
3 Cup Goals
2 European Goals.
Total:
13 Goals.
If the contract provides a EUR 100,000 bonus for “10 official goals,” the player may claim the threshold has been reached.
If it says “10 league goals,” the result is different.
Occasionally, disagreement can arise over whether a goal was officially credited to the player or recorded as an own goal.
The safest approach is to rely on the official competition record designated by the contractual or regulatory framework.
Private statistical platforms should not automatically override official records.
Foreign players may also have assist-based compensation.
For example:
10 Assists = EUR 50,000.
Assist statistics can sometimes be more controversial than goals because different statistical providers may use different definitions.
Contracts should ideally identify the authoritative source.
Goalkeepers frequently receive:
EUR 3,000 Per Clean Sheet
or milestone bonuses such as:
15 Clean Sheets = EUR 75,000.
Disputes can arise if the goalkeeper:
starts the match,
is substituted without conceding,
and the replacement goalkeeper later concedes.
The contract should define the condition.
Similar provisions can apply to defenders.
Does the player need to complete 90 minutes?
Is 60 minutes sufficient?
Does a substitute appearance qualify?
Again, the contractual wording matters.
A foreign athlete may be entitled to additional money when the team wins.
For example:
EUR 5,000 Per League Victory in Which the Player Participates.
If the player participates in 15 qualifying victories:
15 × EUR 5,000 = EUR 75,000.
Official match results and player participation records can establish the claim.
Sometimes win bonuses are not written individually into each player’s main contract.
Instead, club management may announce:
“EUR 10,000 per player if we win the derby.”
The team wins.
The club later refuses payment.
The key question becomes whether the announcement created an enforceable bonus obligation.
A written communication is considerably stronger than an undocumented conversation.
Evidence may include:
Team Email
Official Club Message
Team WhatsApp Group
Signed Bonus Schedule
Management Announcement
Agent Correspondence.
The athlete should preserve the original record.
Promotion disputes can involve very substantial amounts.
A contract may state:
Promotion to Top Division = EUR 200,000.
The club obtains promotion.
The player then demands payment.
The club may respond:
“The bonus applies only to players who played 50% of matches.”
If that condition does not appear in the contractual provision, the club’s position requires careful examination.
A foreign footballer may negotiate:
League Championship = EUR 250,000.
The club wins the championship.
If the contract clearly establishes the entitlement and any additional conditions are satisfied, the player can have a substantial monetary claim.
The next question becomes when payment became due.
These clauses require particularly careful drafting.
Consider:
“EUR 150,000 if the club qualifies for the Champions League.”
What does “qualifies” mean?
It could potentially refer to:
League Position
Entry into Qualification Rounds
Successful Completion of Qualification
Entry into the League Phase.
The contract should identify the trigger.
A contract may provide separate compensation for:
Winning Domestic Cup
Reaching Final
Winning Super Cup
Advancing in European Competition.
Each condition should be calculated independently.
Clubs fighting relegation sometimes offer survival bonuses.
For example:
EUR 75,000 if the club remains in the top division.
The athlete should determine whether payment requires:
team survival alone,
a minimum number of appearances,
or another condition.
A player may also negotiate bonuses for:
Top Scorer
Player of the Season
Team of the Season
National-Team Selection
Individual Competition Awards.
The source determining the award should ideally be identified.
A foreign footballer may receive:
EUR 25,000 for Senior National-Team Selection
or
EUR 10,000 Per International Appearance.
The contract should define whether selection to the squad is enough or actual match participation is required.
The strongest claims normally arise from clear written contractual provisions.
A bonus clause should ideally specify:
Amount
Currency
Trigger
Competition
Calculation Method
Maturity Date
Whether Thresholds Are Cumulative
Gross or Net Payment.
Every missing detail creates potential litigation.
A club president may enter the dressing room and say:
“Win the next three matches and everyone receives EUR 30,000.”
The players achieve the target.
The club later denies that a binding commitment existed.
The athlete then faces an evidentiary problem.
The existence, amount, conditions and authority behind the promise must be proven.
A sporting director may write:
“Management confirms EUR 20,000 per player if we qualify for Europe.”
The athlete should preserve the original message.
Electronic evidence can help demonstrate that the bonus was actually promised and identify its conditions.
Agents frequently negotiate performance bonuses before the professional contract is signed.
The athlete should preserve:
Offer Letters
Emails
Messages
Draft Contracts
Final Contract
Agent Notes.
A discrepancy between the negotiated package and final contractual documentation should be identified immediately.
Foreign footballers should be cautious where a club says:
“We cannot put this bonus in the official contract, but we will pay you separately.”
Professional football regulations contain specific rules concerning contractual remuneration and supplementary agreements.
An undocumented or improperly structured side arrangement can create regulatory and evidentiary problems.
The player should seek advice before accepting such structures.
Satisfying the sporting condition and reaching the payment date are not necessarily the same thing.
Suppose:
Championship Bonus: EUR 200,000
Contract says:
“Payable within 30 days following the final league match.”
The championship may be mathematically secured on 5 May.
The season ends on 25 May.
The contractual payment period then has to be calculated from the wording actually agreed.
The maturity date can affect:
Whether the Club Is in Default
Interest
Formal Payment Demand
Termination Rights
Claim Calculation.
It should always be identified precisely.
Recent TFF Arbitration Board practice provides particularly useful guidance.
In a decision announced on 8 May 2026, the Board dealt with a footballer’s claim containing:
TRY 700,000 Bonus Receivable
and
TRY 396,052.53 Match-Fee Receivable.
The Board separately addressed the interest commencement dates applicable to the different components.
This demonstrates an important practical point:
Bonus and match-fee claims should be separated and calculated individually.
The TFF Arbitration Board also considered a February 2026 dispute involving a:
TRY 250,000 Bonus Receivable.
The Board specifically addressed the date from which interest should run.
Again, the existence of a bonus claim does not end the calculation.
Maturity and interest can become separate issues.
The same approach remained visible in August 2026.
A TFF Arbitration Board decision announced on 21 August 2026 addressed salary components together with a:
TRY 200,000 Bonus Receivable
and separately determined the relevant interest commencement date for the bonus.
Accordingly, foreign players should prepare detailed calculations rather than presenting all contractual receivables as one undifferentiated amount.
An athlete may potentially claim interest on an overdue bonus.
However, the player should establish:
When the Bonus Became Due
Whether a Demand Was Required
When Default Occurred
Applicable Interest Regime.
The correct commencement date can materially affect a large claim.
Compare these two clauses.
Clause A:
“Player shall receive EUR 100,000 if the club finishes in the top three.”
Clause B:
“The club may award the player a performance bonus of up to EUR 100,000 at its discretion.”
The legal consequences can be very different.
The word “bonus” alone does not determine whether payment is mandatory.
Suppose the contract provides:
EUR 150,000 if Club Is Promoted.
Promotion occurs.
The club then says:
“You also needed 25 appearances.”
If no such condition appears in the relevant agreement, the club cannot simply assume that a new threshold existed.
The original contractual documentation must be examined.
Suppose:
20 Appearances = EUR 100,000.
The player makes:
19 Appearances.
Ordinarily, a clear 20-appearance condition has not been satisfied merely because the player came close.
But the analysis becomes more complicated if the club deliberately prevented the final appearance for the purpose of avoiding the bonus.
This is one of the most important performance-bonus disputes.
Suppose:
25 Appearances = EUR 250,000.
The player reaches:
24 Appearances.
He has been a regular starter.
Suddenly, he is excluded from the squad.
The sporting director tells the player’s agent:
“One more match costs us EUR 250,000.”
The athlete should preserve this evidence immediately.
The chronology may be critical:
1 April – Player makes 24th appearance
5 April – Management discusses bonus exposure
7 April – Player excluded from squad
10 April – Individual training begins
15 April – Club proposes mutual termination.
The complete pattern may be more significant than any single event.
Not every non-selection before a bonus threshold is manipulation.
A coach may legitimately exclude a player because of:
Poor Form
Injury
Tactical Change
Disciplinary Reasons
Competition for Position.
The athlete must distinguish genuine sporting discretion from deliberate contractual manipulation.
Suppose the player reaches 19 appearances and suffers a season-ending injury before the 20th.
If the contract clearly requires 20 appearances, the bonus may not automatically become payable.
The precise clause must be reviewed.
A different analysis may arise where the player remains ready to perform but the club itself prevents participation for reasons connected with avoiding the bonus.
Evidence of motive becomes particularly important.
Foreign players should therefore examine performance bonuses whenever a sudden squad exclusion occurs.
Ask:
How Close Was the Player to the Threshold?
What Was the Bonus Amount?
Was the Player Previously Playing Regularly?
What Explanation Was Given?
Did Management Discuss the Bonus?
Was a Transfer or Termination Proposed?
These questions can reveal the economic context.
A club may say:
“We owe the EUR 150,000 bonus, but we will pay only if you reduce next season’s salary.”
These are separate issues.
A mature performance bonus should be distinguished from negotiations concerning future salary.
The player should avoid accidentally waiving an existing receivable during future-contract negotiations.
A club may also condition payment on a transfer.
For example:
“Accept the transfer and we will pay your championship bonus.”
The player should calculate the complete economic position before agreeing.
The transfer agreement, outstanding bonus and remaining contract value should be considered together.
Suppose:
Outstanding Bonus: EUR 200,000
Outstanding Salary: EUR 100,000
Remaining Contract Value: EUR 900,000.
Club offers:
EUR 250,000 for mutual termination and full release.
The athlete should understand that the proposed settlement potentially affects claims worth much more than the unpaid bonus alone.
A termination document may contain language stating that:
“The athlete has no remaining claims of any kind against the club.”
Signing such language can affect:
Salary
Performance Bonuses
Match Fees
Signing Payments
Termination Compensation.
Every claim should be calculated before a release is signed.
Suppose:
Performance Bonus: EUR 180,000
Club pays:
EUR 80,000.
Potential balance:
EUR 100,000.
The player should avoid acknowledging the EUR 80,000 as full and final payment unless that is genuinely the agreed settlement.
Suppose the contract provides:
EUR 100,000.
The club pays an amount in Turkish lira based on an exchange rate the player disputes.
The contract should be examined for:
Payment Currency
Conversion Date
Applicable Exchange Rate
Gross/Net Treatment.
Currency differences can create substantial claims.
A clause providing:
EUR 100,000 Net
is financially different from:
EUR 100,000 Gross.
Tax and withholding issues must therefore be examined before determining whether the club has paid the correct amount.
The athlete should request the relevant calculation and documentation.
The question is not simply how much reached the player’s bank account.
The contractual gross/net structure and legitimate deductions must be considered.
A club may accept that a EUR 100,000 bonus is due but claim:
EUR 60,000 Disciplinary Fine
and transfer only:
EUR 40,000.
The athlete should separately investigate the validity of the alleged disciplinary deduction.
A disputed fine should not automatically be treated as an undisputed set-off.
A strong bonus claim can involve several forms of evidence.
The most important may include:
Professional Contract
Bonus Clause
Registered Contractual Documents
Official Match Records
Player Statistics
League Table
Competition Results
Team Bonus Announcements
Emails
Messages
Agent Correspondence
Bank Statements
Club Payment Calculations
Formal Notices.
The athlete should collect evidence before leaving the club.
Objective records can establish:
Appearances
Minutes
Goals
Match Results
Promotion
Championship
Competition Qualification.
These records reduce dependence on witness recollection.
The athlete should prepare a separate calculation for every bonus.
For example:
Appearance Bonus → 20 Appearances → Threshold Reached → EUR 75,000
Goal Bonus → 10 Goals → Threshold Reached → EUR 50,000
Championship Bonus → Club Champion → EUR 150,000
Total Potential Bonus Claim → EUR 275,000.
This is far clearer than stating:
“The club owes me bonuses.”
The table should also show:
Bonus → Trigger Date → Due Date → Amount → Amount Paid → Outstanding Balance.
This becomes particularly useful when interest is calculated.
If the club refuses payment, the athlete should consider a formal demand identifying:
Contractual Clause
Performance Condition
Evidence That Condition Was Satisfied
Amount Due
Due Date
Outstanding Balance.
For professional footballers, the formal mechanism becomes particularly important where non-payment may eventually be relied upon as part of a termination strategy.
Potentially, depending on the circumstances and applicable rules.
But:
Unpaid Bonus ≠ Automatic Immediate Termination.
The athlete must examine:
Nature of the Bonus
Amount
Maturity
Other Outstanding Remuneration
Notice Requirements
Cure Requirements
Applicable Federation Rules
Contractual Framework.
A payment claim and termination right should not be confused.
Suppose the club owes:
EUR 200,000 Salary
EUR 100,000 Appearance Bonuses
EUR 150,000 Promotion Bonus.
Total outstanding:
EUR 450,000.
The cumulative financial default may be much more significant than one isolated bonus.
All receivables should be identified before termination is considered.
A foreign player should not simply send a message saying:
“You did not pay my bonus, so I am leaving.”
Professional football termination procedures can contain strict formal requirements.
An incorrect termination can expose the player to counterclaims.
This is especially important in 2026.
The TFF amended the Professional Footballers’ Status and Transfers framework in May 2026 and again in June 2026.
Challenges concerning the 2026 amendments were considered by the TFF Arbitration Board in July 2026.
Therefore, foreign footballers should not rely automatically on notices or legal templates prepared under an older regulatory version.
The rules applicable on the relevant date should be checked before any termination action.
Depending on the applicable framework, professional football bonus disputes can fall within TFF dispute-resolution mechanisms.
Recent 2026 Arbitration Board decisions demonstrate active adjudication of:
Bonus Receivables
Match Fees
Salary Receivables
Interest Commencement Dates.
The claim should therefore be prepared with precise calculations.
A foreign footballer’s dispute with a Turkish club may contain an international dimension.
FIFA’s dispute-resolution framework may therefore become relevant depending on the circumstances.
However:
Foreign Nationality Alone Does Not Automatically Establish FIFA Jurisdiction.
The player should determine the correct forum before commencing proceedings.
The analysis should consider:
Contractual Dispute Clause
International Dimension
Applicable TFF Regulations
Applicable FIFA Regulations
Nature of the Employment Dispute
Procedural Deadlines.
Incorrect jurisdiction can substantially delay recovery.
Performance bonus disputes are not limited to football.
Foreign athletes competing in Turkey may encounter similar problems in:
Basketball
Volleyball
Handball
and other professional sports.
However, the applicable federation regulations and dispute-resolution systems can differ.
TFF procedures should therefore not automatically be applied to another sport.
A foreign basketball player may have:
Playoff Qualification Bonus: USD 50,000
Championship Bonus: USD 100,000
EuroLeague Qualification Bonus: USD 75,000.
If the conditions are achieved but payment is refused, the player should establish the contractual trigger, maturity and competent dispute-resolution forum.
A foreign volleyball athlete may have:
League Championship Bonus
Cup Bonus
European Competition Bonus
Appearance-Based Incentives.
The same contractual questions arise, but the procedural route must be determined under the applicable sporting framework.
A club may acknowledge that a bonus is owed but seek a discount.
For example:
Claim: EUR 200,000
Club offers:
EUR 150,000 Immediate Payment.
The athlete should compare:
Strength of Claim
Interest
Time Required
Collection Risk
Continuing Relationship with Club.
Settlement can be commercially sensible even where the athlete believes the full amount is legally recoverable.
A club may propose:
EUR 50,000 Immediately
EUR 50,000 in 30 Days
EUR 50,000 in 60 Days
EUR 50,000 in 90 Days.
The settlement should clearly address what happens if the club misses an installment.
For example:
If one installment remains unpaid beyond the agreed period, the entire outstanding balance may become immediately due.
Such mechanisms can materially improve the athlete’s protection.
Winning a bonus claim does not necessarily guarantee immediate payment.
Where a club has serious financial problems, the athlete should consider collection strategy early.
Repeated promises such as:
“We will pay next month.”
should not continue indefinitely without assessment.
Suppose the player’s contract expires on 30 June.
The championship bonus became due on 15 June.
The club has not paid.
Expiration of the employment relationship does not automatically eliminate a previously accrued monetary claim.
The athlete should pursue it within the applicable procedural and limitation framework.
A transfer does not necessarily eliminate bonuses already earned.
However, the athlete should review:
Transfer Agreement
Mutual Termination
Settlement
Release.
A waiver signed during departure may affect the claim.
If the bonus condition was satisfied before termination, the athlete should determine whether the club still owes the accrued amount.
The fact that the relationship later ended does not automatically answer whether a previously matured receivable remains payable.
Contract:
25 Appearances = EUR 150,000.
Player records:
20 Starts + 5 Substitute Appearances.
Club says substitutes do not count.
The contract says only:
“25 official match appearances.”
The dispute may turn on contractual interpretation.
Contract:
15 League Goals = EUR 100,000.
Player scores:
13 League Goals + 3 Cup Goals.
Total official goals:
16.
But league goals:
13.
If the clause specifically requires league goals, the threshold has not necessarily been reached.
Contract:
EUR 200,000 upon promotion to the top division.
Club is promoted.
Player satisfies every written condition.
Club refuses payment because of financial problems.
Financial difficulty alone does not automatically erase the contractual receivable.
Player needs one more appearance for:
EUR 250,000.
He has been a regular starter.
Management suddenly excludes him.
His agent receives a message explicitly discussing the financial consequence of another appearance.
This evidence should be preserved immediately.
Another player also needs one appearance for a bonus.
However, he has suffered a major decline in form and the coach has consistently selected another player for sporting reasons.
The existence of a bonus threshold alone does not prove manipulation.
Evidence of purpose and circumstances matters.
Club owes:
EUR 150,000 Performance Bonus.
Management says:
“Accept a 30% salary reduction next season and we will pay it.”
The athlete should treat the accrued bonus and future salary negotiation as separate financial issues.
Club owes:
EUR 200,000 Bonus
and player has:
EUR 1 Million Remaining Contract Value.
Club offers:
EUR 250,000 Total
for immediate mutual termination and complete release.
The athlete should calculate the value of everything being waived before signing.
A foreign athlete facing a performance bonus dispute should generally:
Review Contract → Identify Exact Bonus Clause → Determine Whether Threshold Is Cumulative → Identify Qualifying Competition → Collect Official Statistics → Confirm Triggering Event → Determine Maturity Date → Calculate Exact Amount → Check Partial Payments → Preserve Club Communications → Document Any Attempt to Prevent the Threshold → Send Appropriate Payment Demand → Determine Correct Dispute Forum → Calculate Interest → Consider Settlement → Assess Termination Only If Legally Justified → Obtain Decision → Pursue Collection.
Precision is particularly important in performance-bonus cases.
Foreign athletes should seek legal review quickly where a club changes bonus conditions after the athlete achieves the target, claims that a written bonus was discretionary, deliberately excludes the athlete immediately before a threshold, refuses to disclose its calculation, conditions payment on a salary reduction or transfer, asks for a full release, pays only part of the bonus, introduces unexplained deductions or repeatedly postpones payment after acknowledging the debt.
These circumstances can turn a simple payment disagreement into a substantial contractual dispute.
Potentially yes. If the bonus was validly agreed and the contractual condition was satisfied, it may constitute an enforceable monetary receivable.
It depends on the wording of the contract. A clause referring generally to appearances may require different interpretation from one expressly requiring Starting XI appearances.
Financial difficulties do not automatically eliminate a bonus that has already validly accrued under the contract.
A clear numerical condition may not normally be satisfied. However, the position deserves closer examination if the club deliberately prevented the player from reaching the threshold in order to avoid payment.
Potentially. The due date and applicable interest rules must be established. TFF Arbitration Board decisions in 2026 show that interest commencement dates can be separately analyzed for bonus receivables.
Potentially, but proof can be considerably more difficult and football-specific contractual documentation requirements may also affect the analysis.
Potentially in appropriate circumstances, but an unpaid bonus does not automatically create an immediate termination right. The amount, maturity, formal notice requirements and applicable rules must be reviewed.
The club can propose a settlement, but the player should calculate all salary, bonus and compensation claims before agreeing to any waiver.
No. The correct forum depends on the international dimension, contract and applicable TFF and FIFA rules.
The strongest cases usually combine clear contractual wording, official sporting statistics, precise payment calculations, bank records and contemporaneous communications showing how the club treated the bonus.
Performance bonuses are often treated casually during negotiations but can later become some of the largest monetary claims in a professional sports contract.
For foreign athletes, the key is to transform the dispute into a precise calculation:
What was promised? What condition applied? Was it satisfied? When did payment become due? How much remains unpaid? Which forum has jurisdiction?
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign professional footballers and other international athletes with contractual and financial disputes involving Turkish sports clubs. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with appearance bonuses, goal bonuses, match fees, win bonuses, promotion and championship bonuses, European qualification bonuses, unpaid salaries, bonus-threshold manipulation, squad exclusion, formal payment demands, settlement negotiations, contract termination, compensation claims, TFF proceedings and FIFA-related international disputes.
A foreign athlete should preserve the contractual documentation and official sporting evidence as soon as a disagreement emerges. Where the club is already experiencing financial difficulty, early action can also be important for actual recovery.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey