

Was a foreign buyer misled about the size, location, view, floor, facilities or features of Turkish property? Learn about price reduction, contract cancellation, refund, damages and compensation claims in 2026.
A foreign buyer may purchase an apartment, villa, commercial property or off-plan unit in Turkey after relying on advertisements, brochures, architectural plans, online listings, sales presentations or statements made by a developer or real estate agent. After signing the contract or receiving the property, however, the buyer may discover that the property is materially different from what was promised. A property advertised as 150 square meters may actually provide substantially less usable space. An apartment marketed as having an unobstructed sea view may face another building. A unit described as being on the tenth floor may legally correspond to another floor or location. A private garden may actually be a common area. A promised parking space, swimming pool, terrace, storage room or other feature may not legally belong to the apartment. These discrepancies can create significant contractual and compensation claims under Turkish law. The central question is whether the difference is legally material and whether the foreign buyer can prove what was promised.
A property buyer does not merely purchase four walls. The agreed characteristics of the property can be an essential part of the transaction. Size, floor, orientation, location, view, balcony, terrace, garden, parking, storage, construction quality and project facilities can directly determine market value. If the seller or developer materially misrepresents these characteristics, the buyer may potentially have remedies involving correction, price reduction, compensation or, in sufficiently serious cases, termination of the transaction, depending on the legal basis and circumstances.
One of the most common disputes involves square meters. A foreign buyer sees an advertisement stating:
“Luxury 150 m² Apartment.”
The contract is signed and the purchase price is paid. After delivery, an independent measurement suggests that the actual usable area is substantially smaller.
The first question should not simply be:
“Is it exactly 150 square meters?”
The lawyer should determine what the 150 m² representation actually meant.
Was it:
Net Area? Gross Area? Saleable Area? Area Including Common Spaces? Balcony Area? Terrace Area?
The distinction can materially affect the claim.
Foreign buyers should be particularly careful with advertisements using only the phrase:
“150 m².”
Without further explanation, the figure can create misunderstanding.
A buyer may assume that the apartment contains 150 square meters of usable internal living area, while the seller may claim that the number represents a broader gross calculation.
The contract, preliminary information documents, floor plan, technical specifications and advertisements should therefore be compared carefully.
In qualifying prepaid residential transactions, the regulatory framework places particular importance on information concerning the property’s net and gross area, location, orientation, independent-unit plan, site plan, floor plan and technical characteristics.
This means that discrepancies between what was contractually represented and what was ultimately delivered can become highly significant.
Foreign buyers purchasing off-plan property should therefore preserve every version of the project documentation provided before signature.
There is no safe universal rule that every difference automatically produces the same remedy.
Consider:
Promised Net Area: 150 m²
Actual Net Area: 148 m²
and compare it with:
Promised Net Area: 150 m²
Actual Net Area: 115 m².
The second discrepancy is far more likely to affect the economic value and the buyer’s decision to purchase.
The seriousness of the difference should be evaluated according to the contract, measurement methodology, property type, price and impact on market value.
The buyer should not rely exclusively on measurements made by the developer.
Depending on the dispute, an architect, engineer, surveyor or court-appointed expert may need to determine the actual dimensions and compare them with the contractual and approved project information.
A professional measurement can transform the dispute from:
“I think the apartment is smaller”
into:
“The promised and delivered areas differ materially according to technical measurement.”
Location within a development can significantly affect value.
Suppose the buyer was promised:
Building A – 12th Floor – Southwest Corner.
After completion, the buyer discovers that the legal independent unit corresponds to:
Building B – 7th Floor – Interior Position.
Even if the apartments have similar internal layouts, they may not have equivalent market values.
The precise independent unit promised in the contract should be compared with the property actually delivered and registered.
A buyer may pay a premium specifically for a high-floor apartment.
For example:
12th Floor Apartment: EUR 450,000
while comparable:
4th Floor Apartment: EUR 360,000.
If the buyer is ultimately given the lower-floor unit, the issue is not merely cosmetic. It may represent a substantial difference in economic value.
The contract, floor plan, unit number and sales materials become important evidence.
Orientation can affect:
Natural Light
Temperature
View
Privacy
Energy Use
Market Value.
A buyer promised a south-facing apartment may discover that the unit actually faces north.
If orientation was expressly represented and materially influenced the purchase decision, the discrepancy may support a claim.
Sea-view property frequently commands a substantial premium in cities and resort areas.
An advertisement may state:
“Unobstructed Full Sea View.”
After delivery, the buyer discovers that another building blocks most of the view.
The legal analysis should examine whether the representation was:
A Genuine Contractual Feature
or merely:
General Marketing Language.
The more precise the promise, the stronger the potential evidentiary value.
These expressions should not be treated as equivalent.
“500 meters from the sea” describes location.
“Sea-view apartment” describes a feature.
“Permanent unobstructed panoramic sea view” is an even more specific representation.
The exact language used in the advertisement and contract can therefore matter significantly.
Foreign buyers are often marketed properties using statements such as:
“5 Minutes from the Beach.”
“10 Minutes from the Airport.”
“Walking Distance to City Center.”
These statements can be problematic when materially inaccurate.
However, context matters. “Ten minutes” may refer to driving time rather than walking distance. Traffic conditions can vary. A compensation claim becomes stronger where the representation is objectively specific and demonstrably false.
Location can be one of the most valuable characteristics of real estate.
Suppose an international advertisement markets a project under the name of a prestigious neighborhood, while the actual registered property is located in a materially different area.
If the marketing intentionally creates a false impression concerning location and the difference affects value, the buyer should preserve the advertisement and investigate potential remedies.
This is a particularly important problem in residential developments.
The buyer may be shown:
“Your Private 100 m² Garden.”
After purchase, condominium documentation indicates that the area is not independently owned by the buyer.
The distinction between:
Ownership
Exclusive Use Right
and
Common Area
can be critical.
A buyer should not assume that a garden physically accessible only from the apartment is automatically privately owned.
A penthouse may be advertised with:
“80 m² Private Roof Terrace.”
The buyer pays a premium.
Later, title and project documents show that the roof area has a different legal status.
The buyer should compare marketing representations with the condominium documentation and approved project.
Parking can materially affect property value, particularly in major urban developments.
The contract may say:
“One Private Parking Space Included.”
After delivery, the developer says:
“Parking is first come, first served.”
Those are materially different arrangements.
The legal nature of the promised parking right should be investigated.
A buyer may pay for:
Apartment + Storage Unit + Parking Space.
After title transfer, only the apartment is legally identifiable.
The contract and project documentation should establish whether the storage area was a separate independent unit, accessory, allocated area or merely a marketing promise.
Off-plan developments are frequently sold using attractive renderings showing:
Swimming Pools
Gym
Spa
Children’s Areas
Landscaped Gardens
Sports Facilities
Reception
Security
Restaurants.
If these facilities were material contractual features rather than purely illustrative concepts, failure to deliver them may create buyer claims.
The development may technically contain a gym, but the promised:
1,000 m² Luxury Fitness Center
becomes:
A Small 50 m² Exercise Room.
Whether this constitutes actionable non-conformity depends on the contractual specifications and marketing representations.
Foreign buyers should preserve brochures showing dimensions, plans and facility descriptions.
Resort properties may be marketed with:
“Private Beach”
or
“Exclusive Beach Access.”
After purchase, the buyer may discover that access is public, seasonal, subject to another operator or not legally guaranteed.
If private access materially affected the purchase price, the representation should be investigated carefully.
Some foreign buyers purchase fully furnished investment properties.
The brochure may promise:
Premium Kitchen Appliances
Built-In Furniture
Luxury Bathroom Fixtures
Air Conditioning
Smart Home System.
After delivery, cheaper alternatives may have been installed or important items omitted.
The technical specification attached to the agreement can become decisive.
A property marketed as a luxury development may use substantially different materials from those promised.
Potential disputes include:
Flooring
Windows
Kitchen Units
Bathroom Materials
Insulation
Heating Systems
Doors
Facade Materials.
General words such as “luxury” can be difficult to quantify. Specific brands, models and technical standards provide stronger evidence.
A buyer may choose a property because of:
3.5-Meter Ceilings
Open-Plan Kitchen
Three Bedrooms
Walk-In Wardrobe
Two Bathrooms.
The completed property may materially differ.
Approved plans, sales plans and technical specifications should be compared with the finished apartment.
Off-plan projects can evolve during construction, but this does not mean every material change is automatically acceptable.
A developer may change:
Building Position
Landscaping
Common Facilities
Apartment Layout
Facade
Parking
Access Roads.
The contract should be reviewed to determine what modification rights were reserved and whether the particular change exceeds them.
Contracts sometimes allow the developer to make technical modifications.
That does not necessarily mean the developer has unlimited freedom to transform the economic substance of the purchase.
A clause permitting necessary technical adjustments should not automatically be assumed to permit delivery of a fundamentally different apartment.
Foreign buyers sometimes delete the original listing after purchasing.
That is a mistake.
Preserve:
Property Portal Listing
Developer Website Screenshots
Social Media Advertisements
Digital Brochures
Videos
Floor Plans
Price Lists
Sales Presentations.
These materials may help establish how the property was represented when the buyer made the decision.
Turkey’s regulatory framework continues to place significant emphasis on accurate and authorized property advertising. Electronic property advertisements are subject to identity and authorization verification requirements, while misleading commercial advertising and unfair commercial practices continue to face regulatory scrutiny.
For foreign buyers, however, administrative action against misleading advertising is not necessarily the same thing as recovering personal financial losses.
A buyer seeking money may still need a separate contractual or compensation claim.
Many international property sales are negotiated almost entirely through messaging applications.
Examples include:
Buyer: “Is the apartment 140 m² net?”
Agent: “Yes, definitely 140 m² usable area.”
Or:
Buyer: “Will another building block the sea view?”
Developer Representative: “No. The view is permanently open.”
Messages like these can become important when determining what representations were made before purchase.
Preserve the complete conversation rather than only selected screenshots.
Foreign investors increasingly purchase Turkish property without physically inspecting it before signing.
The agent may conduct a video tour and describe:
Location
View
Size
Facilities
Finishes.
Remote purchasers should request written confirmation of all important characteristics rather than relying solely on statements made during a video call.
Potentially.
If the buyer wants to keep the property but its actual characteristics make it worth less than promised, a price reduction or corresponding monetary claim may be appropriate depending on the legal framework.
Example:
Price Paid: EUR 500,000
Value as Promised: EUR 500,000
Value With Actual Defect: EUR 420,000.
The relevant legal calculation should be performed according to the applicable rules and expert valuation rather than simply assuming the buyer automatically receives the EUR 80,000 difference.
A compensation case involving location, view or size often requires technical valuation.
An expert may need to compare:
Property as Contractually Promised
with
Property Actually Delivered.
Relevant valuation factors can include:
Square Meters
Floor
Orientation
View
Parking
Garden
Terrace
Facilities
Location
Construction Quality.
This helps quantify the economic consequences of the misrepresentation.
Potentially, where the discrepancy is sufficiently serious and the applicable legal requirements are satisfied.
A minor difference may support a more limited remedy.
A fundamental difference may support a stronger response.
For example, buying a 200 m² sea-view penthouse with private terrace and receiving a materially smaller unit without the promised private terrace can be very different from discovering a minor measurement variation.
A buyer should not simply send:
“I cancel the contract. Send my money back.”
The legal basis, notification requirements, timing and consequences should be assessed first.
Incorrect termination can create additional disputes concerning deposits, installments and alleged buyer default.
Where the transaction is validly unwound, recovery of amounts paid becomes central.
Evidence should include:
Bank Transfers
SWIFT Records
Receipts
Payment Schedules
Foreign Currency Documentation
Seller Acknowledgments.
If the seller or developer is financially distressed, asset preservation should also be considered.
Potentially, depending on the legal basis and evidence.
The buyer may have incurred additional losses such as certain financing expenses, transaction costs or other direct economic consequences.
However, compensation is not automatic. The buyer must establish:
Breach or Relevant Legal Wrong
Loss
Causation
and the amount claimed.
Potentially in an appropriate case, but the claim must be supported by evidence.
Suppose the property was marketed as a premium rental investment because of its sea view, private parking and resort facilities. Those features are not delivered, and achievable rent is materially lower.
The buyer may attempt to establish economic loss through:
Comparable Rentals
Previous Rental Agreements
Expert Valuation
Professional Rental Assessments.
Speculative future profits are more difficult than documented losses.
A foreign buyer may have purchased a particular property because the developer represented it as suitable for a citizenship investment strategy.
If misrepresentation concerning value, legal identity or other transaction characteristics interferes with that objective, the buyer may face both property and immigration consequences.
The two issues should be analyzed together.
The seller is not necessarily the only relevant party.
Suppose the developer’s documentation correctly states:
110 m² Net
but the real estate agent repeatedly tells the foreign buyer:
“It is 150 m² net.”
The role, authority, knowledge and representations of the intermediary should be investigated separately.
The buyer should preserve the brokerage agreement and commission documents.
This is a common defense.
The legal significance depends on how specific the representation was, whether disclaimers existed, whether the same characteristic appeared in contractual documentation and whether the buyer reasonably relied on it.
A highly detailed representation can be more significant than general promotional language.
Off-plan projects are commonly marketed using architectural renderings.
The buyer should determine whether images are expressly illustrative or whether they represent contractual project characteristics.
A computer-generated image showing landscaping slightly differently may not necessarily create a major claim. A rendering combined with contractual promises of facilities that are never built can present a much stronger issue.
Statements such as:
“Ultra Luxury Residence”
can be subjective.
Statements such as:
“Siemens Built-In Appliances, Natural Marble Flooring and 24-Hour Reception”
are far more specific.
Foreign buyers should insist that commercially important features be objectively defined.
After delivery, the seller may say:
“The buyer inspected everything and accepted the apartment.”
The effect of inspection and acceptance depends on the nature of the discrepancy and applicable legal rules.
A hidden difference that could not reasonably be detected during ordinary inspection may require different analysis from an obvious visible characteristic.
At handover, the developer may ask the buyer to sign:
“Property received completely and without defect.”
If the buyer has not measured the apartment or checked promised features, this can create unnecessary evidentiary problems.
Any known objections should be documented appropriately.
Foreign owners sometimes discover the problem only when they attempt to resell.
A new buyer measures the apartment and says:
“This is not 160 m².”
The original buyer then investigates for the first time.
Delay can affect legal strategy and applicable notification or limitation issues. Legal advice should therefore be obtained immediately after discovery.
Online listings can be deleted or modified.
As soon as a dispute becomes apparent, preserve:
Screenshots
PDF Brochures
Videos
Emails
Messages
Price Lists
Floor Plans
Website Descriptions.
The buyer should also preserve metadata and original files where possible.
In many misrepresentation cases, the most effective analysis involves comparing five categories of evidence: Advertisement → Sales Presentation → Contract → Approved/Official Property Documentation → Property Actually Delivered. Differences between these stages can reveal exactly when and how the buyer was misled.
Foreign buyer pays EUR 450,000 after being repeatedly told the apartment contains 150 m² of net usable area. Independent technical measurement after delivery shows substantially less usable space. The buyer should compare the advertisement, contract, plans and measurement methodology and obtain an expert assessment of the impact on value.
Buyer pays a EUR 100,000 premium for an apartment marketed as having a permanent panoramic sea view. The completed project places another building directly in front of the unit. The buyer should investigate whether the project plans already showed that building and what the seller or developer represented before signature.
Foreign buyer purchases a ground-floor apartment advertised with a 200 m² private garden. After title transfer, condominium documents indicate that the garden is legally a common area and the buyer does not own it individually. The difference between ownership and use should be investigated together with the marketing representations.
Buyer chooses one apartment over another because the developer guarantees two private parking spaces. After delivery, the buyer receives no allocated spaces and must use shared parking. If the promise is documented, the economic difference can form part of the dispute.
Buyer purchases an apartment specifically identified as a 15th-floor unit with city views. The final legal unit is materially different from the one promised. The buyer may need to decide whether to seek the promised unit, keep the alternative unit with monetary relief or pursue termination depending on the legal and factual circumstances.
A resort development is advertised with swimming pools, spa, gym, restaurant, landscaped gardens and children’s facilities. After completion, several major facilities do not exist. The buyer should compare the contract and technical specification with the promotional material and determine which representations became part of the contractual expectations.
A foreign buyer who discovers a material discrepancy should generally follow this sequence: Preserve All Advertising → Obtain the Signed Contract → Obtain Plans and Technical Specifications → Identify the Exact Property → Measure the Property if Size Is Disputed → Photograph Missing or Different Features → Obtain Current Official Documentation → Calculate the Difference Between Promised and Actual Property → Obtain Expert Valuation Where Necessary → Send Appropriate Formal Notice → Determine Whether Cure, Price Reduction, Compensation or Cancellation Is the Best Remedy → Investigate Seller Assets if a Monetary Claim Is Likely.
Before paying a substantial deposit, foreign buyers should require important characteristics to be written clearly into the contract. Instead of accepting “large apartment with beautiful view,” require precise information where commercially important: net and gross area, independent-unit number, block, floor, orientation, balcony, terrace, garden rights, parking, storage, included furniture, technical materials and agreed common facilities. The more precise the contract, the easier it becomes to identify non-conformity later.
Potentially yes. The contract, advertised measurement, actual measurement and distinction between net and gross area must first be established. A material difference can support legal remedies depending on the circumstances.
Potentially, where the discrepancy is sufficiently serious and the applicable legal conditions are satisfied. Minor differences and substantial differences may produce different remedies.
Potentially yes. Online listings, brochures, videos, plans, emails and messages can help establish how the property was represented during negotiations.
That does not automatically resolve the dispute. The specificity of the representation, contractual documents, disclaimers and buyer’s reliance must be examined.
Potentially, particularly where the view was specifically represented and materially affected the property’s price. Expert valuation may be required to establish economic loss.
The condominium and title documentation should be examined immediately. If private ownership or exclusive legal use was specifically promised but not delivered, significant remedies may arise.
Potentially, depending on the agent’s contractual role, authority, representations and conduct. Agent liability requires separate analysis.
Potentially where the legal requirements for damages are satisfied and the loss can be proved with sufficient certainty. Speculative rental projections alone may not be enough.
Do not sign an unqualified statement confirming defect-free delivery without understanding its consequences. Known discrepancies should be documented before or during handover.
Preserve every advertisement and communication, obtain the contract and official plans, document the actual condition, obtain independent measurement or valuation where necessary and seek legal advice before signing a waiver, settlement or acceptance document.
A foreign buyer who receives a property materially different from what was advertised should not focus only on whether the seller is willing to apologize or make minor corrections. The real question is how much the difference changes the legal and economic value of the investment. A smaller apartment, different floor, blocked view, missing parking space, non-private garden or absent project facility can materially affect resale value, rental income and the buyer’s original investment decision.
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign individuals and international investors with real estate transactions and property disputes throughout Turkey. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with property-size disputes, net and gross area discrepancies, misleading advertisements, developer misrepresentation, incorrect apartment location, missing facilities, sea-view disputes, private garden and terrace disputes, parking problems, off-plan project changes, contract cancellation, price reduction, refund and compensation claims.
The strongest claim usually begins by proving three things clearly: what the foreign buyer was promised, what the buyer actually received and the financial difference between the two.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey