

Invested in a fake property project in Turkey? Learn how foreign investors can recover deposits and purchase payments, trace assets, seek precautionary attachment, pursue compensation and respond to real estate fraud in 2026.
Foreign investors are sometimes approached with highly attractive Turkish property opportunities promising below-market prices, guaranteed rental returns, rapid appreciation, luxury facilities, citizenship eligibility or exclusive access to a development before public sales begin. The investor may receive professional brochures, architectural renderings, videos, contracts and payment instructions and transfer EUR 100,000, EUR 300,000 or substantially more. Months later, serious problems emerge. The project may not exist, the seller may not own the land, the construction company may have no legal development rights, the building permit may never have been obtained, the same apartments may have been sold repeatedly or the supposed project company may disappear after collecting investors’ money. In these cases, the foreign investor should stop treating the matter as an ordinary delayed property purchase. The priority becomes money recovery, asset preservation, evidence collection and investigation of potential fraud.
A fake project does not necessarily mean that there is literally no land or construction site. Property fraud can take many forms. At one extreme, criminals may advertise a completely fictitious development using fabricated plans and images. In other cases, a real parcel of land exists but the person collecting money has no ownership or authority to develop it. There may also be a legitimate construction project whose name, plans or photographs are used by unauthorized persons to collect deposits from foreign investors.
The critical question is therefore not simply:
“Does the project exist?”
It is:
“Did the person who received my money actually have the legal authority and genuine ability to sell the property that was promised?”
The clearest fraud scenario involves a project that never existed.
The foreign investor may be shown:
Architectural Renderings
Apartment Plans
Luxury Marketing Videos
Price Lists
Construction Timelines
Rental Return Projections
and supposed official documents.
After transferring money, the investor discovers that there is no corresponding development at the advertised location.
Immediate legal action should be considered because the persons behind the scheme may be moving funds rapidly.
A more sophisticated scheme can involve genuine land.
The fraudster shows the investor the actual parcel and says:
“Our company owns this land and will construct 200 luxury apartments.”
Land registry investigation later shows that the land belongs to an unrelated third party.
The existence of genuine land can make the scheme appear convincing while providing no legal basis for the supposed developer to sell apartments.
Not every situation where the developer does not own the land is fraudulent. Turkish projects can legitimately be developed under agreements with landowners.
The important issue is whether the developer actually possesses enforceable development and contractual rights allowing the project to proceed.
If the developer falsely claims to own the land or conceals that its development agreement has already been terminated, the buyer may face serious risk.
Foreign investors should investigate whether the required building permit exists.
For qualifying prepaid residential transactions, Turkish consumer rules prohibit entering into prepaid housing sales contracts before the building permit has been obtained.
Therefore, a company aggressively collecting large advance payments for a supposed residential development before the necessary project authorization exists should trigger immediate concern.
A more serious case arises where the investor is actually shown a fabricated permit.
Foreign buyers should never assume that a document is genuine merely because it contains:
Official-Looking Logos
Stamps
Signatures
QR Codes
or
Turkish Government Terminology.
Important project documents should be independently verified with the relevant records and authorities.
Fraudsters may also provide altered or fabricated title deed documents.
The investor should not rely on a PDF, photograph or photocopy sent through WhatsApp.
The relevant question is the current official land registry status.
Ownership, parcel information, mortgages, attachments and other restrictions should be independently investigated before substantial payment.
Another technique involves showing genuine title documentation belonging to a different parcel.
The foreign investor sees a legitimate document but does not realize that it concerns land kilometers away from the advertised project.
Parcel, block, location and project information must therefore be matched carefully.
A development company may legitimately participate in a project but only be entitled to certain independent units under its arrangement with the landowner.
If it sells apartments allocated to the landowner rather than to the developer, serious ownership disputes can arise.
The buyer should determine exactly which future units the seller is legally entitled to transfer.
One of the strongest fraud warning signs is discovering that the same apartment has been sold repeatedly.
For example:
Buyer A pays EUR 250,000 for Unit B-42.
Buyer B pays EUR 280,000 for Unit B-42.
Buyer C is also given a reservation agreement for Unit B-42.
Where the developer knowingly collects money from multiple investors for a unit that can only be transferred once, both civil recovery and criminal-fraud issues may become highly significant.
Foreign investors are sometimes targeted with statements such as:
“Government-Approved Citizenship Project.”
“Guaranteed Turkish Passport.”
“Citizenship Automatically Approved.”
“No Need for Independent Legal Review.”
Property acquisition and citizenship qualification are related but separate legal matters. No private developer can guarantee the government’s final citizenship decision merely by selling an apartment.
The property transaction itself must satisfy the applicable legal requirements.
A property may genuinely exist but be sold at a grossly inflated price because the investor is told that the value will satisfy an investment objective.
For example, an investor may pay EUR 500,000 for property whose actual commercial value is substantially lower after being told that the price is “officially guaranteed.”
The appraisal, payment structure, related-party relationships and representations should be investigated.
Another common investment pitch is:
“Guaranteed 12% Annual Rental Return for Five Years.”
The buyer later discovers that the company providing the guarantee has no meaningful assets, the rental arrangement was never economically viable or the guarantor disappears.
A rental guarantee is only as valuable as the legal obligation and financial capacity of the person giving it.
The developer may promise:
“Buy today for EUR 300,000 and we guarantee to repurchase it for EUR 450,000 after three years.”
Such promises should be examined with particular caution.
The investor should determine:
Who gives the guarantee?
What assets support it?
Is the obligation unconditional?
Is there security?
What happens if the company becomes insolvent?
An impressive projected return does not itself create financial security.
Fraudsters frequently create urgency:
“Only Three Apartments Left.”
“Price Increases Tomorrow.”
“You Must Pay the Deposit Today.”
“Another Investor Is Waiting.”
Pressure designed to prevent independent due diligence is one of the strongest warning signs in international property transactions.
The scheme may begin with a relatively small amount.
The investor is asked to pay:
EUR 5,000 Reservation Fee
or
EUR 10,000 Holding Deposit.
After payment, increasingly large installments are demanded.
Even where the initial amount appears small relative to the investment, the buyer should verify the property and seller before sending it.
A major warning sign arises when the company says:
“Do not send the money to the company. Transfer it to our director’s personal account.”
This does not automatically establish fraud, but it creates serious legal and evidentiary concerns.
The investor should preserve every written instruction identifying why the payment was sent to that account.
A Turkish property may be marketed through a company registered in another jurisdiction.
The investor may be instructed to transfer the purchase price to:
Dubai
London
Cyprus
or another foreign location.
This can significantly complicate asset tracing and recovery.
The contractual seller, Turkish property owner, recipient of funds and foreign marketing company must all be identified separately.
Some fraudulent investment projects encourage payment through cryptocurrency, claiming it is faster or more confidential.
Where funds are transferred through digital assets, recovery can become more complicated but not necessarily impossible.
The investor should preserve:
Wallet Addresses
Transaction Hashes
Exchange Records
Messages
Invoices
and any documentation identifying the person controlling the recipient wallet.
Large undocumented cash payments can create major proof problems.
If cash was paid, preserve:
Receipts
Messages Confirming Receipt
Witness Information
Accounting Documents
Withdrawal Records
and any signed acknowledgment.
The absence of a bank transfer does not necessarily make recovery impossible, but it can make proof substantially harder.
The investor may never communicate directly with the genuine property owner or developer.
An unauthorized intermediary may create a professional-looking website, advertise genuine projects and collect deposits.
In 2026, Turkey’s electronic property advertising framework places increased emphasis on identity and authorization verification. Foreign investors should therefore be especially cautious about property advertisements circulated through social media or messaging applications without verifiable authority.
Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and similar platforms are frequently used to reach international investors.
The Turkish regulatory framework now places identity and authorization verification requirements on electronic real estate advertising, including measures designed to reduce fake and unauthorized listings.
However, regulatory enforcement does not eliminate the need for buyer due diligence.
A foreign investor should independently verify the seller, agent and property before transferring money.
Fraudsters may copy:
Developer Logo
Project Photographs
Corporate Information
Apartment Plans
and create a nearly identical website.
The buyer believes communication is occurring with the real company while payments are being redirected to criminals.
Bank-account ownership and corporate contact information should therefore be independently confirmed.
A fraud scheme may become more convincing when another person claims to be:
A Lawyer
A Government Consultant
A Citizenship Specialist
A Bank Representative
or
A Notary Representative.
Professional status and authority should be independently verified.
The buyer should never assume that a person belongs to a regulated profession merely because a business card or email signature says so.
The seller may claim to act for the landowner under a power of attorney.
The investor should determine whether the document is genuine, currently valid and actually authorizes the relevant real estate transaction.
A genuine power of attorney granting limited authority should not be treated as authorization for every possible transaction.
Not every fraudster uses a fictitious company.
A company may be properly registered but have:
Minimal Capital
No Real Estate
No Construction Activity
No Employees
No Meaningful Assets.
Company registration proves that a legal entity exists; it does not prove that the project is financially viable.
A project company may have been established shortly before foreign investors are approached.
That is not automatically unlawful because special-purpose project companies are common in legitimate development structures.
However, the investor should investigate:
Shareholders
Management
Capital
Land Rights
Construction History
Financing
and related companies.
Investors living abroad may receive monthly photographs showing construction activity.
Those images may concern another project.
Foreign buyers should independently verify the physical site and match construction to the correct parcel and development.
A sophisticated scheme may involve minimal excavation or foundation work intended to convince investors that the project is real.
The existence of construction activity does not prove that the seller has sufficient financing, legal rights or permits to complete the project.
The recovery strategy should begin with five questions:
Who received the money?
Where did the money go?
What assets remain?
What contractual rights exist?
Was there intentional deception?
The answer may require simultaneous use of contract, consumer, enforcement, corporate and criminal-law remedies.
Once serious fraud indicators appear, the investor should not continue paying merely because the seller threatens:
“You will lose everything if you miss the next installment.”
The contract should be reviewed immediately to determine the legal consequences of withholding payment.
Sending additional unsecured funds can increase the eventual loss.
Where a suspicious bank transfer has just occurred, speed can matter enormously.
The investor should promptly contact the sending bank and obtain complete transfer documentation. Depending on timing and circumstances, banking procedures relating to the suspicious transaction may need to be explored immediately.
Waiting several weeks can make tracing and recovery more difficult.
Collect:
SWIFT Documents
IBAN Information
Account Holder Details
Bank Statements
Transfer References
Payment Instructions
Foreign Exchange Records.
Do not rely solely on screenshots from mobile banking.
Some investors make payments to several parties:
Developer
Real Estate Agency
Company Director
Consultant
Foreign Company
Marketing Company.
Prepare a payment table showing:
Recipient → Date → Amount → Currency → Bank Account → Reason for Payment.
This can become one of the most important documents in the case.
Keep every version of:
Reservation Agreement
Purchase Agreement
Preliminary Sale Agreement
Payment Plan
Rental Guarantee
Buyback Agreement
Citizenship Agreement
Brokerage Agreement
Supplementary Protocol.
Do not discard earlier drafts merely because a later contract was signed.
Fraudulent websites and social media pages can disappear rapidly after complaints begin.
Preserve:
Screenshots
Videos
Brochures
Project Renderings
Social Media Posts
Price Lists
Emails
Online Advertisements.
Where possible, preserve dates and original electronic files.
International property investment fraud is frequently negotiated through messaging applications.
Messages may contain critical representations:
“We own the land.”
“The building permit is approved.”
“Your money is insured.”
“The apartment is reserved only for you.”
“Citizenship is guaranteed.”
“The project will definitely be delivered in 18 months.”
These statements can become important evidence.
Do not delete voice notes.
A developer representative may have made representations verbally that do not appear in the written contract.
Original audio files and surrounding conversation context should be preserved.
The buyer should determine:
Who Owns the Land?
Does the Project Parcel Exist?
Are There Mortgages?
Are There Attachments?
Has the Property Been Transferred?
Do Project Rights Correspond to the Seller’s Representations?
This can quickly distinguish a genuine but troubled development from a fundamentally fraudulent transaction.
The legal identity of the company receiving the money should be confirmed.
Relevant issues can include:
Trade Name
Registration
Shareholders
Managers
Registered Address
Capital
Corporate Changes
Liquidation Status.
Do not confuse a project brand with the legal company that actually signed the contract.
Fraudulent or distressed structures may involve multiple entities.
One company owns the land.
Another signs the contracts.
Another collects payments.
Another advertises the project.
Another receives assets.
The relationships between these entities should be mapped carefully.
Where the investor has grounds to demand repayment, an appropriate formal notice can document:
The Transaction
Amounts Paid
Misrepresentations
Non-Performance
Termination or Refund Position
and
Deadline for Repayment.
The exact form should be determined according to the legal basis of the claim.
After being confronted, the developer may say:
“We will refund you in 30 days.”
Thirty days later:
“We need another month.”
Then:
“Our bank account is temporarily blocked.”
A voluntary refund can be preferable to litigation, but repeated unsupported promises should not prevent investigation of assets and protective measures.
If the investor has a substantial monetary claim and the statutory conditions are satisfied, precautionary attachment may potentially be used to secure assets before final judgment.
This can be extremely important where there is a genuine risk that the defendants will dispose of assets.
The practical question is not merely:
“Can I win?”
It is:
“Will anything remain to collect when I win?”
Depending on the debtor and legally available enforcement information, recovery strategy may examine:
Real Estate
Vehicles
Company Shares
Receivables
Bank Assets
Unsold Apartments
Other Project Land
and other valuable rights.
The existence of assets should be investigated early.
Where the investor’s claim concerns a specific parcel or apartment rather than only money, an interim injunction may need to be considered.
The appropriate protective measure depends on the substantive claim.
A property injunction and precautionary attachment securing a monetary claim should not be confused.
After collecting investor funds, the project company may transfer valuable assets to another company controlled by the same individuals.
The investor should investigate:
Transfer Date
Recipient
Relationship
Sale Price
Actual Payment
Commercial Reason.
Depending on the circumstances, creditor-protection remedies may become relevant.
A company director may transfer apartments, land or vehicles to relatives shortly before claims arise.
Such transactions should not automatically be assumed fraudulent, but suspicious timing and inadequate consideration can justify closer investigation.
Turkish enforcement and insolvency law contains mechanisms that can potentially challenge certain transactions prejudicing creditors where statutory conditions are satisfied.
These actions are technical and time-sensitive.
The buyer should not wait until years after the suspicious transfer to investigate.
Potentially yes.
Depending on the transaction, claims can involve:
Repayment
Contract Termination
Restitution
Interest
Compensation
and other remedies.
However, identifying the correct defendant is essential where multiple companies or individuals participated.
Potentially, depending on the agent’s role and conduct.
An agent who innocently markets a developer’s project stands differently from an intermediary who knowingly fabricates documents or makes false statements to obtain investor funds.
The brokerage agreement and commission payments should be reviewed.
Company liability and personal liability are different.
A shareholder or manager is not automatically personally liable simply because the company owes the buyer money.
However, independent personal wrongdoing, fraud, personal guarantees or other legally recognized grounds may create separate claims.
Where the evidence indicates intentional deception from the beginning, criminal remedies may become highly relevant.
Potential warning signs include:
Fake Land Ownership
Fabricated Permits
False Title Documents
Multiple Sales of the Same Apartment
Nonexistent Project
False Insurance
False Bank Guarantees
Immediate Diversion of Investor Funds
Disappearance After Payment.
The evidence should be organized before filing allegations.
This distinction is essential.
A genuine developer may begin a legitimate project but later fail because of financing problems.
That can create serious contractual liability without necessarily constituting criminal fraud.
Criminal allegations should focus on evidence of intentional deception rather than simply the fact that the project failed.
A foreign investor should not assume:
“I filed a criminal complaint, so the government will return my EUR 300,000.”
A criminal investigation and a civil money-recovery strategy serve different purposes.
The investor may still need contractual claims, enforcement measures and asset preservation.
In a completely fake project, there may be no apartment to recover.
The case therefore becomes primarily a financial investigation.
The key questions become:
Which account received the money?
Was it transferred elsewhere?
Was property purchased with it?
Were funds moved to related parties?
Do the defendants still own assets?
This is why early action is so important.
Where money moved through several countries, the dispute may involve cross-border recovery considerations.
The Turkish claim should be coordinated with investigation of the foreign recipient and jurisdiction where assets may be located.
The fact that the property was supposedly in Turkey does not mean all recoverable assets remain in Turkey.
Suppose a British investor pays a Dubai marketing company for a Turkish apartment and the Turkish developer denies receiving the money.
The relationship between the foreign intermediary and Turkish project must be established through:
Contracts
Invoices
Agency Agreements
Payment Instructions
Correspondence
and evidence of actual fund flows.
A project may be promoted through social media personalities promising extraordinary investment returns.
Promotional involvement does not automatically make every influencer responsible for the developer’s debts. However, knowingly false commercial representations may require separate analysis depending on the person’s role and conduct.
Turkey strengthened rules surrounding electronic advertising and authorization verification in the real estate market, and the regulatory framework now places particular emphasis on preventing unauthorized and fake listings.
Foreign investors should still treat social-media advertisements as marketing material—not legal due diligence.
A verified advertisement does not replace independent investigation of title, project rights, permits and contractual authority.
Turkey is also moving toward a Secure Payment System for real estate transactions designed to coordinate payment and ownership transfer and reduce fraud, theft and forgery risks. Under the current 2026 implementation timetable, mandatory application has been postponed to 1 October 2026.
This development reinforces an important practical principle: foreign buyers should avoid structures where substantial purchase money is transferred long before legally protected completion.
A secure closing mechanism for completed property does not eliminate the special risks of off-plan developments where the buyer pays years before delivery.
For off-plan purchases, buyers should investigate prepaid housing protections, project security, land rights and payment guarantees separately.
Where the transaction qualifies under Turkey’s prepaid housing regime, building completion insurance may provide important protection in relevant projects.
Foreign buyers who were told:
“Your money is insured”
should obtain the actual policy and individual coverage information.
A marketing statement is not enough.
If the project company fabricated an insurance certificate, the issue can become considerably more serious.
The buyer should independently verify the insurer and policy rather than relying on documents provided by the seller.
The same applies to supposed bank guarantees.
A document displaying a bank logo should not automatically be assumed genuine.
Where a guarantee is commercially important to the investment, its authenticity and enforceability should be independently confirmed.
Property fraud can be particularly damaging where the investor is seeking Turkish citizenship.
The fraudster may combine:
Fake Property
Inflated Value
False Citizenship Advice
Fake Appraisal
and
Unauthorized Payment Structure.
The investor can lose money while also failing to achieve the immigration objective.
Property and citizenship analysis should therefore be coordinated from the beginning.
After the original transaction fails, fraudsters sometimes request another payment:
“Your citizenship file has a problem. Pay EUR 30,000 and we will fix it.”
An investor who already suspects fraud should independently verify every subsequent demand before sending additional funds.
The seller may offer:
“We cannot deliver Project A, but we will transfer an apartment in Project B.”
Before accepting, conduct completely new due diligence on Project B.
Verify:
Ownership
Mortgages
Attachments
Building Permit
Construction Status
Market Value
Seller Authority.
Do not exchange one unverified investment for another.
Suppose the defendants agree to repay EUR 400,000 over 18 months.
The foreign investor should ask:
What happens if they stop paying after month two?
A settlement should be evaluated not only according to the promised amount but according to the available security and enforceability.
The investor may be asked to sign:
“Full and Final Settlement – All Claims Released.”
If the waiver becomes effective immediately while repayment is scheduled for the future, the investor may surrender valuable rights before actually receiving the money.
The release mechanism should be reviewed carefully.
Depending on the legal basis and evidence, the investor may potentially seek more than the principal amount paid.
Relevant losses may include:
Interest
Certain Financing Costs
Direct Transaction Losses
Other Provable Damages.
Every additional damages claim requires proof of causation and amount.
Suppose the investor paid EUR 250,000 for a fake project in 2023. In 2026, equivalent legitimate property costs EUR 400,000.
The investor may have suffered economic harm beyond the historic payment.
Whether and to what extent replacement cost or appreciation can be claimed depends on the applicable legal basis and evidence. It should not automatically be assumed to be recoverable in full.
If the project was marketed as an investment generating rental income from a particular delivery date, lost rent may potentially be investigated.
However, guaranteed-return marketing projections should not automatically be treated as proof of actual loss.
Objective rental evidence and expert analysis are generally stronger.
If the fake project company becomes insolvent, the investor may need to participate in collective insolvency proceedings rather than relying only on ordinary litigation.
Claims, guarantees and suspicious pre-insolvency transfers should be investigated quickly.
A court may determine that the investor is owed EUR 500,000.
If the defendant owns nothing, actual recovery can remain difficult.
This is why successful fraud litigation requires two parallel questions:
Can We Prove the Claim?
and
Can We Locate Assets to Satisfy It?
Prepare a chronology such as:
January 2025 – Investor Sees Advertisement
February 2025 – Video Meeting with Agent
March 2025 – Contract Signed
March 2025 – EUR 50,000 Deposit
June 2025 – EUR 150,000 Installment
October 2025 – EUR 100,000 Installment
January 2026 – Construction Supposed to Begin
April 2026 – Developer Stops Responding
June 2026 – Investor Discovers Land Belongs to Another Company
August 2026 – Refund Still Not Paid.
A detailed timeline helps identify misrepresentations, payments and urgency.
Immediately preserve the purchase contract, reservation agreement, title documents supplied by the seller, payment plan, SWIFT records, bank statements, receipts, invoices, cryptocurrency records, company information, building permit documents, architectural plans, brochures, website screenshots, social media advertisements, WhatsApp and Telegram messages, emails, voice messages, rental guarantees, citizenship promises, powers of attorney, appraisal documents, insurance certificates, bank guarantees and refund promises.
A foreign investor who suspects a fake Turkish property project should generally consider this sequence: Stop Further Payments → Preserve All Digital Evidence → Contact the Bank Promptly for Recent Suspicious Transfers → Identify Every Payment Recipient → Verify the Project Land → Obtain Current Land Registry Information → Verify Seller’s Ownership or Development Rights → Verify Building Permit → Investigate the Developer Company → Investigate the Agent and Related Companies → Verify Insurance and Guarantees → Determine Whether the Project or Unit Exists → Determine Whether the Same Unit Was Sold Multiple Times → Send Appropriate Formal Notice → Calculate Principal, Interest and Potential Damages → Locate Assets → Evaluate Precautionary Attachment → Evaluate Property-Focused Interim Protection Where Relevant → Investigate Suspicious Asset Transfers → Assess Insolvency Risk → Evaluate Criminal Fraud Proceedings → Coordinate Civil Recovery and Criminal Strategy.
Foreign investor transfers EUR 300,000 after seeing professional renderings for a luxury Istanbul project. Independent investigation later reveals that the advertised project does not exist and the company has no rights over the land shown in the brochure.
The priority should be tracing the payment recipients, identifying assets, preserving marketing evidence and evaluating urgent civil and criminal remedies.
Investor visits genuine construction land and believes the company selling the apartments owns it. The actual landowner later confirms having no relationship with the seller.
The existence of real land does not make the investment legitimate. The seller’s representations, money flows and assets should be investigated immediately.
Five foreign investors discover that each signed a contract for Apartment A-12 and collectively paid more than EUR 1 million.
This can provide strong evidence of systematic misconduct. Each buyer should document individual payments while the broader pattern is investigated.
Foreign investor pays EUR 450,000 after being told the apartment guarantees Turkish citizenship. The property is later found not to exist as represented and title transfer never occurs.
The investor should pursue the financial recovery strategy while separately protecting or restructuring the citizenship plan.
Developer representative tells the buyer to send EUR 200,000 to the shareholder’s personal bank account because the company account is “under maintenance.”
The company later denies receiving the payment.
Messages instructing the transfer, account ownership and subsequent fund movements can become critical evidence.
Buyer pays EUR 350,000 because the project promises a guaranteed 15% annual rental return. Construction never begins and the guarantee company has no assets.
The buyer should investigate whether the guarantee formed part of an intentional deceptive scheme and pursue the underlying purchase funds rather than relying solely on the promised rental return.
Potentially yes, but recovery depends on identifying the responsible parties, proving the payments and misrepresentations, and locating assets. Early action can materially improve the practical recovery position.
Stop additional payments, preserve all evidence, obtain current land registry information, verify the project and seller, document every payment recipient and investigate urgent asset-preservation measures.
Where the statutory requirements are satisfied, precautionary attachment or other appropriate interim measures may potentially be available. The exact remedy depends on the nature of the claim.
Potentially. The payment instructions, contractual relationship, account holder and reason for the transfer must be established. Preserve all communications directing payment.
Recovery can be more complicated, but transaction hashes, wallet addresses, exchange records and communications should be preserved immediately.
No. Genuine projects can fail for commercial reasons. Criminal fraud generally requires evidence of intentional deception rather than mere non-performance.
This is a serious warning sign and may substantially strengthen the investigation of intentional misconduct. Each investor’s contract, payments and property rights should still be analyzed separately.
Potentially. Interest and other provable losses may be recoverable depending on the legal basis, causation and evidence.
Only after independent due diligence. Verify the replacement property’s title, value, mortgages, attachments, construction status and the developer’s authority to transfer it.
No. Criminal proceedings and civil money recovery serve different purposes. A coordinated strategy involving asset protection, civil claims and criminal remedies where justified is generally more effective.
A foreign investor who discovers that a Turkish property investment may be fake should act before the people controlling the project have time to move money, transfer property, close companies or disappear.
The critical questions are: Does the project genuinely exist? Who owns the land? Did the seller have authority to sell? Was there a building permit? Who received the money? Was the same apartment sold to other buyers? Are insurance or guarantees genuine? Where are the developer’s assets? Have assets been transferred to related parties? Is the case merely contractual non-performance or evidence of intentional fraud?
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign individuals and international investors with property fraud and real estate recovery disputes throughout Turkey. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with fake property projects, fraudulent developers, nonexistent apartments, double sales, fake investment schemes, purchase-price recovery, contract termination, precautionary attachments, interim injunctions, asset investigation, suspicious asset transfers, developer insolvency, compensation claims and coordinated civil and criminal proceedings.
For victims of fake investment projects, the objective should not be limited to obtaining a judgment stating that money is owed. The practical objective is to identify the responsible persons, locate recoverable assets and protect those assets before they disappear. In serious property fraud cases, the first days and weeks after discovery can be far more important than foreign investors realize.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey