

A foreign buyer sent Turkish property purchase money to an agent, developer director, relative or third-party bank account. Learn how to prove payment, recover the money, protect title rights and respond to fraud in Turkey in 2026.
Foreign buyers purchasing property in Turkey are sometimes instructed not to transfer the purchase price directly to the registered property owner. The real estate agent, developer or seller may instead say: “Send the money to our company director,” “Use the agent’s account,” “Transfer it to the seller’s brother,” “Pay the developer’s other company,” or “This account is easier for international payments.” The buyer may transfer EUR 100,000, EUR 300,000 or the entire purchase price without questioning the arrangement. Problems begin when the title deed is not transferred and the registered owner later says: “I never received your money.” Sending property purchase funds to a third-party bank account does not automatically mean the buyer has lost the money or that the payment is legally irrelevant. However, it can create serious problems concerning proof of payment, authority, contractual performance, title transfer, refund claims, foreign-buyer payment documentation and potential fraud. In 2026, foreign buyers should identify exactly who received the money, why that person received it, whether the seller authorized the payment and how the payment connects to the specific property transaction.
A third-party recipient is generally someone other than the buyer and the registered seller who receives money connected with the purchase.
Examples include:
Real Estate Agent
Developer’s Shareholder
Company Director
Seller’s Spouse
Seller’s Relative
Seller’s Lawyer or Representative
Developer’s Affiliated Company
Landowner
Mortgage Creditor
Attachment Creditor
Construction Contractor
or another individual or company.
Not every third-party payment is unlawful or fraudulent. The critical issue is whether there is a legitimate and provable connection between the payment recipient and the property transaction.
No.
The mere fact that money was transferred to someone other than the registered seller does not automatically make the payment legally worthless.
There can be legitimate reasons for third-party payments.
For example, the seller may expressly instruct the buyer to pay part of the purchase price directly to a mortgage creditor so that the mortgage can be released.
Likewise, an authorized representative may receive payment for the seller.
The problem arises when the legal connection is unclear or cannot later be proven.
Suppose the buyer transfers EUR 250,000 to a company director’s personal account.
The evidence can be very different in these two situations:
Situation A: Seller signs a written instruction stating that EUR 250,000 paid to the director’s specified account will constitute payment of the purchase price.
Situation B: Real estate agent verbally tells the buyer, “Send the money here,” but there is no written authorization from the seller.
Situation A generally creates a much clearer evidentiary position.
This is the classic third-party payment dispute.
Foreign buyer says:
“I paid EUR 300,000 for the apartment.”
Registered seller responds:
“You paid someone else. I received nothing.”
The dispute then becomes one of proving whether payment to the third party legally constituted performance toward the seller.
Relevant evidence can include:
Contract Clauses
Payment Instructions
WhatsApp Messages
Emails
Bank Transfer Descriptions
Invoices
Receipts
Seller Acknowledgments
Power of Attorney
and the relationship between seller and recipient.
Foreign buyers should never rely only on a telephone call for unusual payment instructions.
Before transferring substantial money to a third party, obtain written confirmation identifying:
Property
Buyer
Seller
Amount
Currency
Recipient
Bank Account
and confirmation that payment to that account will be treated as payment toward the property’s purchase price.
The payment reference should clearly connect the transfer with the property.
Instead of:
“Payment”
a properly documented transfer may identify the relevant transaction, such as:
“Purchase Price Installment – Apartment B24 – Buyer [Name] – Seller [Name].”
The exact wording should correspond with the contractual arrangement.
A clear payment description can become highly valuable years later.
The buyer should not agree to descriptions such as:
“Loan”
“Consultancy”
“Gift”
or another artificial explanation when the money is actually the property purchase price.
Creating inaccurate banking records can seriously complicate later litigation and regulatory compliance.
Foreign buyers are frequently asked to pay the agent.
This requires careful analysis.
An agent may be authorized to:
Market the Property
Negotiate
Collect a Reservation Deposit
or potentially perform other tasks.
But authority to advertise a property does not automatically mean authority to receive the entire purchase price.
Suppose the agent is legitimately authorized to market the apartment.
The buyer should not automatically conclude:
“Therefore I can safely transfer EUR 400,000 to the agent.”
The scope of the agent’s authority must be established.
If the seller later denies authorizing the collection, the buyer may face a dispute against the agent rather than a straightforward payment defense against the seller.
This is particularly risky.
A foreign buyer may receive the following message:
“Our company bank account is temporarily unavailable. Please send EUR 100,000 to my personal account.”
The buyer should stop and investigate.
Questions include:
Why Is a Personal Account Being Used?
Does the Seller Know?
Does the Agency Know?
Is This Person Authorized to Collect Purchase Funds?
Will the Seller Issue a Written Receipt?
An unexplained personal-account transfer is a major warning sign.
Developers sometimes instruct foreign buyers to pay a director, shareholder or company owner personally.
This can later create serious disputes.
The buyer should establish whether the payment is legally being received:
On Behalf of the Developer
or
Personally by the Director.
The contractual seller should expressly acknowledge the payment.
Turkish land registry guidance concerning foreign-property investment payment evidence recognizes that payments may, depending on the circumstances, involve accounts belonging to persons reasonably connected with the transaction, including a company owner’s account.
However, this should not be misunderstood as permission to send money indiscriminately to anyone associated with a developer.
The connection must be genuine and provable.
The seller may say:
“Send the payment to my wife’s account.”
This is not automatically invalid.
However, obtain written instructions and preserve evidence establishing the relationship and payment purpose.
The buyer should not rely solely on the surname being the same.
The risk increases where the recipient is more remote.
For example:
“Transfer EUR 200,000 to my cousin.”
The buyer should ask why.
If the seller genuinely directs the payment, that instruction should be documented clearly.
A project may involve several related companies.
For example:
Company A owns the land.
Company B signs the sales contract.
Company C markets the project.
Company D receives the money.
This structure may be legitimate, but it creates substantial legal complexity.
The buyer should map the relationship between the companies before paying.
This distinction is crucial.
Two companies may:
Have the Same Shareholders
Use the Same Office
Use the Same Brand
Share Directors
and still be separate legal entities.
If Company B owes the buyer an apartment but EUR 300,000 was transferred to Company D, the legal basis for Company D receiving the funds should be documented.
Some Turkish developments involve construction agreements between a landowner and developer.
A buyer may be instructed to pay part of the purchase price to the landowner.
This can potentially be legitimate depending on the transaction structure.
However, the buyer should verify the landowner’s role and how that payment affects the buyer’s debt to the contractual seller.
This can actually be an important risk-management mechanism when properly structured.
Suppose the apartment has a bank mortgage.
Instead of sending the entire purchase price to the seller and trusting the seller to repay the bank, part of the price may potentially be coordinated directly with the mortgage creditor as part of a structured closing.
The release of the mortgage and title transfer must be coordinated carefully.
A similar structure may arise where a creditor attachment must be resolved before clean transfer.
The buyer should not simply send money to a creditor based on the seller’s verbal request.
The debt, creditor, release conditions and effect on the property should be independently verified.
Foreign natural persons purchasing real estate in Turkey are subject to specific foreign-exchange and payment-documentation requirements.
Under the current framework, the foreign currency equivalent of the property sale price must be processed through the banking system for the required foreign-exchange purchase documentation before the title transaction.
The payment structure should therefore be coordinated before money is transferred.
For qualifying acquisitions by foreign natural persons, the purchase price is processed through a bank for sale to the Central Bank and the corresponding Foreign Exchange Purchase Certificate is submitted for the title deed transaction.
This procedure should not be treated as an administrative detail to be addressed after the entire purchase price has already been transferred informally.
Under the current official framework, the required foreign currency sale can be handled through the buyer, seller or their agents or representatives, subject to the applicable requirements.
Foreign buyers should coordinate this process with the title transaction rather than relying solely on the agent’s informal payment instructions.
Payment evidence becomes even more sensitive where the property acquisition is intended to support a Turkish citizenship application.
Official land registry guidance requires evidence showing transfer of the relevant purchase amount and recognizes that payment may, depending on the circumstances, be made to seller-related persons such as:
Representative
Spouse
Construction Contract Rights Holder
Mortgage or Attachment Creditor
Company Owner
and other persons where the required reasonable connection can be established.
This does not mean every third-party payment automatically qualifies.
The foreign investor should be able to answer:
Who Is This Recipient?
How Is the Recipient Connected to the Seller?
Why Was the Purchase Price Sent There?
Who Authorized It?
Did the Seller Treat the Payment as Purchase-Price Performance?
Where the connection cannot be explained, serious evidentiary problems may arise.
Foreign investors frequently send funds from overseas banks.
Complete SWIFT documentation should be preserved.
The record can establish:
Sender
Recipient
Account
Date
Currency
Amount
Payment Description.
Official Turkish land registry guidance recognizes qualifying SWIFT evidence in relevant foreign-investor payment contexts.
Download and preserve the official bank receipt or SWIFT record.
A screenshot may omit important information or later become difficult to authenticate.
For a EUR 500,000 property transaction, banking evidence should be treated as a core legal document.
Cash transactions create substantially greater evidentiary risk.
In relevant foreign-property investment procedures, a simple declaration by the parties does not replace documentary evidence of payment.
Foreign buyers should therefore avoid large undocumented cash payments.
This is a significant red flag.
Suppose the seller says:
“Give EUR 100,000 cash to my brother and we will declare the rest at title.”
This structure can create serious legal, evidentiary and regulatory problems.
The buyer should not participate in artificial payment arrangements intended to conceal the actual transaction.
Foreign buyers may be encouraged to:
Declare a Lower Price
Pay Part in Cash
Transfer Part to Another Person
or create another structure that does not accurately reflect the real transaction.
This can expose the buyer to tax, evidentiary, citizenship and contractual risks.
Accurate documentation should be prioritized.
Even if the payment is validly made, the buyer should remember:
Payment ≠ Ownership.
Turkish real estate ownership is fundamentally acquired through the legally required land registry registration.
A buyer can therefore have paid 100% of the price and still not be the registered owner.
Consider:
Property Price: EUR 500,000
EUR 500,000 Paid to Developer Director
Seller Still Registered Owner
Title Transfer Promised Three Months Later.
During those three months, the property may become subject to:
Mortgage
Attachment
Second Sale
Seller Insolvency
or another legal problem.
The buyer should minimize unsecured exposure between payment and title transfer.
If the seller receives or authorizes third-party payment but later transfers the property to another buyer, the foreign purchaser may face a double-sale dispute.
The buyer must investigate:
Current Registered Owner
Second Buyer’s Good Faith
Contract Form
Any Registered Protection
and the seller’s remaining assets.
Suppose the agent receives EUR 250,000 and disappears.
The seller says:
“That is between you and the agent.”
The buyer should immediately investigate whether the agent was acting with actual or apparent authority and whether the seller or agency bears responsibility.
The payment recipient’s assets should also be investigated.
A company may respond:
“Our salesperson was not authorized to receive funds and has disappeared.”
The foreign buyer should preserve evidence showing:
Company Email Addresses
Company WhatsApp Groups
Invoices
Payment Instructions
Corporate Documents
Previous Payments Accepted Through the Same Account
and communications from management.
The issue is whether the payment can legally be connected to the company.
A fraudster may impersonate a legitimate real estate agent and send:
“Our bank account has changed. Send the next installment to this IBAN.”
The buyer transfers EUR 100,000.
The genuine agent later denies sending the message.
This can involve payment-redirection fraud rather than an ordinary property dispute.
Immediate contact with the banks can be critical.
Foreign property transactions are particularly vulnerable because large international payments are expected.
A criminal may compromise an agent’s email account and send new bank instructions shortly before closing.
Any unexpected change of IBAN should be independently verified through a separate trusted communication channel before funds are transferred.
If an email says:
“Our bank details have changed,”
do not simply reply:
“Please confirm.”
If the account has been compromised, the criminal controls the response.
Verify through an independently known telephone number or another trusted channel.
If the transfer was recent, act immediately.
The buyer should:
Contact the Sending Bank
Report Suspected Fraud
Obtain SWIFT Documentation
Identify the Receiving Bank
Preserve All Payment Instructions
Contact Turkish Counsel
and evaluate appropriate legal and criminal measures.
Speed can materially affect the ability to trace funds.
Potentially, depending on the facts and legal conditions.
Different legal mechanisms may become relevant depending on whether the issue involves:
Fraud
Contractual Refund
Unjustified Retention
Criminal Proceeds
or another basis.
There is no automatic freeze merely because the buyer complains.
The legal basis must be established quickly.
Where the buyer has a qualifying monetary claim and the statutory requirements are satisfied, precautionary attachment may potentially be sought against assets.
This can become important where there is evidence that the recipient or seller may dispose of assets before the dispute is resolved.
This is a critical strategic question.
Possible defendants may include:
Seller
Developer
Agent
Third-Party Recipient
or potentially more than one person or company.
The legal basis against each party should be established separately.
The account holder may have received the money, but the seller may still be contractually responsible.
Conversely, suing only the seller may be insufficient where the money was diverted by an unauthorized third party.
The complete transaction structure should be mapped before litigation.
Potentially.
If the recipient has no lawful basis to retain the buyer’s money, restitution or other claims may arise depending on the circumstances.
However, the exact legal basis depends on whether the recipient acted:
For the Seller
For the Buyer
Independently
or fraudulently.
Potentially, particularly where the seller expressly authorized the payment or otherwise legally treated the third-party receipt as performance.
Evidence of authorization is therefore crucial.
Potentially, depending on their respective conduct and legal relationships.
For example, a seller may authorize an agent to collect funds, while the agent later misappropriates them.
The allocation of liability requires analysis of agency, contractual and potentially tort or criminal principles.
A real estate agent may face separate legal consequences where the agent:
Collects Money Without Authority
Misrepresents Payment Instructions
Keeps Purchase Funds
Transfers Funds Elsewhere
or knowingly participates in deceptive conduct.
The brokerage relationship should be reviewed carefully.
A director who personally receives property purchase funds is not automatically personally liable merely because money entered the director’s account.
However, the basis for receiving and retaining those funds must be investigated.
Personal wrongdoing, unauthorized retention or fraud may create separate liability.
Likewise, company shareholders are not automatically liable for all developer debts.
But if the shareholder personally received the foreign buyer’s purchase funds, that specific transaction can require independent legal analysis.
Corporate separation should not be confused with a right to retain money without legal basis.
Not every third-party payment problem constitutes criminal fraud.
Example:
Seller genuinely authorized payment to the seller’s spouse but later disputes whether EUR 20,000 represented the purchase price or a separate debt.
This may primarily be a civil dispute.
By contrast, a fake agent who intentionally provides a fraudulent bank account to steal EUR 300,000 presents a very different situation.
Criminal remedies may become relevant where evidence indicates deliberate deception.
Examples include:
Fake Seller
Fake Agent
Forged Power of Attorney
False Bank Instructions
Impersonation
Multiple Buyers Directed to Personal Accounts
Immediate Disappearance After Payment
or intentional diversion of purchase funds.
The evidence should be preserved before filing.
Foreign buyers should not rely solely on criminal proceedings.
Even where fraud exists, the recovery strategy may also require:
Civil Claims
Restitution
Precautionary Attachment
Enforcement
Property Measures
and investigation of assets.
The goal is not merely to establish wrongdoing but to recover the funds.
A serious recovery strategy asks:
Where did the money go after reaching the third-party account?
Was it:
Withdrawn in Cash?
Transferred to Seller?
Transferred Abroad?
Used to Buy Property?
Sent to Another Related Company?
Distributed Among Several People?
The available legal mechanisms for tracing depend on the proceedings and evidence.
This can strengthen the factual connection between the buyer’s payment and the property transaction.
Suppose:
Buyer → Agent: EUR 300,000
then
Agent → Seller: EUR 285,000
while agent retains commission.
The bank trail can become powerful evidence concerning the actual transaction.
If the seller never received the money, authority becomes even more important.
The buyer needs to determine whether the recipient was authorized to collect funds on the seller’s behalf.
A message such as:
“We confirm receipt of your EUR 250,000 payment through our director’s account. Remaining balance EUR 100,000.”
can be extremely important.
Preserve the entire conversation and original device data where possible.
An invoice or account statement issued by the contractual seller acknowledging the payment can also help establish the connection.
Preserve all accounting documents.
In litigation, accounting and commercial records may become relevant where they record the third-party payment as part of the buyer’s purchase price.
This can contradict a later claim that the seller knew nothing about the transaction.
If the buyer sent:
EUR
USD
GBP
or another currency, preserve the exact amount and currency.
A later refund claim should not automatically be treated as a simple historic Turkish Lira amount without examining the contract and applicable rules.
Exchange-rate movements can materially affect the value of the dispute.
If the seller or third-party recipient becomes legally obligated to repay but fails to do so, interest may form part of the claim.
The applicable rate, currency and starting date depend on the legal basis and default circumstances.
The foreign buyer may also suffer:
Financing Costs
Transaction Expenses
Alternative Accommodation Costs
Losses Connected With a Failed Investment Strategy
or other provable losses.
Recoverability requires analysis of causation and the applicable legal basis.
Third-party payments can become particularly sensitive when the acquisition is connected with Turkish citizenship.
Payment documentation is an important component of the qualifying property transaction.
Foreign investors should therefore avoid improvised structures that make it difficult to prove the relationship between the buyer, seller, payment recipient and property.
This is not sufficient.
The investor should independently verify whether the payment structure satisfies the applicable requirements.
A failed citizenship application can create a separate strategic problem even if the buyer eventually obtains the property.
Turkey has introduced a major development aimed at reducing payment fraud and disputes in real estate sales.
Under the current 2026 timetable, mandatory implementation of the Secure Payment System for qualifying real estate sale payments has been postponed to 1 October 2026.
The system is designed to coordinate the transfer of purchase money with the transfer of property ownership.
The fundamental problem in property transactions is:
Does the buyer pay first?
or
Does the seller transfer title first?
A secure payment mechanism reduces this risk by holding the purchase funds until the title transaction is successfully registered and then releasing the money to the seller.
This can materially reduce the risks associated with uncontrolled third-party transfers.
The land registry system already provides a secure-account mechanism in cooperation with the relevant payment infrastructure, allowing purchase money to be held pending registration and released when the title transfer is completed.
Where available and appropriate, structured payment mechanisms should be considered instead of simply wiring the entire purchase price to an unfamiliar account days before title transfer.
Under the secure-account structure, the payment mechanism is designed so that where the title transaction does not complete, the money can be returned rather than being released unconditionally to the seller.
This directly addresses one of the biggest foreign-buyer risks.
The secure payment mechanism and foreign natural person’s foreign-exchange documentation are related transaction-planning issues but should not be confused.
The buyer should structure:
Foreign Currency Conversion
Required Certificate
Purchase Price Transfer
Title Registration
and any citizenship-related payment evidence as one coordinated closing process.
A title application does not guarantee that registration will successfully occur.
Problems can still emerge concerning:
Seller Authority
Property Restrictions
Documentation
Foreign Acquisition Eligibility
or other matters.
Large payments should therefore be coordinated with confirmation that the transaction is legally ready to complete.
Foreign buyer purchases an apartment for EUR 400,000. Seller signs a document directing the buyer to transfer EUR 50,000 deposit to the authorized agency and confirms that it will be credited against the purchase price.
The arrangement is considerably easier to prove than an undocumented transfer made solely on the agent’s oral instructions.
Foreign buyer signs with Developer Company A but sends EUR 300,000 to its director personally.
The company later denies receiving payment.
The buyer should collect messages, invoices, company records and any acknowledgment connecting the director’s account with the developer’s payment system.
Seller sends an email stating:
“Please transfer EUR 200,000 of the purchase price to my spouse’s account. This payment shall constitute payment to me under our sale agreement.”
The written authorization and bank trail create a significantly clearer position than an undocumented third-party transfer.
Foreign buyer transfers EUR 250,000 to an agent who had authority only to advertise the apartment.
The seller never authorized the agent to receive the price.
The agent disappears.
The buyer must investigate claims against the agent, agency and potentially other responsible parties while tracing assets immediately.
Two days before closing, buyer receives an email apparently from the agent stating that the seller’s bank account has changed.
EUR 350,000 is transferred.
The email account was compromised.
Immediate banking, criminal and asset-recovery action should be considered. Waiting for weeks can substantially reduce recovery prospects.
Property price is EUR 500,000 and the seller owes EUR 150,000 secured by mortgage.
A structured transaction provides for part of the purchase price to satisfy the secured debt while coordinating mortgage release and title transfer.
A third-party payment in this context can serve a legitimate protective function when properly documented.
Foreign investor buys from Developer A but is instructed to pay Developer B, a related company.
Before relying on the payment for a citizenship-related transaction, the relationship and payment documentation should be independently verified.
“Both companies belong to the same owner” is not sufficient legal analysis.
Foreign buyers involved in a third-party payment dispute should preserve the property purchase agreement, reservation agreement, brokerage agreement, current title information, seller identity, third-party recipient identity, payment instructions, SWIFT documents, bank statements, invoices, receipts, Foreign Exchange Purchase Certificate documentation, emails, WhatsApp and Telegram messages, voice notes, powers of attorney, agency authorization documents, company records, citizenship documents where relevant and every acknowledgment showing that the seller accepted or authorized the third-party payment.
A foreign buyer who has already transferred the purchase price to a third party should generally consider this sequence: Identify Account Holder → Preserve Bank/SWIFT Evidence → Identify Who Instructed the Transfer → Obtain Seller’s Written Position → Determine Recipient’s Authority → Connect Payment to Specific Property → Obtain Current Land Registry Information → Determine Whether Title Has Transferred → Check Mortgages and Attachments → Stop Additional Unprotected Payments → Determine Whether Seller Recognizes Payment → Investigate Agent/Company Relationships → Verify Foreign-Exchange Documentation → Verify Citizenship Payment Requirements if Applicable → Demand Title Transfer or Refund as Legally Appropriate → Trace Recipient Assets → Investigate Seller Assets → Consider Precautionary Attachment → Consider Property-Focused Interim Protection Where Relevant → Evaluate Claims Against Seller, Agent and Recipient → Evaluate Criminal Remedies Where Evidence Supports Fraud.
The safest payment structure is generally one where the legal and financial closing occur in a coordinated manner.
Before transferring substantial money, the buyer should know:
Who legally owns the property?
Who legally sells it?
Who receives the purchase price?
Why is that person entitled to receive it?
How is the payment documented?
How does it connect with title registration?
How will any mortgage or attachment be removed?
How are foreign-exchange requirements satisfied?
What happens to the money if title transfer fails?
If these questions cannot be answered clearly, the buyer should not treat the requested bank transfer as routine.
Not automatically. The legal effect depends on the recipient’s relationship with the seller, authority to receive payment and evidence showing that the transfer was made toward the property purchase price.
Potentially. Messages can be important evidence, particularly where they clearly identify the account, amount and purpose. Preserve the complete conversation together with official banking records.
The agent’s authority must be investigated. Depending on the circumstances, claims may exist against the agent, agency, seller or more than one party.
Potentially, but the relationship and authority should be documented. Official foreign-investor payment guidance recognizes certain seller-related payment recipients where a reasonable connection can be established.
Potentially, and in a properly structured closing this can sometimes reduce risk. The mortgage debt, release conditions and connection with the purchase price should be verified and documented.
No. Payment does not itself transfer ownership. Turkish real estate ownership requires the legally prescribed registration process.
Depending on the facts, civil restitution, contractual, enforcement and potentially criminal remedies may need to be considered. Asset investigation should begin quickly.
Potentially, where the requirements for precautionary attachment or another applicable protective measure are satisfied. It is not automatic merely because a dispute exists.
Yes. Citizenship-related property acquisitions require carefully documented payment and transaction structures. The relationship between the buyer, seller, payment recipient and property must be provable.
The purchase funds should be coordinated with independent title due diligence, foreign-buyer foreign-exchange requirements and the legally required ownership transfer. Structured secure-payment mechanisms can substantially reduce the risk of paying before title registration.
When a foreign buyer sends EUR 100,000, EUR 300,000 or EUR 500,000 to someone other than the registered seller, the decisive question is not simply:
“Was the bank account in the seller’s name?”
The correct legal analysis asks: Who owned the account? Who instructed the buyer to pay it? Was the recipient authorized? Did the seller acknowledge the payment? Was the transfer connected to the specific apartment? Did the money reach the seller? Has title transferred? Is the recipient an agent, director, shareholder, spouse, creditor or unrelated person? Can the money still be traced and secured?
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign individuals and international investors with Turkish property payment disputes and real estate recovery claims. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with third-party bank transfers, real estate agent payments, developer director accounts, disputed purchase payments, SWIFT evidence, foreign-buyer payment documentation, title deed disputes, citizenship-related payment issues, purchase-price recovery, precautionary attachments, asset tracing and property fraud.
The safest principle for foreign property buyers is straightforward: never send substantial purchase funds to a third-party account unless the identity, authority and legal purpose of that payment are clearly documented before the transfer occurs. Where the payment has already been made and the seller denies receiving it, immediate preservation of the bank trail and communications can determine whether the buyer is able to connect the money to the property transaction and recover it.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey