Can foreigners request suspension of execution against a deportation decision in Turkey? Learn when filing a deportation lawsuit stops removal, the seven-day deadline, exceptions, interim protection, Constitutional Court measures, Article 55 protection and removal-center procedures in 2026.

A foreigner who receives a deportation decision in Turkey may immediately ask: “Can I request suspension of execution so that I am not deported before the court decides my case?”

The answer requires an important distinction. In ordinary Turkish administrative litigation, a claimant frequently requests a suspension of execution to temporarily prevent an administrative decision from being implemented while the lawsuit is pending. Deportation litigation, however, is governed by a special statutory regime under the Law on Foreigners and International Protection.

Under the current 2026 framework, when the statutory judicial challenge against a deportation decision is filed in time, the law itself provides important protection against removal during the relevant judicial process, subject to the applicable statutory rules and exceptions. Therefore, the first question should not simply be “Can I obtain a suspension of execution?” but rather “Does my timely deportation lawsuit already have suspensive effect, and does any statutory exception apply to my case?”

This distinction is crucial because an incorrectly prepared application can cause a foreigner to focus on the wrong procedural remedy while an extremely short litigation deadline continues to run.

1. What Is Suspension of Execution in Turkish Administrative Law?

A suspension of execution is an interim judicial measure designed to temporarily prevent implementation of an administrative act while its legality is being examined.

In ordinary administrative cases, filing a lawsuit does not generally mean that the challenged administrative decision automatically stops producing legal consequences.

For that reason, claimants frequently ask the administrative court to suspend execution.

Deportation litigation is different because Turkish immigration legislation contains a specific rule concerning removal while the judicial challenge is pending.

2. Is a Separate Suspension of Execution Request Always Necessary in a Deportation Case?

No.

This is one of the most important points for foreigners in 2026.

Under the current special procedure governing deportation decisions, a timely judicial challenge itself provides protection against physical removal during the statutory period and judicial proceedings, subject to the applicable legal framework.

Accordingly, a foreigner should not automatically assume that deportation can proceed unless the administrative court first issues a traditional suspension-of-execution order.

3. Filing a Deportation Lawsuit Can Have Suspensive Effect

The Law on Foreigners and International Protection establishes a special judicial-review mechanism for deportation decisions.

Under the current official procedure, subject to the foreigner’s consent to removal, the foreigner is not removed during the period available for bringing the judicial challenge or, where judicial review is pursued, until the judicial proceedings are concluded.

This is substantially different from many ordinary administrative lawsuits.

4. Why Is This Rule Important?

Imagine the following situation:

Monday: Foreigner receives deportation decision.

Tuesday: Removal preparations begin.

Wednesday: Foreigner files the statutory lawsuit against the deportation decision.

If the special statutory suspensive protection applies, the foreigner should not ordinarily have to wait for a separate traditional interim order before the statutory protection against removal operates.

This is why correctly identifying the legal basis of the deportation decision is essential.

5. What Is the 2026 Deadline to Challenge a Deportation Decision?

Current official Turkish Migration Management guidance states that the foreigner, legal representative or lawyer may challenge a deportation decision before the administrative court within seven days from notification of the decision.

This is a very short period.

The foreigner should therefore identify the exact notification date immediately.

6. Do Not Rely on Old Internet Articles About the Deadline

Foreigners frequently encounter older articles mentioning different appeal periods.

This can be dangerous.

The current official Turkish-language Migration Management guidance states a seven-day judicial challenge period from notification.

Therefore, anyone receiving a deportation decision in 2026 should calculate the applicable deadline using the current law and actual notification documents rather than relying on an old article found online.

7. Notification Date Is Critical

The relevant chronology should be established carefully:

Decision Date → Notification Date → Final Day for Judicial Challenge → Date Lawsuit Filed.

The decision date and notification date may not be identical.

A foreigner should preserve:

Notification Form

Signature Record

Removal Center Documents

Police Documents

and any other document showing when the decision was communicated.

8. What Happens During the Seven-Day Challenge Period?

Under the current statutory framework described by official Migration Management guidance, the foreigner is protected against removal during the period available for judicial challenge, subject to the applicable rules and the foreigner’s consent to removal.

This protection is extremely important because otherwise a foreigner could potentially be removed before obtaining meaningful judicial review.

9. What Happens After the Lawsuit Is Filed?

Where the judicial remedy is used within the applicable period, the statutory protection can continue until the judicial proceedings concerning the deportation decision are concluded.

Therefore:

Timely Deportation Lawsuit → Statutory Protection Against Removal During Judicial Review

can be the central mechanism.

A separate conventional suspension-of-execution analysis should not replace this special statutory framework.

10. Must the Authority Be Informed That the Lawsuit Was Filed?

Yes.

Current official Migration Management guidance states that the person who applies to the administrative court should also notify the authority that issued the deportation decision.

This is practically very important.

A foreigner should not assume that every administrative unit will instantly learn of a newly filed court action without the required procedural steps being completed.

11. Proof of Filing Should Be Preserved

The foreigner or lawyer should preserve documents showing:

Court

Case Number

Filing Date

Challenged Deportation Decision

and notification to the relevant administrative authority.

This can become particularly important where removal preparations are already underway.

12. Can the Foreigner Simply Request “Suspension of Execution”?

A lawyer can frame appropriate interim requests according to the circumstances, but deportation litigation should not be treated exactly like an ordinary administrative dispute.

The first task is to identify the statutory suspensive effect applicable to the deportation challenge.

The case should then determine whether any additional interim protection is required.

13. Why Lawyers Still Discuss Interim Protection

Because deportation disputes can involve several different administrative measures at the same time.

For example, the foreigner may face:

Deportation Decision

Administrative Detention

Entry Ban

Restriction Code

Residence Permit Cancellation

or another administrative measure.

The special suspensive rule concerning physical deportation does not necessarily suspend every other administrative measure automatically.

14. Deportation Decision and Entry Ban Are Different

Suppose a foreigner challenges a deportation decision.

An entry ban has also been imposed.

The suspensive effect of the deportation lawsuit should not automatically be interpreted as cancellation or suspension of every entry-related administrative restriction.

Each administrative measure should be identified separately.

15. Deportation Decision and Residence Permit Cancellation Are Different

Likewise:

Deportation Lawsuit ≠ Automatic Restoration of Residence Permit.

If the foreigner’s residence permit has been separately cancelled, that decision may require its own legal analysis.

The foreigner should obtain the entire immigration file rather than focusing exclusively on the deportation paper.

16. Deportation Lawsuit Does Not Automatically Release the Foreigner From a Removal Center

This distinction is extremely important.

A foreigner can be protected against physical deportation while still remaining under administrative detention.

Therefore:

Suspension/Prevention of Deportation ≠ Release From Administrative Detention.

Administrative detention must be challenged through its own legal mechanism.

17. How Is Administrative Detention Challenged?

A foreigner placed under administrative detention for deportation purposes may challenge the detention before the competent criminal judgeship of peace under the immigration legislation.

This is separate from the administrative court lawsuit against the deportation decision.

18. Two Proceedings May Be Necessary

A foreigner in a removal center may therefore require:

Proceeding 1: Administrative court challenge against deportation.

Proceeding 2: Challenge against administrative detention before the criminal judgeship of peace.

Success in one does not automatically guarantee success in the other.

19. Why This Distinction Matters in Removal Centers

A foreigner may say:

“My deportation lawsuit is pending. Why am I still in the removal center?”

Because the lawsuit concerns the legality of deportation, while detention concerns whether the person may continue to be administratively detained pending immigration procedures.

These are separate legal questions.

20. Alternatives to Administrative Detention

Turkish immigration legislation provides alternatives to administrative detention.

Depending on the case, these may include obligations involving:

Residence at a Specified Address

Reporting

Guarantee

Electronic Monitoring

and other statutory alternatives.

Where detention is unnecessary or disproportionate, these mechanisms may become relevant.

21. Article 55 Can Be More Important Than a Traditional Suspension Request

Certain foreigners should not be subject to a deportation decision even where a ground under the deportation provisions otherwise exists.

Article 55 of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection provides important protections.

These circumstances should be investigated immediately.

22. Risk of Death or Torture

A foreigner should not be removed where serious indications exist that the person would face:

Death Penalty

Torture

Inhuman Treatment

or

Degrading Treatment

in the country of removal.

In these cases, the argument concerns not merely procedural suspension but a substantive prohibition against removal.

23. Evidence of Risk Must Be Individualized

A foreigner should not rely solely on:

“My country is dangerous.”

The legal file should explain:

Why this particular foreigner faces a real risk.

Useful evidence may include:

Arrest Warrants

Previous Detention

Medical Evidence of Torture

Death Threats

Police Reports

Court Records

and reliable country information connected to the individual’s circumstances.

24. Serious Medical Conditions

Article 55 protection may also become relevant where serious health conditions, age or pregnancy make travel dangerous.

Detailed medical evidence should be obtained.

A brief document stating only:

“Patient is receiving treatment”

may not sufficiently establish the travel risk.

25. Life-Threatening Treatment

A foreigner undergoing treatment for a life-threatening illness may also have protection where the necessary treatment is unavailable in the destination country.

The evidence should therefore address:

Medical Necessity

Consequences of Interruption

Travel Risk

and

Availability of Treatment in the Destination Country.

26. Human Trafficking Victims

Foreigners benefiting from the applicable victim-support process for human trafficking receive specific statutory protection.

Official victim-identification and support documentation should be submitted.

27. Victims of Serious Violence

Specified victims of psychological, physical or sexual violence can also fall within statutory protection while treatment continues.

Relevant medical, forensic and criminal-investigation documents can be essential.

28. What If Deportation Would Separate a Turkish Family?

Family life can become another major issue.

Suppose the foreigner has:

Turkish Citizen Spouse

Turkish Citizen Children

Long-Term Residence

and an established family life in Turkey.

The deportation challenge should address whether removal would disproportionately interfere with constitutionally protected family life.

29. Family Life Does Not Automatically Stop Deportation

Marriage or children should not be treated as an automatic suspension mechanism.

The foreigner must demonstrate the reality and depth of family life.

Relevant evidence can include:

Marriage Certificate

Children’s Birth Records

Citizenship Records

Joint Address

School Records

Custody Decisions

Medical Records

Financial Support

and evidence of daily parenting.

30. Best Interests of the Child

Where children are involved, their best interests can become particularly important.

The case should ask:

Who Provides Daily Care?

Would the Child Be Separated From a Parent?

Can the Child Relocate?

Does the Child Have Medical Needs?

Where Does the Child Attend School?

Is the Child a Turkish Citizen?

The practical consequences of removal should be demonstrated with evidence.

31. Public Order Deportation Cases

A foreigner may be ordered removed because authorities consider the person a threat to public order.

In these cases, the challenge should identify the actual factual basis.

Relevant evidence may include:

Acquittal

Non-Prosecution Decision

Release Decision

Criminal Record

Camera Evidence

Witness Statements

and criminal file documents.

32. Acquittal Can Strengthen the Deportation Challenge

Suppose deportation is based substantially on a criminal allegation.

The foreigner is later acquitted.

That judgment can become highly important in challenging the factual basis of the deportation decision.

However, acquittal should not automatically be assumed to cancel the administrative decision without appropriate legal action.

33. Public Security Cases

Cases involving alleged public-security or national-security risks can be more complex.

The foreigner should seek meaningful examination of the factual and legal basis relied upon by the authorities.

Family, residence and employment evidence should not replace a direct response to the alleged security ground.

34. What if the Foreigner Has a Valid Residence Permit?

A valid residence permit does not automatically prevent deportation where a separate statutory removal ground exists.

However, the permit can be important evidence concerning:

Lawful Residence

Established Life

Immigration History

and potentially errors in the administrative assessment.

If the permit was separately cancelled, that decision should also be investigated.

35. What if the Foreigner Has a Work Permit?

The same principle applies.

A valid work permit does not create absolute immunity from deportation.

But lawful employment, tax records, social security records and established economic life may be relevant depending on the deportation ground.

36. Can a Foreigner Be Deported Before the Court Reviews the Case?

Where the special statutory protection against removal applies and the judicial challenge is properly pursued, the purpose of the rule is precisely to prevent removal before effective judicial review is completed.

This is why timely filing and immediate notification of the issuing authority are essential.

37. What If Removal Is Imminent Despite the Pending Case?

This should be treated as an emergency.

The foreigner or lawyer should immediately verify:

Was the Lawsuit Filed in Time?

Was the Correct Deportation Decision Challenged?

Was the Issuing Authority Notified?

Does a Statutory Exception Apply?

Has the Foreigner Consented to Removal?

Is There Another Removal Decision?

Is the Administrative File Correctly Updated?

The answer should not be assumed.

38. Constitutional Court Individual Application

In appropriate circumstances, a foreigner may ultimately apply individually to the Turkish Constitutional Court after satisfying the applicable requirements concerning ordinary remedies.

Deportation cases can involve fundamental rights such as:

Prohibition of Ill-Treatment

Family Life

and other constitutional guarantees.

39. Constitutional Court Interim Measure

Where removal creates an imminent risk of irreversible harm, particularly involving allegations of death, torture or prohibited ill-treatment, a request for an interim measure before the Constitutional Court can become relevant in appropriate cases.

This is not an ordinary substitute for the administrative court lawsuit.

It is an exceptional constitutional mechanism.

40. Why Constitutional Interim Measures Matter

Consider a foreigner who alleges:

“If I am returned tomorrow, I will be detained and tortured.”

If removal is imminent and the ordinary process has not provided effective protection against the alleged irreversible harm, constitutional interim protection may become critical depending on the procedural circumstances.

41. The Constitutional Court Examines Concrete Risk

A constitutional application should not merely state:

“I am afraid.”

The applicant should present an arguable claim supported by concrete evidence concerning the alleged risk.

Recent 2026 Constitutional Court proceedings continue to demonstrate judicial examination of claims involving removal to countries where applicants allege risks of prohibited ill-treatment.

42. European Court of Human Rights

After the applicable domestic remedies and requirements are considered, proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights may also become relevant in exceptional cases involving serious human-rights risks.

Urgent interim measures can exist at that level in appropriate circumstances.

However, this should not be treated as a substitute for failing to use the available Turkish remedies within their deadlines.

43. Non-Refoulement Is a Core Principle

A foreigner should not be returned to a place where removal would violate applicable protection against return to prohibited harm.

This is broader than the terminology of ordinary suspension of execution.

Where a genuine non-refoulement issue exists, it should be clearly raised before the competent authorities and courts with supporting evidence.

44. Can the Court Reject a Suspension Request but the Foreigner Still Remain Protected?

Potentially, this question illustrates why the special statutory structure matters.

If statutory protection against removal applies because the deportation lawsuit is timely pending, the foreigner’s protection should not be analyzed solely by asking whether a traditional suspension-of-execution request was separately granted.

The legal basis for non-removal must be identified correctly.

45. Can a Lawyer Request Alternative Interim Protection?

Where necessary, legal counsel can formulate appropriate requests according to the specific administrative measures and risks involved.

But the request should correspond to the actual legal problem.

For example:

Physical Deportation

Administrative Detention

Entry Ban

and

Residence Permit Cancellation

may require different procedural strategies.

46. A Deportation Lawsuit Is Not a General Freeze on the Foreigner’s Immigration File

Another important distinction:

A pending deportation lawsuit does not necessarily mean that every immigration decision concerning the foreigner becomes legally frozen.

Separate measures may remain effective unless independently challenged.

47. Restriction Codes

A restriction code may continue to affect the foreigner’s immigration position.

The legal basis of the code should be identified.

Some codes are connected with entry restrictions, security concerns or administrative violations.

The appropriate remedy depends on the specific code and underlying decision.

48. Entry Ban

If the foreigner is also subject to an entry ban, the deportation lawsuit should not automatically be assumed to remove that ban.

The ban may require separate challenge depending on the circumstances.

49. Residence Permit Cancellation

Similarly, where the residence permit has been cancelled separately, the foreigner may need to challenge that administrative act or pursue another appropriate immigration route.

Winning against deportation does not necessarily recreate the old permit automatically.

50. What Evidence Should Be Submitted With the Deportation Lawsuit?

Evidence depends on the ground for removal.

Potential evidence includes: Deportation Decision → Notification Record → Passport → Residence Permit → Work Permit → Criminal File → Acquittal → Non-Prosecution Decision → Marriage Certificate → Children’s Records → School Records → Custody Documents → Medical Reports → International Protection Records → Evidence of Threats → Arrest Warrants From Country of Origin → Evidence of Previous Torture → Country-Risk Evidence → Employment Records → Long-Term Residence Records → Documents Challenging Allegedly False Information or Documents.

51. Do Not Submit Hundreds of Irrelevant Documents

The strongest deportation case is usually structured around:

Ground for Deportation → Legal Objection → Evidence → Risk Created by Removal.

If the decision concerns public order, address public order.

If the case concerns torture risk, prove the individualized risk.

If it concerns family life, demonstrate the real family relationship and consequences of separation.

52. Practical Example: Foreigner Files Within Seven Days

A foreign national receives a deportation decision on Monday.

The lawyer files the administrative court action within the statutory period and informs the issuing authority.

Where the statutory suspensive protection applies, removal should not ordinarily proceed while the judicial review is pending.

The lawyer should nevertheless confirm that the relevant authorities have received the filing information.

53. Practical Example: Foreigner Waits Too Long

A foreigner receives the decision but believes:

“I have 30 or 60 days because this is an administrative case.”

The person waits several weeks.

This can create a serious procedural problem because deportation decisions are governed by a special, much shorter judicial challenge period.

General administrative-litigation assumptions should therefore not be used.

54. Practical Example: Foreigner Is in a Removal Center

A foreigner files the deportation lawsuit.

The person remains detained.

The family believes the lawsuit failed because the foreigner has not been released.

This is incorrect reasoning.

The lawyer may need to challenge administrative detention separately before the competent criminal judgeship of peace.

55. Practical Example: Torture Risk

A foreigner faces removal to a country where he alleges that authorities previously detained and tortured him.

The file includes:

Previous Detention Documents

Medical Reports

Current Arrest Warrant

and evidence concerning the treatment of similarly situated persons.

The legal strategy should emphasize Article 55 and non-refoulement protection in addition to the procedural challenge against deportation.

56. Practical Example: Turkish Children

A foreign father has two Turkish citizen children.

He faces deportation following a public-order allegation.

The challenge should address:

Evidence Behind Public-Order Allegation

and

Proportionality of Separating the Family.

Submitting only children’s birth certificates may be insufficient.

57. Practical Example: Acquittal After Deportation Decision

A deportation decision relies heavily on an alleged criminal offence.

After the administrative lawsuit begins, the criminal court acquits the foreigner.

The acquittal should be submitted to the administrative court promptly as new evidence affecting the factual basis of removal.

58. Practical Example: Separate Entry Ban

The administrative court proceedings prevent implementation of the deportation decision during judicial review.

However, an entry ban also exists.

The foreigner should not assume that the pending deportation case automatically eliminates the separate entry restriction.

59. What Happens If the Administrative Court Cancels the Deportation Decision?

If the court annuls the deportation decision, removal based on that annulled decision cannot continue as though the decision remained legally valid.

However, separate immigration problems may still require resolution.

These can include:

Residence Permit

Restriction Code

Entry Ban

or other administrative measures.

60. What Happens If the Court Rejects the Case?

The legal consequences should be assessed immediately.

The foreigner’s circumstances may involve constitutional claims, non-refoulement allegations, family-life issues or other fundamental-rights questions requiring evaluation of further available remedies.

A rejected administrative case should never be ignored where removal could cause irreversible harm.

Difference Between Suspension of Execution and Statutory Non-Removal Protection

Foreigners should understand this distinction clearly.

Traditional Suspension of Execution: An interim administrative-court remedy generally requiring the court to temporarily stop implementation of an administrative act under the applicable administrative litigation rules.

Statutory Non-Removal Protection in Deportation Litigation: A special immigration-law mechanism under which physical removal is prevented during the applicable challenge period and judicial proceedings when statutory requirements are satisfied.

Confusing these mechanisms can lead to unnecessary procedural mistakes.

2026 Deportation Emergency Checklist

A foreigner facing immediate deportation should determine: What Is the Exact Deportation Decision? → When Was It Notified? → Is the Seven-Day Period Still Running? → Has the Administrative Court Case Been Filed? → Has the Authority That Issued the Deportation Decision Been Informed? → Does the Statutory Non-Removal Protection Apply? → Is There Any Special Exception? → Is the Foreigner Under Administrative Detention? → Has Detention Been Challenged Separately? → Is There an Entry Ban? → Is There a Restriction Code? → Was the Residence Permit Cancelled? → Does Article 55 Apply? → Is There a Risk of Death or Torture? → Is There Serious Medical Evidence? → Are There Turkish Spouse or Children? → Is There an Acquittal or Non-Prosecution Decision? → Is Constitutional Interim Protection Necessary Because of Imminent Irreversible Harm?

2026 Emergency Action Plan

The practical sequence should generally be: Obtain Full Deportation Decision → Record Notification Date → Identify Statutory Deportation Ground → Calculate Seven-Day Judicial Challenge Period → Obtain Immigration File → File Administrative Court Challenge in Time → Notify the Authority That Issued the Deportation Decision → Preserve Proof of Notification → Confirm Statutory Protection Against Removal → Determine Whether Administrative Detention Exists → Challenge Detention Separately Where Appropriate → Investigate Alternatives to Detention → Collect Article 55 Evidence → Collect Country-Risk Evidence → Obtain Medical Reports → Collect Family-Life Evidence → Obtain Criminal Case Documents → Submit Acquittal or Non-Prosecution Decision → Identify Entry Ban and Restriction Codes → Investigate Residence Permit Cancellation → Update the Administrative Court With New Evidence → Evaluate Constitutional Court Remedies and Urgent Interim Protection Where Removal Creates an Imminent Risk of Irreversible Fundamental-Rights Harm.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a foreigner request suspension of execution against deportation in Turkey?

Yes, interim protection can be relevant, but deportation litigation is governed by a special statutory regime. A timely judicial challenge can itself provide protection against physical removal during the applicable period and proceedings, subject to the statutory framework.

2. Do I always need a separate suspension-of-execution decision to stop deportation?

Not necessarily. The special provisions governing deportation provide statutory protection against removal where their requirements are satisfied. A separate interim remedy may still become relevant to other administrative measures or exceptional circumstances.

3. How long do I have to challenge a deportation decision in Turkey in 2026?

Current official Turkish Migration Management guidance states that the challenge must be brought before the administrative court within seven days from notification.

4. Does filing the lawsuit automatically release me from the removal center?

No. Deportation and administrative detention are separate issues. Administrative detention may need to be challenged separately before the competent criminal judgeship of peace.

5. Can I still be deported if I claim that I will be tortured in my country?

A credible risk of death, torture, inhuman or degrading treatment raises serious Article 55 and non-refoulement issues. The risk should be supported with individualized evidence and raised immediately.

6. Can Turkish children stop deportation?

Not automatically. However, genuine family life, Turkish citizen children, custody, daily care and the best interests of the child can be highly important in assessing the legality and proportionality of deportation.

7. What happens if I have been acquitted of the criminal allegation used against me?

The acquittal can materially strengthen the challenge where deportation relies on the same allegations. It should be submitted to the administrative court promptly.

8. Does the deportation lawsuit also suspend an entry ban?

Not automatically. Deportation, entry bans, restriction codes and residence permit cancellation can constitute separate administrative measures requiring separate analysis.

9. Can the Constitutional Court stop an imminent deportation?

In appropriate cases involving an imminent risk of irreversible fundamental-rights harm, an interim-measure request before the Constitutional Court can become relevant, subject to applicable procedural requirements.

10. What should I do first if deportation is imminent?

Obtain the complete deportation decision and determine the exact notification date immediately. The seven-day judicial challenge period is critical. The deportation ground, detention status, Article 55 risks and any family or medical circumstances should then be documented without delay.

Legal Support for Suspension of Deportation in Turkey

The central question in a deportation case should not simply be:

“Can we request suspension of execution?”

A complete legal strategy should ask:

Does the special statutory non-removal protection apply? Was the lawsuit filed within seven days? Was the authority properly informed? Is the foreigner administratively detained? Does Article 55 prohibit removal? Is there a real risk of torture or prohibited treatment? Does the foreigner have Turkish children or a Turkish spouse? Is the public-order allegation supported by evidence? Is there an acquittal? Are there separate entry-ban, restriction-code or residence-permit decisions? Is urgent constitutional protection necessary?

Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign nationals facing deportation decisions and urgent removal proceedings throughout Turkey. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with deportation cancellation lawsuits, urgent protection against removal, Article 55 and non-refoulement claims, Constitutional Court applications, family-life claims, public-order and public-security disputes, administrative detention objections, removal-center proceedings, restriction codes and entry-ban disputes.

Because the current judicial challenge period against a deportation decision is extremely short, foreigners should not wait for an actual flight or physical removal attempt before seeking legal protection. The deportation decision, notification date and available evidence should be examined immediately.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey