

Can a Turkish importer claim preferential customs treatment when the original A.TR certificate is lost? Learn about duplicate documents, electronic verification, security, repayment and appeal options in 2026.
A lost A.TR Movement Certificate does not always mean that an importer permanently loses preferential customs treatment. Depending on the stage of the customs procedure, the importer may obtain a duplicate, request verification from the issuing authority, submit an electronic record or provide the document later under the applicable customs procedure.
However, an A.TR certificate must be handled carefully. It generally proves that goods are in free circulation within the relevant Customs Union framework. It is not, by itself, a certificate of origin. The Turkish Ministry of Trade explains this distinction in its official origin guidance.
An A.TR Movement Certificate generally demonstrates the free-circulation status of goods moving between Turkey and the European Union under the Customs Union system.
It does not automatically prove:
Where origin must be proven, Customs may require EUR.1, EUR-MED, an invoice declaration or another document prescribed by the relevant legal arrangement.
The legal and practical result depends on when the document was lost.
If the A.TR certificate was lost before the Turkish import declaration was submitted, the exporter or authorised representative should immediately contact the issuing customs authority or chamber.
A duplicate or replacement may be possible if the issuing institution can verify:
The replacement document should not be recreated informally by the exporter. It should be issued through the competent authority and clearly identified as a duplicate or replacement where the applicable procedure requires this.
If the goods have arrived in Turkey but the original A.TR is unavailable, the importer should notify the customs broker and customs office immediately.
Depending on the procedure, Customs may:
The importer should obtain written confirmation of the procedure rather than relying on an informal statement. A delay of even a few days may create storage, demurrage and production losses.
If the A.TR was accepted and later lost, the importer should preserve a scanned copy, customs declaration reference and electronic verification data. A post-clearance audit may still require proof that the document was validly issued.
If Customs later questions the certificate, the issuing authority may be asked to confirm its authenticity and content. A verified electronic record can be particularly useful where the paper original is no longer available.
Possibly, but not automatically.
The importer may be able to claim preferential treatment if Customs can verify the certificate through an official system or obtain confirmation from the issuing authority. In other cases, the importer may have to pay the normal customs duty first and later seek repayment after submitting valid replacement evidence.
Some customs procedures may allow the document to be submitted after the declaration, sometimes against security. The exact conditions depend on the applicable legislation, the type of goods, the customs declaration and the reason why the certificate is unavailable.
The importer should request a written decision explaining:
Confusing A.TR and EUR.1 is one of the most common mistakes in customs practice.
A.TR generally concerns free circulation. EUR.1 generally proves preferential origin under a relevant preferential trade arrangement. A certificate of origin normally concerns non-preferential origin.
Therefore:
For products outside the Customs Union scope or subject to origin-based arrangements, an A.TR may not be sufficient even if it is authentic.
The importer and exporter should create a replacement evidence file containing:
If the goods travelled through a third country, the importer should also preserve transit declarations, customs seal information and evidence that the goods remained under customs control.
Yes, if Customs later concludes that the A.TR was invalid, unauthorised, unverifiable or unrelated to the goods.
A retrospective assessment may include:
Under the general framework of Customs Law No. 4458, under-assessed customs duties may generally be notified within three years from the date the customs debt arose, subject to statutory exceptions. The relevant dates must be calculated separately for each declaration.
If the only problem is that the original paper was lost but the issuing authority confirms its validity, the importer may have strong grounds to oppose the assessment.
A replacement may be rejected where:
The importer should request the complete written reasoning. A general statement such as “certificate unavailable” may not be sufficient if the authority has not considered electronic verification or confirmation from the issuing institution.
Under Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458, an objection is generally filed within 15 days from lawful notification of the customs decision.
The objection should include:
If the objection is rejected, the importer may bring proceedings before the competent tax court within the applicable procedural period. Filing a lawsuit does not automatically suspend collection. A separate suspension-of-execution request may be necessary if immediate payment would cause serious and difficult-to-repair commercial harm.
Where eligible, settlement may be considered. The importer should compare settlement with litigation and with the possibility of obtaining a verified replacement document.
In 2026, Turkey expanded digital A.TR processes for certain simplified e-commerce exports to the European Union. The Ministry of Trade announced an automated electronic A.TR system for eligible low-value shipments handled through authorised express carriers and postal operators.
This development shows the increasing importance of electronic verification, reference numbers and data consistency. It does not eliminate the need to keep supporting records. Exporters and importers should retain electronic confirmations and ensure that the certificate data matches the customs declaration.
For a Turkish import, the appropriate verification channel depends on the transaction and the issuing authority. A company should not assume that a screenshot or ordinary scanned copy will have the same evidentiary value as an official electronic confirmation.
When an A.TR certificate is lost, the importer should:
1. Can an importer obtain preferential treatment if the original A.TR is lost?
Possibly. A duplicate, official verification or electronic confirmation may allow preferential treatment, depending on the customs procedure.
2. Can a scanned copy replace the original A.TR?
Not automatically. Customs may accept a copy only if the applicable procedure permits it or the issuing authority verifies the document.
3. Can the exporter request a duplicate A.TR?
In many cases, the exporter or authorised representative can request a duplicate from the issuing institution, subject to verification requirements.
4. Can the importer pay normal duty and claim repayment later?
Possibly. If the replacement or verification is accepted after clearance, the importer may request repayment under the applicable procedure.
5. Is A.TR proof of the product’s origin?
Generally no. A.TR usually proves free circulation, while EUR.1 or another origin document may be required to prove preferential origin.
6. Can Turkish Customs reject an A.TR after release of the goods?
Yes. Post-clearance verification may result in additional duties, interest and penalties.
7. What is the objection deadline against a retrospective assessment?
An objection is generally filed within 15 days from notification under Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458.
8. Can electronic A.TR data help when the paper document is lost?
Yes. Official electronic verification can be valuable evidence, provided the data is authentic and corresponds to the relevant shipment.
9. Who is responsible for a lost certificate?
The importer may face the customs debt, while responsibility between the importer, exporter, broker and carrier depends on the contract and circumstances.
10. Can a lost A.TR issue create criminal liability?
Loss alone does not create criminal liability. Criminal risk generally requires evidence of intentional falsification, fraudulent use or deliberate customs-duty evasion.
This article is intended for general informational purposes only. To avoid any loss of rights, we recommend consulting your lawyer regarding your specific circumstances.
FFK PARTNER HUKUK VE DANIŞMANLIK, operating internationally as Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office, assists foreign exporters, Turkish importers, customs brokers and international companies with lost A.TR certificates, duplicate-document procedures, customs verification, retrospective duty assessments and customs litigation.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can review the customs file, contact the issuing authority, prepare objections, request suspension of collection and evaluate repayment or settlement options.
For urgent legal support:
Mobile / WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Office: +90 312 434 22 22
Email: ffk@ffkpartnerhukuk.com.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower, Balgat, Çankaya / Ankara, Turkey