

Can a foreign employee legally work for two companies at the same time in Turkey? Learn the 2026 rules on second employers, separate work permits, part-time work, group companies, freelance work and work permit compliance.
Foreigners in Turkey should not assume that one employer-sponsored work permit allows them to work for a second employer. Under the current work permit framework, an ordinary fixed-term dependent work permit is issued for employment in a specific job and workplace under a particular employer. The Ministry of Labour and Social Security expressly states that a foreigner who holds a work permit for one employer cannot use that same permit to work at another employer’s workplace.
Therefore, if a foreign employee wants to undertake a genuine second employment relationship, the second job requires its own work authorization analysis. A work permit issued for Employer A does not automatically authorize employment with Employer B.
Yes, for an ordinary dependent fixed-term work permit.
The Ministry describes this permit as authorization to work in a specific job at a specific workplace belonging to a particular employer. The first permit may generally be issued for up to one year, subject to the duration of the employment or service contract.
This employer-specific structure is fundamental to understanding second jobs.
For example:
Employer A – Software Specialist
does not automatically authorize:
Employer B – Part-Time IT Consultant.
The second employment relationship cannot simply rely on the permit issued for Employer A.
No.
The Ministry’s current guidance is explicit: a foreigner who has a work permit with a particular employer cannot work at another employer’s workplace using the same permit. To work for a different employer, a new work permit must be obtained.
This applies even where the second job:
The fact that the employee already holds one valid work permit does not create a general right to work for other businesses.
A second employment arrangement must be independently authorized rather than being covered automatically by the first permit.
The second employer would need to satisfy the applicable work permit requirements, and the proposed employment would need to be legally compatible with the foreigner’s existing status and working arrangements.
The Ministry’s current guidance treats an application to work for a different employer according to the procedures and principles applicable to a first application.
Accordingly, a company considering hiring a foreigner who already works elsewhere should not simply ask whether the foreigner “has a work permit.” It should determine which employer that permit authorizes.
No.
The second employer’s application must satisfy the applicable evaluation rules.
Depending on the employee, employer, profession and sector, these may include:
Holding an existing work permit does not automatically exempt another employer from these requirements.
Under the current general evaluation criteria, work permit applications can be subject to employment and financial eligibility requirements.
There are also significant exemptions.
Effective from August 3, 2026, domestic applications for foreigners who have legally stayed in Turkey for at least one year during the preceding three years under a work permit, residence permit or international protection status can benefit from an exemption from the employment and financial eligibility criteria, subject to the conditions and numerical limits established by the Ministry.
This exemption may make some applications easier, but it does not transform an existing permit into authorization to work for a second employer.
It may, depending on the applicable criteria and exemptions.
Under the general work permit evaluation framework, employment criteria are ordinarily assessed for the workplace making the application.
However, current 2026 rules contain important exceptions, including the August 3, 2026 lawful-stay exemption and sector-specific provisions.
The second employer must therefore determine whether it independently satisfies the criteria applicable to that application.
It cannot rely on Turkish employees working for the foreigner’s first employer.
Potentially, yes.
The employer making the additional application is evaluated according to the applicable work permit criteria.
The current general financial thresholds include requirements based on paid-in capital, net sales or exports, subject to exemptions and special sector rules.
Therefore, Employer B cannot generally rely on Employer A’s financial figures merely because both companies want to employ the same foreign national.
Part-time status does not by itself eliminate the work permit requirement.
A foreigner cannot lawfully treat a second part-time job as exempt merely because it involves limited working hours.
The key question is whether the activity constitutes work requiring authorization under the International Labour Force framework.
Foreigners covered by the legislation must obtain a work permit or applicable work permit exemption before beginning work in Turkey.
The same principle applies.
For example, a foreign employee working Monday to Friday for a technology company cannot automatically work for another company every Saturday using the first employer’s permit.
The second employment relationship must be independently lawful.
The number of days worked does not change the identity of the employer.
The existence of a corporate group does not automatically make the companies one employer.
Suppose a multinational group owns:
If each company is a separate legal entity, a work permit issued under Company A should not automatically be treated as authorization to perform employment for Company B.
The Ministry’s rule focuses on the legal employer and workplace, not merely the ultimate shareholder.
That does not automatically change the result.
Companies can have identical shareholders while remaining separate legal employers.
The following factors should be examined:
If the second company is a separate employer, the existing permit should not simply be used for both companies.
This is different.
The Ministry expressly recognizes that a foreigner holding a work permit under one employer may work in another position at that employer’s workplace or at other branches belonging to the same employer in the same line of business, provided the necessary conditions are satisfied.
Therefore:
Company A headquarters + Company A qualifying branch
is different from:
Company A + separately incorporated Company B.
Employers should identify the legal entity rather than relying on the commercial brand name.
Potentially, but the distinction between two positions with one employer and employment by two separate employers is crucial.
The Ministry permits, subject to necessary conditions, a foreigner to work in a different position within the same employer.
For example, an employee may have responsibilities involving both:
That does not necessarily mean there are two employers.
The legal problem becomes different when another company separately employs and pays the foreigner.
This requires careful structuring.
Multinational groups sometimes want one foreign executive to act simultaneously as:
Corporate appointment and employment authorization are not necessarily the same thing.
A person may hold a corporate title or governance role while the actual activities performed for each company still need to be examined under the work permit rules.
Companies should therefore avoid assuming that one executive work permit automatically covers operational employment throughout an entire corporate group.
The answer depends on the actual role.
Being registered as a shareholder, board member, director or authorized representative does not automatically answer whether the foreigner is performing work requiring authorization.
The actual activities performed in Turkey should be examined.
Where the person actively works for multiple companies, separate work authorization questions can arise.
Not automatically.
A dependent work permit authorizes the employment relationship for which it was issued. It should not be interpreted as a general freelance license.
For example, a foreign marketing specialist employed by one company should not assume that the same permit automatically allows paid freelance marketing work for five unrelated businesses.
The legal structure of the additional activity must be examined separately.
Payment is an important indicator but is not the only consideration.
Authorities may examine the substance of the activity, including:
Calling compensation a “consultancy fee” does not necessarily prevent an activity from being treated as work.
Changing the payment method does not automatically eliminate work permit requirements.
If the foreigner is genuinely conducting independent professional or commercial activity, a different work authorization structure may be relevant.
However, issuing invoices instead of receiving payroll should not be used merely to disguise a second employment relationship.
The authorities can examine the actual nature of the work.
No.
Working online does not change the identity of the employer.
For example, a foreigner physically located in Turkey who works remotely for another Turkish company cannot automatically rely on the work permit issued by the first Turkish employer.
The Ministry’s rule is based on authorization for a specific employer and workplace.
Remote work should not be treated as an exception by default.
This requires a more fact-specific analysis.
Relevant factors can include:
The answer should therefore not be based solely on the location of the company’s headquarters.
Potentially, but only where the foreigner’s activity genuinely falls within one of the statutory exemption categories.
A work permit exemption is itself an official authorization allowing qualifying foreigners to work without obtaining an ordinary work permit during the exemption period.
It is not a general exception available simply because the foreigner already has another job.
The second activity must independently satisfy the conditions of the relevant exemption category.
Student status does not itself create unrestricted employment rights.
Foreign students who are permitted to work must still comply with the work permit framework and applicable limitations.
A student should therefore not assume that one authorized employment relationship allows a second informal job.
Each proposed employment relationship requires legal review.
This is materially different.
The Ministry describes a permanent work permit as a permit issued without affiliation to a particular employer, giving the foreigner an indefinite right to work and reside in Turkey. Foreigners with long-term residence status or at least eight years of legal work permit history may apply, although meeting these conditions does not create an absolute right to approval.
Accordingly, the employer-specific restrictions applicable to an ordinary fixed-term dependent permit should not simply be applied in the same way to a permanent work permit holder.
Even then, professional restrictions and other employment laws may still apply.
Turquoise Card holders are subject to a different work authorization framework from ordinary employer-dependent fixed-term permit holders.
Therefore, whether a foreigner can undertake multiple activities should always begin by identifying the type of work authorization they actually hold.
The rules applicable to a standard first-year employer-sponsored permit should not automatically be applied to every foreign national working in Turkey.
A proposed second-employer arrangement should be assessed through the appropriate work permit application process rather than assuming the first permit covers both jobs.
The Ministry’s current application framework expressly provides that applications to work for a different employer are evaluated according to first-application procedures and principles.
The second employer should therefore evaluate eligibility before the foreigner begins the additional job.
The safer rule is no unless there is another valid legal basis authorizing that employment.
A work permit application is not the same as an approved work permit.
Foreigners covered by the International Labour Force Law are required to obtain the necessary work permit or exemption before starting work.
The employee should therefore not begin working for Employer B merely because Employer B has submitted an application.
No.
A residence permit by itself should not be confused with work authorization.
A foreigner’s lawful right to reside in Turkey does not automatically authorize employment with an additional employer.
The second employment must have the necessary work authorization.
Employer A’s consent may be relevant under the employment contract, but it cannot replace government work authorization.
For example, Employer A may state:
“We have no objection to the employee working on weekends for another company.”
That may resolve a contractual exclusivity issue between the employee and Employer A.
It does not automatically authorize employment under immigration and labour rules.
Both contractual permission and work permit compliance may be necessary.
Then a separate employment-law issue arises.
Even if the foreigner can obtain the necessary work authorization for additional employment, the first employment contract may contain:
The employee should therefore examine both work permit law and the existing employment contract.
Yes.
The issue may go beyond immigration compliance.
A foreign employee working simultaneously for competing companies could face disputes involving:
A valid work authorization does not automatically eliminate these private-law obligations.
The salary criterion is assessed in relation to the relevant work permit application.
Current Ministry criteria set different minimum remuneration levels according to occupational category:
Where a second employer applies for authorization, the salary structure should therefore be reviewed under the criteria applicable to that position.
Employers should not assume that salaries paid by unrelated employers can simply be combined to satisfy the remuneration criterion for one work permit application.
The work permit assessment concerns the employment relationship for which authorization is sought.
For example, Employer B should not assume that a low salary becomes compliant merely because Employer A separately pays the foreign employee a substantial salary.
This can create consequences for both the foreigner and the second employer.
The Ministry states that foreigners within the scope of the International Labour Force Law must obtain a valid work permit or exemption before working in Turkey and that unauthorized work can result in administrative and other legal consequences.
The existence of a valid permit for Employer A does not necessarily protect unauthorized employment performed for Employer B.
Potentially.
If the foreigner is found working outside the scope of their authorization, the authorities may examine the person’s overall work permit compliance.
The consequences depend on the facts, the type of permit and the nature of the unauthorized activity.
Foreign employees should therefore resolve the second-employment issue before starting the additional work.
Before hiring a foreigner who already has another job in Turkey, the second employer should check:
The phrase “the candidate already has a work permit” is not enough.
No.
There is an important distinction.
If the foreigner leaves Employer A and starts working exclusively for Employer B, this is an employer change.
The Ministry states that a different-employer application is evaluated according to first-application procedures and principles.
If the foreigner intends to continue working for Employer A while simultaneously taking a second job, the legal structure of both employment relationships must be considered.
The employee should not assume that the work permit issued for Employer A automatically transfers to Employer B.
A dependent permit is connected to the employer for whom it was issued.
Employer B needs the appropriate authorization for the foreigner to work for it.
Potentially.
Multiple employment relationships can also create issues concerning:
Work permit compliance is therefore only one part of the analysis.
The employers should ensure that the overall employment structure complies with Turkish labour and social security law.
For most foreigners holding an ordinary employer-dependent fixed-term work permit, the safest rule is:
One permit should not be treated as authorization for two separate employers.
The Ministry expressly states that a foreigner with a work permit issued under one employer cannot work at another employer’s workplace using the same permit.
Accordingly:
Same employer + different qualifying position:
Potentially possible if the necessary conditions are satisfied.
Same employer + another qualifying branch in the same line of business:
Potentially possible under the existing employer structure.
Different legal employer:
The existing permit does not cover the second employer; separate work authorization is required.
Second part-time or weekend job:
Not automatically exempt.
Remote work for another employer:
Not automatically exempt.
Permanent work permit holder:
Different rules apply because the permit is not tied to a particular employer.
The legal question is therefore not simply “Does the foreigner have a work permit?”
The correct question is:
“Does the foreigner have the appropriate work authorization for this particular employment relationship?”
No. A foreigner holding an employer-dependent work permit cannot use that same permit to work for another employer.
A different-employer employment relationship requires its own work authorization analysis and application. The Ministry evaluates applications involving a different employer under first-application procedures and principles.
Part-time status does not automatically remove the work permit requirement. The second employment must still be lawfully authorized.
Not automatically under one permit. If the companies are separate legal employers, the existing permit should not be treated as authorization for both.
Potentially. The Ministry allows work at other branches of the same employer in the same line of business where the necessary conditions are satisfied.
Not automatically. An employer-dependent work permit is not a general authorization to provide paid freelance services to unrelated clients.
The foreigner should not begin the second employment merely because an application has been submitted. The necessary work authorization should first become legally effective.
No. The first employer’s consent may solve an employment-contract issue, but it does not replace the required government work authorization.
Not in the same way. The Ministry describes a permanent work permit as being issued without affiliation to a specific employer.
The foreigner and prospective second employer should review the existing permit, proposed position, salary, employer eligibility criteria, contractual restrictions and the work authorization required for the additional employment before any work begins.
Foreign professionals are increasingly offered simultaneous positions, consultancy work, part-time employment and roles within multiple companies belonging to the same international group. These arrangements can create significant work permit risks when an employer-dependent permit is mistakenly treated as a general authorization to work throughout Turkey.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign employees, executives, international companies and foreign-owned businesses with second-employer arrangements, multiple employment relationships, employer changes and work permit compliance in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance concerning additional employment, separate employer work permits, group-company employment, part-time work, remote work, managerial appointments, work permit applications and foreign employee compliance.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey