

Can foreigners claim earthquake insurance compensation in Turkey? Learn about compulsory earthquake insurance, private property insurance, earthquake damage claims, rejected or underpaid claims and compensation rights of foreign property owners in Turkey.
Yes. Foreign property owners in Turkey can generally claim insurance compensation for earthquake damage where the property and loss fall within a valid insurance policy.
Foreign nationality does not itself prevent an insured property owner from claiming earthquake compensation.
The most important questions are instead:
Turkey’s compulsory earthquake insurance system covers specified buildings and independent units and protects against direct material damage caused by earthquakes and certain earthquake-related events.
Yes.
The compulsory earthquake insurance framework is primarily connected to the insured property and ownership rather than Turkish nationality.
The official claim system expressly recognizes a Foreigner Identity Number as one of the identifiers that may be used by policyholders for online earthquake claim transactions.
Accordingly, a foreigner who legally owns insured property in Turkey can potentially receive compensation in accordance with the applicable policy and insurance rules.
Compulsory earthquake insurance covers direct material damage to the insured building caused by:
Coverage applies within the limits stated in the policy.
The building can be either partially or completely damaged.
Coverage includes qualifying damage to structural and complementary parts such as:
Therefore, compensation is not limited only to a building that completely collapses. Partial structural damage may also fall within coverage.
No.
One of the most important distinctions for foreign property owners is between the building and the contents of the property.
Compulsory earthquake insurance does not cover movable property such as:
These losses may instead need to be examined under an additional private home or property insurance policy.
No, compulsory earthquake insurance does not cover loss of rental income.
This can be particularly important for foreign investors who purchased Turkish property as a rental investment.
The compulsory scheme also excludes matters such as:
Additional private insurance should therefore be reviewed.
This may substantially increase the available protection.
A foreign property owner may have:
The 2026 compulsory earthquake insurance tariff expressly contemplates additional voluntary earthquake insurance where the rebuilding value exceeds the compulsory insurance amount.
Therefore, foreign owners should not stop their investigation after checking only the compulsory policy.
Assume a foreign investor owns an apartment in Turkey.
After an earthquake:
Structural damage: TRY 1,500,000
Furniture damage: TRY 300,000
Temporary accommodation: TRY 100,000
Lost rental income: TRY 200,000
These losses should not automatically be submitted as one undifferentiated claim.
Structural building damage may fall within compulsory earthquake coverage subject to the policy limits and conditions.
Furniture, accommodation and lost rent are outside the compulsory coverage and should be examined under any additional private policy.
The statutory system includes qualifying:
The exact status of the property should nevertheless be verified.
Not necessarily under compulsory earthquake insurance.
Buildings used entirely for commercial or industrial purposes are among those identified outside the compulsory scheme.
Foreign companies owning:
should therefore carefully examine their private commercial property and earthquake insurance.
The first priority should be personal safety and compliance with official safety instructions.
Once it is safe to address the insurance claim, the property owner should:
The objective is to create a complete evidentiary record of the damage.
Official compulsory earthquake claim guidance identifies information such as:
The insurer should also be informed about additional insurance policies containing earthquake coverage for the same building.
Potentially, yes.
A foreign owner does not necessarily lose insurance rights merely because they were outside Turkey when the earthquake occurred.
The important issues are ownership, policy coverage, timely notification, documentation and compliance with the claim procedure.
Where the owner cannot personally manage the process in Turkey, representation may be considered.
No general rule makes physical presence at the property a condition for building insurance compensation.
A foreign investor may own an apartment in Turkey while residing abroad.
The claim concerns insured damage to the property.
The ownership and insurance position should be distinguished from the tenant’s personal property.
Official compulsory earthquake insurance guidance states that a tenant cannot take out the policy in their own name as the beneficiary. A tenant may arrange the insurance as policyholder on behalf of the owner, but compensation is paid to the person identified as the entitled owner in the title records.
The tenant’s furniture and personal belongings require separate insurance analysis.
An assessment generally determines the nature and extent of earthquake-related building damage.
Foreign owners should preserve independent evidence where they disagree with the assessment.
Useful evidence can include:
This can become particularly important where the dispute concerns whether damage was caused by the earthquake or was pre-existing.
This is a common factual issue.
Compulsory earthquake insurance excludes damage that develops over time because of the building’s own defects rather than as a result of the earthquake.
Therefore, causation becomes critical.
The foreign owner may need evidence showing:
Condition before earthquake → earthquake event → new damage immediately afterward
Historical photographs, previous inspections and engineering evidence can become important.
Pre-existing defects do not necessarily mean that every later loss is automatically outside coverage.
The important issue is which damage was caused by the insured earthquake event.
An expert may need to distinguish:
This can create a serious coverage problem.
The Catastrophe Insurances Law provides that where damage is determined to have resulted from alterations contrary to the approved project that negatively affected the load-bearing system, the owner or usufruct holder may lose the right to insurance compensation.
This issue should therefore be investigated carefully before accepting a rejection.
That does not automatically prevent an insured owner from claiming.
Official guidance states that the absence of compulsory earthquake insurance for other residences in the same building does not prevent an insured residence’s damage from being evaluated under its own policy limits.
Under the Catastrophe Insurances Law, compensation for an insured building damaged by an earthquake is to be paid no later than thirty days after the necessary information, documents and damage assessment have been completed.
This does not necessarily mean thirty days from the earthquake itself.
The completion of the required documentation and damage assessment is important.
First determine why.
Possible issues include:
Keep a written chronology of every communication and document submitted.
A foreign property owner does not necessarily have to accept an assessment merely because an amount has been calculated.
Review:
Where the disagreement is technically significant, independent engineering or insurance expertise may be useful.
Request the precise reason for rejection.
Possible grounds might concern:
Each reason requires a different legal response.
A generic rejection should not simply be accepted without examining the policy and factual basis.
Foreign owners frequently have overlapping insurance arrangements.
Prepare a loss table:
| Loss | Compulsory Earthquake Insurance | Additional Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Structural earthquake damage | Potentially covered | May provide excess/additional coverage |
| Furniture | Not covered | Potentially covered |
| Lost rent | Not covered | Depends on policy |
| Temporary accommodation | Not covered | Depends on policy |
| Business interruption | Not covered | Depends on policy |
| Bodily injury | Not covered | Requires separate legal/insurance analysis |
This prevents potentially recoverable losses from being overlooked.
Commercial investors require particular care.
An office located within a qualifying residential building may fall within the compulsory system, while a building used entirely for commercial or industrial purposes may not.
Private commercial property insurance therefore becomes particularly important for:
Compulsory earthquake insurance does not compensate business interruption or loss of profit.
However, a commercial policy may contain business interruption protection.
Review:
For foreign-owned businesses, the business interruption claim can sometimes exceed the physical property claim.
Review both:
The existence of financing may affect payment arrangements or rights concerning insurance proceeds.
Do not assume that all compensation will necessarily be paid directly and unconditionally to the foreign owner.
This issue has become particularly important in 2026.
Official guidance states that for sales registered on or after September 5, 2026, the seller’s compulsory earthquake policy ends on the day the title transfer is registered. The buyer must therefore have a valid policy issued in the buyer’s own name before the title transaction.
Foreign buyers who recently acquired property should immediately verify whose name appears on the applicable policy.
Yes.
Official compulsory earthquake insurance guidance expressly confirms coverage for both completely and partially damaged insured buildings within applicable policy limits.
Total collapse is not required.
Not under compulsory earthquake insurance.
Bodily injury and death are expressly outside its coverage.
Other insurance policies and potential legal claims should be examined separately.
No. Non-pecuniary or moral damages are excluded from compulsory earthquake insurance coverage.
This does not determine whether some separate legal claim against another responsible person may exist.
This can create a much broader dispute.
Potentially relevant parties may include:
The insurance claim and potential liability claims should be investigated separately.
Do not allow an insurance settlement to obscure evidence of serious construction defects.
Unless urgent safety work is required, document the condition thoroughly before substantial repairs.
Preserve:
Safety must always take priority, but evidence should be preserved wherever reasonably possible.
The owner should identify exactly what is disputed.
For example:
A technical objection is stronger when supported by engineering evidence.
Potentially, yes.
The available route depends on the insurance arrangement, disputed amount, insurer and nature of the claim.
Possible mechanisms can include:
The policy and claim file should be reviewed before choosing the route.
Foreign owners may receive:
Before signing, determine whether the document closes only one part of the claim or releases broader rights.
This is particularly important where both compulsory and private insurance policies exist.
After earthquake damage, a foreign property owner should:
Yes. Foreign nationality does not itself prevent an insured property owner from claiming compensation. The official claim system specifically accommodates a Foreigner Identity Number for policyholders.
Yes. Qualifying direct building damage can be covered whether the insured building is completely or partially damaged.
No. Movable property and household contents are outside compulsory earthquake insurance coverage.
No. Loss of rental income is excluded from compulsory earthquake insurance. Additional private insurance should be checked.
Potentially, yes. Physical presence in Turkey during the earthquake is not itself the basis of coverage; ownership, policy status, insured damage and compliance with the claim process are the central issues.
The damage calculation, policy limit, property information and technical assessment should be reviewed. Independent technical evidence may be appropriate.
Evidence should distinguish pre-existing defects from damage caused or aggravated by the earthquake. Causation may require technical assessment.
The governing law provides for payment within thirty days after the required information and documents and the damage assessment have been completed.
Potentially under applicable private commercial insurance. Entirely commercial or industrial buildings are generally outside the compulsory earthquake insurance scheme, making the private policy particularly important.
After ensuring safety, immediately preserve evidence of the damage, identify every applicable insurance policy and notify the relevant insurer or compulsory earthquake insurance system.
Earthquake insurance disputes involving foreign property owners can become complicated where there are disagreements concerning structural damage, policy limits, pre-existing defects, underinsurance, private insurance coverage or the amount of compensation.
Foreign investors should also remember that compulsory earthquake insurance does not cover every economic consequence of an earthquake. Contents, lost rent, alternative accommodation, business interruption and other indirect losses fall outside compulsory coverage and may require examination under separate private policies.
A strong claim strategy generally requires policy analysis, technical damage evidence, correct classification of each loss, review of the insurer’s assessment and preservation of all documentation from the beginning of the claim.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign property owners, foreign investors and international companies with earthquake insurance claims, rejected claims, underpaid compensation, property insurance disputes and commercial earthquake losses in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing insurance coverage, challenging disputed damage assessments, evaluating underpaid or rejected claims and pursuing appropriate insurance compensation remedies.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
This article is intended for general information and does not constitute legal advice. Insurance entitlement depends on the policy in force on the date of loss, ownership status, cause and extent of damage, policy limits, exclusions and the specific circumstances of each claim.