

Can foreign investors recover money paid to a fraudulent citizenship or property consultant in Turkey? Learn about refund claims, fraud complaints, bank transfers, asset protection and property investment remedies.
Yes. A foreign investor who has transferred money to a fraudulent citizenship, immigration or property consultant in Turkey may have several legal routes to recover the funds.
The appropriate strategy depends on who received the money, why it was paid, what was promised, whether property was actually purchased, where the funds were transferred and whether the transaction involved deception from the beginning.
Where deceptive conduct causes another person financial loss while producing an unlawful benefit, the facts may potentially fall within the fraud provisions of the Turkish Criminal Code. Certain circumstances—including use of banking systems, commercial activity or abuse of professional trust—can also be relevant to the legal characterization of the conduct.
However, filing a criminal complaint and recovering money are not exactly the same objective.
A foreign investor should normally develop a strategy focused on both:
identifying potential criminal conduct
and
locating, preserving and recovering the money.
Foreign investors may encounter schemes involving:
The legal strategy depends on what actually happened.
This is often the most important question.
Prepare a complete payment map:
Foreign investor
→ consultant
→ consultant’s company
→ property seller
→ related company
→ third-party account
The person who made the promises may not be the person who ultimately received the funds.
Immediately preserve:
Do not rely only on screenshots where official banking records can be obtained.
Where money was transferred internationally, preserve the complete transfer documentation.
The records can help establish:
This can become central evidence in both civil recovery proceedings and a criminal investigation.
Separate every transfer.
For example:
USD 400,000 — property purchase
USD 25,000 — consultancy fee
USD 10,000 — alleged government expenses
USD 15,000 — legal or administrative costs
Each payment may have a different legal basis and a different recipient.
A foreign investor may believe that money is being paid toward a property purchase but discover that funds were transferred to:
This does not automatically prove fraud, but it requires immediate investigation.
Ask:
Why was this person receiving the investor’s money?
Save:
Statements made before the payment can be particularly important when determining whether the investor was deliberately deceived.
Foreign-investor fraud cases frequently involve communications through messaging platforms.
Preserve the complete conversation rather than isolated screenshots.
The chronology may establish:
Promise
→ payment request
→ money transfer
→ delay
→ new excuse
→ additional payment request
→ consultant disappears.
Was the investor told:
“This property qualifies for citizenship.”
“Citizenship is guaranteed.”
“I have contacts who will approve the application.”
“The property is worth USD 500,000.”
“Send the purchase money to my personal account.”
“The title deed will be transferred next week.”
The precise representation matters.
This distinction is important.
A commercial transaction can fail without a crime having occurred.
Fraud generally requires deceptive conduct used to mislead the victim and obtain an unlawful benefit. The current fraud provisions expressly focus on deceptive conduct, loss and resulting benefit.
Therefore, distinguish:
Poor investment
from
breach of contract
from
deliberate deception.
Suppose a foreign investor pays the full purchase price but never receives title.
Immediately determine:
The answer determines whether the case primarily involves contractual recovery, fraud, property remedies or a combination.
If the transaction concerns a specific property, establish:
Time can be critical if the property is being transferred to another person.
This can be a major warning sign.
A consultant may market property without authority to sell it.
Obtain:
Determine whether the consultant had any legal authority to receive the purchase price.
Citizenship-related transactions can create valuation disputes.
For example:
Actual commercial price: substantially lower
Price represented to foreign investor: substantially higher
The investor should obtain an independent historical valuation examining the property’s value at the date of purchase.
Property values can legitimately vary.
A fraud allegation requires more than simply showing that another valuer would have selected a different number.
Investigate whether there was:
No private consultant can lawfully guarantee the ultimate exercise of governmental decision-making merely by taking a fee.
Preserve any written or recorded representation that citizenship approval was guaranteed.
The context of that promise can become highly relevant to determining whether the investor was deceived.
This requires particular caution.
The Turkish Criminal Code’s fraud provisions specifically address certain forms of deception involving claims of relationships or influence with public officials for the purpose of obtaining a benefit.
Preserve the exact language used by the consultant.
Do not paraphrase it later from memory if original messages exist.
Where the evidence supports fraudulent conduct, the investor may submit a criminal complaint to the competent authorities.
Under the Criminal Procedure Code, reports or complaints concerning offences may be submitted to a public prosecutor’s office or law-enforcement authorities.
The complaint should be supported with organized evidence rather than a general accusation.
For example:
January: Consultant approaches investor.
February: Property represented as qualifying investment.
March: Investor transfers purchase funds.
April: Consultant promises title transfer.
May: Additional money requested.
June: Investor discovers seller never received the purchase price.
This structure can make the allegation much easier to understand.
Modern fraud investigations frequently rely on:
Recent criminal investigations published by prosecution authorities demonstrate the practical importance of bank movements and digital evidence in tracing alleged fraud proceeds.
The criminal-procedure framework was amended in late 2025 to introduce mechanisms concerning temporary suspension and seizure of accounts in specified technology-assisted offences, including certain forms of aggravated fraud.
Whether these mechanisms apply depends on the alleged offence and facts.
They should not be assumed to apply automatically to every citizenship or property dispute.
This is crucial.
A foreign investor should not assume:
Criminal complaint filed = money automatically refunded.
Recovery may require additional civil, enforcement or protective measures depending on the case.
The criminal and financial-recovery strategies should therefore be coordinated.
Depending on the transaction, potential claims may involve:
The precise cause of action should be selected after reviewing the contracts and payment structure.
Potential defendants may include, depending on the evidence:
However, everyone connected to a transaction should not automatically be sued.
Liability must be established individually.
Create a table:
| Payment | Recipient | Stated Purpose | Actual Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Property funds | Consultant company | Purchase price | To be investigated |
| Consultancy fee | Consultant | Professional service | Service disputed |
| Valuation payment | Third party | Valuation | Verify |
| Additional fee | Personal account | Administrative expense | No supporting document |
This can reveal the structure of the scheme.
Trace subsequent transfers as far as legally possible.
The investor should identify:
First recipient
→ second account
→ company
→ property purchase
→ cash withdrawal
where evidence permits.
Do not assume that recovery is limited to the first bank account.
If there is evidence that the recipient is:
urgent protective measures may need to be considered.
The objective is to prevent a successful judgment from becoming practically worthless.
For qualifying monetary claims, Turkish enforcement law provides mechanisms allowing a creditor to seek precautionary attachment where the statutory conditions are satisfied.
The exact requirements depend on the claim and evidence.
The investor should therefore prepare documentation establishing:
Criminal proceedings can take time.
Meanwhile, assets may disappear.
Therefore, ask immediately:
What assets currently exist?
Who owns them?
Are transfers already occurring?
The answer may determine whether urgent civil protection should be pursued.
The existence of identifiable assets may materially affect recovery strategy.
The legal team can evaluate whether appropriate protective or enforcement remedies are available based on the claim and procedural conditions.
Identify:
Do not automatically assume that the company’s shareholders are personally liable for every company debt.
Personal liability requires a separate legal basis.
Closure or liquidation does not necessarily make the underlying transaction disappear.
Obtain corporate records and determine:
Fraudulent structures may move funds between connected businesses.
However, common ownership alone does not automatically make every related company liable.
Evidence should establish the role of each entity.
This can create a separate and serious dispute.
Determine whether the consultant or another representative used the investor’s authority to:
Obtain the complete power of attorney and every transaction performed under it.
Where a representative still possesses active authority and there is a genuine risk of misuse, the investor should urgently consider whether the authority should be revoked through the legally appropriate procedure.
Future unauthorized transactions may otherwise compound the loss.
Preserve the original disputed document.
Do not write on or alter it.
Obtain genuine signature samples and identify:
Forgery issues can create separate criminal and civil consequences.
The investor may discover:
Obtain the relevant property records and determine whether these matters existed when the consultant represented the property as suitable for investment.
Citizenship refusal does not automatically prove consultant fraud.
Determine why the application failed.
Potential causes can include:
Then compare that reason with what the consultant promised.
A consultancy contract may state that citizenship cannot be guaranteed.
That clause should be reviewed alongside what was actually represented before payment.
For example, written contractual disclaimers and contradictory messages may create an evidentiary dispute requiring examination of the complete transaction.
Recovery can become more difficult, but not necessarily impossible.
Evidence may include:
Collect all available evidence immediately.
Where funds were transferred through digital assets, preserve:
Digital transactions may remain traceable even when the consultant claims that the money has disappeared.
Fraud victims are sometimes approached again and told:
“Pay one more fee and we will release your investment.”
or
“Pay this government charge and your citizenship will be approved.”
Verify the legal basis and recipient before making any further payment.
Avoid messages that could complicate the dispute.
Instead, preserve evidence and use structured legal demands where appropriate.
A careless confrontation can also warn a dishonest recipient to move assets.
Depending on the circumstances, a formal demand may request:
However, timing matters.
Where there is an immediate asset-dissipation risk, protective measures may need consideration before alerting the recipient.
Different claims can be subject to different limitation rules.
The relevant period can depend on whether the claim is based on:
Do not assume that an old citizenship investment can be pursued indefinitely.
A foreign investor should:
Potentially, yes. Recovery options depend on the evidence, recipient of the money, contractual structure, fraudulent conduct and whether assets can be located.
It can be important evidence, particularly where the promise was knowingly false and was used to induce payment. The complete circumstances must be examined.
Yes, where the facts support suspected criminal conduct. Turkish criminal law defines fraud around deceptive conduct causing loss while producing an unlawful benefit.
No. A criminal investigation and financial recovery are related but distinct. Civil or enforcement remedies may also be necessary.
That can be important evidence. The reason for the payment, recipient’s authority and subsequent use of the funds should be investigated.
Potentially, where the statutory requirements for the relevant protective measure are satisfied. This can be especially important where there is evidence of asset dissipation.
The investor should immediately identify the registered owner, current property status, recipient of the purchase money and whether the property has been transferred to another buyer.
The document and transactions performed under it should be investigated immediately. Forgery can create separate criminal and civil consequences.
Citizenship refusal alone does not prove fraud. The reason for refusal should first be identified and compared with the representations made by the consultant.
Follow the money immediately. Identify who received each payment, where it was transferred afterward and what assets remain available for potential recovery.
Foreign-investor fraud cases should not be approached only as criminal complaints.
The practical objective is usually:
Identify the deception
→ preserve the evidence
→ trace the money
→ identify responsible persons
→ protect available assets
→ pursue recovery.
A foreign investor who has lost money to a fraudulent citizenship or property consultant should determine immediately:
Who received the money?
What was promised?
Was the property genuine?
Was the consultant authorized?
Was the investment value manipulated?
Was citizenship falsely guaranteed?
Where are the funds now?
Does the recipient still have assets in Turkey?
Turkish criminal law provides remedies where deceptive conduct satisfies the statutory elements of fraud, while criminal-procedure law also provides investigative mechanisms that may be relevant to tracing and preserving suspected proceeds in appropriate cases.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign investors, property buyers and citizenship applicants with fraudulent property transactions, fake consultants, misappropriated investment funds, forged documents and recovery of money transferred in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in tracing investment payments, reviewing property and citizenship documentation, preparing criminal complaints, evaluating civil recovery claims and seeking appropriate measures to protect recoverable assets.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
This article is intended for general information and does not constitute legal advice. Recovery options depend on the contracts, payment trail, alleged representations, property records, available assets, evidence of deception and procedural circumstances of each case.