

Perishable imported goods spoil because of a customs delay in Turkey. Learn how foreign importers can document deterioration, seek urgent release, prove causation, calculate losses and pursue compensation.
Perishable goods cannot wait indefinitely for a customs dispute to be resolved.
Fresh food, seafood, fruit, vegetables, flowers, temperature-sensitive products and other short-life commercial goods may lose most or all of their value while waiting for physical inspection, laboratory analysis, product-safety controls, origin verification or another customs procedure.
When this happens, the importer may suffer far more than ordinary storage costs.
Potential losses include:
Whether compensation can be obtained depends on why the goods were delayed, whether the deterioration was avoidable, which party controlled each stage, whether the importer acted promptly and whether causation and the amount of loss can be proved.
The recommended strategy is:
Document shelf life immediately → notify Customs of urgency → preserve temperature records → request expedited processing → obtain an independent survey → document deterioration → mitigate the loss → identify responsibility for every day of delay → preserve customs and commercial evidence → pursue the appropriate compensation remedy where legal requirements are satisfied.
A delay of ten days may be commercially manageable for steel components.
The same delay can destroy a shipment of:
Therefore, the perishability of the goods should be brought to the authorities’ attention immediately and supported with objective evidence.
One of the first questions is:
How much commercially usable life remained when the goods arrived in Turkey?
Record:
This is essential for causation.
Collect:
The importer must be able to show that the cargo was commercially sound before the disputed delay.
For refrigerated cargo, temperature evidence may be decisive.
Obtain data from:
A continuous temperature record can help establish whether spoilage resulted from time, temperature failure or both.
Identify the exact reason:
Compensation cannot be properly analyzed without identifying the underlying measure.
Do not assume the nature of the goods is sufficient.
Submit written information explaining:
Create a formal record of urgency.
Where commercially justified, request priority handling of:
Explain the irreversible consequences of delay.
Record:
Arrival
→ declaration
→ inspection
→ sampling
→ laboratory referral
→ result
→ release decision
→ actual release.
Every day can matter with perishable cargo.
Check whether Customs was waiting for:
Any company-caused period should be identified separately.
Review whether the broker submitted:
A broker’s failure may become relevant to liability.
Sampling can create serious risk for short-life products.
Record:
If the sample remained inactive, document that period carefully.
Where sampling occurs, preserve information concerning:
This can become important if the analysis itself is later disputed.
Some food or regulated products may require controls beyond ordinary customs examination.
Identify which public authority was responsible for each period of delay.
Do not automatically attribute every day to Customs.
If deterioration begins, obtain evidence immediately.
Do not wait until the entire shipment is destroyed.
Record:
For commercially significant shipments, an independent survey can be crucial.
The report should address:
Depending on the cargo, relevant expertise may include:
Technical evidence can be central to proving causation.
If goods must be destroyed, first preserve evidence where legally and practically possible.
Document:
Obtain official or third-party records where appropriate.
The shipment may not be completely worthless.
Separate:
commercially usable goods
from
spoiled goods.
Reasonable salvage efforts can reduce the loss.
If goods remain safe and legally marketable but have reduced shelf life, an urgent discounted sale may mitigate damages.
Preserve evidence of:
The difference may help demonstrate actual depreciation.
Mitigation does not justify violating food-safety or product-safety requirements.
Goods that are unsafe or legally prohibited from market placement should not be sold merely to reduce financial loss.
This depends on the specific customs status, goods and regulatory control.
There is no universal right to immediate release merely because cargo is perishable.
However, where lawful alternatives exist, they should be investigated urgently rather than allowing deterioration to continue.
Depending on the circumstances, assess whether lawful options exist involving:
The correct option depends on the status of the goods.
Sometimes goods deteriorate not because Customs took too long, but because the storage facility failed to maintain required conditions.
Review:
This can shift responsibility.
If a storage operator failed to maintain agreed conditions, potential responsibility may arise independently of the customs dispute.
Preserve:
If deterioration began during transportation, the carrier may be involved.
Obtain:
Do not assume the damage began after arrival.
Goods may have arrived with insufficient remaining shelf life.
Review:
This can materially affect causation.
Notify the insurer where relevant coverage may exist.
Provide:
Do not assume customs delay is covered; policy wording and exclusions must be reviewed.
Start with objective figures:
Quantity imported
minus
quantity salvaged
equals
quantity lost.
Then determine the legally relevant value of the lost goods based on appropriate evidence.
If part of the shipment is sold at a discount, include that amount in the damages calculation.
The objective is actual economic loss, not an inflated gross figure.
Spoiled cargo may generate:
Preserve invoices and payment evidence.
Prepare separate schedules for:
This makes the loss easier to prove.
If deterioration prevents delivery to a confirmed buyer, preserve:
This may support a separate commercial-loss claim.
Do not claim the entire cancelled sale price as profit.
Calculate:
Expected sale revenue
minus
costs that would have been incurred
minus
salvage or resale proceeds
to identify the actual financial loss.
The importer may buy replacement products at a higher price to preserve a customer contract.
Document:
The importer must establish why the goods spoiled.
Possible causes include:
Time delay
temperature failure
supplier defect
transport damage
storage failure
or a combination.
Technical evidence is essential.
Customs authorities may lawfully inspect imported goods.
Commercial loss caused by the existence of an ordinary lawful control does not automatically create compensation liability.
The particular conduct and legal basis must be examined.
A materially different situation may exist where:
Such circumstances should be documented carefully.
Written notification can become important.
If the importer never informed the authorities that goods would become worthless within days, proving the significance of the delay may become more difficult.
The importer should demonstrate active efforts to prevent deterioration.
Examples include:
Keep records of every effort.
Perishable goods can become commercially worthless while:
continue increasing.
At some point, the company should assess whether continued storage remains economically rational and legally necessary.
Where the loss can be legally attributed to unlawful or otherwise compensable administrative conduct, the importer may need to consider the applicable administrative compensation process.
The case should be supported by evidence of:
With perishable cargo, winning damages years later may be less useful than preventing the cargo from spoiling.
Where the legal requirements are satisfied, available urgent judicial remedies concerning the underlying administrative measure should be assessed promptly.
A typical case may involve:
The loss should not automatically be attributed entirely to one party.
Include:
The recommended response is:
Prove the goods arrived in good condition
→ document remaining shelf life
→ notify Customs of perishability
→ request urgent processing
→ preserve temperature data
→ monitor deterioration
→ obtain an independent survey
→ investigate release, movement, salvage or re-export options
→ mitigate the loss
→ identify responsibility for every day of delay
→ calculate actual damage
→ pursue compensation against the legally responsible party where appropriate.
Potentially. The importer must establish the applicable basis of responsibility, actual loss and causation between the relevant conduct and deterioration.
No. Responsibility depends on why the goods spoiled and which party caused or contributed to the loss.
Shelf-life information, temperature logs, customs chronology, photographs and independent survey evidence can be particularly important.
Yes. The importer should document the urgency and remaining shelf life as early as possible.
Not automatically. Salvage value, resale proceeds and other relevant financial factors must be considered when calculating actual loss.
Potentially. They should be documented separately and connected to the relevant period of delay.
Potential responsibility of the warehouse or storage operator should be investigated separately.
Supplier and transportation responsibility may become important. The condition and remaining shelf life at arrival should be established.
Where destruction is legally or commercially necessary, evidence of condition, quantity, value and disposal should first be preserved as far as practicable.
Waiting for the customs procedure to finish before documenting deterioration. With perishable cargo, evidence and commercial value can disappear at the same time.
Customs delays involving perishable cargo can create urgent disputes concerning:
Spoiled imported goods
Customs inspections
Laboratory delays
Product-safety controls
Cold-storage failures
Port and warehouse costs
Container demurrage
Buyer contract cancellations
Lost profit
and compensation claims.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign importers, food companies, international traders and other businesses facing deterioration or total loss of perishable goods during customs procedures in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in urgent customs applications, preservation of evidence, customs-delay analysis, identification of responsible parties, coordination of damage documentation and pursuit of appropriate compensation remedies for provable commercial losses.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey