

A foreign company accidentally pays Turkish customs duties twice. Learn how to identify duplicate payments, apply for repayment, correct customs records, prove payment and challenge a rejected customs refund request.
A foreign company importing goods into Turkey may occasionally discover that the same customs liability has effectively been paid twice.
Duplicate payment can arise because of:
The company should not simply leave the excess amount on the assumption that Customs will automatically identify and return it.
Under Article 211 of Customs Law No. 4458, customs duties determined to have been paid even though they were not legally due are subject to repayment. Ministry guidance also confirms that repayment and remission applications are handled through the electronic Repayment or Remission Request Management System.
The recommended strategy is:
Identify the duplicate payment → match both payments to the same customs liability → verify that no separate debt exists → collect bank and customs records → determine the correct repayment procedure → submit the application to the competent customs office → monitor the decision → challenge an unlawful rejection where necessary.
The simplest example is:
Customs liability: TRY 500,000
First payment: TRY 500,000
Second payment: TRY 500,000
If both payments concern the same legal customs debt and no separate liability exists, the second amount may constitute an overpayment requiring repayment analysis.
However, the company must prove that the second payment was genuinely unnecessary.
Do not submit a refund request based only on the accounting department’s conclusion.
Compare:
There may be two payments because there were actually two separate customs liabilities.
Record:
The refund application should clearly connect the overpayment with a specific customs transaction.
A customs payment may include several components.
Separate:
Do not describe the entire payment simply as “customs tax.”
Article 211 of Customs Law No. 4458 provides the principal framework for repayment of customs duties that were paid despite not being legally due.
Official Ministry guidance confirms that duties found to have been paid even though they should not legally have been paid are repaid under Article 211.
A genuine duplicate payment can therefore potentially fall within the repayment framework.
These concepts should not be confused.
Repayment generally concerns an amount already paid that must be returned.
Remission concerns an amount that was assessed but should not legally remain payable.
If the company has already paid twice, the issue will generally focus on repayment.
Identify the cause:
Understanding the cause helps determine what evidence is required.
The strongest evidence usually begins with proof that two separate payments were actually made.
Collect:
Do not rely only on internal accounting entries.
This is crucial.
The company should demonstrate:
Payment 1 → Declaration X → Liability Y
and
Payment 2 → Declaration X → Same Liability Y.
If the second payment relates to another declaration or assessment, it may not be a duplicate.
Check whether the second payment was:
This can determine the appropriate remedy.
If the broker arranged payment, obtain:
This can explain how the duplication occurred.
The company’s bank statement should show:
Match these records with Customs documentation.
For example:
| Item | First Payment | Second Payment |
|---|---|---|
| Declaration | Same declaration | Same declaration |
| Date | Date 1 | Date 2 |
| Amount | TRY 500,000 | TRY 500,000 |
| Liability | Customs duty | Customs duty |
| Status | Proper payment | Alleged overpayment |
A simple reconciliation table can make the application substantially clearer.
Sometimes the original declaration is corrected and the company’s accounting team mistakenly pays the entire revised amount rather than only the additional difference.
For example:
Original duty paid: TRY 600,000
Corrected total liability: TRY 700,000
Only TRY 100,000 additional payment may be required.
If TRY 700,000 is paid again, the company should investigate a potential TRY 600,000 overpayment.
A company may pay an additional assessment even though the same amount was previously collected through another customs procedure.
Compare all assessment and payment records before filing.
Some customs procedures involve security or guarantees.
Determine whether the company:
A security deposit should not automatically be treated as a duplicate tax payment.
Before claiming a refund, confirm that Customs has not already allocated the apparent overpayment to another legally collectible customs liability.
Obtain the relevant account information where necessary.
The Ministry operates an electronic Repayment or Remission Request Management System for applications under Articles 211–214 of the Customs Law. Ministry materials state that the application form and supporting documents are submitted electronically through this system.
The company should therefore identify the correct electronic and administrative procedure for its case.
The application should clearly identify:
Attach supporting evidence.
Avoid simply stating:
“We overpaid customs duty.”
Instead show:
Legally payable customs liability: X
Total actually paid: Y
Excess amount: Y – X
Refund requested: Z.
This is the legal core of the application.
The company should demonstrate that the second payment did not correspond to a separate customs debt.
If the duplicate payment resulted from incorrect declaration data, the customs record may need correction as part of the repayment process.
Official Ministry guidance recognizes that declaration correction may also be possible after delivery under the applicable statutory framework.
The procedural requirements should be checked for the specific declaration.
Never alter:
The refund request should rely on authentic records.
Repayment rights are subject to statutory procedural periods.
Therefore, identify:
Do not delay merely because the overpayment is obvious.
If one duplicate payment occurred because of a systematic accounting error, check whether the same problem affected other imports.
Review a reasonable historical period for:
A single discovery may reveal a much larger refund opportunity.
Where several declarations are affected, create:
Declaration number
Amount legally due
Amount paid
Overpayment
Evidence
Refund requested.
This helps Customs verify the application efficiently.
The refund claimant must have the appropriate legal relationship with the customs liability and payment.
Where payments were made through:
determine who legally holds the repayment claim.
Foreign-owned companies should ensure that the person making the application has appropriate authority.
Prepare:
If the broker caused the duplicate payment, the company may have two different issues:
Refund claim against Customs
and
potential contractual claim against the broker for unrecovered losses or expenses.
Do not confuse them.
Once the duplicate payment is identified, coordinate with finance regarding:
The legal refund file and accounting records should reconcile.
Where repayment is delayed or the overpayment arose from an administrative error, determine whether the applicable legal framework provides any additional monetary entitlement.
Do not automatically assume that every customs refund includes interest.
Customs may reject the application because it concludes:
The rejection should be reviewed rather than automatically accepted.
If Customs refuses repayment, obtain the formal decision.
Identify:
The next step should be based on the written decision.
A repayment rejection may trigger administrative challenge deadlines.
Do not allow informal discussions with the customs office to replace a formal objection.
Record the notification date immediately.
If the administrative route does not resolve the dispute, the company may need to assess the appropriate judicial remedy.
The court file should clearly establish:
Amount legally due
versus
amount actually paid.
Where the evidence is straightforward, the application should also be straightforward.
The central question is:
Did the administration receive more customs duty than was legally payable?
If yes, prove the difference with clean documentation.
During reconciliation, the company may discover:
A refund review can therefore become a broader customs compliance review.
Companies often focus on underpayment risk but overlook overpayments.
Periodic customs reviews should also identify whether the importer paid excessive amounts because of:
Many duplicate payments occur because finance and customs systems are not reconciled.
Establish a control linking:
Declaration number
→ customs liability
→ payment reference
→ bank transaction.
For large importers, consider internal controls requiring confirmation that:
This can prevent repeated duplicate payments.
Whenever a customs declaration is amended, accounting should confirm whether the new amount represents:
This is a common area for payment mistakes.
Once repayment is approved, retain:
These records may be relevant during future audits.
Do not close the file merely because Customs approves repayment.
Confirm:
Amount requested
Amount approved
Amount actually received.
Investigate any difference.
After the refund process, determine why the duplicate payment occurred.
Correct:
The objective should be preventing recurrence.
The recommended sequence is:
Identify the declaration
→ verify the legal customs liability
→ confirm both payments
→ determine whether the second payment was allocated elsewhere
→ calculate the exact overpayment
→ collect customs and bank records
→ check the statutory application period
→ submit the repayment application
→ monitor the Customs decision
→ challenge an unlawful rejection where necessary
→ confirm receipt of the refund
→ correct internal controls.
Potentially, yes. Article 211 provides for repayment of customs duties determined to have been paid even though they were not legally due.
Companies should not rely on an automatic refund. The overpayment should be identified and the applicable repayment procedure followed.
The Ministry operates the Repayment or Remission Request Management System for applications under Articles 211–214, allowing the application form and supporting documents to be submitted electronically.
The customs declaration, accrual information, payment receipts, bank records and a reconciliation showing the exact excess payment are particularly important.
The company should determine who legally made the payment and holds the repayment claim. Potential broker responsibility can be considered separately.
Then the issue may not be a simple duplicate-payment refund. The allocation and underlying liability should first be reviewed.
The customs framework permits post-release declaration corrections in applicable circumstances, subject to the relevant procedure.
Yes. Customs repayment rights are subject to statutory procedural periods. The applicable deadline should be calculated immediately from the relevant facts rather than postponing the application.
Obtain the written decision, record its notification date and evaluate the applicable administrative and judicial challenge procedures.
A clear reconciliation proving that two actual payments were made against the same customs liability while only one payment was legally due.
Customs repayment disputes may involve:
Duplicate customs payments
Overpaid customs duties
Incorrect assessments
Declaration corrections
Refund applications
Repayment and remission procedures
Customs broker errors
and rejected refund requests.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign companies, multinational groups, manufacturers and importers seeking repayment of customs duties and other customs-related amounts overpaid in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reconciling customs payments, determining whether amounts were legally due, preparing repayment applications, correcting related customs records and challenging rejected refund requests through the appropriate administrative and judicial procedures.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey