

Turkish authorities attach company machinery, vehicles, inventory or other assets for customs debt. Learn how foreign investors can challenge the debt, object to unlawful or excessive attachment, seek urgent relief and prevent sale of seized assets.
A customs dispute in Turkey can escalate from an additional duty assessment or administrative penalty into compulsory collection against the company’s assets.
The authorities may seek attachment of:
For a foreign investor, attachment can threaten much more than the amount of the customs debt. Seizure of essential machinery, vehicles or inventory may interrupt production, prevent deliveries and create serious liquidity problems.
Unpaid customs duties may be collected under Law No. 6183 on the Collection Procedure of Public Receivables. Ministry guidance confirms that, under Article 62 of Law No. 6183, movable and immovable assets, receivables and rights may be attached up to an amount sufficient to satisfy the public receivable.
The recommended emergency strategy is:
Identify the attached assets → obtain the complete collection file → verify the underlying customs debt → examine notification and finality → determine whether the attachment exceeds the collectible debt → challenge the appropriate collection measure → seek urgent suspension where available → prevent sale of attached assets → protect business continuity.
Prepare an immediate inventory.
Record:
Do not rely only on verbal information from company personnel.
Request the official documentation showing:
The attachment itself must be connected to an identifiable public receivable.
Reconstruct the entire chain:
Customs declaration
→ additional assessment
→ administrative penalty
→ notification
→ administrative objection
→ court proceedings
→ finality
→ payment order
→ attachment.
A procedural defect earlier in this chain can materially affect the collection analysis.
This is one of the first questions foreign investors should examine.
A customs assessment and a legally collectible public debt are not always the same thing.
Check whether:
A company may discover the customs problem only after assets are attached.
Obtain evidence concerning service of:
If the administration relies on an earlier notification to establish finality, that notification should be reviewed carefully.
Foreign-owned companies should not assume that the absence of a physical letter means that no valid notification occurred.
Review the company’s official electronic notification records and determine exactly when each relevant document was legally served.
Before compulsory collection reaches attachment, the collection file may contain a payment order or another legally relevant demand.
Obtain the complete document.
Record:
principal
penalties
late-payment amounts
total debt
notification date.
There may now be two different legal issues:
Was the customs assessment itself lawful?
and
Was attachment lawfully imposed and properly limited?
Do not treat them as one question.
Ministry guidance expressly states that customs duties not paid within the applicable period are pursued under Law No. 6183.
Therefore, once attachment begins, the company’s strategy must combine customs law with public-receivables collection law.
Under the collection framework described by the Ministry, the administration may attach the debtor’s movable and immovable property, receivables and rights in an amount sufficient to satisfy the public receivable.
The phrase “sufficient to satisfy the public receivable” is particularly important when evaluating excessive attachment.
Prepare an independent reconciliation:
Principal customs debt
legally applicable penalties
late-payment amounts
−
payments
−
amounts cancelled or reduced
=
actual outstanding amount.
Do not accept the enforcement figure without verification.
Obtain:
A payment may exist but may not have been correctly matched to the collection file.
Suppose Customs originally assessed TRY 20 million.
If subsequent proceedings reduced the collectible amount to TRY 8 million, enforcement should be reconciled with the actual judicial result.
Obtain the complete judgment rather than relying on a summary.
If a customs settlement occurred, determine:
The enforcement file should correspond to the settlement outcome.
The company may already have provided:
Determine whether the administration is holding significant security while simultaneously attaching additional corporate assets.
This is a crucial issue.
Suppose:
Collectible customs debt: TRY 10 million
while assets worth approximately:
TRY 35 million
have been attached.
The company should immediately analyze whether the scope of enforcement exceeds what is necessary to secure collection.
The statutory collection framework contemplates attachment sufficient to cover the public receivable rather than unlimited attachment of corporate property.
For example:
| Asset | Estimated Value | Operational Importance |
|---|---|---|
| Production Machine A | TRY 8 million | Critical |
| Vehicle Fleet | TRY 4 million | High |
| Inventory | TRY 7 million | Critical |
| Equipment | TRY 3 million | Medium |
Independent valuation evidence may be useful where the administration’s valuation or overall scope of attachment is disputed.
If Customs attaches a machine essential to the company’s only production line, explain this specifically.
Document:
This may become important in an urgent relief application.
Attachment of finished products or raw materials may prevent:
Document the exact goods and commercial commitments affected.
Company vehicles may be essential for:
Prepare evidence showing which vehicles are genuinely operationally necessary.
If the collection extends to company land, factories or commercial premises, obtain:
The company’s overall security structure should be reviewed.
Public-debt collection can extend to the debtor’s receivables and rights. Ministry guidance specifically refers to attachment of receivables and rights as well as movable and immovable property.
Therefore, determine whether customers or other third parties have also received attachment notices.
Attachment should never be treated as merely symbolic.
Official Ministry activity in 2026 confirms that movable property attached under Law No. 6183 can proceed to public auction.
Once a sale process advances, recovery of the physical asset may become substantially more difficult.
Determine whether:
The closer the case moves toward sale, the more urgent the response becomes.
If sale proceedings have begun, obtain:
Do not assume that challenging the original customs debt automatically stops a scheduled sale.
Depending on the procedural posture, the company should assess whether suspension of execution or another urgent judicial measure can be sought.
The application should address both:
the apparent unlawfulness of the collection measure
and
the serious or difficult-to-repair consequences of continued enforcement.
Strong evidence can include:
Explain concretely why sale or continued restraint of the asset would cause harm that cannot easily be reversed.
Whether a particular challenge suspends collection or sale depends on the legal route and procedural stage.
The company should specifically determine whether separate interim protection is necessary.
Even where some customs debt is valid, that does not automatically justify every enforcement measure.
A company may accept:
TRY 5 million debt
while disputing:
TRY 20 million of attached assets.
These are separate issues.
Depending on the circumstances and applicable collection procedure, it may be commercially preferable to investigate whether an attached operational asset can be released against another acceptable form of security.
This can be particularly important where machinery is worth substantially more than the debt but is essential for production.
Before offering additional security, calculate:
existing guarantees
cash security
bank attachment
attached assets.
The company should understand its total exposure.
An asset located at the company’s premises may actually belong to:
Ownership should be established with reliable documents.
The legal owner may need to pursue the appropriate third-party remedy.
For leased machinery or vehicles, preserve:
Mere possession by the customs debtor does not necessarily resolve ownership.
A Turkish subsidiary and its foreign parent are generally distinct legal persons.
If assets belonging to another group entity are affected, determine the legal basis immediately.
Do not assume group ownership automatically permits collection.
Similarly, an unpaid corporate customs debt does not automatically transform every shareholder asset into property available for collection.
Any attempt to extend liability should be reviewed under the specific statutory framework.
If collection moves from the company to directors or legal representatives, examine:
Do not treat personal liability as automatic.
Examine separately:
limitation concerning assessment or notification of the customs debt
and
limitation concerning collection of a finalized public receivable.
A company should not confuse these two periods.
After enforcement becomes foreseeable, artificial transfers intended to defeat collection can create additional legal exposure.
Foreign investors should use lawful remedies:
If attachment threatens production, prepare a quantified estimate.
Include:
daily production loss
employee costs
customer penalties
replacement costs
lost orders.
This can strengthen the urgency evidence even where those losses are not automatically recoverable.
One attachment may indicate that several historical customs assessments have entered collection.
Perform a company-wide review immediately.
Otherwise, assets released from one attachment may shortly become subject to another.
For each customs debt record:
Declaration
Assessment
Penalty
Notification
Objection
Court case
Final amount
Payment order
Attachment
Sale status.
This can reveal procedural errors quickly.
The customs merits and enforcement procedure must be handled together.
Classification, origin or customs-value arguments may explain why the original debt is wrong, while public-debt rules determine whether the current attachment can proceed.
Prepare a concise corporate report stating:
Debt claimed
Amount disputed
Assets attached
Estimated asset value
Sale status
Legal challenge
Urgent relief requested
Operational impact.
This is particularly important where the attachment affects investment continuity.
The practical position changes significantly once attached property enters and completes the sale process.
The Ministry continues to conduct public auctions of movable assets attached under Law No. 6183 in 2026.
Early action is therefore substantially more effective than attempting to reconstruct the dispute after disposal.
The recommended sequence is:
Identify every attached asset
→ obtain attachment records
→ obtain the payment order
→ retrieve the underlying customs assessments
→ review notification
→ review objections and litigation
→ determine whether the debt is legally collectible
→ calculate the actual outstanding amount
→ check existing security
→ compare debt with attached asset value
→ challenge excessive or unlawful attachment
→ seek urgent suspension where available
→ prevent auction or sale
→ protect essential operating assets
→ review all other customs debts.
Yes. Once customs duties become collectible public receivables, compulsory collection under Law No. 6183 may include attachment of movable and immovable property, receivables and rights. Ministry guidance confirms this collection framework.
Potentially, yes. The appropriate remedy depends on the underlying debt, notification history, payment order, procedural finality and the specific attachment measure.
The collection framework refers to attachment of property sufficient to satisfy the public receivable. Where the overall attachment materially exceeds the collectible amount, the scope of enforcement should be reviewed urgently.
The company should review whether the underlying assessment remains challengeable and whether existing administrative or judicial proceedings affect collectability. The customs merits and enforcement proceedings must be coordinated.
Attached movable property can proceed to public sale under the applicable collection framework. The Ministry published public-auction notices for movable assets attached under Law No. 6183 in 2026.
Not automatically in every case. The company should determine whether the selected remedy suspends enforcement or whether separate interim judicial protection must be requested.
Ownership should be documented immediately. The actual owner may need to use the appropriate third-party procedure to protect its rights.
Corporate debt does not by itself establish automatic shareholder liability. Any extension of collection to shareholders or representatives requires a specific legal basis and separate analysis.
Depending on the procedural circumstances, replacement or alternative security may be worth examining. Existing guarantees and other attachments should first be calculated to avoid unnecessary duplicate security.
Determine whether the customs debt was legally collectible, calculate whether the attachment exceeds the actual debt and establish whether the attached assets are already moving toward public sale. Once an auction process advances, the need for urgent legal action becomes significantly greater.
Customs collection disputes may involve:
Company asset attachment
Machinery seizure
Vehicle attachment
Inventory attachment
Customs payment orders
Excessive attachment
Public-debt enforcement
Suspension of execution
Third-party ownership
and public auction of attached assets.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign investors, multinational companies, manufacturers and importers whose corporate assets are attached because of customs debts in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing customs assessments and collection files, challenging unlawful or excessive attachments, protecting third-party-owned assets, seeking urgent suspension measures and taking legal action to prevent the sale of essential corporate property.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey