

Turkish Customs applies a new HS code that increases import duty. Learn how businesses can challenge tariff reclassification, additional duties and penalties, protect historical imports and obtain classification certainty for future shipments.
A change in the tariff classification of imported goods can dramatically increase the cost of doing business in Turkey.
A product previously imported under one HS code may suddenly be classified by Turkish Customs under another tariff position carrying:
Turkey’s tariff system uses a 12-digit Customs Tariff Statistics Position. The first six digits correspond to the international Harmonized System, followed by Combined Nomenclature and Turkish national/statistical subdivisions.
The problem is particularly important in 2026 because Turkey has introduced both annual and mid-year tariff adjustments. The Ministry of Trade confirmed that the 2026 Import Regime incorporated changes to tariff positions and product descriptions, while additional amendments published in July 2026 reorganized statistical positions for numerous products.
A business facing a higher duty because of a new classification should therefore determine immediately:
Has the legislation actually changed?
Has Customs merely changed its interpretation of an unchanged product?
Has the product itself changed?
Does the new classification apply only prospectively or is Customs also assessing historical imports?
These questions lead to very different legal strategies.
Do not assume that every new tariff classification has the same legal basis.
The change may result from:
The first task is to identify the legal source of the change.
This distinction is critical.
The applicable tariff legislation itself changes.
The legislation remains substantially the same, but Customs decides that the product should have been classified differently.
A company challenging the second situation may have significantly different arguments from a company affected by a prospective legislative amendment.
Identify:
A new tariff measure should not simply be assumed to apply to every historical import.
The relevant legal regime must be determined for each declaration.
The Ministry’s current customs legislation resources identify the 2026 Turkish Customs Tariff Schedule as the schedule published on December 30, 2025.
Businesses should compare:
2025 classification
with
2026 classification
and any subsequent amendments.
Annual tariff schedules are not necessarily the end of the analysis.
In July 2026, the Ministry announced further Import Regime amendments and stated that statistical positions for numerous products had been reorganized.
Therefore, the company must determine exactly which tariff version applied on the relevant import date.
Prepare a technical table:
| Issue | Old Classification | New Classification |
|---|---|---|
| HS/GTIP | Code A | Code B |
| Product description | Description A | Description B |
| Customs duty | Rate A | Rate B |
| Additional duty | Position A | Position B |
| Anti-dumping | Position A | Position B |
| Regulatory controls | Position A | Position B |
This reveals the actual financial and regulatory consequences.
Customs may argue that the new classification reflects changes to:
Compare historical and current product specifications carefully.
Collect:
A classification dispute cannot usually be resolved through commercial product names alone.
Suppose Customs moves the product from a low-duty machinery heading to a higher-duty parts heading.
Ask:
Why?
The company’s challenge should identify the precise technical or legal error in Customs’ reasoning.
Tariff classification should not be based merely on comparing product descriptions.
The applicable analysis may require:
The Ministry maintains current tariff explanatory materials and classification-decision communiqués, including materials listed in its tariff legislation resources updated in May 2026.
If identical goods were historically imported under the old classification, preserve:
Previous acceptance does not necessarily prevent Customs from correcting an incorrect classification, but it may be important to the dispute.
If Customs previously physically examined identical goods and accepted the old code, obtain the inspection record.
This can support the argument that the company did not conceal the nature of the goods.
Where the new classification is based on laboratory analysis, review:
A technical finding should also be distinguished from the ultimate legal tariff classification.
Determine whether the company already holds valid Binding Tariff Information concerning the product.
BTI is a formal administrative decision concerning classification under the Turkish Customs Tariff Schedule.
An applicable BTI can materially change the company’s position.
If classification uncertainty continues, obtaining BTI may provide greater prospective certainty.
Applications can be made electronically or through authorized regional customs authorities and require a detailed description of the goods and supporting classification materials.
Determining the correct tariff position is only the first stage.
After identifying the code, separately determine:
The Ministry itself notes that after tariff classification is determined, the applicable tax rates and foreign-trade measures must be identified separately.
A classification change may move the goods into a tariff position subject to additional customs duty.
Turkey’s current consolidated additional-customs-duty framework identifies applicable rates by GTIP and also contains specific rules concerning origin and preferential treatment.
The company’s analysis must therefore consider both classification and origin.
A higher nominal duty does not always mean the company must pay the highest possible amount.
Review:
The classification and origin analyses should be coordinated.
A tariff change can sometimes place a product within a position associated with an anti-dumping measure.
If so, verify:
Do not assume that the tariff code alone proves that anti-dumping duty applies.
Prepare a shipment-level calculation.
For example:
Old customs burden: TRY 500,000
New classification: TRY 1,400,000
Difference: TRY 900,000.
Then include potential:
This determines the commercial importance of the challenge.
A company may accept the new classification prospectively but dispute its application to older declarations.
Do not automatically assume:
New code today = wrong code three years ago.
Historical legislation and historical product characteristics must be reviewed.
For each historical import, record:
Declaration date
Tariff code
Product
Customs value
Duty paid
New duty claimed
Penalty
Notification date.
This is essential where Customs expands the issue into a post-clearance review.
If Customs seeks additional duties for historical imports, review whether each assessment remains timely under the applicable customs framework.
The analysis should be declaration-specific.
Do not assume that a current tariff change automatically reopens all historical transactions.
Where Customs issues a formal assessment based on the new classification, identify the notification date immediately.
The administrative challenge procedure under Customs Law Article 242 is deadline-sensitive.
Commercial negotiations with the supplier, broker or customs office should not be allowed to consume the legal challenge period.
A new classification may generate:
additional duty
and
administrative penalty.
The penalty should be independently examined.
The company may argue:
Primary position: The historical classification was legally correct.
Alternative position: Even if the new classification is accepted, the penalty lacks the asserted legal basis or has been incorrectly calculated.
There is an important factual difference between:
accurately described goods classified under a disputed heading
and
goods deliberately described inaccurately to obtain a lower duty.
The company’s documentation should make this distinction clear where appropriate.
Collect:
These materials can become important in penalty disputes.
If a foreign supplier expressly guaranteed an HS classification that later proves incorrect, examine the supply contract.
Potential recovery may involve:
This contractual claim is separate from the company’s relationship with Turkish Customs.
If the broker independently selected the historical classification, preserve:
A professional-liability claim may need to be considered separately.
The company should protect its customs challenge first.
Whether the supplier or broker ultimately reimburses the loss can be addressed simultaneously under the relevant contracts.
A sudden duty increase may affect long-term supply contracts.
Review:
The company may be able to renegotiate the commercial allocation of the increased cost.
The agreed delivery term can affect which party commercially bears import costs.
But Incoterms should not automatically be treated as resolving every public-law customs liability issue.
Read the full contract.
A distributor may be unable to pass the new import cost to customers.
Calculate:
new landed cost
gross margin
existing customer commitments
termination exposure.
Customs strategy and commercial-contract strategy should therefore be coordinated.
A higher standard duty may not always represent the final effective cost.
The Ministry’s 2026 Import Regime included tariff quotas for certain industrial products where domestic production did not sufficiently meet input needs.
Businesses should determine whether any applicable relief mechanism exists for their product.
If Customs has formally questioned the classification, changing ports to find an office that continues accepting the lower-duty code can create additional compliance risk.
Resolve the classification substantively.
Where goods are currently held and classification remains disputed, assess whether available customs procedures permit release against appropriate security or another lawful mechanism.
This can be particularly important where storage charges are accumulating.
If the tariff dispute delays clearance, document:
These costs can quickly exceed the disputed duty.
A classification change for one product may affect:
Conduct a focused portfolio review before Customs expands the issue.
If the legal and technical review establishes that the new classification is correct, future declarations should be updated.
Continuing a known incorrect classification can increase risk.
A business can adopt a conservative classification for future imports while continuing to challenge the historical assessment.
Document the commercial and legal reasons for the prospective change.
If the classification changes, update:
This prevents different brokers from using inconsistent codes.
A permanent duty increase may require:
Legal classification analysis should therefore feed directly into commercial planning.
Changing the supplier or country of origin can alter the customs burden.
However, businesses should not use artificial routing or unsupported origin declarations merely to avoid higher duties.
Any restructuring must reflect genuine commercial and origin rules.
Where a new classification increases duty, businesses generally need:
Historical defense strategy:
Challenge reclassification, assessments and penalties concerning previous imports.
Future import strategy:
Establish the correct classification, obtain greater certainty where possible and adjust sourcing or pricing.
The recommended sequence is:
Identify why the classification changed
→ determine the effective date
→ compare old and new tariff codes
→ verify product specifications
→ review current classification materials
→ check existing BTI
→ calculate the duty difference
→ review additional customs duty and anti-dumping exposure
→ identify historical declarations
→ record assessment notification dates
→ challenge reclassification and penalties where appropriate
→ consider BTI for future imports
→ review supplier and broker responsibility
→ review commercial contracts
→ update future customs compliance.
Yes. Classification treatment may change because of amendments to the tariff framework, new classification decisions or a Customs determination that the previous classification was incorrect. Turkey also made tariff-position adjustments during 2026.
Not automatically. The legal regime, product characteristics and tariff rules applicable to each historical declaration should be examined separately.
Yes. Where Customs issues an adverse assessment based on a disputed classification, the importer can use the applicable administrative and judicial challenge mechanisms. Technical evidence is often central to the dispute.
Potentially. Additional duty and administrative penalty should be analyzed separately, including the statutory basis and calculation of the penalty.
Yes. BTI is a formal administrative classification decision and can provide greater certainty for qualifying future imports.
Yes. Additional customs duty is applied by reference to listed GTIPs and other conditions under the applicable regime. The current consolidated framework should be checked for the product and origin concerned.
Potentially. But the exact trade-defense measure, product description, origin, producer and applicable period must also be examined.
Possibly. The supply agreement should be reviewed for tariff warranties, customs-duty allocation, indemnities, change-in-law provisions and pricing clauses.
The classification should first be reviewed technically and legally. If the new classification is confirmed as correct, future declarations should be updated accordingly.
Identify whether the change results from new legislation or a new interpretation of existing rules. Then verify the correct classification, calculate the complete financial impact, protect the deadline for challenging any assessment and separately develop a compliant classification strategy for future imports.
Tariff changes can create disputes involving:
HS code reclassification
Higher customs duties
Additional customs duties
Anti-dumping measures
Historical customs assessments
Administrative penalties
Binding Tariff Information
Customs audits
and international supply contracts.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign-owned businesses, international manufacturers and importers when a new tariff classification substantially increases the cost of importing goods into Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in challenging tariff reclassification and additional assessments, reviewing historical import exposure, contesting customs penalties, evaluating Binding Tariff Information and coordinating customs disputes with supplier, broker and commercial-contract remedies.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey