

A TAREKS application contains incorrect product information in Turkey. Learn how importers can address model, brand, manufacturer, quantity, tariff, document and technical-data errors before customs clearance.
An incorrect product entry in a TAREKS application can create consequences far beyond a simple data-entry problem. A wrong model number, manufacturer, brand, product description, quantity, technical characteristic or document reference may result in additional inspection, requests for supporting documentation, incompatibility with the customs declaration or even refusal of the import-control process. The correct response depends on what information is wrong, when the error is discovered, whether the application has already entered the control process and whether the mistake affects the substantive identity or regulatory compliance of the product. The importer should therefore avoid making informal or contradictory corrections and should create a documented record explaining the genuine error.
TAREKS is Turkey’s risk-based electronic control system used in connection with certain product-safety and technical-regulation controls in foreign trade. Depending on the product and applicable import-control framework, information entered into the system can be compared with supporting documents and the goods presented for importation.
Incorrect information can therefore affect both the electronic application and subsequent physical or documentary controls.
Errors may concern the product description, manufacturer, brand, model, type, quantity, country information, tariff classification, conformity documentation, certificate information or other product-specific data required by the applicable control procedure.
The significance of the mistake depends on whether it is merely clerical or changes the identity or regulatory treatment of the imported product.
An obvious typing mistake in a model number should not automatically be treated in the same manner as declaring a completely different product.
The importer should clearly demonstrate whether the mistake is a harmless clerical discrepancy or a substantive error affecting the control.
Timing can be critical. An error discovered before the application advances substantially may present a different procedural situation from an error discovered after documentary examination, physical inspection, sampling or an adverse control result.
The importer should record when and how the error was identified.
This should not be assumed. The ability to amend, cancel, withdraw or make a new application depends on the applicable product-control procedure and the stage reached by the application.
The importer should determine the legally and technically available mechanism before changing information.
Attempting to solve the problem by repeatedly filing new applications can create additional inconsistencies.
If a replacement or new application is required, preserve the connection with the original application and document why the correction became necessary.
Before contacting the authority or preparing a correction, compare the TAREKS application with the actual goods and supporting documents.
Create a list identifying the incorrect entry, correct information, source document proving the correct information and reason for the original mistake.
A model number can connect the imported product with its Declaration of Conformity, technical file, test report, certificate and label.
If the TAREKS application identifies Model A while the shipment contains Model B, authorities may question whether the supporting conformity documentation actually covers the imported goods.
The manufacturer identified in the application should be compared with the manufacturer shown on the product, packaging, Declaration of Conformity and other relevant documents.
Corporate-name changes, mergers and factory relocations should be explained with supporting evidence where necessary.
A product may be sold under one brand while manufactured by another company. The importer should not interchange brand owner, manufacturer, exporter and seller merely because they belong to the same commercial supply chain.
Each entity’s role should be described accurately.
Where a foreign brand uses a contract manufacturer, the application and conformity documents should be reviewed carefully.
The importer should be able to explain which entity is legally identified as the manufacturer under the applicable technical framework.
Generic or inaccurate descriptions can cause inspection problems.
The description should allow the authority to connect the application with the product presented for control and with the applicable technical documentation.
If the application states a quantity different from the shipment, determine whether the discrepancy results from a simple entry mistake, partial shipment, packing difference or actual excess goods.
The customs declaration, invoice, packing list and TAREKS information should be reconciled.
If the wrong tariff classification was entered, the issue may extend beyond TAREKS.
Tariff classification can affect customs duty, technical controls, additional import measures and other regulatory requirements. The importer should therefore conduct a separate classification analysis rather than treating the issue as a simple TAREKS correction.
Country of origin, country of export and country of dispatch should not be confused.
An incorrect country entry can become particularly serious where the product is subject to origin-sensitive customs or trade-policy measures.
Incorrect certificate references can prevent authorities from matching the imported goods with the relevant conformity evidence.
Compare certificate numbers, dates, scope, manufacturer and product models carefully.
Where a Declaration of Conformity is relevant, check whether the exact imported product is covered.
A corrected TAREKS application cannot cure a situation in which the underlying conformity declaration itself relates to another product.
If the application references a test report, verify the laboratory, report number, product model, manufacturer and tested technical characteristics.
Do not modify the application merely to force the imported product to match an unrelated report.
This distinction is fundamental.
If the product itself fails applicable technical requirements, changing the electronic application cannot transform the goods into compliant products.
The importer must distinguish a data error from a product-compliance failure.
Keep a copy or record of the original application before any authorized correction, cancellation or replacement.
This helps demonstrate what the original mistake was and prevents later uncertainty about the sequence of events.
For material discrepancies, prepare a concise explanation identifying the error, its cause, correct information and supporting documents.
A transparent correction is generally stronger than allowing authorities to discover unexplained inconsistencies independently.
If the application was prepared by a customs broker or another representative, determine what information the importer supplied and how the incorrect entry occurred.
Preserve emails, instructions, invoices and technical documents sent before the application.
The fact that an intermediary entered incorrect information does not necessarily mean the importer can ignore the problem.
Public-law responsibility and contractual responsibility between the importer and service provider should be analyzed separately.
Sometimes the Turkish importer enters incorrect information because the foreign manufacturer supplied the wrong model, certificate, product description or technical document.
The importer should formally request corrected and verified documentation.
A supplier should not simply alter an existing certificate, test report or Declaration of Conformity without a legitimate regulatory basis.
Corrections should accurately reflect genuine historical and technical facts.
Respond promptly and identify the discrepancy before providing additional documents.
The importer should determine whether the applicable procedure permits supplementation, correction, cancellation or another procedural step.
Physical inspection can make the discrepancy more significant because authorities can compare the application directly with the goods.
Preserve photographs and product-identification information and explain the difference accurately.
Do not attempt to change the identity of the goods after sampling.
The sample, application and shipment should remain traceable to one another. Any correction should preserve that chain of identification.
Potentially, where the applicable procedure permits or requires it. However, the importer should not assume that a new application automatically cancels the consequences of the earlier one.
The procedural status of the original application should first be clarified.
Possibly, depending on the relevant import-control communiqué, application stage and system procedure.
Cancellation should not be treated as a universal right available in every TAREKS case.
Request the formal reason for refusal.
Determine whether the authority considers the discrepancy substantive, believes the product presented is different from the product originally declared or considers the procedural stage too advanced for the requested correction.
If the incorrect information results in an adverse administrative measure, the importer should identify the competent authority, formal decision, notification date and applicable administrative or judicial remedy.
The exact remedy depends on the legal basis of the decision.
No universal assumption should be made.
If goods remain detained, the company should separately evaluate the legal status of the shipment and whether urgent protection is available where delay creates serious and difficult-to-reverse losses.
A minor application error can become a major financial problem if goods remain at the port or warehouse for weeks.
Keep daily records of storage, demurrage, terminal and container expenses.
Perishable products, seasonal goods, project equipment and production-critical components can lose substantial commercial value during a TAREKS delay.
The correction strategy should therefore consider both regulatory and commercial urgency.
Potentially, depending on the nature of the incorrect information, applicable legislation and surrounding facts.
An innocent typing mistake should be distinguished factually from knowingly providing false information or attempting to conceal the true identity of the product.
The company should preserve evidence demonstrating how the mistake occurred.
Internal product records, broker instructions, supplier documents and correction efforts may become relevant if authorities question whether the discrepancy was deliberate.
A TAREKS correction may expose a separate inconsistency in the customs declaration.
Compare tariff classification, origin, quantity, value, manufacturer and product description across both systems.
Where relevant, determine whether the same incorrect product information appears in registration systems, technical documentation, certificates or earlier applications.
Correcting only TAREKS may leave the broader compliance problem unresolved.
If the same mistake was repeated in earlier TAREKS applications, conduct a controlled historical review.
One current discrepancy should not automatically be assumed to affect every historical shipment, but repeated incorrect master data can create wider exposure.
If additional shipments are heading to Turkey, correct the underlying master-data or supplier-document problem before those shipments enter the TAREKS process.
Otherwise, the same error may be repeated.
Foreign manufacturers and Turkish importers should maintain a Turkey-specific product file containing the correct product name, manufacturer, brand, model, tariff classification, country information, relevant conformity documentation, test reports and labeling information.
This reduces repetitive data-entry errors.
Before every TAREKS application, compare the electronic information against the commercial invoice, packing list, customs classification, product label and applicable conformity documents.
For high-value or frequently imported products, a second-person review can prevent expensive delays.
When incorrect product information is discovered in a TAREKS application, the importer should immediately preserve the original application, identify every incorrect field, compare the information with the actual goods, determine whether the problem is clerical or substantive, verify the procedural stage, identify the legally available correction or cancellation mechanism, prepare supporting evidence, coordinate with the foreign manufacturer and customs broker, review the customs declaration and protect any administrative or judicial remedy if the correction is rejected.
Potentially. The available procedure depends on the type of error, applicable product-control rules and stage of the application.
Not necessarily. The status of the existing application and applicable procedure should be determined first.
An obvious clerical error may be easier to explain, but supporting documents should demonstrate the actual product identity.
The importer should compare the application with product labels and conformity documents and provide evidence establishing the correct manufacturer.
A tariff-classification error may have broader customs consequences and should be analyzed separately rather than treated solely as an electronic application correction.
Potentially, depending on the applicable procedure and stage of control. Supplementation should not be assumed to be universally available.
The importer should preserve the condition and identity of the goods and transparently explain the discrepancy. Unauthorized changes should not be made.
No. Authorities may still examine whether the actual product satisfies applicable technical and product-safety requirements.
Potentially, depending on the legal basis, seriousness of the incorrect information and surrounding circumstances. The factual distinction between an accidental error and deliberate misrepresentation can be important.
Do not try to make the documents fit an incorrect TAREKS entry. Establish the true identity and regulatory status of the imported product first, preserve the original application and then use the legally available procedure to correct the electronic record transparently.
Incorrect TAREKS information can lead to documentary controls, physical inspections, delayed customs clearance, laboratory examination, additional storage costs, adverse product-safety decisions and wider customs disputes. Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign manufacturers, international exporters and Turkish importers in resolving TAREKS and technical import-control problems in Turkey. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing incorrect applications, coordinating supporting technical documentation, addressing discrepancies with customs and product-control authorities, challenging adverse administrative measures and evaluating contractual responsibility where the error originates from a foreign supplier or service provider.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey