

When can receiving and transferring money through a Turkish bank account become money laundering? Learn the criminal risks for foreigners, MASAK issues, bank freezes and defense strategies in Turkey.
A foreign national who receives money into a Turkish bank account and then transfers it to another account may face serious questions if authorities suspect that the funds originate from a criminal offence. However, receiving money and transferring it onward does not automatically constitute money laundering. The legal assessment depends on the source of the funds, the person’s knowledge, the purpose and circumstances of the transfer, the relationship between the parties and whether the transaction forms part of conduct intended to conceal or legitimize criminal proceeds.
For foreigners, the situation can become particularly serious because a suspicious banking transaction may trigger not only a criminal investigation but also bank account restrictions, MASAK-related reporting, seizure measures, immigration consequences and difficulties with future banking transactions in Turkey.
The most important issue is therefore not simply:
“Did the foreigner transfer the money?”
The more important questions are:
Where did the money come from?
Why was it transferred?
What did the foreigner know?
Who instructed the transfer?
What evidence exists showing the legitimate purpose of the transaction?
The principal provision is Article 282 of the Turkish Criminal Code, which concerns laundering assets arising from an offence.
The basic concept is that criminal proceeds may be subjected to transactions designed to conceal their unlawful origin or make them appear legitimate. The exact statutory elements must be assessed according to the conduct alleged in the particular investigation.
Therefore, a banking transaction involving suspicious money should not automatically be treated as proof of laundering.
A foreigner may legitimately receive money for many reasons:
The existence of a transfer alone does not establish criminal liability.
The investigation should establish whether the money actually constitutes proceeds of an underlying offence.
For example, authorities may investigate whether funds originate from:
The alleged underlying offence should therefore be identified.
A foreigner can still become the subject of a laundering investigation even if they did not commit the underlying offence.
The key issue becomes what the person knew and what they did with the proceeds.
This is why the person’s role in the transaction must be reconstructed carefully.
Suppose a foreign national receives money from an acquaintance and transfers it to another account after receiving instructions.
The investigation may ask:
Did the person know the money came from crime?
Did they know why it was being transferred?
Did they receive a commission?
Did they conceal the transaction?
Were there warnings or suspicious circumstances?
The answers can materially affect the legal assessment.
This situation deserves particular caution.
A person may be told:
“The money will come into your account. Just send it to this other account.”
That instruction does not automatically establish criminal liability.
However, if the transaction is connected with criminal proceeds and the person knowingly participates in moving or concealing those proceeds, the risk becomes substantially more serious.
A commission can attract additional attention.
Investigators may ask why the person was paid to receive and transfer funds and whether the commission indicates knowledge or participation in a broader scheme.
The amount and explanation for the payment should therefore be documented.
Personal relationships do not automatically eliminate criminal risk.
At the same time, a friend or family relationship does not automatically prove knowledge of a criminal source.
The complete communication history should be examined.
Preserve messages concerning:
Deleting messages after learning about an investigation can create additional evidentiary problems.
Investigators may examine:
The complete transaction history may be more informative than a single transfer.
A foreigner’s account may receive money and transfer substantially the same amount shortly afterward.
That pattern does not itself prove money laundering.
However, investigators may ask why the account was used as an intermediary and whether the account holder understood the purpose.
Repeated transfers involving unrelated people, companies or accounts may attract greater scrutiny.
The foreigner should be able to explain the commercial or personal reason for the transaction pattern.
Funds moving:
Foreign country → Turkish account → another Turkish account → foreign country
may generate questions concerning the ultimate beneficiary and purpose.
This does not automatically mean the transaction is unlawful.
The underlying transaction should be documented.
Suppose a foreign consultant legitimately receives USD 20,000 from a Turkish company and later transfers part of the money to a subcontractor.
That may be an ordinary commercial transaction.
Contracts, invoices, service records, tax documents and correspondence can help demonstrate the legitimate purpose.
The absence of a written contract does not automatically prove criminal conduct.
However, it can make it more difficult to establish the legitimate economic purpose of a significant transfer.
Alternative evidence should therefore be collected.
A genuine loan can be legitimate.
Evidence may include:
A verbal explanation made only after an investigation begins may receive greater scrutiny than contemporaneous documentation.
Property transactions can involve substantial transfers.
The foreigner should preserve:
An employee may have transferred company funds under instructions from a manager or finance department.
The employee’s authority, job duties and knowledge can become important.
The fact that the employee’s account was used does not automatically establish personal criminal responsibility.
An agent should preserve the agency agreement and instructions received from the principal.
Investigators may examine whether the agent knew the transaction was unlawful.
Identity theft, unauthorized banking access or account compromise can completely change the legal analysis.
Immediately preserve:
Providing an IBAN is not automatically criminal.
However, knowingly allowing another person to use the account for suspicious transactions can create serious legal exposure.
A person should never rent, sell or lend their bank account to another person.
Banks and financial institutions in Turkey have obligations concerning suspicious transactions and financial crime risks.
A suspicious transaction report or compliance review does not itself mean that the customer has been convicted of a crime.
It may, however, trigger additional scrutiny.
A bank may restrict transactions or request supporting documents where it identifies compliance concerns.
The foreigner should determine:
A bank compliance restriction and a judicial seizure are not necessarily the same thing.
The existence of an account restriction should not be presented as proof that the customer committed money laundering.
The legal basis and nature of the restriction should be identified first.
Do not ignore an official summons or investigative contact.
The foreigner should determine whether they are being called as:
The procedural rights can differ.
Where the suspect does not sufficiently understand Turkish, appropriate interpretation and procedural safeguards become particularly important.
The person should not sign a statement they do not understand.
If the foreigner does not remember why a transfer occurred, they should not invent an explanation.
It is better to state accurately what they remember and distinguish known facts from assumptions.
A foreign suspect should consider obtaining a criminal defense lawyer before answering detailed questions concerning suspicious banking transactions.
This is particularly important where the investigation concerns Article 282 or another serious offence.
Do not provide only the single transfer that appears favorable.
The surrounding transactions may explain the legitimate purpose of the disputed payment.
The complete account history can sometimes be essential to understanding the transaction.
For example:
10 March: Company signs consultancy agreement.
15 March: USD 30,000 transferred.
16 March: USD 20,000 transferred to subcontractor.
17 March: Invoice issued.
20 March: Service delivered.
A chronological record can make the economic purpose easier to understand.
Ask who ultimately received the funds.
A transaction may look suspicious when viewed only as:
Account A → Account B
but become understandable when the full commercial chain is shown.
If there was a legitimate reason for using a particular Turkish account, document it.
For example:
Do not fabricate contracts, invoices or payment explanations to make an old transaction appear legitimate.
Authentic contemporaneous evidence is much safer.
Keep original:
Do not alter screenshots or selectively delete messages.
The fact that funds have already left the account does not necessarily end the investigation.
Authorities can investigate the complete transaction chain.
The foreigner should therefore preserve evidence showing why the onward transfer occurred.
The company’s internal authorization system may become important.
Preserve:
If the money was received accidentally and immediately returned, preserve evidence of:
The circumstances and knowledge at the time remain important.
A person who unknowingly received criminal proceeds may themselves be a victim or witness rather than a participant.
Evidence showing how the person was deceived can therefore be critical.
Crypto-related transfers can receive heightened scrutiny because transaction chains may involve multiple wallets, exchanges and jurisdictions.
Preserve:
This can create significant risk if the investment was actually part of a fraudulent scheme.
The person should preserve evidence showing:
Investigators may examine whether the account holder was a participant, an unwitting intermediary or another victim.
The defense should focus on the person’s actual knowledge and role rather than merely the existence of the account transaction.
Jurisdictional and procedural issues may become more complicated when the person resides abroad.
However, leaving Turkey does not automatically eliminate an investigation or possible procedural obligations.
Legal advice should be obtained before deciding whether to travel to Turkey.
For a foreign national, a criminal investigation can have consequences beyond the banking issue.
Depending on the allegations and procedural outcome, residence status, entry restrictions, deportation-related measures or other immigration consequences may need separate assessment.
A criminal defense strategy should therefore consider immigration consequences where relevant.
If the foreigner was actually defrauded into receiving or transferring funds, the person may have separate rights against the individuals who deceived them.
Do not assume that participation in an investigation automatically resolves the underlying financial dispute.
The first steps should be:
Yes, where the factual and legal elements alleged by the prosecution are not established.
A defense may focus on issues such as:
The precise defense depends on the allegation and evidence.
A general statement such as:
“I did not know it was illegal.”
may be insufficient by itself.
A stronger defense can reconstruct the transaction:
Who sent the money → why it was sent → what the foreigner understood → why it was transferred → who ultimately received it → what documents confirm the explanation.
No. The source of the money, the person’s knowledge, the purpose of the transaction and the conduct surrounding the transfer must be examined.
Yes. The investigation may concern whether the person knowingly participated in handling criminal proceeds even if someone else committed the underlying offence.
Not by itself. Legitimate transfers are ordinary banking activity. The legal risk depends on the source, purpose and circumstances.
The instruction itself does not establish criminal liability. Investigators may nevertheless examine who gave the instruction and what the account holder knew about the transaction.
Yes. Messages can help establish the purpose of the payment, instructions received, the person’s understanding and communications with the sender or beneficiary.
First determine whether the restriction is an internal bank compliance measure, a formal administrative action or a judicial seizure. The appropriate response depends on the legal basis.
Potentially, depending on the allegations, evidence and procedural circumstances. A suspicious transfer alone does not automatically require arrest.
Lack of knowledge can be highly important, but the complete circumstances must be examined, including whether there were facts that allegedly should have alerted the person to the unlawful source.
Potentially. Criminal allegations involving a foreign national can have separate immigration implications depending on the offence, procedural stage and eventual outcome.
Determine your procedural status, obtain appropriate legal assistance where necessary, ensure you understand the proceedings and avoid signing a statement that you do not understand.
A foreign national who receives and transfers money through a Turkish bank account may face criminal investigation, bank restrictions, asset-seizure measures and immigration-related consequences if authorities suspect that the funds are connected with criminal proceeds. Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign nationals, investors, employees, company managers and business owners facing financial-crime investigations in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing suspicious banking transactions, preparing criminal defenses, analyzing MASAK-related issues, challenging unlawful seizure or account restrictions, preserving digital and financial evidence and coordinating criminal and immigration strategies for foreign clients.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey