

Planning to buy an apartment scheduled for demolition in Turkey? Learn the legal risks for foreign investors, including title deed status, risky buildings, land shares, replacement apartments, redevelopment agreements, additional costs, demolition and contractor risks.
An apartment scheduled for demolition can appear to be an attractive investment.
The existing property may be offered below the price of a new apartment. The seller may promise that the buyer will receive a valuable replacement unit after urban transformation. A contractor may already be preparing a modern redevelopment project.
But this type of transaction is fundamentally different from purchasing an ordinary apartment.
If demolition is already approaching, the physical apartment being shown to the buyer may soon cease to exist.
The real investment may therefore be the ownership interest, land share, redevelopment rights and contractual position attached to that apartment.
Before purchasing, a foreign investor should answer a much more important question:
What exactly will remain legally and economically after the existing apartment is demolished?
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign investors with pre-purchase due diligence involving properties scheduled for demolition, risky-building procedures, land shares, redevelopment agreements, replacement apartments and urban transformation disputes.
Not every planned demolition has the same legal basis.
The building may have been officially determined to be risky under the urban transformation framework.
Demolition may form part of a broader area-based transformation project.
Owners may have voluntarily agreed to demolish and reconstruct an old building.
A redevelopment agreement may already have been signed with a contractor.
Different legal structures create different risks.
The buyer should therefore obtain the documents establishing why demolition is scheduled.
This is one of the first questions that should be investigated.
Where a building has been officially determined to be risky and the determination has become final, the process can proceed toward evacuation and demolition.
The buyer should establish whether the risky-building determination is still open to objection, whether it has become final and whether evacuation and demolition procedures have already started.
The investment risk changes substantially depending on the stage reached.
A seller may say that demolition is “planned for next year.”
That statement should not be accepted without verification.
If the risky-building determination has become final and formal evacuation and demolition procedures are already progressing, the practical occupation period may be much shorter.
The buyer may have little opportunity to live in the apartment or generate rental income before the building must be vacated.
Under the current risky-building framework, owners can be given a period not exceeding 90 days for evacuation and demolition.
That does not mean a new buyer will necessarily have 90 days of unrestricted use after completing the purchase.
The process may already be underway.
The relevant notices may already have been issued.
Therefore, the buyer should obtain the actual procedural chronology before calculating expected occupation or rental income.
This changes the nature of due diligence.
In an ordinary purchase, the buyer investigates the apartment that will continue to exist.
In a demolition-stage purchase, the buyer must investigate both the existing unit and the legal position after demolition.
The current apartment may effectively become only the starting point for future redevelopment rights.
Once the existing building is demolished, the underlying land and the owner’s registered share become particularly important.
A foreign investor should therefore examine the land share attached to the apartment.
Two apartments with similar physical characteristics may have materially different land shares.
This can affect owner decision-making and redevelopment negotiations.
The number written on the title deed should not automatically be assumed to reflect a legally correct historical allocation.
Land-share disputes can become especially serious immediately before or during urban transformation.
If the apartment appears substantially more valuable than other units but carries a surprisingly small land share, further investigation may be appropriate.
Buying before understanding the issue can transfer a difficult dispute to the investor.
Foreign investors sometimes believe that physical demolition means ownership simply disappears.
That is an oversimplification.
The title and land-share structure, subsequent redevelopment arrangements and eventual establishment of rights in the new building must be examined according to the particular project.
The investor should understand how the existing title position is expected to transition into the future redevelopment structure.
An updated title record should be obtained immediately before purchase.
The buyer should examine the declarations and encumbrance sections carefully.
Risky-building status and subsequent statutory procedures can generate relevant title entries.
Mortgages, attachments and other registered rights should also be investigated.
The fact that the physical building will soon be demolished does not make these legal issues irrelevant.
This is an important due diligence point.
The physical removal of the risky building should not automatically be interpreted as meaning that the parcel is no longer connected with the statutory transformation process.
A buyer considering a property at or around the demolition stage should therefore investigate the continuing legal status of the parcel rather than relying only on whether a risky-building notation is visible in the form originally used before demolition.
This may be more important than the condition of the existing apartment.
Once risky-building status has become final, the owners can begin taking decisions concerning the new application without necessarily waiting for physical demolition.
A foreign buyer may therefore enter a project where the essential redevelopment structure has already been determined.
Owner-meeting records should be obtained before purchase.
Under the current urban transformation framework, where unanimity cannot be achieved, decisions concerning the new application can generally be taken by the required simple majority calculated according to ownership shares.
This means that buying an apartment does not necessarily give the foreign investor the ability to redesign or renegotiate the entire project.
The required majority may already have selected the redevelopment structure.
This can reveal significant hidden risk.
If the seller participated in the majority agreement, determine what documents were signed.
If the seller opposed the project, investigate whether the seller’s ownership share has become subject to the special statutory procedure applicable to dissenting owners.
The buyer should never unknowingly purchase into an advanced majority dispute.
Where the statutory share-sale process has reached the relevant stage, a notation can be requested in the title record indicating that the share is subject to sale under the urban transformation framework and cannot be sold or subjected to another transaction requiring transfer while that restriction applies.
This makes a current title investigation essential.
A buyer should never assume that the seller remains completely free to transfer the property merely because the seller still appears as the registered owner.
If a contractor has already been selected, the buyer should obtain the complete signed agreement.
Do not purchase based only on the seller’s explanation.
The agreement may regulate:
the replacement apartment,
its expected area,
floor and orientation,
construction period,
temporary rent,
additional owner payments,
technical specifications,
property transfers,
delay consequences,
security,
default,
and termination.
For a demolition-stage investment, this agreement may be one of the most important documents in the entire transaction.
This should never remain vague.
If the seller says, “You will receive a new apartment,” ask for the exact contractual basis.
Which unit?
Which floor?
What net area?
What gross area?
Which orientation?
Will there be a balcony?
Parking?
Storage?
What technical specification?
A promise of “one new apartment” is not enough to calculate investment value.
The existing apartment may have 150 square meters.
The replacement apartment may not.
The existing unit may be on an upper floor.
The replacement may be lower.
The existing apartment may face a particular direction or have an open view.
The future building configuration may change those characteristics.
The investment should therefore be valued according to the expected replacement unit, not merely the old apartment.
The existing building may have been constructed under older planning rules.
After demolition, the replacement project must comply with the legally applicable planning and building framework.
Development density may differ.
Height may differ.
The number of floors may differ.
Setbacks and parking requirements may affect the project.
The old building is therefore not always a reliable representation of the future building.
A foreign investor should investigate the legally applicable planning conditions.
This is particularly important where the purchase price assumes that the new project will contain more construction area than the old building.
The buyer should distinguish between existing legal development rights and speculative future planning expectations.
A seller may say that the new project will have additional floors.
A contractor may claim that a zoning increase is expected.
A real estate agent may describe the future apartment as significantly more valuable because of anticipated development rights.
Unless those rights have a reliable legal basis, they should not be priced as guaranteed value.
Permit status can substantially change the level of uncertainty.
If a permit has already been issued, the approved architectural project can be examined.
The buyer can compare the seller’s promised replacement unit with the legally approved project.
If there is no permit, important aspects of the future project may still change.
Computer-generated images and sales brochures can be useful for understanding the intended project.
But they should not be confused with legally approved architectural documents.
The buyer should verify whether the promised building configuration has received the necessary administrative approvals.
An apartment scheduled for demolition may look cheap because the advertised price reflects only the existing ownership interest.
But the buyer may later be required to make substantial payments under the redevelopment structure.
The seller should disclose all existing payment obligations.
The redevelopment agreement should be reviewed for future contributions.
Any additional protocols should also be obtained.
This is a particularly important transactional question.
If construction contributions have already become due, the buyer should determine whether unpaid amounts exist.
The transaction documents should clearly allocate responsibility for existing and future obligations.
Otherwise, a dispute can arise immediately after purchase.
Before demolition, there is at least an existing building.
After demolition, owners become heavily dependent on successful completion of the new project.
If the contractor experiences serious financial difficulty, the investment can become trapped in an unfinished development.
For this reason, contractor due diligence becomes essential.
The redevelopment agreement should be examined for mechanisms protecting owners if construction does not proceed as promised.
The legal and financial structure of any security should be understood.
Foreign investors should avoid assuming that a large or impressive project presentation guarantees completion.
Consider the sequence:
The investor purchases the apartment.
The building is demolished.
The investor loses rental income.
The contractor begins construction.
The contractor then becomes financially distressed.
Construction stops.
The investor may now own rights connected with an unfinished project rather than an income-producing apartment.
This scenario should be included in the investment analysis before purchase.
Some redevelopment agreements require the contractor to pay owners temporary rent during construction.
If the seller relies on this payment when presenting the investment, the buyer should check the contract.
How much is paid?
When does payment start?
When does it end?
Does it continue during contractor delay?
Is it adjusted over time?
These questions can materially affect investment returns.
Public rental assistance under the urban transformation framework should not be confused with contractual rent paid by a contractor.
Different eligibility conditions apply.
A foreign investor should not include public assistance in the financial model unless eligibility and the current applicable conditions have been verified.
If demolition is imminent, the existing apartment may provide little or no meaningful future rental income.
A buyer should therefore calculate returns based on the redevelopment period rather than the current rental yield.
An apartment advertised as producing attractive monthly rent may become vacant shortly after purchase.
The property may currently be occupied by a tenant.
The buyer should obtain and review the lease.
Rent payment history and deposits should be investigated.
The relationship between the urban transformation process and the tenant’s evacuation should also be understood.
Purchasing a property scheduled for demolition does not justify ignoring existing private-law relationships.
The redevelopment may already be subject to litigation.
An owner may have challenged the risky-building determination.
There may be a land-share correction lawsuit.
The zoning plan may be disputed.
The contractor agreement may be challenged.
The statutory sale of a dissenting owner’s share may be contested.
Pending litigation can delay or materially change the project.
A scheduled demolition date does not always mean the legal process is uncontested.
An owner may have filed an administrative lawsuit or requested interim judicial protection.
The buyer should understand whether the demolition timetable depends on an unresolved court dispute.
The market value of an apartment approaching demolition should not necessarily be calculated in the same way as an ordinary apartment.
The buyer should assess the economic value of:
the land share,
the redevelopment rights,
the replacement unit,
expected construction contributions,
temporary rent rights,
expected completion time,
contractor risk,
planning risk,
and litigation risk.
The old apartment’s current market value is only part of the analysis.
A shop scheduled for demolition can present particularly serious allocation risks.
Its value may depend on street frontage, visibility and pedestrian access.
The replacement commercial unit may be placed in a materially different location.
A simple square-meter comparison may therefore be misleading.
The exact future commercial allocation should be reviewed.
This can create a serious post-purchase dispute.
A seller may promise a larger replacement apartment, additional floors or no construction contribution.
If those statements are not supported by the redevelopment documents, the buyer may later discover a materially different investment.
Important seller representations should therefore be documented in the transaction structure rather than left as informal assurances.
A foreign investor may complete the purchase and then leave the country.
Meanwhile, owner meetings can continue.
Notifications can be made.
Construction decisions can change.
Additional payments may be requested.
Disputes can develop.
The buyer should establish a reliable monitoring system immediately after acquisition.
A representative can monitor the redevelopment process, obtain documents and take authorized legal action.
But the scope of authority should be drafted carefully.
Authority to receive information should not automatically become unrestricted authority to sell property, transfer title, accept a different apartment, incur additional debt or waive legal claims.
Where the property is being acquired as part of a citizenship-related investment, the demolition and redevelopment status should be investigated before completing the transaction.
Future title changes, valuation and redevelopment arrangements can create additional complexity.
The property transaction and the separate investment requirements should therefore be coordinated from the beginning.
Before paying a substantial deposit, a foreign buyer should verify:
the registered owner,
the exact independent unit,
the land share,
the current title entries,
the risky-building status,
the demolition procedure,
owner-meeting decisions,
the majority decision,
any dissenting-owner sale process,
the redevelopment agreement,
the replacement apartment,
additional owner contributions,
temporary rent,
the zoning position,
permit status,
the contractor,
and existing litigation.
If these issues cannot be clarified, the buyer should understand that the investment contains substantial unresolved risk.
Urban transformation procedures can move quickly.
A title record obtained several weeks earlier may not reflect the position on completion day.
A new mortgage or attachment may have appeared.
A statutory sale-related notation may have been entered.
Other relevant changes may have occurred.
Critical checks should therefore be refreshed before the title transfer.
The first priority is determine the legal reason for demolition and establish the exact stage of the demolition procedure.
The second priority is obtain a current title record and investigate the land share, encumbrances, declarations and any urban transformation-related entries.
The third priority is determine whether the owners have already taken a binding redevelopment decision and whether the seller participated in or opposed that decision.
The fourth priority is investigate whether any dissenting-owner share-sale procedure affects the property or the seller’s ability to transfer it.
The fifth priority is obtain the complete redevelopment agreement and identify the exact replacement apartment before paying a substantial deposit.
The sixth priority is calculate the total investment cost, including additional construction contributions and the period without rental income.
The seventh priority is verify current zoning conditions and permit status rather than pricing speculative future development rights as guaranteed value.
The eighth priority is investigate the contractor’s ability to complete the project and the contractual protections available if construction stops.
The ninth priority is check existing litigation and determine whether demolition, planning or redevelopment decisions are currently disputed.
The tenth priority is value the transaction primarily according to the legal and economic position after demolition rather than according to the physical apartment that is about to disappear.
The central principle is clear: a foreign investor buying an apartment scheduled for demolition is not merely purchasing an old apartment at a discount. The investor may be purchasing a land share, an existing majority decision, contractual rights and obligations under a redevelopment agreement, exposure to construction costs and a future replacement property that may take years to complete. Every one of those elements should be investigated before the purchase price is paid.
Potentially, depending on the legal stage and title status. However, the transaction requires substantially more due diligence than an ordinary apartment purchase.
Once risky-building status has become final, the statutory evacuation and demolition process can proceed. Under the current framework, owners can be given a period not exceeding 90 days for evacuation and demolition.
Physical demolition should not be confused with automatic disappearance of every property right. The title, land share and redevelopment structure must be examined to determine the owner’s continuing legal position.
The buyer should never assume this without examining the applicable redevelopment decision, ownership structure and contractor agreement. The replacement unit should be identified in the relevant documents.
Yes, potentially. Planning conditions and the redevelopment agreement can result in a replacement unit with different physical characteristics from the existing apartment.
Yes. Under the current framework, applicable new-application decisions can generally proceed through the required simple majority calculated according to ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved.
Potentially. Where the seller is a dissenting owner and the applicable statutory process has advanced, this must be investigated before the transaction. Relevant title restrictions can also arise during the sale process.
Potentially, depending on the redevelopment agreement and transaction structure. Existing and future payment obligations should be identified before purchase.
No completion date should be treated as risk-free. The contractual deadline, permit status, actual project progress, contractor financial position and remedies for delay should all be reviewed.
Ask what legal and economic position you will own after the existing building has been demolished. The answer should be supported by title records, owner decisions, redevelopment contracts, planning documents and permit information rather than verbal promises.
Buying an apartment immediately before demolition can create an investment opportunity, but it can also create a situation where the investor pays for a property that disappears shortly after completion and then waits years for a replacement.
The investment should therefore be analyzed from the end of the process backwards.
What replacement property will exist?
What land share supports the owner’s rights?
What agreement governs construction?
How much additional money must be paid?
Who bears delay risk?
What happens if the contractor fails?
What planning rights actually exist?
Has the majority already committed the property to a particular redevelopment structure?
Only after these questions are answered can the existing purchase price be evaluated properly.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign individuals, investors and companies considering the acquisition of properties scheduled for demolition or already involved in urban transformation.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists with pre-purchase due diligence, title deed investigations, risky-building and demolition procedures, land-share analysis, majority decisions, redevelopment agreements, replacement-apartment rights, contractor risks, zoning and permit reviews and urban transformation disputes.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr