

Learn how foreign investors can conduct customs law due diligence before acquiring a Turkish company, identify hidden duties and penalties, assess import compliance, and reduce post-closing liability risks in 2026.
Acquiring a company engaged in importing, exporting, manufacturing, warehousing, or international distribution in Turkey may expose the buyer to substantial customs liabilities that are not immediately visible in financial statements.
A target company may appear commercially profitable while carrying unresolved risks arising from incorrect tariff classifications, understated customs values, unsupported origin declarations, incomplete inward processing procedures, unpaid anti-dumping duties, or ongoing customs investigations.
For this reason, customs law due diligence before acquiring a Turkish company should be treated as a separate and essential part of the transaction review.
A foreign investor should determine not only whether the target has paid its declared customs duties, but also whether its historical declarations were legally accurate. Turkish customs liabilities may arise after clearance through administrative reviews, post-clearance controls, investigations, or disputes concerning earlier transactions.
A carefully structured customs review helps the buyer identify hidden liabilities, negotiate appropriate contractual protection, adjust the purchase price, and establish a post-closing compliance plan.
Customs risks are often underestimated during mergers and acquisitions because they are spread across thousands of individual import and export transactions.
The target company may rely on:
An error in one recurring practice may affect hundreds of declarations.
For example, if the same incorrect tariff classification was used for several years, the resulting exposure may include additional customs duties, import VAT, other import charges, interest, administrative penalties, and litigation costs.
Turkish Customs Law No. 4458 provides the principal legal framework for customs procedures in Turkey. Customs value, tariff classification, origin, customs procedures, declarations, controls, and penalties are also governed by secondary legislation and administrative rules.
In a share acquisition, the legal identity of the target company generally remains unchanged. Its historical customs liabilities, pending audits, administrative disputes, records, permits, and contractual relationships remain within the same company.
The buyer therefore acquires economic control of an entity that may already carry customs exposure.
In an asset acquisition, liability allocation may differ. However, the buyer may still face practical and legal risks where it takes over customs authorizations, inventories, warehouses, import operations, personnel, records, or business lines.
The transaction structure must therefore be reviewed together with:
The buyer should not assume that choosing an asset transaction automatically eliminates every customs-related risk.
The review should cover a sufficiently representative historical period and focus on the target’s highest-risk products, procedures, suppliers, customers, and customs offices.
The scope should normally include:
The review should also examine whether the target’s written policies correspond to its actual customs practices.
Turkey uses a twelve-digit customs tariff code known as the Customs Tariff Statistics Position.
Incorrect classification can affect:
The due diligence team should request a product-level tariff list and compare it with:
Particular attention should be paid where the target uses one general code for several technically different products.
A code provided by a foreign supplier should not be accepted without verification. Tariff classification may differ across jurisdictions, especially at national statistical-code level.
Customs valuation is frequently one of the most financially significant areas in an acquisition involving a multinational group.
Under the Turkish customs framework, customs value is determined through statutory valuation methods. The primary method is generally transaction value, followed where necessary by methods involving identical goods, similar goods, unit price, computed value, and the fallback method.
The review should investigate whether the target properly included or treated:
A transfer price accepted for corporate income tax purposes is not automatically acceptable for customs valuation.
Where goods are purchased from a related foreign company, the buyer should examine whether the relationship influenced the price and whether supporting valuation documentation exists.
The target may have benefited from preferential customs treatment under free trade agreements, the Customs Union, or other trade arrangements.
The due diligence review should verify whether preferential treatment was supported by valid documents and whether the goods satisfied the applicable origin rules.
The Ministry of Trade distinguishes between proof of non-preferential origin and documents used to establish preferential origin. It also confirms that an A.TR Movement Certificate demonstrates free circulation status rather than origin, while an EUR.1 Movement Certificate may establish preferential origin under the relevant agreement.
The review should examine:
A recurring misunderstanding of A.TR documentation can create significant retroactive liability.
Certain products may be subject to anti-dumping duties, countervailing measures, surveillance practices, quotas, additional financial liabilities, or other trade policy measures.
These measures may depend on:
The target’s import portfolio should be screened against the measures applicable during the relevant periods.
A company may incorrectly believe that a product is not subject to anti-dumping duty because it was shipped from a third country. However, the relevant issue may be the actual origin, producer, or circumvention structure.
Companies engaged in manufacturing often use special customs procedures to reduce or suspend import duties.
These may include:
Under the inward processing procedure, non-free-circulation goods may be imported for processing and later re-exported under the applicable conditions.
The due diligence review should determine whether:
Unclosed or improperly managed procedures may produce customs debt and penalty exposure.
The buyer should identify whether the target imports regulated products such as:
The review should verify compliance with:
The Turkish import regime and related annual measures determine customs duties and may affect additional import requirements.
A target company may have cleared goods successfully in practice without satisfying every legal requirement. Previous clearance does not necessarily prove full compliance.
Customs brokers may prepare and submit declarations, but the target company should not have transferred all internal customs knowledge to an external service provider.
The Ministry of Trade states that companies may conduct customs transactions themselves or appoint a licensed customs broker through a power of attorney. Customs brokers are private-sector professionals certified by the Ministry.
The buyer should review:
A target that cannot explain its own declarations without contacting its broker presents a serious compliance risk.
The seller should disclose all:
The due diligence team should not rely solely on a statement that no final customs debt exists. A pending audit or unresolved document request may later produce substantial exposure.
The company’s accounting records should be reconciled with customs declarations to identify differences in value, quantity, currency, inventory, and supplier information.
Exports should also be reviewed, especially where the target uses preferential origin declarations, export incentives, inward processing authorizations, controlled goods, or VAT-related mechanisms.
Goods leaving the Turkish Customs Territory are generally subject to customs control and must be declared through the applicable export procedures.
The buyer should verify:
An incomplete export procedure may affect both customs and tax positions.
A focused customs due diligence request list should include:
Where transaction volumes are high, data analytics should be used to select risk-based samples.
The following issues should receive immediate attention:
The presence of a red flag does not automatically require abandoning the transaction, but it should affect valuation, contractual protection, and closing conditions.
Where customs exposure is identified, the buyer may seek protection through:
General tax indemnities may not adequately cover every customs risk. Customs liabilities should be addressed expressly.
The seller’s representations should cover classification, valuation, origin, customs procedures, permits, audits, brokers, records, and compliance with trade measures.
Due diligence should lead directly to a post-closing action plan.
The buyer should prioritize:
Closing the acquisition does not eliminate historical exposure. Rapid integration reduces the risk that inherited errors continue under the buyer’s ownership.
In 2026, customs due diligence should place increased emphasis on electronic customs records, automated risk analysis, data consistency, supply-chain traceability, product safety controls, origin verification, and related-party valuation.
Foreign investors should also review whether the target’s customs data is consistent with its accounting, tax, transfer-pricing, logistics, and inventory systems.
The most serious acquisition risk is often not an isolated error, but a repeated compliance practice embedded in the company’s operating model.
It is particularly important where the target imports, exports, manufactures, stores, distributes, or processes goods. A limited review may still be appropriate where customs activity is minor.
Yes. In a share acquisition, the target remains the same legal entity, and its historical customs risks generally remain within the company.
Common risks include incorrect tariff classification, customs valuation errors, unsupported origin claims, and improperly closed special customs procedures.
The use of a customs broker does not automatically eliminate the importer’s or exporter’s legal responsibility. Broker conduct and internal supervision should both be examined.
Yes. Related-party pricing, royalties, year-end adjustments, and assists may affect customs value even where the tax documentation appears satisfactory.
No. It generally demonstrates free circulation status under the Customs Union framework, not the origin of the goods.
Yes. Identified exposure may justify a price adjustment, escrow, specific indemnity, holdback, or pre-closing corrective action.
The buyer should determine the audit’s scope, potential financial exposure, procedural stage, and available legal defences before closing.
The appropriate period depends on legal limitation rules, transaction size, record availability, audit history, and the target’s risk profile. Higher-risk transactions may require a broader historical review.
Certain errors may be addressed through correction, disclosure, payment, objection, settlement, or litigation procedures. The correct strategy depends on the facts and procedural status.
Acquiring a Turkish company without examining its customs history may expose a foreign buyer to unexpected duties, administrative penalties, disrupted supply chains, and prolonged litigation.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign investors, multinational groups, private equity funds, manufacturers, importers, exporters, and logistics companies with customs law due diligence, transaction risk analysis, tariff classification, customs valuation, origin rules, customs audits, administrative objections, and post-closing compliance.
Working with an experienced customs lawyer before signing or closing the transaction helps identify hidden liabilities, strengthen contractual protection, and prevent avoidable financial losses.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
Contact Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office for strategic, confidential, and client-focused legal support before acquiring a company in Turkey.
Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Customs exposure depends on the transaction structure, imported products, applicable procedures, historical declarations, and the facts of each acquisition.