

Can a Turkish sports club pay a foreign athlete’s salary to an overseas bank account? This 2026 guide explains cross-border salary payments, foreign currency contracts, Turkish athlete taxation, withholding, annual tax returns, double taxation treaties, image rights, bonuses, bank compliance, and payment disputes.
Foreign professional athletes playing for Turkish sports clubs are frequently paid under contracts denominated in euros, U.S. dollars, or another foreign currency. At the same time, the athlete may want some or all compensation transferred to a bank account outside Turkey.
This creates several distinct legal questions.
Can a Turkish club pay the athlete directly to a foreign bank account? Does receiving the salary abroad prevent Turkish taxation? Who bears bank charges and currency-conversion losses? What happens if the athlete is tax resident in another country? Can a signing bonus or image-rights payment be transferred through a foreign company? And what happens when a Turkish bank delays a large international transfer for compliance checks?
The most important principle is straightforward:
The location of the bank account receiving the money does not, by itself, determine where an athlete’s income is taxable.
Where a foreign professional athlete performs sporting activities for a Turkish club in Turkey, Turkish tax and employment rules can remain relevant even if the salary is paid directly to an account in London, Dubai, Monaco, New York, Frankfurt, or another jurisdiction.
Turkey also applies a special income-tax regime to professional athletes. Under Temporary Article 72 of Income Tax Law No. 193, the regime currently continues through December 31, 2028. (LEXPERA)
For international athletes, clubs, and agents, cross-border payment provisions should therefore be reviewed before the sports contract is signed.
A cross-border bank account does not automatically prevent salary payments from being made internationally.
However, the payment structure must be consistent with the athlete’s contract, Turkish tax obligations, banking rules, foreign-exchange requirements, and applicable financial-compliance procedures.
The contract should clearly identify:
the payer, beneficiary, bank account, currency, payment date, transfer method, bank charges, tax deductions, and consequences of payment delays.
Simply writing “salary: EUR 2 million” is not enough for a high-value international sports contract.
Not automatically.
This is one of the most important misconceptions in international sports taxation.
Suppose a foreign footballer:
The use of the Swiss account does not automatically convert compensation for sporting activities performed in Turkey into Swiss-source income.
The nature and source of the underlying income must be analyzed independently from the payment destination.
Turkey applies special rules to salary and salary-equivalent payments made to professional athletes.
Temporary Article 72 of Income Tax Law No. 193 currently applies through December 31, 2028. (LEXPERA)
For sports organized through league systems, withholding rates generally are:
| Athlete category | Withholding rate |
|---|---|
| Highest league | 20% |
| League immediately below highest league | 10% |
| Other leagues | 5% |
| Certain non-league sports | 5% |
The detailed Revenue Administration guidance confirms these rates and explains the taxation of payments made to athletes. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Foreign nationality does not itself create an exemption.
A Brazilian footballer, American basketball player, Serbian volleyball player, or another foreign professional athlete playing for a Turkish sports organization may still fall within Turkish taxation rules applicable to athlete compensation.
The analysis should focus on:
the sporting activity, source of income, contractual relationship, tax residency, domestic legislation, and applicable double taxation treaty.
The Turkish Revenue Administration takes a broad approach.
Its guidance explains that payments and benefits connected with sporting activities can include:
monthly salary, performance bonuses, match payments, signing fees, image-rights payments, provision of real estate or vehicles, housing, and other benefits. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Therefore, dividing a compensation package into several labels does not automatically divide it into several tax regimes.
International transfers frequently involve substantial signing-on fees.
For example:
Annual salary: EUR 2,500,000
Signing bonus: EUR 1,000,000
Performance bonus: EUR 500,000
The fact that the signing bonus is transferred separately to an overseas account does not automatically remove it from Turkish taxation.
Its true contractual and economic character must be examined.
Foreign athletes may receive bonuses based on:
appearances, goals, assists, clean sheets, league position, championships, European competition qualification, tournament results, or individual awards.
The payment provisions should state when these bonuses become due and whether the amounts are gross or net of applicable taxes.
Image rights require particular caution.
A club might structure compensation as:
EUR 2 million sporting salary + EUR 1 million image-rights fee.
Calling the second payment an “image-rights fee” does not necessarily determine its tax treatment.
The Revenue Administration’s athlete guidance specifically recognizes that payments described as image-rights payments can fall within athlete wage treatment where they are connected with the athlete’s sporting relationship. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Elite athletes sometimes operate through foreign image-rights or management companies.
A Turkish club may therefore be asked to pay part of the compensation to:
a UK company, UAE company, Dutch company, Swiss company, U.S. company, or another foreign entity.
This requires careful analysis.
Routing payment through a foreign corporation does not necessarily eliminate Turkish taxation where the underlying income is connected with sporting activities performed in Turkey.
Ordinary employees frequently focus on treaty employment provisions.
Professional athletes are different.
Many Turkish double taxation treaties contain a specific artistes and sportspersons article.
For example, the Turkey-Canada treaty permits the state where the sportsperson’s personal sporting activities are exercised to tax the related income. It also contains rules addressing situations where income accrues to another person rather than directly to the athlete. (Canada)
The Turkey-UK treaty similarly provides that income derived by an athlete from personal activities exercised in the other contracting state may be taxed in that other state. (GOV.UK)
This treaty feature is extremely important.
Some treaties expressly contemplate situations where sporting income is paid not to the athlete personally but to another entity.
For example, the U.S.-Turkey treaty contains provisions addressing income from an athlete’s activities accruing to another person. (Gelir İdaresi Hizmeti)
Therefore, establishing an offshore company should never be assumed to transform Turkish sporting income into income beyond Turkish taxation.
The athlete’s tax residency remains important for other income and treaty purposes.
A foreign athlete can potentially become a Turkish tax resident depending on domicile and length of residence.
Tax residency can affect treatment of:
foreign sponsorship income, investment income, rental income, dividends, capital gains, and other international earnings.
For this reason, salary structuring and tax-residency analysis should be completed together.
Turkey introduced a major new foreign-source income exemption in 2026 through Law No. 7582.
Qualifying individuals who become resident in Turkey may obtain an exemption for certain income and earnings derived outside Turkey where statutory requirements are satisfied, including conditions relating to their residence and tax position during the preceding three calendar years. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
However, this regime should not be misunderstood.
Transferring Turkish club salary to a foreign bank account does not automatically transform that salary into exempt foreign-source income.
The source and nature of the income remain critical.
This is among the most important contractual issues for foreign athletes.
A contract may state:
“The athlete shall receive EUR 3,000,000 per season.”
But does that mean:
EUR 3 million gross before tax
or
EUR 3 million net after Turkish taxes?
For a high-value professional athlete, the financial difference can be substantial.
The contract should expressly state the intended treatment.
Foreign athletes frequently negotiate guaranteed net compensation.
For example:
“EUR 2 million net per season.”
Where this structure is intended, the agreement should clearly allocate the tax burden and specify whether the club must gross up payments to achieve the guaranteed net amount.
Poor drafting can generate major disputes when additional tax becomes payable.
A sophisticated international athlete contract should consider a tax gross-up mechanism.
The clause can regulate who bears:
withholding taxes, additional annual income tax, tax assessments, legislative changes, penalties caused by the club’s non-compliance, and interest resulting from delayed payment.
The allocation should be explicit.
Withholding does not necessarily end the athlete’s tax obligations.
According to the Turkish Revenue Administration, where professional athlete wage income exceeds the fourth bracket of the income-tax tariff, the income must be reported through an annual income-tax return.
For 2026, that threshold is TRY 5.3 million. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
This is highly relevant to foreign athletes earning substantial salaries.
There was also an important development in 2026 concerning withholding credits.
On February 12, 2026, the Turkish Constitutional Court invalidated language that had conditioned an athlete’s ability to credit withheld tax against annual tax liability on the withholding agent actually having paid that amount to the tax office. The decision was published on June 3, 2026. (Anayasa Makamı)
This is particularly relevant where a club deducts tax from the athlete’s salary but later fails to remit the withheld amount properly.
Consider the following scenario.
A Turkish club deducts tax from the foreign player’s gross salary and pays the player the net amount.
The athlete later discovers that the club failed to transfer part of the withheld tax to the tax administration.
The 2026 Constitutional Court decision materially changes the previous rule that could prevent the athlete from crediting that withholding simply because the withholding agent failed to remit it. (Anayasa Makamı)
Athletes should nevertheless preserve payslips, payment records, withholding documents, and club accounting records.
Professional athlete contracts frequently use:
EUR, USD, GBP, CHF, or TRY.
The agreement should specify not merely the salary amount but also the contractual payment currency.
Currency provisions can become particularly important during periods of substantial exchange-rate volatility.
Suppose the contract promises EUR 100,000 monthly but the club pays the TRY equivalent.
The contract should specify:
whether TRY payment is permitted, which exchange rate applies, which date determines the rate, and who bears conversion costs.
Otherwise, apparently small differences can become significant over an entire season.
Possible contractual benchmarks can include a specified bank rate, an official reference rate, or another objectively identifiable method.
The contract should avoid vague wording such as:
“the applicable exchange rate.”
Which rate? On which date? At what time?
Precision prevents disputes.
International payments can involve:
sending-bank charges, intermediary-bank fees, correspondent-bank charges, and receiving-bank fees.
The contract should specify who bears these costs.
If the athlete is contractually entitled to EUR 250,000 but receives EUR 248,900 after transfer fees, a dispute may arise unless the agreement allocates those charges.
High-value contracts can address whether payment is considered completed only when the full amount actually reaches the athlete’s designated account.
This can prevent the club from treating intermediary banking deductions as part of the athlete’s salary.
Cross-border transfers may require additional processing time.
The agreement should therefore define whether payment is considered made when:
the club instructs its bank, the club’s account is debited, or the athlete’s account is credited.
From the athlete’s perspective, receipt-based drafting generally provides greater certainty.
A club should not necessarily escape contractual default simply because an international bank transfer takes longer than expected.
The agreement can establish:
payment deadlines, grace periods, default interest, notice procedures, and termination consequences.
The athlete should not bear indefinite banking delays caused by the payer.
Large international salary transfers may be subject to compliance reviews by financial institutions.
Banks may request information concerning:
source of funds, athlete contract, identity, tax information, purpose of payment, beneficiary ownership, and relationship between payer and recipient.
This does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing.
High-value cross-border transactions naturally receive enhanced compliance attention.
Sports transactions can involve significant sums and complex international payment structures.
Banks may therefore scrutinize transfers involving:
third-party accounts, agents, offshore companies, unexplained payment descriptions, multiple jurisdictions, or unusual transaction patterns.
The payment structure should match the written contracts and economic reality.
Sending athlete salary to an unrelated third party can create significant legal and compliance problems.
Payments should normally correspond to the contractual creditor unless a legitimate and properly documented alternative arrangement exists.
Requests to transfer compensation to:
family members, unrelated companies, agents, or third-party bank accounts
should receive particular scrutiny.
Athlete salary and agent compensation should generally be clearly distinguished.
The contractual documents should identify:
who owes the agent’s fee, amount or calculation method, invoicing arrangements, tax treatment, and payment destination.
Combining player salary and intermediary compensation into unexplained transfers creates avoidable risks.
A foreign athlete playing in Turkey may also receive sponsorship payments from companies outside Turkey.
Those payments require separate analysis.
Relevant factors can include:
athlete tax residency, location of promotional services, source of payment, applicable treaty, image-rights structure, and the new 2026 foreign-source income exemption.
The foreign location of the sponsor alone does not resolve the tax question.
An athlete may receive international revenue from social media platforms or foreign brands.
Those payments should not automatically be treated as club salary.
However, they still require proper Turkish tax analysis where the athlete is resident or performs relevant commercial activities in Turkey.
International athletes may earn prize money from competitions outside Turkey.
The tax analysis can differ from ordinary Turkish club salary.
Relevant factors include:
competition location, athlete residence, treaty provisions, payer, and whether foreign tax was withheld.
Athletes should preserve official prize-payment and foreign-tax documentation.
An athlete can potentially face taxation in more than one jurisdiction.
Applicable double taxation treaties and domestic foreign-tax-credit rules can provide mechanisms for relieving double taxation.
Documentation becomes crucial.
Athletes should retain:
foreign withholding certificates, foreign tax returns, bank records, tax-residency certificates, and payment statements.
Cross-border salary issues become particularly complicated where an athlete changes clubs during the same year.
For example:
January–June: Premier League club
July–December: Turkish Süper Lig club
The athlete may receive:
Each payment must be properly allocated.
A foreign athlete leaving a Turkish club may receive:
unpaid salary, settlement compensation, termination compensation, bonuses, or damages.
The fact that a settlement payment is transferred abroad does not determine its Turkish tax characterization.
The underlying legal basis for the payment should be examined.
A foreign athlete may obtain an award or decision ordering a Turkish club to pay outstanding compensation.
The resulting payment can include:
principal salary, bonuses, compensation, interest, and procedural costs.
Each component may require separate legal and tax analysis.
Athletes should preserve a complete payment trail.
Important evidence includes:
signed sports contract, amendments, club payroll records, bank transfer confirmations, SWIFT documentation, invoices where relevant, tax withholding records, bonus calculations, and correspondence concerning delayed payments.
This evidence can become crucial in tax audits and sports disputes.
A contract proves what should have been paid.
Bank records prove what actually was paid.
For cross-border disputes, both are necessary.
The athlete should regularly reconcile contractual entitlements against actual bank receipts.
Where a Turkish sports club fails to pay a foreign athlete, the athlete’s remedies depend on the contractual and regulatory framework.
Potential routes may involve:
contractual notices, federation mechanisms, FIFA procedures where applicable, arbitration, Turkish courts, enforcement proceedings, or negotiated settlement.
Jurisdiction and dispute-resolution provisions should therefore be reviewed before initiating proceedings.
International athlete contracts should clearly address:
governing law, competent federation bodies, arbitration, Turkish courts, FIFA jurisdiction where applicable, and enforcement mechanisms.
A cross-border bank account does not itself determine jurisdiction.
International payments can also be delayed or rejected where a transaction involves sanctioned individuals, entities, banks, or jurisdictions.
Sports clubs making international payments should therefore conduct appropriate compliance checks concerning:
beneficiary banks, intermediary institutions, beneficial owners, agents, and relevant jurisdictions.
This becomes particularly important where payment routes involve several countries.
A sophisticated contract can address what happens if the athlete’s designated foreign bank rejects the payment.
For example, the athlete may be required to nominate another compliant account within a specified period.
This prevents banking problems from developing into unnecessary salary disputes.
Before signing with a Turkish sports club, an international athlete should verify:
gross versus net salary, contractual currency, Turkish withholding, annual tax return exposure, tax gross-up, payment account, international transfer costs, exchange-rate methodology, payment date, intermediary-bank charges, bonuses, signing fees, image-rights payments, foreign-company payments, sponsorship income, double taxation treaty protection, tax residency, bank compliance, sanctions screening, late-payment interest, termination rights, and dispute resolution.
For high-value athletes, the financial terms should be modeled before the contract becomes binding.
The fundamental principle for international athletes is this:
Where the money is paid is not necessarily where the money is taxed.
A Turkish club cannot generally transform compensation for sporting activities performed in Turkey into foreign-source income merely by sending the money to an overseas bank account.
Likewise, athletes should not assume that offshore accounts, foreign image-rights companies, or foreign payment instructions eliminate Turkish tax obligations.
The underlying sporting activity and economic substance remain central.
Potentially, yes, subject to the contract, applicable foreign-exchange and banking requirements, tax obligations, and financial-compliance procedures. The payment destination should be clearly documented in the athlete’s contract or payment instructions.
No. Sending compensation to a foreign bank account does not by itself make income exempt from Turkish taxation.
Under Temporary Article 72 of Income Tax Law No. 193, athletes in the highest league are generally subject to 20% withholding on qualifying athlete salary payments. The special regime currently applies through December 31, 2028. (LEXPERA)
Potentially. The Revenue Administration states that athlete wage income exceeding the fourth income-tax bracket must be declared annually. The threshold for 2026 is TRY 5.3 million. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
A contractual payment can potentially involve a foreign company, but this does not automatically determine its tax treatment. The Turkish Revenue Administration expressly recognizes that image-rights payments connected with sporting activities can fall within athlete wage taxation. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
Potentially, but many treaties contain specific sportsperson provisions allowing Turkey to tax income connected with sporting activities performed in Turkey. The exact treaty must be examined. (Canada)
The athlete’s contract should specify this. For high-value contracts, it is preferable to state clearly whether the club must ensure that the full contractual amount reaches the athlete’s account.
A significant Constitutional Court decision published on June 3, 2026 invalidated the statutory wording that had conditioned the athlete’s ability to credit withheld tax on the withholding agent actually remitting it to the tax office. (Anayasa Makamı)
Not merely because they are paid abroad. The 2026 exemption concerns qualifying foreign-source income of individuals satisfying its statutory requirements. A Turkish club salary does not become foreign-source simply because it is transferred to a foreign bank account. (Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı)
At minimum, the athlete should verify net versus gross salary, tax responsibility, payment currency, overseas bank arrangements, exchange-rate rules, transfer fees, bonuses, image rights, annual tax exposure, double taxation treaty treatment, and remedies for late or unpaid salary.
For an international athlete, the headline salary in a Turkish sports contract does not necessarily represent the amount ultimately received.
Tax withholding, annual income-tax liability, exchange-rate movements, international bank charges, payment delays, image-rights structures, bonuses, double taxation, and cross-border compliance requirements can materially affect the economic value of the agreement.
The 2026 Constitutional Court decision concerning athlete withholding credits and Turkey’s broader 2026 tax changes make careful review particularly important for foreign athletes negotiating new contracts. (Anayasa Makamı)
Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance to international professional athletes, footballers, basketball players, volleyball players, coaches, agents, sports clubs, and sports companies concerning cross-border salary arrangements, athlete contracts, unpaid salaries, signing bonuses, image-rights agreements, tax-related contractual risks, net salary guarantees, international payments, sports arbitration, and compensation claims in Turkey.
For high-value international transfers, the payment and tax provisions should ideally be reviewed before the athlete signs the final contract, particularly where salary is denominated in foreign currency or will be transferred outside Turkey.
For a case-specific legal assessment concerning a foreign athlete’s salary arrangement, unpaid compensation, cross-border payment structure, or professional sports contract in Turkey, you may contact our office.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower, Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey