

Buying property in Turkey? Learn how to check a Turkish property for mortgages, liens, attachments, court annotations, usufruct rights, easements and other title encumbrances before paying a deposit or completing the purchase.
A property in Turkey can have a completely genuine title deed and still carry significant legal problems.
A seller may be the registered owner, but the property may simultaneously be subject to a bank mortgage, creditor attachment, court restriction, usufruct right, easement, preliminary sale annotation, lease annotation, right of residence, family residence annotation, or another restriction affecting ownership or use.
For a foreign buyer, this creates one of the most important rules of Turkish real estate investment:
Never assume that seeing the seller’s title deed means the property is legally clean.
The current land registry record must be examined separately.
Turkey’s General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre (TKGM) defines the collective concept of title restrictions as covering entries such as annotations, declarations, easements, real estate obligations and pledges that restrict ownership.
For buyers, the practical objective is therefore not simply to ask:
“Does the seller own the property?”
The correct question is:
“What rights, debts, restrictions, claims or third-party interests are currently registered against this property?”
This guide explains how foreign buyers can investigate those issues before purchasing Turkish real estate.
An encumbrance is broadly a right, restriction or registered legal condition affecting the property or the owner’s ability to deal with it freely.
The Turkish land registry can contain several different categories of entries.
These may include:
mortgages, attachments, annotations, declarations, easements, usufruct rights, residence rights, rights of passage, contractual rights and other restrictions.
TKGM’s official explanation states that the concept includes restrictions on ownership such as annotations, declarations, easements, real estate obligations and pledges.
Each entry has to be examined individually.
A seller may show a buyer an authentic title deed certificate.
That does not prove the property is currently free from encumbrances.
Suppose the certificate was issued three years ago.
Since then:
the seller may have obtained a bank loan secured by a mortgage, a creditor may have attached the property, litigation may have produced a registry annotation, or another real right may have been established.
The paper certificate does not automatically reveal everything that happened afterward.
The current official land registry record is therefore more important than an old title deed document.
A mortgage is a registered security right over real estate.
A property owner may mortgage the property to secure:
a housing loan, commercial financing, corporate debt, third-party debt or another financial obligation.
The mortgage gives the creditor important rights concerning the property if the secured debt is not satisfied.
For a purchaser, discovering a mortgage does not necessarily mean the transaction must immediately be abandoned.
But the mortgage must be understood and properly dealt with before completion.
Potentially, yes.
The existence of a mortgage does not automatically make every sale impossible.
The critical problem is that purchasing the property does not necessarily make the registered mortgage disappear.
Therefore, if the buyer expects to acquire unencumbered ownership, the mortgage release should be coordinated as part of closing.
Never rely only on:
“The mortgage will disappear when you buy the apartment.”
That assumption can be extremely dangerous.
A proper review should determine:
who the mortgage creditor is,
the registered amount or scope,
the mortgage rank,
the relevant registration details,
whether the underlying obligation remains outstanding,
and
how and when the mortgage will be released.
The legal significance of the mortgage should be established before purchase funds are released.
A seller may say:
“I already paid the bank. There is no mortgage anymore.”
That statement should be verified.
Repayment of the underlying loan and formal deletion of the mortgage from the land registry are distinct matters.
If the registry still contains the mortgage when the buyer is preparing to acquire the property, its formal release should be addressed.
A creditor pursuing the property owner may cause an attachment to be registered against the real estate through enforcement proceedings.
This may result from:
commercial debts, unpaid loans, judgments, contractual debts, tax liabilities or other enforceable claims.
An attachment can create significantly greater transactional risk than buyers initially expect.
A creditor who has attached the property may be pursuing compulsory enforcement against it.
Depending on the circumstances, this can ultimately lead to forced sale proceedings.
A buyer should therefore never treat an attachment as a minor administrative note.
The underlying enforcement file and current status may need to be investigated.
A property can carry multiple attachments.
For example:
Bank A – mortgage
Creditor B – attachment
Tax authority – public debt attachment
Creditor C – additional attachment
The buyer should not merely ask whether “a lien” exists.
The entire registry position should be examined.
Litigation involving the property may also be reflected in the land registry.
Disputes can concern:
ownership, title cancellation, inheritance, fraudulent transfer, matrimonial property, contractual purchase rights or other claims.
A lawsuit concerning ownership can fundamentally alter the risk of the transaction.
Imagine purchasing a property while another person is already suing the seller claiming:
“This property actually belongs to me.”
Even if the seller is currently shown as registered owner, the buyer needs to understand the litigation before proceeding.
The case file, claim, procedural stage and effect of any registry annotation should be investigated.
A seller may previously have promised to sell the property to someone else under a legally relevant preliminary transaction.
Where qualifying rights have been annotated in the registry, they may affect subsequent purchasers.
This is why checking only:
owner + mortgage + attachment
is not enough.
The complete set of registry entries matters.
A usufruct can give another person extensive rights to use and benefit from property even though someone else holds ownership.
For example, the seller may be the registered owner while another individual holds a lifetime usufruct.
A foreign buyer expecting immediate unrestricted use could therefore acquire a property that another person remains legally entitled to use.
A right of residence can allow another person to occupy the property.
This can become extremely important where the buyer intends to move into the property immediately.
Ownership alone does not always establish an unrestricted right to immediate physical occupation.
An easement may permit use of the property for another legal purpose.
Examples may involve:
passage, access, infrastructure, pipelines, utilities or other rights benefiting another property or party.
For development land, villas and commercial real estate, easements can materially affect property value and development potential.
A rural or development parcel may look accessible when inspected.
But the apparent road may cross another person’s land.
The buyer should determine whether there is legally secure access and whether relevant passage rights appear in cadastral or registry records.
Physical access and legal access are not necessarily the same thing.
Annotations can reveal rights and restrictions that materially affect a purchase.
Depending on the circumstances, these can relate to:
contracts, litigation, family-related restrictions, purchase rights, leases or other legally significant arrangements.
Each annotation should be identified and interpreted.
The declarations section can also contain important information about the property.
A declaration does not necessarily operate in the same manner as a mortgage or attachment, but it can still be highly relevant to legal due diligence.
The buyer’s lawyer should determine what each declaration means rather than simply confirming that one exists.
The land registry should also be reviewed for limited real rights affecting the property.
These may materially restrict:
occupation, construction, access, development, commercial exploitation or future resale.
A buyer purchasing expensive land should understand these rights before valuing the investment.
TKGM’s Web Tapu system provides property owners with electronic access to their property information.
According to TKGM, an owner can use Web Tapu to view property information and, after the applicable electronic payment, obtain officially valid current documents including a current title deed, mortgage document and land registry record copy.
This makes Web Tapu particularly useful for verifying current registry information.
Official TKGM Web Tapu Information
Access to detailed land registry information is not simply unrestricted public browsing.
However, TKGM states that property owners can authorize another person to examine their property information through Web Tapu.
This can be particularly useful during a sale.
Instead of sending an old screenshot, the seller can facilitate legitimate verification of current information.
Where properly authorized and legally entitled to obtain the relevant information, a lawyer can investigate the title position as part of real estate due diligence.
This can be especially useful for foreign purchasers who are outside Turkey.
The objective is not simply to obtain a document.
It is to interpret what every relevant registry entry means for the proposed acquisition.
The registry record provides information concerning the property’s registered legal status.
TKGM confirms that an official land registry record copy can be obtained through Web Tapu under the applicable procedure.
The buyer should distinguish this from a simple photograph of the title deed certificate.
TKGM’s official FAQ provides a useful definition.
It describes the relevant restrictions as a collective term covering matters that restrict ownership, including annotations, declarations, easements, real estate obligations, foundation-related entries and pledges.
For a foreign buyer, this is important because the due-diligence exercise must go beyond checking for a conventional bank mortgage.
Turkish law does not make detailed land registry information universally available to anyone without limitation.
TKGM’s guidance refers to the framework under Article 1020 of the Turkish Civil Code for persons who establish a credible legal interest in obtaining land registry information and documentation.
The appropriate method therefore depends on whether the requester is the owner, a registered right holder, an authorized representative or another person establishing the necessary interest.
An agent may send a screenshot stating:
“No debt. Clean title.”
That should not conclude the investigation.
Ask:
When was the information obtained?
Does it show the complete record?
Who obtained it?
Could new entries have appeared afterward?
For significant transactions, current official information should be independently reviewed.
A sales contract may state that the property is free from debt and restrictions.
That contractual representation can be useful.
But it does not replace registry verification.
The strongest structure is generally:
seller warranty + independent registry investigation + final pre-closing check.
Ideally, the legal position should be investigated before a substantial non-refundable deposit is paid.
This is especially important where the seller or agent is demanding a large reservation payment.
A buyer should not discover after paying EUR 50,000 that the property carries:
a large mortgage, multiple attachments and pending ownership litigation.
If commercial circumstances require a reservation payment before full due diligence is completed, the agreement should contain appropriate protection.
For example, refund rights can be structured around discovery of unacceptable:
mortgages, attachments, title defects, litigation, ownership problems or other material encumbrances.
The precise wording matters.
Where substantial time passes between initial due diligence and signing, the title position may need to be refreshed.
A registry report obtained months ago should not automatically be treated as current.
This is one of the most important protections.
Suppose due diligence is completed on Monday.
On Tuesday, a creditor registers an attachment.
The title transfer occurs on Friday.
If nobody rechecks the property, the buyer may be relying on outdated information.
For significant transactions, a final registry check close to completion should therefore be considered essential.
A seller experiencing financial difficulties may simultaneously face:
bank enforcement, supplier claims, tax collection, court proceedings or other creditor actions.
A property that was clean when negotiations began may not remain clean throughout a lengthy transaction.
The appropriate method depends on the mortgage and transaction structure.
Where a bank mortgage secures an outstanding loan, the parties may need to coordinate:
the outstanding payoff amount, payment to the lender, release documentation, registry deletion and payment of the remaining purchase price.
The sequence should be determined before closing.
A dangerous structure is:
Buyer pays entire price → Seller promises to repay bank → Seller promises to remove mortgage later.
If the seller fails to perform, the buyer may have paid for property that remains encumbered.
A safer closing structure should connect payment with actual discharge of the mortgage.
An attachment may require resolution through the relevant enforcement process.
The underlying debt may need to be:
paid, settled, secured, successfully challenged or otherwise legally resolved.
The buyer should not assume that paying the seller automatically resolves the creditor’s attachment.
Where an attachment appears, the due-diligence investigation may need to identify:
the enforcement office, file number, creditor, debtor, claim amount, attachment date and current status.
This information helps determine whether the problem can realistically be resolved before completion.
Tax or other public receivables can generate enforcement measures affecting property.
Where a public-law attachment exists, the applicable administrative collection process should be examined.
Do not assume that the procedure for releasing every type of attachment is identical.
Where several creditors have registered claims, removing only one may not produce clean ownership.
The closing strategy should identify every entry requiring deletion.
The buyer should know what the registry is supposed to look like immediately after closing.
A very recent acquisition is not automatically suspicious.
However, combined with other circumstances, it may justify additional investigation.
For example:
property acquired last week + immediate resale + unusually low price + power-of-attorney seller + substantial mortgage
should trigger enhanced due diligence.
If someone is selling under a power of attorney, verify both:
the property record
and
the representative’s authority.
The power should be genuine, valid and sufficiently broad to authorize the transaction.
A clean property registry does not compensate for an invalid seller authorization.
If the registered owner is a Turkish company, the property record is only one part of the investigation.
The buyer may also need to examine:
company existence, authorized representatives, signature authority, corporate approvals, insolvency concerns and restrictions affecting disposition of assets.
The individual negotiating the sale may not have authority to complete it.
Where ownership recently passed through inheritance, determine whether:
inheritance procedures were properly completed, all relevant owners are registered, disputes exist, or someone is attempting to sell more than their ownership share.
Encumbrance verification should be combined with ownership verification.
A seller may own only a fractional share.
This can raise issues beyond mortgages and attachments, including rights arising from co-ownership.
Before buying a share rather than an entire property, the legal consequences should be separately analyzed.
Off-plan property requires special attention because the developer’s land may carry substantial financing.
A developer may have mortgaged the project land to finance construction.
The buyer should determine:
what property is mortgaged, who the lender is, whether individual units can be released, when release occurs and what contractual protections exist if the developer defaults.
Large construction projects often use secured financing.
A mortgage itself does not prove the project is unsafe.
The important issue is whether there is a reliable mechanism ensuring the buyer’s unit can ultimately be transferred with the promised title condition.
Commercial properties may involve additional rights such as:
long-term leases, rights affecting business use, easements, financing security or contractual restrictions.
The buyer should investigate both the registry and the underlying commercial occupancy arrangements.
For land purchases, due diligence should extend beyond financial liens.
Particularly important issues can include:
rights of passage, utility easements, development restrictions, agricultural limitations, expropriation-related issues and cadastral access.
A property can be free of bank debt but still unsuitable for the buyer’s project.
This distinction is crucial.
Even where no problematic title restrictions appear, separate risks may exist concerning:
zoning, unauthorized construction, building permits, occupancy status, tenants, management debts, tax issues, structural condition or contractual disputes.
Registry due diligence is therefore one component of a complete property investigation.
TKGM provides an online Parcel Inquiry system for real estate such as land and plots.
But parcel inquiry primarily helps identify cadastral information.
It should not be confused with obtaining and reviewing the complete current registry information concerning mortgages, attachments and other rights.
TKGM describes Web Tapu as its electronic platform for title-related procedures, including applications for sales, mortgages, inheritance transfers and similar land registry transactions.
For owners, it also provides access to official property documentation and current registry information.
This distinction is important for foreign purchasers performing remote due diligence.
Foreign buyers sometimes receive a registry document early in negotiations and assume it remains valid indefinitely.
It does not.
Ask for current records and conduct a final check before completion.
The more valuable the transaction, the less reasonable it is to rely on old documentation.
This should increase caution.
A seller may have legitimate privacy concerns and can use appropriate official mechanisms to facilitate controlled review.
TKGM specifically states that owners can authorize another person to inspect their property information through Web Tapu.
A blanket refusal to permit meaningful title verification should therefore be treated seriously.
This can potentially be structured safely.
For example, part of the purchase funds may need to satisfy the secured debt while the remainder goes to the seller.
However, the process must be coordinated so that:
payment, lender confirmation, mortgage release and title transfer work together.
Do not improvise the sequence on closing day.
The buyer’s rights depend substantially on the purchase or reservation agreement and the nature of the problem.
Potential remedies may involve:
requiring removal, postponing closing, terminating the agreement, seeking repayment of the deposit or pursuing other contractual remedies.
This is why due-diligence conditions should be included before money is paid.
Immediate legal analysis is required.
The first questions are:
Was the encumbrance already registered before the acquisition?
Was the buyer informed?
What did the contract say?
Was there fraud or misrepresentation?
What rights does the holder of the encumbrance have?
The answer determines whether the strategy should focus on release, contractual claims, damages, fraud remedies or another legal route.
Potentially.
Liability can arise depending on:
the sale agreement, representations made, warranties, the seller’s knowledge, the nature of the defect and applicable statutory rules.
Evidence of what the seller represented before purchase should therefore be preserved.
Save:
e-mails, WhatsApp messages, property advertisements, brochures, reservation agreements and statements about title condition.
If the seller repeatedly stated:
“The property has no mortgage or debt,”
those communications may later become relevant evidence.
A seller may say:
“The Land Registry will allow the sale, so everything is fine.”
That is not necessarily the correct test.
A transaction being technically capable of registration does not mean that every existing right disappears or that the acquisition is commercially safe.
The buyer needs to know what rights survive and what risks are being acquired.
For significant foreign-buyer transactions, a practical approach is:
Stage One – Before Deposit: Initial ownership and encumbrance investigation.
Stage Two – Before Binding Commitment: Full legal due diligence and resolution plan for identified problems.
Stage Three – Immediately Before Transfer: Fresh registry check confirming that no new adverse entries have appeared.
This significantly reduces the risk of purchasing based on outdated information.
Before purchasing property in Turkey, verify:
For high-value acquisitions, the legal significance of each entry should be analyzed rather than relying on a simple “clean/not clean” description.
The current official land registry information should be examined. TKGM states that property owners can obtain officially valid current title documentation, mortgage documentation and land registry record copies through Web Tapu under the applicable procedure.
Potentially, yes. The existence of a mortgage does not automatically prevent every transfer. However, the mortgage does not simply disappear because ownership changes, so its legal effect and release procedure should be examined before purchase.
An old title deed certificate should not be relied upon to establish the property’s current legal status. Current official registry information should be checked.
A mortgage generally arises as a security right over the property, while an attachment is generally connected with enforcement against the debtor’s property. Their legal effects and release procedures differ.
TKGM explains that it broadly includes ownership-restricting annotations, declarations, easements, real estate obligations, foundation-related entries and pledges.
Detailed registry information is subject to access rules. The owner can access their own property information and TKGM states that owners can authorize another person to examine property information through Web Tapu.
No. Parcel Inquiry is useful for cadastral and parcel information, but it should not be treated as a substitute for reviewing the current official land registry record.
Ideally before a substantial non-refundable deposit is paid, again during legal due diligence where necessary, and finally close to title transfer to ensure that no new adverse entry has appeared.
Determine the creditor, secured obligation, current status and formal release mechanism. If the seller promises clean title, payment and mortgage discharge should be coordinated as part of closing.
The attachment and underlying enforcement proceedings should be investigated before proceeding. The buyer should understand exactly how the attachment will be removed and should not rely solely on the seller’s promise that it will be resolved later.
Checking whether a property has a mortgage is only one part of a proper Turkish title investigation.
Before purchasing real estate, a foreign buyer should understand the property’s entire current registry position, including mortgages, attachments, court annotations, usufruct rights, easements, contractual annotations, declarations and other third-party rights.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign individuals, overseas investors and international companies concerning title deed verification, mortgage and lien investigations, real estate due diligence, property purchase agreements, encumbrance removal, title disputes, off-plan acquisitions, fraudulent property transactions and high-value real estate investments in Turkey.
Where an encumbrance is discovered, the objective is not simply to identify it. Counsel should determine what it means, whether it prevents or compromises the proposed acquisition, whether it can be removed, who must remove it, and how the purchase price should be protected until clean title is confirmed.
For a case-specific assessment, the current land registry records, relevant encumbrances, seller documentation, purchase agreement and proposed payment structure should be reviewed together before completion.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower, Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey