Factory fire in Turkey? Learn how businesses can claim insurance compensation for buildings, machinery, stock, production losses, business interruption, lost profit and additional operating expenses in 2026.

A factory fire can produce several different categories of loss at the same time. The building may be damaged, production machinery may become unusable, raw materials and finished goods may be destroyed, electrical and electronic systems may require replacement, and production may stop for weeks or months. For this reason, a factory fire insurance claim in Turkey should rarely be calculated only by adding the visible physical damage. Depending on the insurance policies and additional coverages in force, the business may potentially seek compensation for property damage, machinery and equipment losses, destroyed stock, reasonable mitigation expenses and business interruption or loss of profit. Turkish insurance practice recognizes separate general conditions for fire insurance, machinery breakdown insurance and fire-related loss-of-profit insurance. The existence of these different coverages is critical because damage to machinery and interruption of production do not automatically mean that every resulting financial loss is covered by a basic fire policy.

What Can a Factory Claim After a Fire?

The precise recoverable amount depends on the wording of the policy, insured values, endorsements, exclusions, deductibles, sub-limits and additional coverages. A properly structured factory fire claim may involve damage to the factory building, machinery, production lines, electrical installations, electronic equipment, raw materials, semi-finished products, finished stock, warehouse contents and other insured assets. Separate business-interruption coverage may also compensate qualifying financial losses caused by the shutdown or disruption of production. Each category should be identified and calculated independently rather than submitting one general figure to the insurer.

Factory Building Damage

Where the factory building is insured, compensation may potentially include the reasonable cost of repairing or reconstructing the parts damaged by the fire. Structural columns, roofing, walls, flooring, doors, windows, electrical installations, mechanical systems and other insured building components may all require assessment. In major industrial fires, the damage is not always visible immediately. Heat can weaken structural elements even where they have not collapsed. An engineering assessment can therefore be necessary before accepting the insurer’s repair estimate.

What If the Factory Is Completely Destroyed?

A total or near-total loss requires a detailed valuation of the insured property. The amount recoverable is not automatically equal to the cost of purchasing an entirely new facility. The insurance value, policy limit, applicable valuation method, depreciation provisions, salvage value and underinsurance rules may all affect compensation. The insurer’s calculation should therefore be examined against both the policy and independent reconstruction evidence.

Machinery Loss After a Factory Fire

Machinery is often the largest component of an industrial fire claim. CNC machines, production lines, compressors, generators, boilers, packaging equipment, refrigeration systems, conveyors, robotic systems and specialized manufacturing equipment may be worth considerably more than the factory building itself. Machinery should be assessed individually. The fact that a machine does not appear burned does not necessarily mean that it remains operational or safe.

Fire Is Not the Only Cause of Machinery Damage

Industrial machinery can suffer damage from flames, excessive heat, smoke, soot, water used during firefighting, chemical contamination and sudden interruption of electrical systems. Sensitive electronic controls may fail after exposure to heat or moisture. Bearings, seals and mechanical tolerances can also be affected. Consequently, the insurer should not assess machinery solely according to visible burn marks.

Can Smoke-Damaged Machinery Be Replaced?

Potentially, depending on the severity of the contamination and the policy. The important question is whether cleaning and repair can genuinely return the equipment to its pre-loss operational condition. For sophisticated manufacturing equipment, manufacturers or authorized technical services may need to determine whether contaminated electronic and mechanical components can safely continue operating.

Repair or Replacement: Who Decides?

This is a frequent source of disagreement. The insurer may argue that machinery can be repaired for TRY 2 million, while the manufacturer states that the equipment is unsafe or economically impractical to repair and replacement will cost TRY 7 million. The issue should be resolved through technical evidence rather than the insurer’s preference alone. Manufacturer reports, authorized-service findings, engineering reports and repair-versus-replacement calculations can become decisive.

Machinery Breakdown Insurance and Fire Insurance Are Different

Factories frequently maintain several policies simultaneously. Machinery breakdown insurance generally addresses sudden and unexpected physical damage to insured machinery arising from specified operational and technical risks. Fire-related damage, however, must be analyzed under the appropriate fire/property coverage because machinery breakdown general conditions contain separate exclusions and limitations. Businesses should therefore identify which policy responds to which component of the loss rather than assuming that every damaged machine falls under machinery breakdown insurance.

Production Line Damage

A production line should not always be valued as a collection of isolated machines. Damage to one critical component can make the entire system unusable. Compatibility problems may also arise when an obsolete component can no longer be replaced. The business may therefore need engineering evidence explaining why replacement of a broader system is technically necessary.

Can Electrical Systems Be Included?

Where insured, electrical installations damaged by fire may form part of the property claim. Transformers, distribution boards, cabling, switchgear and production-control infrastructure may require inspection. Electrical equipment exposed to fire, heat or firefighting water should be tested before being returned to service.

Destroyed Raw Materials

Raw materials destroyed in the fire can represent a substantial insured stock loss. The factory should establish the quantity and value existing immediately before the incident. Inventory-management records, purchase invoices, warehouse records, accounting books and production records can help establish the amount.

Semi-Finished Products

Work-in-progress can be more difficult to value than ordinary raw materials. A partially manufactured product contains not only raw material but also production inputs already incurred before the fire. The valuation methodology should reflect the applicable insurance terms and actual stage of production.

Finished Goods and Inventory

Finished products stored at the factory or warehouse may also be insured. However, businesses should distinguish manufacturing cost, book value and anticipated selling price. Insurance compensation is not automatically calculated by multiplying the number of destroyed products by their retail selling price. The policy’s valuation method must be applied.

What If Inventory Records Were Destroyed?

Physical destruction of accounting records does not necessarily prevent the business from proving stock loss. Modern factories often have substantial electronic evidence. ERP systems, electronic invoices, supplier records, warehouse software, customs records, production reports, tax records, bank transactions and customer orders can be used to reconstruct inventory.

Evidence Should Be Secured Immediately

One of the most serious mistakes after a factory fire is concentrating exclusively on restarting production while postponing evidence collection. The business should preserve photographs, videos, security-camera footage, fire brigade records, police or prosecutor documentation where applicable, damaged machinery, inventory records and communications concerning the incident. Evidence that disappears during cleanup may be impossible to recreate later.

Can Debris Removal Costs Be Claimed?

Potentially, if the policy contains the relevant coverage. Large industrial fires can create significant demolition, transportation, disposal and cleaning expenses. Special disposal requirements may apply where chemicals, contaminated materials or industrial waste are involved. Any applicable sub-limit for debris removal should be checked.

Emergency and Mitigation Expenses

The insured business is generally expected to take reasonable measures to prevent the loss from increasing. Emergency roof protection, temporary electrical work, moving undamaged inventory, protecting machinery from rain or contamination and other urgent measures may therefore become relevant to the insurance claim depending on the policy and circumstances. Every emergency expense should be documented.

Business Interruption Can Exceed the Physical Damage

For many factories, the most serious consequence of a fire is not the destroyed property but the inability to produce. A TRY 20 million machinery loss can potentially cause substantially greater financial damage if the factory remains closed for twelve months. This is why business-interruption or fire-related loss-of-profit insurance can be critically important for manufacturing companies.

Is Business Interruption Automatically Covered?

No. A basic fire insurance policy should not automatically be assumed to cover lost profits. Separate business-interruption or fire-related loss-of-profit coverage generally needs to exist. The policy must therefore be reviewed immediately after the fire to determine whether interruption losses are insured.

What Does Fire-Related Loss-of-Profit Insurance Cover?

Under the applicable Turkish insurance framework, qualifying coverage can protect against gross-profit loss resulting from the partial or complete interruption of commercial operations after insured physical property suffers damage from a covered fire-related risk. The calculation can include loss arising from reduced turnover and qualifying increased operating costs incurred to prevent or reduce that reduction.

Lost Revenue Is Not the Same as Insurance Compensation

This distinction is crucial. Suppose a factory would normally have generated TRY 100 million of sales during the shutdown period but actually generated only TRY 40 million. The TRY 60 million difference does not automatically become the insurance claim. The calculation generally requires analysis of the applicable gross-profit rate, variable expenses, saved expenses, increased costs of working and policy provisions.

How Is Business Interruption Calculated?

The calculation usually begins by estimating the turnover the factory would probably have achieved had the fire not occurred. Historical turnover, growth trends, seasonal patterns, existing customer contracts, production capacity and other relevant commercial circumstances may be considered. Actual turnover during the interruption period is then examined. The difference is used within the applicable policy formula to calculate insured gross-profit loss.

Example of a Factory Business Interruption Claim

Assume a manufacturer would reasonably have generated TRY 80 million in turnover during the six months following the fire. Because production stopped, actual turnover was only TRY 20 million. The TRY 60 million turnover reduction is the starting point rather than automatically the recoverable amount. If the applicable gross-profit rate were 35%, the turnover-related gross-profit loss could potentially be approximately TRY 21 million before application of other adjustments, deductibles, policy limits and qualifying increased operating expenses.

Can Lost Customer Orders Be Used as Evidence?

Yes. Cancelled orders, customer correspondence and terminated supply contracts may provide useful evidence demonstrating how the fire affected the business. They are particularly important where historical financial statements do not fully reflect expected future growth.

What If the Factory Was Growing Rapidly Before the Fire?

A simple comparison with the previous year’s turnover may understate the loss. Suppose production capacity increased by 40% shortly before the fire and major supply contracts had already been signed. Using only last year’s sales figures could significantly underestimate what the factory would probably have earned. Business-interruption calculations should therefore consider genuine business trends where permitted by the policy framework.

What If the Factory Was Already Losing Money?

This does not automatically mean that there is no business-interruption claim. The precise calculation depends on the policy definition of gross profit and the business’s financial structure. However, the insurer may rely heavily on historical losses to challenge projections suggesting substantial future profitability. Objective financial evidence becomes especially important.

Additional Increased Costs of Working

A factory may incur extraordinary expenses to continue production after the fire. Depending on coverage, qualifying additional operating expenses can potentially form part of the business-interruption calculation where they are reasonably incurred to prevent or reduce the insured turnover loss.

Temporary Factory Rental

Suppose the insured factory becomes unusable but the company can rent another production facility for six months. The temporary facility costs TRY 5 million, but operating there prevents TRY 15 million of otherwise insured gross-profit loss. Subject to policy terms and calculation limitations, the temporary operating expense may potentially qualify as an increased cost of working.

Outsourcing Production

A manufacturer may temporarily outsource production to another company after the fire. Additional manufacturing costs can potentially be relevant where outsourcing reduces the business-interruption loss. The claimant should demonstrate the financial rationale and the loss that would have occurred without outsourcing.

Overtime and Additional Shifts

Once part of the factory becomes operational again, the company may introduce overtime or additional shifts to recover lost production. Qualifying additional payroll and operating costs may potentially be considered if they reduce insured interruption losses and fall within the relevant policy provisions.

Expedited Machinery Replacement

A business may pay substantially more to obtain replacement machinery quickly. Air freight, expedited manufacturing or priority installation can be expensive but may reduce months of lost production. Depending on policy wording, some increased costs may potentially be recoverable where they reasonably reduce the insured business-interruption loss.

How Long Is Business Interruption Covered?

The policy contains a maximum indemnity period. Common commercial structures may provide different periods depending on the policy negotiated. The insurer’s responsibility does not automatically continue until the business eventually returns to profitability. The maximum indemnity period stated in the policy is therefore one of the most important provisions to examine after a fire.

Why Is a 12-Month Indemnity Period Sometimes Insufficient?

Specialized industrial machinery may require many months to manufacture, transport, install, test and commission. Construction permits and rebuilding may create further delays. A factory with a twelve-month indemnity period may therefore discover after a major loss that production cannot realistically resume within the insured period. This can create a significant uninsured gap.

What If Reconstruction Is Deliberately Delayed?

The insurer may challenge interruption losses where the business unnecessarily delays reconstruction or machinery replacement. The claimant should therefore maintain a detailed recovery timeline showing contractor appointments, quotations, permits, purchase orders, machinery manufacturing times, shipping schedules and installation dates.

Can Employee Salaries Be Recovered?

Employee costs require careful analysis within the business-interruption calculation. Continuing payroll expenses may affect insured gross profit depending on the policy structure, whereas expenses saved because employees are no longer being paid may reduce the recoverable loss. Payroll should therefore not simply be added to the claim as a separate amount without examining the policy formula.

Loan Payments and Financial Obligations

A factory may continue servicing bank loans despite having no production income. Whether these costs affect the insured loss depends on the policy and business-interruption calculation. The fact that an expense continues after the fire does not automatically make it separately recoverable.

Underinsurance Can Dramatically Reduce Compensation

One of the most serious problems in factory fire claims is underinsurance. Industrial asset values can increase rapidly because of inflation, exchange rates and replacement costs. Machinery purchased years earlier for TRY 20 million may cost TRY 70 million to replace today. If insured values were not updated, the insurer may invoke applicable underinsurance provisions.

Example of Underinsurance

Assume the correct insurable value of factory machinery is TRY 100 million but the machinery was insured for only TRY 60 million. A fire causes TRY 30 million of partial damage. Depending on the applicable policy provisions, the insurer may argue for proportional reduction because only 60% of the relevant value was insured. This can create a substantial compensation shortfall.

Business Interruption Can Also Be Underinsured

Underinsurance is not limited to buildings and machinery. A factory may underestimate annual gross profit when purchasing business-interruption insurance. If the actual relevant gross profit substantially exceeds the insured figure, proportional reductions may affect the business-interruption compensation.

Currency Changes Can Create Valuation Disputes

Factories frequently use imported machinery priced in euros or US dollars. Replacement costs can therefore change dramatically when exchange rates move. The policy should be examined to determine the insured currency, valuation methodology and relevant date for calculating the loss.

Depreciation Disputes

Insurers may attempt to apply depreciation when valuing damaged machinery or property. Whether and how depreciation applies depends on the policy and valuation basis. A factory should not automatically accept a substantial depreciation deduction without checking whether it is consistent with the agreed insurance value and policy provisions.

Salvage Value

Damaged machinery, scrap metal or inventory may retain some residual value. The insurer may deduct salvage from compensation. The claimant should verify whether the proposed salvage value is realistic. An insurer should not attribute a large theoretical salvage value to equipment that cannot actually be sold for that amount.

What If the Insurer Says the Fire Was Caused by Poor Maintenance?

This is a common coverage dispute. The insurer may argue that electrical systems, machinery or safety equipment were inadequately maintained. The existence of maintenance problems does not automatically answer the coverage question. The cause of the fire, policy exclusions, insured’s conduct and causal relationship between any breach and the loss must be examined carefully.

What If the Insurer Alleges Gross Negligence?

An allegation of gross negligence can significantly affect a claim but should not simply be accepted because the insurer uses that terminology. The factual conduct, policy provisions and applicable insurance law must be analyzed. Maintenance logs, occupational safety records, electrical inspections and fire-safety documentation can become important evidence.

What If the Insurer Suspects Arson?

Arson allegations can transform a commercial insurance claim into a complex legal and evidentiary dispute. Fire brigade reports, prosecutor files, forensic examinations, CCTV footage, access-control records, alarm records and witness statements may become critical. The business should obtain independent legal and technical assistance before important evidence disappears.

Can the Insurance Company Reject the Claim Because the Cause Is Unknown?

An unidentified ignition source does not automatically mean that no insurance compensation is payable. Coverage should be analyzed according to the insured event and applicable exclusions. The insurer’s inability to identify the precise technical origin of the fire should not automatically be treated as proof of an exclusion.

What If the Fire Started in a Neighboring Factory?

The insured business may potentially have two different legal avenues: a contractual insurance claim against its own insurer and a liability claim against the responsible third party. If the insurer pays the covered loss, subrogation issues may arise regarding claims against the party responsible for the fire.

What If a Contractor Caused the Fire?

A welding contractor, electrical contractor, maintenance company or machinery installer may potentially be responsible for the incident. The factory should preserve contracts, work orders, safety permits, CCTV footage and technical evidence concerning the contractor’s activities. Third-party liability can become particularly important where insurance limits are insufficient to cover the entire loss.

The Insurer’s Expert Report Is Not Automatically Final

Insurance companies generally obtain expert assessments after major fires. The insured business does not necessarily have to accept the insurer’s calculation. Where millions of lira are disputed, independent fire engineers, structural engineers, machinery experts, accountants and financial experts may be necessary.

How Should an Expert Report Be Challenged?

The claimant should identify specific errors rather than merely asserting that the valuation is too low. For example, the insurer may have omitted three machines, used obsolete replacement quotations, incorrectly depreciated equipment, underestimated stock quantities or applied the wrong gross-profit rate. Each error should be quantified and supported.

Example: Insurer Offers TRY 30 Million on a TRY 55 Million Loss

Suppose the insurer recognizes TRY 10 million of building damage, TRY 15 million of machinery damage and TRY 5 million of stock damage. Independent evidence demonstrates TRY 12 million of building damage, TRY 28 million of machinery damage and TRY 8 million of stock loss. In addition, the policy provides qualifying business-interruption coverage generating another TRY 7 million claim. The real dispute may therefore concern approximately TRY 25 million rather than merely a disagreement about one repair invoice.

Partial Payment Does Not Necessarily End the Claim

An insurer may pay the undisputed portion while continuing to reject the remainder. A factory can potentially accept an undisputed payment while preserving claims concerning the balance. However, settlement protocols, releases and discharge documents should be examined carefully before signature.

Be Careful With “Full and Final Settlement”

After a major fire, businesses may face serious cash-flow pressure and feel compelled to accept an early settlement. A payment document describing compensation as full and final settlement may create legal disputes concerning whether additional property damage, machinery loss, business interruption or interest can later be claimed. The financial urgency of reopening the factory should not prevent careful examination of settlement wording.

Can Interest Be Claimed on Delayed Compensation?

Potentially, yes. Where insurance compensation has become due and the insurer delays payment, default interest may become part of the claim under Turkish insurance law. In a high-value factory fire dispute, interest can become extremely significant because the unpaid principal may involve tens or hundreds of millions of Turkish lira.

Example of the Financial Impact of Delay

Suppose TRY 50 million of insurance compensation remains unpaid while a dispute continues for a substantial period. Even before considering business-interruption losses, accumulated interest can materially increase the economic value of the case. The default date should therefore be determined at the beginning of the dispute rather than considered only after the principal claim has been resolved.

Can a Factory Use the Insurance Arbitration Commission?

Potentially, where the relevant insurer and dispute fall within the applicable insurance arbitration framework. Arbitration can provide an alternative to conventional litigation. However, major factory fires frequently involve complex technical and accounting evidence, and the procedural route should be selected after considering the amount, policy structure, expert issues and nature of the dispute.

When Might Court Proceedings Be Necessary?

Commercial litigation may be appropriate where the dispute involves extensive expert examination, complex policy interpretation, substantial compensation or multiple responsible parties. Depending on the case, proceedings may require expertise in structural engineering, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, fire causation, accounting and business valuation.

What Evidence Should a Factory Preserve?

A strong factory fire insurance file normally requires the insurance policy and endorsements, asset schedules, photographs and videos, fire brigade and official reports, machinery inventories, purchase invoices, maintenance records, accounting books, stock records, production records, financial statements, customer contracts, orders, supplier records and evidence of every expense incurred after the fire. The business should also preserve all correspondence with the insurer and its experts.

Why Production Records Matter

Production records can demonstrate the factory’s capacity immediately before the fire. They may also establish expected output during the interruption period. This is particularly important where the business had recently expanded and historical financial statements do not fully represent expected future production.

Why Customer Contracts Matter

Long-term supply agreements can provide strong evidence of expected future sales. If the factory had binding orders that could not be fulfilled because of the fire, those records can support the business-interruption analysis. However, expected sales still need to be translated into the appropriate insured gross-profit calculation rather than claimed automatically as lost revenue.

Why Independent Accounting Analysis Matters

Business-interruption claims are often accounting disputes disguised as insurance disputes. Small differences in the gross-profit rate, standard turnover, variable expenses or indemnity period can change compensation by millions of lira. A detailed financial model should therefore accompany substantial claims.

What Should a Factory Do in the First 24–72 Hours?

After ensuring human safety and complying with instructions from emergency authorities, management should notify insurers, secure the site, preserve CCTV and digital records, photograph the damage, protect undamaged property, identify damaged machinery and inventory and create a chronology of the incident. Accounting backups and ERP records should be secured immediately. No major disposal of damaged assets should occur before appropriate documentation and inspection unless safety or public-authority requirements make immediate removal necessary.

What Should Happen During the First Month?

The business should obtain preliminary engineering assessments, determine the likely reconstruction period, request replacement quotations, establish stock loss and begin calculating business-interruption exposure. Management should also examine whether temporary production, outsourcing or relocation could reduce losses. Every mitigation decision should be documented.

Factory Fire Claims Involving Foreign-Owned Businesses

Foreign-owned factories operating in Turkey generally face the same fundamental insurance issues. Difficulties may arise where machinery was imported, invoices are denominated in foreign currencies, parent-company accounting records are held abroad or global insurance programs overlap with local Turkish policies. The interaction between local and international coverage should therefore be examined carefully.

Imported Machinery Can Create Major Valuation Problems

Replacement of imported machinery may involve not only the manufacturer’s price but also transportation, customs-related expenses, installation and commissioning costs, depending on the insurance structure. Exchange-rate movements can further increase replacement costs. A valuation based only on the historical purchase invoice may therefore substantially underestimate the economic reality of replacement.

2026 Strategy for Factory Fire Insurance Claims in Turkey

In 2026, a serious factory fire claim should be approached as a multidisciplinary insurance recovery project, not merely as a property-damage notification. Turkish insurance regulation continues to distinguish fire insurance, machinery breakdown insurance and fire-related loss-of-profit insurance as separate coverage frameworks. A factory should therefore identify each relevant policy and determine exactly which loss belongs under which coverage. The strongest strategy is generally to document the physical loss immediately, obtain independent technical assessments, reconstruct stock values, determine repair-versus-replacement costs, calculate production interruption, establish the applicable gross-profit loss, document increased operating expenses, examine underinsurance and policy limits, challenge unsupported insurer deductions and preserve claims for unpaid compensation and applicable interest.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What losses can a factory claim after a fire?

Depending on the policies in force, recoverable losses may include insured building damage, machinery, equipment, raw materials, semi-finished products, finished stock and certain additional expenses. Business-interruption losses may also be recoverable where appropriate coverage exists.

2. Is machinery automatically covered by factory fire insurance?

Not necessarily in every circumstance. The machinery must fall within the insured property and the loss must fall within the applicable coverage. Fire insurance and machinery breakdown insurance should also be distinguished.

3. Can smoke-damaged machinery be claimed even if it did not burn?

Potentially, yes. Heat, smoke, soot, moisture and firefighting water can render sophisticated machinery unusable even without visible burning.

4. Can a factory claim lost profit?

Potentially, but appropriate business-interruption or fire-related loss-of-profit coverage generally needs to exist. Basic physical fire coverage should not automatically be treated as lost-profit insurance.

5. Is lost turnover fully recoverable?

No. Lost turnover is not normally identical to the insured loss. The calculation generally considers the applicable gross-profit rate, saved expenses, increased operating costs and policy provisions.

6. Can temporary production costs be claimed?

Potentially. Qualifying additional costs incurred to reduce the business-interruption loss may be recoverable under appropriate coverage and subject to policy limitations.

7. What happens if the factory is underinsured?

Compensation may potentially be proportionally reduced depending on the policy and applicable underinsurance provisions. This can significantly affect both property and business-interruption claims.

8. Can the insurer’s expert report be challenged?

Yes. Independent engineering, machinery, accounting and valuation evidence can be used to challenge an inadequate insurer assessment.

9. Can interest be claimed when the insurer delays payment?

Potentially, yes. If compensation has become due and the insurer is in default, applicable interest may be claimed in addition to the principal compensation.

10. Can a foreign-owned factory pursue an insurance claim in Turkey?

Yes. Foreign ownership does not itself prevent a company from pursuing compensation under insurance coverage applicable in Turkey.

Legal Support for Factory Fire Insurance Claims in Turkey

Factory fire claims can involve property damage, machinery replacement, stock losses, business interruption, loss of profit, increased operating expenses and substantial interest claims. Because these losses interact, accepting an insurer’s initial expert valuation without independently calculating the entire insured loss can result in a significant underpayment.

Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to Turkish and foreign-owned companies concerning factory fire insurance claims, rejected and underpaid compensation, machinery-loss disputes, business-interruption claims, disputed expert reports and insurance arbitration or litigation.

Fırat Fesih Kaya can assess the insurance policies, insurer calculations and expert reports, identify potentially recoverable categories of loss, coordinate the legal assessment of engineering and financial evidence and pursue outstanding compensation through the appropriate legal procedure.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey