

A foreign buyer receives an apartment without facilities promised in the project. Learn about developer liability, completion, price reduction, compensation and cancellation rights.
A foreign buyer may have legal remedies when an apartment is delivered without facilities promised in the project, sales agreement or marketing materials.
Potentially missing facilities may include:
The buyer’s rights depend on whether the facility was contractually promised, clearly represented during the sale, included in the approved project or merely shown as an illustrative feature.
The absence may constitute incomplete performance, a contractual breach, a defective delivery or misleading commercial representation.
The developer may be responsible if the facility was promised as part of the project and the buyer relied on that promise when purchasing the property.
Developer liability may arise where:
Title deed transfer and physical delivery do not automatically release the developer from contractual obligations. The buyer may still have claims for incomplete delivery or loss of value.
They may be.
A project brochure, website, video, sales presentation, floor plan, model apartment or message may help prove what the developer represented before the purchase.
The buyer should preserve:
A court may assess whether the facility was presented as a definite part of the project or merely as a visual example.
General wording such as “facilities may change” may be relevant, but it does not necessarily protect a developer from every claim. A broad disclaimer may be challenged if the project was materially different from what was specifically promised.
The legal remedy may depend on whether the facility is delayed or will never be delivered.
If the developer is still legally and practically able to complete the facility, the buyer may request completion within a reasonable period and compensation for the delay.
If the developer cannot or will not construct the promised facility, the buyer may consider:
The buyer should request a written explanation and a realistic completion schedule rather than relying on repeated informal promises.
Possibly.
If the facility is clearly part of the developer’s contractual obligations, the buyer may demand that the developer complete and deliver it.
A formal demand should identify:
The buyer should avoid signing a document confirming that the project is fully complete if important facilities are still missing.
Yes, a price reduction may be appropriate when:
A professional valuation may compare the value of the property as promised with its actual value without the facility.
The buyer may also need to account for the facility’s effect on rental income, service charges, resale value and project reputation.
The buyer may seek compensation for proven losses, such as:
The buyer must generally prove that the loss resulted from the developer’s failure and that the amount is reasonable.
A claim for anticipated future income should be supported by rental agreements, advertising records, market evidence or other reliable documentation.
Cancellation or rescission may be considered if the missing facilities represent a serious breach that defeats the purpose of the purchase.
Cancellation may be more relevant where:
Cancellation is not automatic. A court may decide that completion, price reduction or compensation is more appropriate.
The buyer should not unilaterally abandon payments or attempt to reverse the title registration without legal advice.
Many project contracts contain wording that allows changes to design, facilities or materials.
The effect depends on the exact wording and the extent of the change. A clause may permit reasonable technical adjustments, but it may not automatically authorize the developer to remove a central facility or substantially reduce the project’s promised quality.
The buyer should examine:
A broad disclaimer should not be treated as an automatic defense without reviewing the entire transaction.
The developer is generally the primary party for delivering promised project facilities, especially before completion and handover.
After handover, building management may be responsible for:
The buyer should distinguish between:
The responsible party may be the developer, management, service company or more than one party.
The buyer should preserve:
The buyer should record when the apartment was delivered and when the missing facility was discovered.
If the facility exists but is unusable, the buyer should document its condition, closure dates, maintenance problems and communications with management.
A foreign buyer should:
The buyer should not accept a verbal promise that the facilities will be completed “soon” without a written commitment.
Pre-litigation mediation may be mandatory for certain consumer, civil or commercial disputes.
Mediation may address:
The settlement should identify the facility, technical standards, completion date, inspection process, payment obligations and consequences of delay.
Mediation does not prevent the buyer from requesting urgent legal protection where evidence may be destroyed or the project is being transferred.
A foreign buyer may often pursue the claim without travelling to Turkey.
A lawyer may assist with:
A power of attorney may require notarization, apostille or consular legalization and certified translation, depending on where it is signed.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign buyers with missing project facilities, developer liability, incomplete delivery, compensation and property disputes in Turkey.
Foreign buyers should avoid:
A foreign buyer who receives an apartment without facilities promised in the project may have claims against the developer, seller, building management or service company.
The buyer may request completion, a price reduction, compensation, adjustment of service charges or cancellation in serious cases. The correct remedy depends on the contract, promotional evidence, the material importance of the facility and the actual financial loss.
The buyer should preserve evidence, obtain a written explanation, request a realistic completion plan and seek legal advice before signing a release or accepting an inadequate settlement.
Yes. Compensation may be available where the facility was promised and the buyer suffered a proven financial loss or reduction in property value.
They may be important evidence, especially when they clearly present a facility as included in the project and the buyer relied on that representation.
Possibly. If completion is legally and technically possible and the facility was part of the developer’s obligations, the buyer may request performance.
Yes. A price reduction may be appropriate when the apartment remains usable but is worth less because a promised facility is missing.
Cancellation may be considered when the missing facility represents a serious breach and the property is materially different from what was promised.
Not necessarily. The wording, the importance of the facility and the extent of the change must be reviewed.
Responsibility may involve the building management, service company or developer, depending on whether the problem concerns construction, maintenance or operation.
Possibly. If charges were paid for facilities that were never delivered or unavailable, the buyer may request adjustment or reimbursement depending on the documents.
Mediation may be mandatory for certain claims. The requirement should be assessed before filing a lawsuit.
In many cases, yes. A properly authorized Turkish lawyer may manage notices, evidence, mediation, valuation and litigation.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We recommend consulting a lawyer about your specific circumstances to avoid any loss of rights.
If your apartment was delivered without facilities promised in the project, Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office can review your contract and promotional evidence, assess developer liability, calculate loss of value and pursue completion, price reduction, compensation or cancellation remedies.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal support to foreign buyers in incomplete delivery disputes, missing project facilities, developer liability, consumer claims and real estate litigation in Turkey.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Office Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yildirim Tower, Office No:148, Balgat, Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey