

A foreign property buyer discovers that the seller was an impostor in Turkey. Learn about criminal complaints, fraud, forged documents, asset tracing, evidence preservation and recovery of transferred money.
Foreign buyers purchasing real estate in Turkey may face a particularly serious form of fraud: discovering after transferring money, paying a deposit or beginning the title deed process that the person claiming to own the property was actually an impostor. The fraud may involve a stolen or forged identity document, counterfeit power of attorney, false title deed documents, fabricated bank records, an unauthorized intermediary or a person impersonating the genuine property owner. When this happens, the foreign buyer should treat the matter not merely as a failed real estate transaction but as a potential criminal fraud and document-forgery case requiring immediate evidence preservation and asset-recovery action.
The fraud can take several forms. A person may falsely claim to be the registered owner, impersonate an owner living abroad, use another person’s identity information, produce a false power of attorney or cooperate with intermediaries who create the appearance of a legitimate sale.
Foreign buyers can be particularly vulnerable when negotiations take place remotely or when they cannot independently review Turkish documents.
The buyer should determine the property’s genuine title status immediately.
Screenshots, photographs or copies of a title deed supplied by the purported seller should not be treated as conclusive proof of ownership. The relevant official property records and the identity of the registered owner must be examined.
If impersonation is suspected, the buyer should not make another installment merely because the seller claims that the problem can be “corrected.”
Remaining funds should be protected while the identity and ownership issue is investigated.
If money has recently been transferred, notify the relevant bank promptly about the suspected fraud.
Whether funds can actually be blocked or recovered depends on the circumstances and status of the transfer, but delay can make tracing and recovery substantially more difficult.
Keep payment receipts, SWIFT records, IBAN details, recipient names, transaction descriptions and communications containing payment instructions.
The route taken by the money can become one of the most important parts of the criminal investigation.
Do not delete communications with the purported seller, broker or intermediary.
Preserve the complete conversation where possible, including telephone numbers, usernames, profile information, dates, voice messages, photographs, documents and payment instructions.
A few screenshots may omit important context. The entire communication history can help investigators reconstruct how the fraudulent transaction developed.
Original electronic evidence should therefore be preserved wherever possible.
If the property was advertised online, preserve the advertisement, photographs, asking price, account information and contact details.
Online advertisements may later be deleted once the perpetrators realize that the buyer has discovered the fraud.
Keep emails, PDF documents, draft contracts, identification documents, title deed images, valuation reports and powers of attorney sent during the transaction.
Metadata and the circumstances in which documents were transmitted can sometimes become relevant to the investigation.
Where a person intentionally impersonates a property owner and obtains money by deception, the conduct may potentially constitute fraud under Turkish criminal law.
The precise criminal classification depends on how the scheme was carried out.
Certain methods used to commit fraud can bring the conduct within aggravated forms of the offense.
For example, the use of banking or information systems and other legally specified circumstances can affect criminal classification. The factual method used to obtain the buyer’s money should therefore be reconstructed carefully.
If the impostor used forged identity documents, powers of attorney, contracts or other documents, document-related offenses may arise independently from the fraud allegation.
Investigators should receive copies of every suspicious document.
A purported representative may claim that the owner is abroad and that the sale is being conducted through a power of attorney.
The authority, authenticity and scope of that document should be checked carefully.
In an impersonation case, the registered property owner may have had no involvement whatsoever.
The criminal investigation should distinguish the genuine owner from the person using the owner’s identity.
The fact that an impostor used another person’s property information does not prove that the genuine owner participated in the scheme.
Evidence should be used to identify the actual participants.
Determine who introduced the buyer to the supposed seller and what representations were made.
An intermediary’s criminal or civil responsibility depends on their actual knowledge, conduct and role; mere involvement in the transaction does not automatically establish participation in fraud.
This question can be important.
A legitimate intermediary may itself have relied on false identity documents. Conversely, evidence may show that an intermediary knowingly assisted the fraudulent transaction.
The investigation should establish the facts rather than assume either scenario.
A foreign buyer who discovers seller impersonation should consider promptly submitting a criminal complaint to the competent Turkish authorities.
The complaint should provide a chronological account rather than merely state, “I was defrauded.”
It should identify the property, purported seller, intermediaries, communications, payment dates, recipient bank accounts, suspicious documents, discovery of the genuine ownership position and resulting financial loss.
Supporting evidence should be organized and attached where appropriate.
Provide all available telephone numbers, email addresses, bank accounts, usernames, company information and intermediary details.
Even seemingly minor identifiers can help connect participants in a coordinated fraud scheme.
A criminal complaint can still describe the known facts and available identifiers.
Telephone numbers, bank accounts, electronic communications and other records may assist authorities in identifying the person behind the false identity.
The account receiving the purchase price may belong to the impostor, an accomplice, a company or a third person.
Investigators should determine who controlled the account and what happened to the funds after receipt.
Fraud proceeds can move quickly.
For this reason, early identification of subsequent transfers can be critical to asset recovery.
A criminal complaint alone does not guarantee recovery of the buyer’s money.
Where legally available and justified by the evidence, measures concerning relevant assets or proceeds should be evaluated promptly before the money or property is dissipated.
Convicting a perpetrator and recovering the victim’s financial loss are related but distinct objectives.
The foreign buyer’s legal strategy should therefore address both criminal accountability and practical asset recovery.
Potentially, but recovery depends heavily on whether the perpetrators and assets can be identified and whether appropriate legal measures are taken in time.
Tracing the payment is often central.
Cash payments make tracing more difficult but do not necessarily make proof impossible.
Messages, witnesses, receipts, withdrawal records, meeting locations and other surrounding evidence may help establish payment.
If the buyer was instructed to transfer cryptocurrency, preserve wallet addresses, transaction hashes, exchange records and communications.
Digital asset tracing may become necessary.
The amount lost does not determine whether the conduct can be investigated as fraud.
A fraudulent deposit scheme can still create criminal liability.
If the buyer discovers the deception before transferring the full amount, the conduct may still have criminal significance depending on how far the scheme progressed.
The buyer should preserve the evidence even if the final payment was prevented.
Preserve the original contract and every version exchanged during negotiations.
The identity written in the contract should be compared with official ownership and identity information.
A sophisticated-looking agreement does not establish that the purported seller actually owns the property.
Fraudsters can produce detailed contracts to create credibility.
This creates a substantially more complex situation requiring immediate examination of the official transaction, identities, authorizations and underlying documents.
Potential criminal proceedings may need to be coordinated with appropriate property-law remedies concerning the title record.
Depending on the circumstances, the buyer may need more than a criminal complaint.
Title-related litigation, restitution claims, precautionary measures or other civil remedies may need to be evaluated alongside the criminal investigation.
Where there is a risk that disputed property or other relevant assets will be transferred, appropriate interim measures should be evaluated urgently.
The correct remedy depends on the legal nature of the buyer’s claim.
Obtain the company’s registration information and identify its managers, shareholders and actual role in the transaction.
Payment to a company account does not by itself establish that every shareholder or manager participated in the offense.
Turkish criminal responsibility is personal.
The investigation should establish which individuals knowingly participated in deception, document fabrication, money transfers or concealment.
A foreign complainant who does not sufficiently understand Turkish should ensure that statements and important procedural acts are accurately interpreted where required.
The buyer should not sign a statement they do not understand.
Names, dates, amounts, bank accounts and property information should be checked carefully.
An incorrect translation or factual mistake can complicate the investigation later.
Investigators may need original digital or documentary material rather than only printed screenshots.
Do not alter files before preserving them.
Immediately telling the suspected fraudster that criminal proceedings are being prepared can sometimes provide an opportunity to delete accounts, move funds or disappear.
Communication strategy should be considered together with the evidence and recovery strategy.
Victims of property fraud may subsequently be targeted by individuals claiming they can recover the money in exchange for another payment.
Any such request should be independently verified.
Repeated property advertisements, bank accounts, telephone numbers or company names may indicate a broader scheme.
Evidence involving other transactions can potentially become relevant to understanding the structure of the alleged fraud.
Departure from Turkey does not necessarily terminate the criminal investigation.
The available measures will depend on the offense, evidence, suspect’s identity, location and procedural status.
A foreign suspect, overseas bank account, foreign company or cross-border money transfer may require additional evidence-gathering and international cooperation.
The buyer should preserve foreign banking and corporate records from the beginning.
Foreign buyers sometimes purchase property in connection with residence or citizenship planning.
If the underlying transaction is fraudulent, the immigration consequences should be reviewed separately rather than assuming that the criminal complaint automatically protects an application.
Once a buyer learns that a document may be fraudulent, it should not knowingly be presented in another official process as genuine.
The document should instead be preserved as potential evidence.
A perpetrator cannot necessarily avoid responsibility merely by arguing that the foreign buyer should have been more careful.
The investigation should focus on whether intentional deception occurred and whether it caused the buyer to transfer money or otherwise suffer loss.
Preserve records showing what the buyer was told, what documents were provided and what verification attempts were made.
This helps demonstrate how the deception operated.
A foreign buyer discovering that the seller was an impostor should immediately stop further payments, preserve communications and advertisements, obtain official information concerning the genuine owner, preserve bank-transfer evidence, identify all accounts and intermediaries, secure suspicious documents, consider notifying relevant financial institutions, prepare a detailed criminal complaint, evaluate asset-preservation measures and determine whether separate property or civil proceedings are required.
Depending on the circumstances, intentionally impersonating an owner to obtain money may constitute fraud and may also involve separate document-related offenses.
The power of attorney should be preserved and its authenticity investigated. Forged documentation may create criminal issues in addition to the underlying fraud.
Yes. Foreign nationality does not prevent a victim from reporting an alleged criminal offense committed in Turkey.
Banking records can become important evidence in a criminal investigation. The appropriate authorities can evaluate legally available investigative measures.
Depending on the evidence, location of the funds and applicable procedural requirements, asset-related measures may potentially be available. Speed can be important because fraud proceeds may be transferred quickly.
Not automatically. The genuine owner may also be a victim of identity misuse.
Only the agent’s actual role and knowledge can establish responsibility. An agent may have participated knowingly or may itself have been deceived.
The investigation may still continue. The available measures depend on the suspect’s identity, evidence, alleged offense and location.
Recovery should not be assumed merely because a criminal complaint has been filed. Asset tracing and any appropriate civil or interim remedies should be considered separately.
Stop additional payments and preserve the evidence immediately. Bank transfers, communications, false identity documents, powers of attorney, property advertisements and information concerning the genuine registered owner should be secured before the perpetrators have an opportunity to move funds or destroy evidence.
Foreign property fraud cases may involve seller impersonation, forged powers of attorney, fake identity documents, fraudulent bank transfers, title deed disputes, asset tracing and coordinated criminal and civil proceedings. Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign property buyers who discover that a seller, intermediary or purported representative has used false identity or ownership information in Turkey. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in preserving evidence, preparing criminal complaints, following criminal investigations, evaluating asset-preservation and recovery measures and coordinating criminal proceedings with necessary property-law remedies.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey