

A foreign buyer purchases an apartment in Turkey but the developer says the original unit is unavailable and offers a smaller apartment. Learn about rejection, price reduction, termination, refund, compensation, title deed and evidence options.
A foreign buyer who purchases an apartment in Turkey may face a serious problem when the developer, construction company or seller later announces that the contracted unit is no longer available and offers a smaller apartment as a replacement. The buyer does not generally have to accept a materially different property merely because the seller cannot deliver the apartment originally agreed upon. The legal position depends on the sale agreement, preliminary real estate sale agreement, project documents, payment history, title deed status, construction stage and the reason the original unit became unavailable. The first priority is to establish exactly what property the seller promised and whether the proposed replacement represents a legally and commercially equivalent performance.
The buyer should first review the agreement and identify the apartment promised by the seller. Important information may include the project name, block, floor, apartment number, gross and net area, number of rooms, balcony or terrace, orientation, parking allocation and other promised characteristics.
If a particular unit was clearly identified, the seller cannot simply treat another apartment as interchangeable without examining the contractual and legal consequences.
An apartment with a smaller usable area can have a substantially different market value and utility. The difference may affect room dimensions, living space, balcony area, storage space and future resale value.
Accordingly, the seller’s statement that the substitute apartment is “similar” should not be accepted without a detailed comparison.
The existence and scope of any substitution right depend on the contract and applicable law. A clause allowing certain project modifications does not necessarily mean that the developer has unlimited authority to replace the purchased property with a materially smaller unit.
The wording and validity of the contractual clause should be reviewed carefully.
This question can fundamentally change the dispute. The buyer should request a written explanation.
The unit may have been sold to another person, transferred to a third party, combined with another apartment, removed during a project revision, altered during construction or become unavailable because of another legal or technical problem.
If the seller entered into transactions concerning the same apartment with more than one buyer, the dispute may become significantly more serious.
The dates and legal nature of the transactions, title deed records, contractual documents and payments should be examined immediately.
Where relevant, determine the current legal status of the property. The buyer should investigate whether the original unit has been transferred, mortgaged or subjected to another registered right or restriction.
This information can be critical when deciding whether performance remains legally possible.
Keep the sale agreement, preliminary agreement, reservation documents, payment receipts, bank transfers, invoices, project plans, floor plans, brochures and written correspondence.
The buyer may need to prove not only that an apartment was purchased but precisely which apartment and characteristics were promised.
Foreign buyers are often shown brochures, renderings, floor plans, websites, sales-office presentations and model apartments before purchasing.
Preserve the materials that influenced the transaction, particularly where they identify the size or location of the purchased unit.
Messages showing the selected apartment, negotiated price, promised area, delivery date or later substitution proposal can become important evidence.
Do not rely solely on screenshots if the original correspondence can also be preserved.
Disputes frequently arise because sellers refer to gross area while buyers focus on usable net area.
The replacement apartment should therefore be compared using the same measurement basis as the original apartment.
A meaningful comparison should examine more than a single square-meter figure.
Compare the layout, usable area, rooms, balcony, floor, orientation, view, common-area allocation and other characteristics that materially affect value.
Where the difference is commercially significant, an independent valuation can help determine the value of the originally contracted apartment and the proposed replacement.
This can become important in negotiations, litigation and compensation calculations.
A foreign buyer should not sign a replacement agreement merely because the developer says there is no alternative.
If the substitute unit is materially different, the buyer should first determine the legal consequences of rejecting it.
A new agreement may contain language stating that the buyer accepts the substitute apartment as full performance and releases the seller from previous claims.
Such provisions can materially affect later litigation.
The document should therefore be reviewed before signature.
The developer may ask the buyer to sign a document stating that no further claims exist.
A buyer considering compensation for lost area, reduced value, delay or another loss should understand the consequences before signing any waiver.
Potentially, depending on whether delivery or transfer remains legally and factually possible and the contractual structure of the transaction.
If the original apartment still exists but the seller simply prefers to give it to someone else, the legal analysis may differ substantially from a case where the apartment genuinely ceased to exist after a lawful project revision.
If the buyer voluntarily decides to accept a smaller apartment, the financial difference should be examined carefully.
The appropriate adjustment should not necessarily be calculated merely by multiplying missing square meters by the original average price per square meter. Floor, view, orientation, layout and current market value can also affect the difference.
Depending on the legal basis and facts, additional losses may potentially become relevant. These may include certain financing costs, additional accommodation expenses or other provable losses causally connected with the seller’s breach.
The availability and amount of compensation must be established according to the specific transaction.
Where the seller cannot provide the agreed property and the proposed substitute is unacceptable, termination or another remedy leading to repayment may potentially be considered depending on the contract and applicable legal framework.
The buyer should calculate the consequences before making an irreversible election.
A buyer may have paid for the apartment years earlier and face substantially higher real estate prices when the dispute arises.
For that reason, simply recovering the nominal amount originally paid may not necessarily reflect the buyer’s entire economic position.
Potential claims should be analyzed before accepting a refund agreement.
If the buyer paid in a foreign currency or converted foreign funds for the transaction, payment records should be preserved.
Currency movements can materially affect the commercial consequences of a long-running property dispute.
If the purchase price has not yet been paid in full, the buyer should obtain legal advice before simply stopping installments.
Unilaterally withholding payments without evaluating the contract may create additional allegations of buyer default.
A replacement may be larger or located in a different part of the project but still be unsuitable for the buyer.
The buyer’s rights should not be evaluated solely by square meters. The overall contractual and economic equivalence of the proposed property matters.
A smaller apartment on another floor may have a different view, sunlight exposure, privacy level or accessibility.
These differences should be included in any valuation comparison.
A replacement offer may quietly exclude parking, storage or other rights associated with the original apartment.
Compare the complete package rather than only the residential unit.
Where the original purchase included furniture, appliances, interior finishes or other packages, determine whether the replacement includes the same specifications.
The replacement should not result in hidden reductions in the agreed commercial package.
Developers sometimes rely on architectural or administrative project revisions.
The buyer should determine what changed, when it changed, whether the contractual documents contemplated the change and how it affected the particular purchased unit.
A developer may both deliver late and propose a different apartment.
Accepting a substitute unit should not automatically be assumed to resolve separate claims arising from delay unless the buyer expressly agrees to such settlement.
At handover, buyers may be asked to sign documents confirming that the property has been received completely and without objection.
If the buyer disputes area, specifications or other matters, signing unconditional acceptance documents can complicate the dispute.
If the buyer is considering acceptance, actual measurements may be appropriate.
Do not rely exclusively on the developer’s marketing figure where usable area is commercially important.
An architect, engineer or real estate valuation expert can assist in comparing the original and replacement units.
Expert evidence may become particularly important if litigation concerns area, layout or market-value differences.
Where the buyer rejects the replacement or reserves rights, a properly structured written notice can clarify the position.
The notice can identify the original contractual obligation, explain why the replacement is unacceptable and reserve relevant legal rights.
Long negotiations conducted exclusively by telephone can create evidentiary difficulties.
Important offers, objections and deadlines should be documented.
If a developer is experiencing financial difficulties, delay can increase recovery risk.
The buyer should investigate whether there are mortgages, enforcement proceedings, insolvency concerns or other circumstances affecting the project or seller where legally relevant.
If there is a serious risk that the disputed property will be transferred or that enforcement of a future judgment will become difficult, the availability of appropriate interim judicial measures should be evaluated promptly.
The requirements depend on the specific claim and evidence.
The buyer should obtain the title deed history and investigate the timing and legal basis of the transfer.
The consequences can depend on the legal structure of the original transaction and the rights acquired by the third party.
Being a foreign national does not eliminate the need to establish the contractual facts with reliable evidence.
Translations, powers of attorney, foreign payment records and communications with overseas representatives should be organized early.
A foreign buyer who is outside Turkey may be able to conduct many legal steps through an appropriately authorized lawyer.
The required form and scope of the power of attorney should be determined according to the intended legal action.
Where the purchase was connected with a residence or citizenship strategy, substitution of the property can have consequences beyond the ordinary sale dispute.
The buyer should avoid changing units without checking whether the replacement affects the relevant property value, title deed arrangements or other requirements.
Buyers sometimes accept an inferior apartment because they fear losing all payments.
Before doing so, calculate the value difference and investigate the enforceability of the original rights.
A negotiated replacement can be reasonable, but it should be an informed commercial decision.
If the buyer wishes to accept the smaller apartment, the settlement should clearly address the replacement unit, adjusted purchase price, refund amount, payment date, delivery date, title deed transfer, outstanding defects, delay claims and whether any rights are being released.
Ambiguous settlement language can create another dispute later.
If a buyer accepts a materially smaller and less valuable unit, the financial consequences should be negotiated transparently.
The seller should not automatically retain the full original purchase price while providing materially reduced performance.
The most important evidence normally includes the original agreement, floor plan, payment records, title deed information where available, brochures, correspondence, replacement proposal, plans of the substitute apartment and valuation evidence.
These documents should be organized chronologically.
When a foreign buyer is told that the purchased apartment is unavailable and a smaller unit will be substituted, the buyer should avoid signing immediately. The original contractual unit should first be identified precisely, the reason for its unavailability investigated, current property records checked where relevant, the original and replacement apartments technically and financially compared, and all communications preserved. The buyer can then evaluate whether to insist on performance where possible, reject the replacement, negotiate an appropriate price adjustment, terminate the transaction or pursue compensation and other available remedies.
Not automatically. The contract, reason the original unit is unavailable and material differences between the properties must be examined.
The answer depends on the contractual provisions and applicable law. A general project-change clause should not automatically be assumed to authorize every material substitution.
Potentially, where performance remains legally and factually possible. The title deed and contractual position should be investigated.
Potentially. The value difference should be calculated carefully before any settlement or waiver is signed.
No. Floor, orientation, view, layout, balcony, parking, storage and other characteristics can materially affect market value.
Depending on the contractual breach and applicable legal framework, termination and repayment remedies may potentially be available.
The transaction history, contracts and title deed records should be examined immediately. The legal consequences depend on the specific circumstances.
Not before reviewing whether it contains releases, waivers or statements accepting the replacement as complete performance.
The consequences of changing the property should be reviewed before accepting the substitute because the replacement may affect the underlying transaction structure.
Do not accept or reject the substitute solely on the developer’s verbal explanation. Establish the legal status of the original apartment, preserve the purchase documents and compare the original and replacement properties technically and financially before choosing a remedy.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign buyers and international investors in disputes involving unavailable apartments, substituted units, reduced square meterage, delayed delivery, title deed problems, developer breaches, double sales, defective properties, refunds and compensation claims. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing purchase agreements, investigating the status of the original property, evaluating replacement offers, negotiating settlements and pursuing appropriate judicial remedies where a developer fails to deliver the apartment originally purchased.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile / WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey