Foreign Investor Buys Land Subject to an Ongoing Partition Lawsuit in Turkey: What Are the Risks? (2026 Updated Guide)

A foreign investor plans to buy land subject to an ongoing partition lawsuit in Turkey. Learn the risks of judicial sale, physical division, changing ownership, auction exposure, pending claims and the due diligence required before purchasing a share.

A foreign investor may find an attractive parcel of land in Turkey at a price significantly below comparable properties. The seller may explain that the land has several co-owners but insist that this is not a serious problem. Only during title or litigation due diligence does the investor discover that an ongoing partition lawsuit has already been filed to terminate the co-ownership.

This discovery can fundamentally change the investment.

A partition lawsuit is not merely a private disagreement between existing owners. Its purpose is to terminate the existing co-ownership relationship. Depending on the characteristics of the property, the proceedings may ultimately result in physical division of the land or judicial sale of the property and distribution of the proceeds among the owners. Turkish court decisions consistently describe partition proceedings as actions designed to terminate co-ownership and move the property out of the existing shared ownership structure.

Therefore, a foreign investor considering purchasing land or an ownership share during an ongoing partition lawsuit must ask a different question from an ordinary property buyer: What exactly will happen to the ownership I am purchasing if the lawsuit continues?

The answer requires examination of the court file, the current ownership structure, the requested form of partition, the possibility of physical division, the risk of judicial sale and the procedural consequences of purchasing an ownership interest while litigation is pending.

What Is a Partition Lawsuit?

A partition lawsuit seeks to terminate shared ownership.

It can concern property held under ordinary co-ownership or other forms of common ownership where the applicable conditions are satisfied.

These proceedings are distinctive because the objective is not simply to determine which co-owner is “right” or “wrong.” Turkish Court of Cassation decisions describe them as bilateral proceedings producing similar consequences for the parties.

For an investor, this means the lawsuit can affect the entire economic structure of the property.

Why Is an Ongoing Partition Case Important to a Buyer?

Because the property being purchased may not remain in its current form.

If the investor buys a share today, the court proceedings may later result in:

• physical division of the parcel,
• judicial sale of the entire property,
• distribution of sale proceeds,
• disputes concerning buildings or improvements,
• changes in the parties during litigation, or
• additional proceedings that delay final resolution.

The investor should therefore never value the acquisition as though the partition lawsuit did not exist.

Buying a Share Does Not Automatically End the Lawsuit

A seller may tell the foreign investor:

“If you buy my share, the lawsuit will disappear.”

That should not be assumed.

A pending partition case concerns termination of the co-ownership relationship. Transfer of one person’s interest during the proceedings does not necessarily eliminate the underlying dispute.

The procedural consequences of the transfer must be examined separately.

Can Property Involved in Litigation Be Transferred?

The existence of litigation does not always mean that the subject property becomes legally incapable of transfer.

Turkish procedural law recognizes circumstances in which the subject matter of litigation is transferred while proceedings are pending. Article 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure regulates the procedural consequences of transfer of the subject matter after a lawsuit has begun. Court of Cassation jurisprudence confirms that this mechanism can apply to disputes involving real estate.

However, the fact that a transfer may be technically possible does not mean it is commercially safe.

The Buyer May Enter an Existing Legal Dispute

A foreign investor should understand that purchasing during litigation may mean stepping into a legal position already affected by the pending case.

The court file must therefore be reviewed before closing.

The investor should determine:

who filed the lawsuit,

who the defendants are,

what form of partition is requested,

whether all owners have been included,

what expert reports have been obtained,

whether physical division has been examined,

whether sale has been requested, and

what procedural stage the case has reached.

Do Not Rely Only on the Seller’s Explanation of the Case

The seller may minimize the litigation.

Statements such as:

“It is just a family dispute.”

“The case will be withdrawn.”

“The court will give me my section.”

“The other owners cannot force a sale.”

“I will cancel the lawsuit after you buy.”

should not replace independent review of the court file.

The investor needs to know what has actually been requested and decided.

Obtain the Case Number Before Paying a Deposit

If the seller discloses a partition lawsuit, request the court and case information immediately.

The investor’s lawyer should review the proceedings rather than relying on a summary provided by the seller or real estate agent.

If the seller refuses to provide the case details, that should be treated as a significant warning sign.

Determine Whether the Seller Is Plaintiff or Defendant

This can help explain the history of the dispute.

A seller who filed the partition lawsuit may actively be seeking judicial sale.

A defendant may oppose sale and request physical division.

However, labels such as plaintiff and defendant should not be treated as equivalent to winning and losing parties because partition proceedings have a distinctive bilateral nature.

The actual petitions and requests are more important than the party label.

Can One Co-Owner Demand Termination of Co-Ownership?

Subject to applicable restrictions, a co-owner may seek termination of co-ownership.

The other owners cannot necessarily prevent the proceedings merely because they prefer the existing ownership arrangement.

This is one reason why purchasing a minority share can be risky: the investor may acquire the share but have limited ability to preserve the existing parcel in its current ownership structure.

First Major Risk: Physical Division

The court may investigate whether the property can be divided physically.

Court of Cassation jurisprudence requires consideration of factors including the property’s area, nature, number of owners, ownership percentages, agricultural characteristics and planning legislation when determining whether physical division is possible.

For an investor, physical division can fundamentally change the acquisition.

The Investor May Not Receive the Part They Expected

Suppose a foreign investor purchases a 40 percent share because the seller has always used the roadside section of the land.

The investor may assume that purchasing the seller’s share means acquiring that physical section.

That assumption can be dangerous.

An undivided ownership share does not necessarily correspond to the particular area historically used by the seller.

If the court eventually orders physical partition, the allocation may not match the investor’s commercial expectations.

Seller’s Historical Use Is Not Necessarily the Final Partition

The seller may say:

“My family has always used this side.”

“This section is my 40 percent.”

“The road frontage belongs to me.”

These statements should be checked carefully.

A practical usage arrangement among co-owners does not automatically mean that the court will recognize the same physical allocation in the final partition.

Zoning Rules Can Prevent Physical Division

Physical division is not determined merely by drawing lines on a map.

The proposed division must be legally permissible.

Court of Cassation decisions emphasize the need to examine planning rules and obtain the relevant administrative assessment concerning whether the proposed subdivision can legally proceed.

Therefore, an investor should independently investigate subdivision feasibility.

Agricultural Land Can Create Additional Problems

Where the property is agricultural, statutory restrictions can affect whether physical division is possible.

A parcel that appears large enough to divide mathematically may not be legally divisible.

The investor should therefore determine the official classification of the land before assuming that partition will produce a separate parcel.

Second Major Risk: Judicial Sale of the Entire Property

If physical division is not possible, judicial sale may become the central outcome.

Court of Cassation decisions confirm that where lawful physical division cannot be achieved, termination of co-ownership through sale may be appropriate.

This is one of the most significant risks for a foreign investor purchasing a share during an ongoing case.

The Investor Could Lose the Land and Receive Money Instead

The investor may purchase a share because they want to build, develop or hold the property.

But if the partition proceedings result in sale of the property, the investor’s economic position can shift from owning land to receiving the amount attributable to the ownership interest from the sale proceeds.

This may completely defeat the original investment strategy.

A Partition Lawsuit Is Not a Guaranteed Path to Sole Ownership

Some investors deliberately buy a co-owner’s share because they believe:

“I will buy 30 percent now and obtain the remaining 70 percent through the partition case.”

That is not guaranteed.

If the property proceeds to judicial sale, the investor may have an opportunity to pursue acquisition through the sale process, but other buyers may compete.

The final price can therefore be significantly different from the investor’s original expectations.

Judicial Sale Creates Auction Risk

The investor should model the possibility that the property will eventually be sold.

Questions include:

How much is the entire parcel worth?

What is the investor’s maximum acquisition budget?

Could third-party bidders participate?

Would the investor still want the property if the price increases substantially?

What happens if another bidder purchases it?

Buying the initial share without answering these questions can be speculative.

Sale Is Conducted Through the Applicable Judicial Sale Framework

The Code of Civil Procedure provides that where sale is required for partition or termination of co-ownership, the judge appoints a sales officer and the sale of movable and immovable property proceeds under the applicable enforcement-sale rules.

A foreign investor should therefore understand that this is not equivalent to an ordinary negotiated private sale.

Can the Sale Be Limited to Existing Co-Owners?

This should not be assumed.

A sale restricted to co-owners requires the legally relevant agreement of the co-owners.

Without the necessary agreement, the investor should evaluate the possibility of broader auction competition.

A purchase strategy based entirely on the belief that only existing owners can bid may therefore be seriously flawed.

Third Major Risk: The Purchase Price May Be Too High

A share in property already subject to a partition lawsuit should not automatically be valued like a clean share in property with stable co-ownership.

The investor faces litigation uncertainty, potential judicial sale, delay and procedural expenses.

The purchase price should therefore reflect the actual legal risk.

Compare Share Price With Expected Sale Proceeds

Suppose the investor pays a substantial premium for a 25 percent share because the land has development potential.

If the property is later sold through the partition process at a disappointing price, the amount distributed to the investor may be lower than the original investment.

The investor should calculate this downside before purchasing.

Fourth Major Risk: Litigation May Already Be Advanced

The timing of the purchase is critical.

A case filed last month presents a different risk from a case in which:

expert reports have already been completed,

physical division has been rejected,

sale has been ordered, or

the proceedings have moved toward the sale stage.

The buyer should establish exactly where the case stands.

Review Every Expert Report

Expert reports can provide essential information about:

property value,

physical divisibility,

zoning,

existing buildings,

trees and improvements,

ownership shares, and

proposed partition.

The investor should not purchase without understanding these findings where they already exist.

Fifth Major Risk: Buildings and Improvements May Be Disputed

The land may contain a house, warehouse, commercial building, agricultural structure, trees or other improvements.

One co-owner may claim that these improvements belong exclusively to them.

This can complicate the partition case significantly.

Recent Court of Cassation jurisprudence confirms that disputes concerning structures or other improvements may require separate consideration and can affect how sale proceeds are ultimately allocated.

Do Not Assume Every Building Belongs to All Owners Economically

Although structures may form part of the real estate, disputes concerning who created or owns particular improvements can affect allocation of value.

The investor should review whether the court file contains claims concerning buildings, trees or other additions.

These claims can affect the economic value of the share being purchased.

A Separate Lawsuit About Improvements May Delay the Partition Case

Where ownership of improvements is disputed and the relevant party pursues the issue through the appropriate proceedings, the partition case may need to await resolution of that dispute in applicable circumstances.

This can significantly extend the investment timeline.

Sixth Major Risk: The Seller’s Share May Have Changed

Do not rely on the percentage stated in an old contract or advertisement.

Share transfers, inheritance and other transactions may have changed the ownership structure.

Court decisions concerning partition proceedings emphasize the importance of correctly identifying current ownership shares when determining distribution of sale proceeds.

Obtain current title information immediately before closing.

Seventh Major Risk: All Co-Owners Must Be Accounted For

Partition litigation generally requires the participation of all relevant co-owners.

Court of Cassation jurisprudence emphasizes that all co-owners must be included and that proper constitution of the parties is a matter considered throughout the proceedings.

If the ownership structure is complicated by deaths, inheritance or transfers, the case may be delayed.

What If a Co-Owner Dies During the Case?

The procedural position may need to be updated to account for successors.

This can delay the proceedings and change the ownership structure.

The investor should therefore review whether any original parties have died and whether inheritance procedures remain unresolved.

Eighth Major Risk: Seller Promises to Withdraw the Lawsuit

A seller who originally filed the case may promise to withdraw after receiving the purchase price.

The buyer should not assume this automatically eliminates the litigation.

Other parties’ procedural positions and requests must be considered.

Because partition proceedings are bilateral in nature, the investor should obtain specific procedural advice before treating withdrawal by one person as guaranteed termination of the case.

What If Another Co-Owner Wants the Case to Continue?

This can be crucial.

Even if the selling co-owner changes position, another co-owner may still have an interest in terminating the co-ownership.

The investor should therefore investigate every party’s position rather than relying solely on the seller.

Ninth Major Risk: The Investor May Become a Litigation Party

Transfer of an ownership interest while litigation is pending can create procedural consequences under Article 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Court of Cassation jurisprudence recognizes that where the subject matter is transferred during pending litigation, the procedural position can pass or otherwise be adjusted according to the statutory rules.

The investor should therefore obtain advice on how the acquisition affects participation in the pending case.

Buying the Share Means Buying the Litigation Context

Commercially, the investor should think of the transaction as acquiring more than a title percentage.

The investor may also inherit the practical consequences of:

existing expert findings,

procedural deadlines,

adverse valuation evidence,

partition requests,

sale risk, and

ongoing disputes with other co-owners.

These factors should influence both the purchase decision and price.

Tenth Major Risk: The Land May Be Sold Before the Investor’s Development Plan Begins

A foreign investor may intend to obtain zoning approval, prepare architectural plans or begin a development project.

If the partition proceedings are already moving toward judicial sale, spending substantial amounts on development planning may be premature.

The litigation timetable should therefore be incorporated into the investment plan.

Can the Investor Stop the Partition Case After Buying a Majority Share?

Not automatically.

Acquiring 60, 70 or even 90 percent of the property does not necessarily eliminate another co-owner’s ability to pursue termination of co-ownership where the statutory conditions are satisfied.

A small remaining share can therefore have major strategic significance.

Majority Ownership Does Not Guarantee Control Over the Outcome

The investor should distinguish corporate-style majority control from co-ownership of land.

Owning most of the parcel does not necessarily allow the investor to dictate whether co-ownership must continue indefinitely.

This is particularly important where the investor intends to acquire a majority share rather than the entire property.

Can the Investor Buy All Remaining Shares During the Lawsuit?

Potentially, if the remaining owners voluntarily agree to sell and the transactions can legally be completed.

This may provide a commercial solution to the partition dispute.

However, every acquisition should be coordinated carefully with the pending proceedings and current title structure.

Buying Every Share Can Change the Practical Need for Partition

If one person ultimately acquires all ownership interests, the co-ownership that gave rise to the dispute may disappear.

But the investor should not pay for the remaining shares without ensuring that the litigation and title consequences are properly addressed.

The closing and court strategy should be coordinated.

Do Not Buy the First Share Before Speaking to the Other Owners

Where possible, the investor should understand the positions of the remaining co-owners before purchasing.

Some may be willing to sell.

Others may insist on judicial sale.

Another may claim ownership of buildings or challenge the seller’s percentage.

Understanding these positions can prevent the investor from entering an unexpectedly hostile ownership structure.

Eleventh Major Risk: The Investor May Overestimate the Value of a Specific Section

A seller may market their share based on a valuable part of the parcel.

For example:

road frontage,

commercial frontage,

water access,

a building,

a valuable orchard, or

the area closest to future development.

But if the property remains undivided, the seller may not own that physical section independently.

The partition outcome may not preserve that allocation.

Inspect the Cadastral Structure

The investor should compare physical use with official cadastral boundaries.

A property marketed as several informal sections may legally remain a single parcel.

This distinction can determine whether the investment strategy is realistic.

Twelfth Major Risk: Encumbrances May Exist Independently of the Partition Case

The pending lawsuit should not distract the investor from ordinary title due diligence.

Check for:

mortgages,

attachments,

usufruct rights,

easements,

annotations,

other pending litigation, and

restrictions affecting transfer.

The seller’s share may carry risks unrelated to the partition proceedings.

Check Whether the Lawsuit Is Annotated

The title record should be reviewed for litigation-related annotations or other entries concerning the pending dispute.

The investor should obtain current records rather than relying on a title document supplied by the seller.

The existence or absence of a particular annotation should also not substitute for direct examination of the actual court file.

Thirteenth Major Risk: Foreign Ownership Restrictions Still Apply

A pending partition lawsuit does not suspend the rules governing foreign acquisition of real estate.

The investor must still determine whether they are legally eligible to acquire the relevant land or share.

Nationality, statutory acquisition limits, property characteristics and restricted-area rules may need to be considered.

Auction Acquisition Must Also Be Legally Possible

If the investor’s strategy is to buy a share now and later acquire the entire property through judicial sale, the investor must ensure that foreign-acquisition restrictions would permit the contemplated ultimate acquisition.

Winning an auction strategy is of little value if the investor cannot legally acquire the resulting property.

This should be investigated before purchasing the initial share.

Agricultural Land Requires Additional Analysis

Where the parcel is agricultural, the feasibility of physical division and foreign acquisition may involve additional legal considerations.

Court of Cassation jurisprudence expressly recognizes the relevance of agricultural characteristics when assessing physical partition.

The investor should therefore identify the property’s official classification early.

Fourteenth Major Risk: The Case Can Take Longer Than Expected

Partition cases can become complicated by:

multiple owners,

inheritance issues,

expert reports,

valuation disputes,

improvement claims,

zoning questions,

appeals, and

sale procedures.

The investor should not structure financing around an unrealistically short litigation timeline.

Carrying Costs Should Be Calculated

During the litigation period, the investor may incur:

legal expenses,

taxes,

property maintenance,

financing costs,

due diligence expenses, and

opportunity costs.

These amounts should be incorporated into the investment model.

Fifteenth Major Risk: The Final Sale Price Is Uncertain

A seller may calculate the value of their share using a high private-market valuation.

A judicial sale may produce a different economic outcome.

The investor should therefore run conservative scenarios.

Ask:

What if the property sells below the investor’s expected market value?

What if the investor must bid substantially more to keep the land?

What if another bidder wins?

What if the proceedings take several years?

A sound acquisition should remain economically defensible under less favorable outcomes.

Can the Investor Participate in the Judicial Sale?

Potentially, subject to the applicable sale rules and the investor’s legal eligibility to acquire the property.

However, the investor should not treat participation as equivalent to guaranteed success.

Auction strategy should be planned separately from the initial share acquisition.

What Happens to Sale Proceeds?

Where co-ownership is terminated through sale, the sale proceeds are distributed according to the legally relevant ownership interests, subject to issues such as recognized improvement claims where applicable.

Court of Cassation decisions emphasize that judgments ordering sale must address how proceeds are to be distributed.

The investor should therefore verify the seller’s actual share before calculating expected recovery.

Can Buildings Affect Distribution of the Proceeds?

Yes, in appropriate circumstances.

Where buildings, trees or similar improvements are recognized as belonging to particular co-owners and increase the property’s value, the valuation and distribution analysis can reflect those interests.

This may mean that simple percentage ownership calculations do not tell the entire economic story.

Obtain an Independent Valuation

Do not rely exclusively on the seller’s valuation.

An independent valuation can help the investor compare:

the value of the share being purchased,

the value of the entire parcel,

the possible value after physical division,

the potential judicial-sale outcome, and

the development value if complete ownership is eventually acquired.

This allows the litigation risk to be priced more realistically.

What Should the Purchase Agreement Say?

A transaction involving pending partition litigation requires significantly more protection than an ordinary share purchase.

The agreement should accurately disclose the litigation and address issues such as the case number, procedural stage, seller representations, purchase price, existing court decisions and consequences of materially inaccurate information.

The exact contractual structure should reflect the particular case.

Seller Should Disclose the Entire Court File

The buyer should request more than the initial petition.

Relevant materials may include:

claim petition,

responses,

hearing minutes,

expert reports,

valuation reports,

interim orders,

appeal documents, and

existing judgments.

The buyer should know what has already happened before assuming the risk.

What If the Seller Hid the Partition Lawsuit?

This can materially affect the dispute between buyer and seller.

Preserve the advertisement, messages and contractual representations.

If the seller expressly represented that no litigation existed despite knowing about an ongoing case, the buyer should obtain legal advice promptly regarding contractual and other available remedies.

Do Not Make the Final Payment Before Updating the Court and Title Search

The litigation position can change during negotiations.

A new judgment may be issued.

A sale decision may become final.

Another ownership share may be transferred.

An attachment may be registered.

Final due diligence should therefore be repeated immediately before closing.

Consider Making Closing Conditional

Where the investor remains willing to purchase, completion can potentially be structured around specified conditions.

Depending on the investment strategy, these may include:

review of the complete court file,

confirmation of current ownership,

acceptable litigation status,

absence of undisclosed encumbrances,

foreign-acquisition eligibility, and

specified seller representations remaining accurate at closing.

What If the Investor Already Paid a Deposit?

The buyer should immediately review the agreement.

If the partition lawsuit was not disclosed, the seller’s representations and the buyer’s knowledge at the time of payment may become important.

The buyer should avoid paying the balance until the legal consequences of the pending proceedings have been assessed.

Can the Buyer Withdraw?

Potentially, depending on the transaction documents, representations and circumstances.

A buyer who discovers a previously undisclosed lawsuit may have a materially different position from a buyer who expressly accepted the litigation risk in the contract.

The agreement should be reviewed before any formal termination notice is sent.

Can the Deposit Be Recovered?

Potentially.

The answer depends on the legal nature of the payment, the agreement, disclosure of the lawsuit and reason the transaction does not proceed.

Evidence showing that the property was represented as litigation-free may become particularly important.

Preserve the Property Advertisement

If the advertisement stated:

“clean title,”

“no disputes,”

“ready for immediate development,” or

“sole-owner land,”

preserve it.

The advertisement can help establish what was represented before the investor committed money.

Preserve WhatsApp and Email Communications

Messages can reveal whether the seller disclosed the partition proceedings.

Save the complete communication history rather than only isolated screenshots.

Messages concerning other owners, judicial sale, expected court decisions or promises to withdraw the case may become important evidence.

Do Not Rely on an Agent’s Statement That the Case Is “Not Important”

A real estate agent may not understand the procedural consequences of a partition lawsuit.

The investor should obtain independent legal review of the court file.

The decision should be based on the actual proceedings, not a sales explanation.

2026 Practical Legal Strategy

A foreign investor considering land subject to an ongoing partition lawsuit should not treat the transaction as an ordinary purchase of a clean ownership share. The investor is acquiring an ownership interest within a legal process whose purpose is to terminate the existing co-ownership structure.

The first step should be to obtain current title information and the complete court file. The investor should identify all owners, verify the seller’s exact percentage, determine the procedural stage and establish whether the parties seek physical partition or sale.

The second step is to determine whether physical division is realistically possible. Turkish Court of Cassation jurisprudence requires consideration of the property’s characteristics, ownership structure, agricultural status and planning rules. Where lawful division is impossible, sale can become the mechanism for terminating co-ownership.

The investor should then model the worst-case scenario: the entire property is sold and another bidder acquires it. The purchase remains commercially rational only if the investor can tolerate that result.

Any disputes involving buildings, trees or other improvements must also be investigated because they may affect both the timing of the proceedings and distribution of the sale proceeds.

Finally, the foreign investor’s own eligibility to acquire the share and potentially the entire property must be checked independently.

Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can review the title records, partition case file, expert reports, ownership percentages and proposed purchase agreement to determine whether acquiring the land or share is commercially and legally defensible before the investor commits substantial capital.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a foreign investor buy land while a partition lawsuit is pending?

Potentially, but the transfer can have important procedural and economic consequences. The court file and title position should be reviewed before the acquisition.

Does buying a share stop the partition lawsuit?

Not automatically. The purpose of the pending proceedings is to terminate the co-ownership relationship, and transfer of one ownership interest does not necessarily eliminate that dispute.

Can the court physically divide the land?

Potentially, if physical partition is legally and practically possible. Property size, ownership structure, planning requirements and agricultural characteristics can all be relevant.

What happens if the land cannot be physically divided?

Termination through sale may become appropriate. Court of Cassation jurisprudence recognizes sale where lawful physical division is not feasible.

Can I lose the land after buying a share?

The investor may remain entitled to the economic value associated with the ownership interest, but a judicial sale can result in the property itself being acquired by another buyer. This is one of the central risks of purchasing during partition litigation.

If I buy 70 percent of the land, can I stop the remaining owner from seeking partition?

Majority ownership does not automatically guarantee continuation of co-ownership. The rights of the remaining co-owner and the applicable statutory conditions must still be considered.

Can I buy the whole property at the judicial sale?

Potentially, if you are eligible to acquire the property and comply with the applicable sale rules. However, other bidding may prevent you from becoming the purchaser.

What happens to buildings on the land?

Buildings, trees and other improvements can create additional valuation and ownership disputes. Recognized improvement claims may affect allocation of sale proceeds.

What if the seller did not disclose the partition lawsuit?

Preserve the sale advertisement, messages, agreement and payment evidence. The seller’s representations and the buyer’s knowledge may become important in determining available remedies.

What should a foreign investor check before paying?

Obtain the current title record, review the complete partition case file, verify every ownership share, examine expert reports, determine whether physical division or judicial sale is likely, investigate improvements and encumbrances, calculate auction risk and confirm foreign-acquisition eligibility before paying the purchase price.

Legal Support for Foreign Investors Buying Land Under Partition Litigation

Foreign investors can face substantial financial risk when purchasing land or an ownership share already subject to an ongoing partition lawsuit. The proceedings may result in physical division, judicial sale, auction competition, disputes over buildings and improvements or an investment outcome completely different from what the seller originally represented.

Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign investors with co-owned land acquisitions, partition litigation, title due diligence, ownership-share disputes, judicial-sale risk assessment and failed real-estate investments. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can examine the land-registry records, pending court proceedings, expert reports and proposed transaction structure to determine the risks before the investor purchases the property or becomes involved in the existing co-ownership dispute.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22

WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22

Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr