

A foreign company wants to convert an office or commercial building into a hotel in Turkey. Learn the zoning, change-of-use, building permit, occupancy, fire-safety, workplace licence and tourism certification risks before investing.
A foreign company may acquire an office building, business center, former corporate headquarters, commercial block or another large property in Turkey and conclude that converting it into a hotel would produce a substantially higher investment return. The building may already have elevators, parking, reception areas and large floor plates that appear suitable for guest rooms.
However, a commercial building cannot be treated as a hotel merely because it can physically accommodate bedrooms.
Hotel conversion involves several overlapping regulatory layers. The investor must examine the zoning plan, approved building use, architectural project, change-of-use requirements, structural modifications, occupancy documentation, fire safety, workplace opening and operating licence, and the tourism certification framework administered by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
The regulatory environment is also current and evolving. The Tourism Facilities Qualifications Regulation was amended again on August 31, 2026, while the implementation communiqué governing tourism-facility certification was amended on June 16, 2026.
For the investor, the correct question is therefore not:
“Can this commercial building physically be turned into a hotel?”
It is:
“Can this exact property lawfully be converted, licensed and certified for the exact hotel concept we intend to operate?”
One of the most dangerous assumptions is that any property classified broadly as commercial can automatically become a hotel.
An office, shop, business center and hotel may all involve commercial activity, but they are not necessarily interchangeable from a planning, construction or licensing perspective.
The investor should determine the property’s exact approved use rather than relying on the general description “commercial.”
Before purchasing or converting the building, obtain and analyze the applicable zoning documentation.
The review should address:
the parcel’s planning designation,
whether accommodation or tourism use is permitted,
plan notes,
building density,
height restrictions,
parking,
setbacks,
protected-area restrictions, and
any special tourism-planning provisions.
If hotel use is fundamentally incompatible with the applicable plan, interior renovation alone cannot solve the problem.
The analysis can become more complex where the property is located within a culture and tourism protection and development region or tourism center.
The Ministry’s current certification communiqué specifically provides for planning verification in tourism investment certificate applications involving properties located within these designated areas. Applications inconsistent with the applicable parcel-use purpose, facility type or class can be rejected.
This should be investigated before the acquisition becomes unconditional.
The foreign company should review:
title deed,
building permit,
approved architectural project,
occupancy documentation,
later project revisions,
municipal archive records,
planning-enforcement history, and
existing workplace licences.
The actual building should then be compared with the approved plans.
A building may possess valid occupancy documentation for office or another commercial use.
That does not necessarily establish that it can operate as a hotel.
The proposed conversion may require the property’s documentation to be brought into conformity with its new use.
Official Ministry guidance has expressly recognized that when a building’s use changes, a new-use-compatible modification permit, subsequent occupancy documentation and the appropriate workplace licence may be required.
This is one of the central due-diligence questions.
If the building is officially approved as an office but the investor intends to operate it as a hotel, determine whether a formal change-of-use and modification-permit process is necessary.
The answer should be established before:
demolition work,
room construction,
bathroom installation,
hotel branding,
equipment purchases, or
large non-refundable payments.
Foreign investors sometimes hire a hotel designer before confirming regulatory feasibility.
This reverses the correct order.
First determine:
what hotel type is intended,
whether planning permits it,
whether the building can lawfully change use,
whether technical compliance is feasible,
and
what approvals will be required.
Only then should the final architectural design be prepared.
“Hotel” is too broad for serious legal due diligence.
The investor should determine whether the project is intended to operate as:
a hotel,
boutique hotel,
apart hotel,
motel,
special accommodation facility,
or
another regulated accommodation type.
The Ministry’s tourism framework distinguishes accommodation facility types and imposes type- and class-specific requirements. The Ministry identifies the Tourism Facilities Qualifications Regulation as the principal regulation governing facility types and classifications.
The selected category may affect:
minimum physical characteristics,
guest rooms,
common areas,
reception,
food and beverage facilities,
circulation,
service areas,
accessibility,
staff facilities, and
other operational requirements.
A building suitable for one accommodation concept may be commercially unsuitable for another.
The investor should avoid renovating the building first and then asking:
“What hotel category can we obtain?”
The intended regulatory category should guide the architectural project from the beginning.
Otherwise, completed construction may have to be redesigned.
A commercial building may appear capable of accommodating 120 guest rooms.
After regulatory and architectural analysis, the lawful capacity may be considerably lower.
Space can be consumed by:
corridors,
stairs,
service areas,
reception,
technical rooms,
housekeeping,
fire-safety infrastructure,
accessible rooms,
elevators,
food and beverage areas, and
other mandatory or operational spaces.
The acquisition price should therefore not be based solely on theoretical room count.
The commercial building may already contain:
unauthorized mezzanines,
enclosed terraces,
additional floors,
basement conversions,
rooftop structures,
extensions, or
other deviations from approved plans.
These should be identified before hotel capacity is calculated.
An unauthorized area should not be valued as guaranteed hotel floor area.
A technical team should conduct a floor-by-floor comparison.
Determine whether:
the external dimensions match,
internal layouts correspond,
additional structures exist,
common areas were altered,
parking was converted,
and
the roof or basement has been modified.
A hotel conversion can become substantially more difficult if the existing building must first be brought into planning compliance.
Hotels present heightened fire-safety concerns because guests sleep in the building and may be unfamiliar with evacuation routes.
Current workplace-licensing rules expressly require occupancy documentation and a fire-service report for accommodation establishments, including hotels, motels, holiday villages and similar facilities. The regulatory amendments also clarified additional accommodation-facility conditions involving building materials, heating, ventilation, hot and cold water and elevators.
Fire compliance should therefore be tested before the investment is finalized.
The investor should evaluate:
escape stairs,
emergency exits,
corridor lengths,
fire compartments,
alarm systems,
sprinklers where applicable,
smoke control,
emergency lighting,
fire-resistant construction,
kitchen risks,
electrical systems,
and
fire-service access.
A building may be capable of becoming a hotel only after extremely expensive fire-safety reconstruction.
Office buildings are designed according to their original use and occupancy assumptions.
Hotel conversion may change:
occupancy patterns,
night-time use,
evacuation characteristics,
and
guest circulation.
The investor should not assume that existing stairs and exits will automatically remain sufficient.
Current accommodation licensing conditions include elevator requirements depending on the number of floors traversed by guests. The 2025 licensing amendments clarified that where guests travel more than three floors, a guest elevator is required, together with specified safety and ventilation arrangements.
Existing office elevators should therefore be evaluated for the proposed hotel configuration.
Hotel conversion should also address accessibility from the beginning.
Potential issues include:
entrances,
ramps,
elevators,
accessible guest rooms,
bathrooms,
common areas,
restaurants,
and
circulation routes.
Retrofitting accessibility after construction can be substantially more expensive than integrating it into the initial conversion project.
An office floor divided into small rooms does not automatically become a compliant hotel floor.
The investor should consider:
room dimensions,
bathrooms,
ventilation,
natural lighting where applicable,
sound insulation,
mechanical systems,
electrical capacity,
fire safety, and
guest circulation.
Hotel-room feasibility should be tested before the final purchase valuation.
Current workplace-licensing rules for accommodation establishments contain specific requirements regarding room configuration. The 2025 amendments expressly clarified, among other matters, that kitchens or kitchen niches are not to be arranged in ordinary guest bedrooms under the relevant accommodation conditions.
If the investor intends an apartment-style concept, the correct facility category should therefore be selected before design.
Converting office floors into dozens of hotel rooms may require substantial new:
water supply,
wastewater,
ventilation,
waterproofing,
hot-water systems, and
vertical plumbing shafts.
A building that is structurally suitable may still be commercially unsuitable because of mechanical conversion costs.
Current accommodation-facility requirements include adequate heating and natural or mechanical ventilation throughout the premises, together with continuous hot and cold water.
Existing office HVAC systems should therefore be tested against hotel operation rather than assumed adequate.
The change from office to hotel use may affect parking calculations and operational needs.
The investor should examine:
existing lawful parking,
zoning requirements,
valet arrangements,
tour-bus access,
guest drop-off,
service access, and
whether any parking areas were previously converted to another use.
A hotel with no workable arrival arrangement may face both regulatory and commercial difficulties.
The building may have been designed for employees arriving during business hours.
A hotel requires different circulation involving:
guests,
luggage,
taxis,
tour buses,
deliveries,
staff,
waste collection, and
emergency vehicles.
Site circulation should form part of legal and technical due diligence.
Investors often maximize guest-room numbers and underestimate operational areas.
A hotel may require space for:
housekeeping,
laundry,
linen,
staff,
storage,
waste,
technical equipment,
food preparation,
deliveries, and
administration.
Ignoring these areas can produce an unrealistic room count.
The hotel will require the appropriate opening and operating licence from the competent authority.
For tourism certification purposes, the Ministry’s current implementation communiqué requires the workplace licence to correspond with the activity, licence holder, address and relevant parcel information. Conditional licences described as temporary, limited or partial are not accepted for the tourism certification process.
This makes the municipal or other competent-authority licensing stage central to the project.
The current tourism-certification communiqué provides that applications for accommodation establishments must be supported by a workplace opening and operating licence appropriate to the type of accommodation facility.
For certain categories, the rules provide specific flexibility concerning the form of the licence, but investors should not assume that a generic commercial licence will be sufficient.
The intended hotel category and workplace licence should therefore be coordinated.
A workplace opening and operating licence is not the end of the process.
The Ministry of Culture and Tourism operates a separate tourism certification system under the Tourism Encouragement Law, Tourism Facilities Qualifications Regulation and implementing communiqué.
A foreign company should build both regulatory processes into its investment timetable.
The Ministry describes a Tourism Operation Certificate as the document issued to tourism facilities that have completed their investment, commenced operation and satisfy the minimum qualifications applicable to the requested facility type and class.
The certificate should therefore not be treated as a simple corporate registration document.
The physical facility itself must satisfy the applicable requirements.
According to the Ministry’s current guidance, a Tourism Operation Certificate application includes, among other matters:
the application,
a workplace opening and operating licence consistent with the facility’s current status,
the property’s title information,
and
corporate identification information for legal-entity applicants.
The property, operator and licence documentation should therefore be coordinated before application.
The two systems should not be treated independently.
Official Ministry guidance explains that while the workplace licence is issued under the workplace-licensing framework, tourism facilities must also comply with the Tourism Encouragement Law and Tourism Facilities Qualifications Regulation because failure to obtain or maintain the required tourism certification can lead to consequences for the workplace licence.
This makes compliance after opening as important as compliance before opening.
For a substantial conversion project, the investor should assess whether a tourism investment certificate is relevant during the development phase.
This is particularly important where:
major construction is planned,
the property is in a tourism region,
special planning provisions apply, or
the investment model depends on a specific hotel type or class.
The regulatory sequence should be mapped before construction starts.
Certain tourism facilities are subject to additional rules under the Tourism Facilities Implementation Regulation.
The framework connects building permits for qualifying tourism facilities with tourism investment documentation and the applicable implementation zoning plan.
Large hotel projects therefore require particularly coordinated tourism and planning due diligence.
Under the Tourism Facilities Implementation Regulation, certain qualifying tourism facilities can be subject to title-registry annotations concerning tourism use and restrictions on alternative use or creation of independent sections.
The investor should therefore review not only existing title encumbrances but also the consequences of the proposed tourism investment structure.
A foreign company may plan to operate the hotel for several years and later:
sell it,
convert it back to offices,
divide it into units, or
redevelop the property.
The tourism investment structure can affect these future options.
Exit planning should therefore begin before the conversion.
A successful hotel may eventually become more valuable for residential redevelopment.
However, changing from hotel use to residential use can require a separate planning and permitting analysis.
The investor should not base its exit strategy on an assumed future conversion.
Some commercial buildings consist of multiple independent sections under condominium ownership.
A foreign company may purchase only some of those sections and intend to operate them together as a hotel.
This can create issues involving:
common entrances,
elevators,
corridors,
facade,
signage,
roof,
mechanical systems,
parking,
and
other common areas.
Owning several units does not automatically give the investor control over the entire building.
The investor may plan hotel rooms on upper floors while other owners continue operating:
shops,
offices,
residences, or
restaurants.
This can create complications concerning:
guest access,
fire evacuation,
security,
common areas,
noise,
deliveries,
and
technical installations.
The management plan and condominium structure should be examined before purchase.
The hotel design may require physically connecting multiple independent sections.
Potential works include:
removing walls,
opening corridors,
creating shared stairways,
combining entrances,
or
altering common areas.
The investor should establish the legal and technical feasibility before closing.
Hotel projects often rely on rooftops for:
restaurants,
bars,
pools,
terraces,
mechanical equipment,
or
premium guest facilities.
The investor should verify:
ownership,
common-area status,
approved project,
structural capacity,
planning legality,
and
required permissions.
An attractive rooftop should not be included in the hotel valuation merely because it is physically accessible.
A hotel may include:
restaurant,
breakfast room,
bar,
rooftop venue,
banquet hall, or
entertainment facility.
Each additional activity can create further licensing and technical requirements.
The hotel-conversion due diligence should therefore reflect the entire business model rather than only guest accommodation.
If the hotel concept includes alcohol service, the investor should investigate the additional regulatory requirements before finalizing:
restaurant design,
bar areas,
revenue projections, and
operating model.
The ability to operate a hotel does not automatically answer every question concerning alcohol sales.
A luxury hotel may include:
spa,
sauna,
Turkish bath,
fitness center,
indoor pool,
outdoor pool, or
wellness services.
These facilities can create additional:
construction,
hygiene,
technical,
safety, and
licensing requirements.
Their feasibility should be tested before the investment model assumes revenue from them.
A foreign investor may target an older commercial building because its architecture is ideal for a boutique hotel.
If the building is protected or located in a conservation area, alterations may require additional approvals.
Potentially sensitive works include:
facade changes,
windows,
roof alterations,
elevators,
fire escapes,
mechanical installations,
signage,
and
internal structural work.
A boutique-hotel concept can therefore involve substantially more complex conversion than an ordinary modern commercial building.
Hotel conversion can increase structural demands through:
new bathrooms,
water tanks,
mechanical systems,
kitchens,
pools,
elevators,
and
other installations.
A structural engineer should assess the proposed design before the investor commits to expensive construction.
The investor should consider:
building age,
construction history,
structural documentation,
later alterations,
known damage,
and
the proposed intensity of hotel use.
Where appropriate, detailed structural investigation should occur before purchase.
A commercial building may be occupied by:
office tenants,
shops,
restaurants,
storage users, or
other businesses.
Purchasing the building does not necessarily mean immediate vacant possession.
The investor should review:
leases,
termination rights,
expiry dates,
eviction risks,
security deposits,
and
possession timetable.
The hotel construction schedule should not assume that every tenant can immediately be removed.
A two-year delay in obtaining vacant possession can materially affect:
financing,
construction contracts,
brand agreements,
and
project returns.
Tenant due diligence should therefore be completed before the investment timetable is finalized.
A foreign investor may negotiate with an international hotel brand before acquiring the building.
The brand may impose requirements concerning:
room numbers,
room dimensions,
restaurants,
conference areas,
back-of-house space,
fire safety,
accessibility,
and
technical systems.
The investor should align brand requirements with Turkish regulatory feasibility.
A brand’s approval does not replace Turkish permits.
The fact that an international hotel group accepts the building does not establish that:
hotel use is permitted,
the change of use will be approved,
the workplace licence will be issued, or
the tourism certificate will be obtained.
Commercial and regulatory approvals must be separated.
Hotel conversion projects frequently involve substantial financing.
Loan documentation may contain milestones relating to:
building permits,
construction progress,
workplace licensing,
tourism certification,
hotel opening, and
brand agreements.
The investor should avoid promising regulatory milestones that have not yet been tested for feasibility.
The contractor’s obligations should be coordinated with the approved hotel project.
Contracts should address issues such as:
permit responsibility,
project compliance,
change orders,
delay,
defective work,
regulatory inspections,
completion standards, and
documentation required for occupancy and licensing.
A technically completed hotel is not commercially completed if it cannot lawfully open.
If the building is acquired specifically for hotel conversion, preserve statements such as:
“Hotel conversion is approved.”
“Tourism use is permitted.”
“No zoning amendment is required.”
“Fire compliance will be straightforward.”
“The building can accommodate 150 rooms.”
“Tourism certification is guaranteed.”
These representations should be independently verified.
Preserve advertisements describing the building as:
“hotel suitable,”
“ideal hotel investment,”
“tourism approved,”
“ready for hotel conversion,” or
“licensed hotel project.”
Marketing terminology should be compared with official planning and licensing documentation.
Suppose the foreign company expressly informs the seller that it is buying the building for conversion into a hotel.
The seller states that hotel use has already been approved.
After closing, the investor discovers that the zoning plan does not support the represented use or that a previous hotel conversion application was rejected.
Depending on the contractual documentation and circumstances, seller liability may become a significant issue.
Ask whether the seller or previous owner ever applied for:
change of use,
hotel building permit,
tourism investment certification,
workplace licence,
fire approval,
or
another accommodation-related authorization.
Obtain the outcome.
A previous refusal can reveal a problem that materially affects the investment.
If the seller already knew that the building could not satisfy a critical hotel requirement and failed to disclose that information, the earlier administrative file may become central evidence in a later transaction dispute.
The investor should obtain the municipal and regulatory history as early as possible.
For a major acquisition, the agreement can expressly state that the purchaser intends to convert and operate the property as a specified hotel or accommodation facility, subject to applicable regulatory approvals.
This helps clarify the commercial purpose of the transaction.
Depending on the transaction, warranties may address:
zoning status,
lawful commercial use,
absence of unauthorized construction,
building and occupancy permits,
previous hotel applications,
existing enforcement,
fire-safety information,
title restrictions,
leases,
and
accuracy of disclosed building plans.
Generic property warranties may be inadequate for a hotel-conversion project.
If hotel conversion is essential to the investment, closing can potentially be conditioned on obtaining or satisfactorily confirming a critical regulatory milestone.
The condition may relate to:
hotel-use feasibility,
change-of-use approval,
planning confirmation,
tourism investment documentation,
or
another essential authorization.
The appropriate condition depends on the transaction.
A foreign company may prefer not to pay the entire purchase price before the core hotel-conversion risk is resolved.
The parties may consider:
deposit protection,
staged payments,
escrow,
retention, or
another contractual security mechanism.
The transaction structure should allocate the risk clearly.
The investor should first classify the problem.
Is the obstacle:
zoning,
change of use,
unauthorized construction,
fire safety,
occupancy documentation,
workplace licensing,
tourism certification,
or
technical feasibility?
Do not assume every problem can be solved by submitting another application.
Possible solutions may include:
architectural revision,
modification permit,
removal of unauthorized construction,
fire-safety reconstruction,
accessibility improvements,
mechanical upgrades,
reduction of room capacity, or
selection of another accommodation category.
A coordinated legal and technical feasibility study should identify realistic options.
A building may theoretically be convertible but only after:
losing substantial floor area,
adding new fire stairs,
reducing room count,
rebuilding mechanical systems,
constructing new elevators,
and
undertaking major structural reinforcement.
The legal answer may be “possible,” while the investment answer is “commercially irrational.”
Both questions must be asked.
Potentially.
If the competent authority refuses a change-of-use, workplace licence or another administrative application, obtain the written decision and complete file.
A challenge may be considered where the authority:
uses incorrect facts,
misinterprets the zoning plan,
applies the wrong facility category,
ignores valid permits,
or
otherwise acts unlawfully.
But litigation cannot simply convert a legally prohibited hotel use into a lawful one.
Create a detailed chronology of:
applications,
technical submissions,
inspection reports,
deficiency notices,
refusals,
notifications,
and
administrative correspondence.
Informal discussions should not be allowed to cause legal deadlines to expire.
The foreign company may need two parallel strategies.
The first asks:
Can the hotel conversion or licence refusal be successfully challenged or corrected?
The second asks:
Did the seller breach a warranty or misrepresent the property’s suitability for hotel conversion?
The evidence, deadlines and remedies may differ.
Document:
purchase price,
architectural fees,
engineering costs,
demolition,
construction expenditure,
hotel-brand fees,
financing costs,
temporary security and maintenance,
equipment orders,
consultant fees,
and
the difference between the building’s expected hotel value and actual lawful value.
This evidence can become important in a seller dispute.
If hotel conversion fails, determine whether the property can continue lawfully as:
offices,
retail,
another accommodation category,
another commercial use, or
a redevelopment project.
Alternative-use value can materially affect the investor’s litigation and exit strategy.
A foreign company planning to convert a commercial building into a hotel in Turkey should complete hotel-specific legal and technical feasibility due diligence before making the property acquisition unconditional.
First, identify the intended accommodation category and confirm planning compatibility. A generic “commercial” designation should never be assumed to authorize hotel operation. Where the property lies within a tourism center or culture and tourism protection and development region, the applicable tourism planning position requires additional attention.
Second, review the building’s legal status. Compare the title deed, building permit, approved architectural project, occupancy documentation and actual physical condition. Determine whether a formal change of use and modification permit are required and whether unauthorized construction must first be corrected.
Third, conduct fire and technical feasibility before calculating the final hotel room count. Current workplace-licensing rules require occupancy documentation and fire reporting for accommodation facilities and contain detailed minimum conditions concerning matters including heating, ventilation, water and elevators.
Fourth, coordinate the workplace licence with tourism certification. The Ministry requires the workplace opening and operating licence to correspond with the accommodation activity and facility details, and tourism operation certification is based on compliance with the applicable facility type and class requirements.
Fifth, use the latest regulatory framework. The Tourism Facilities Qualifications Regulation was amended on August 31, 2026, and its implementation communiqué was amended on June 16, 2026. A hotel project should therefore not be structured using an old checklist or assumptions from a previous acquisition.
Finally, allocate unresolved regulatory risk contractually. Where hotel conversion is fundamental to the transaction, conditions precedent, specific warranties, indemnities, escrow, retention or staged payment structures may provide materially greater protection than paying the full purchase price and attempting to solve the problem afterward.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can review the property’s title and zoning status, approved building use, architectural and occupancy documentation, hotel-conversion feasibility, workplace licensing requirements, tourism certification framework and acquisition documents to determine whether the proposed hotel investment can lawfully proceed and how regulatory risks should be allocated before substantial capital is committed.
No. The zoning plan, approved building use, physical configuration, change-of-use requirements, fire safety, occupancy documentation, workplace licensing and tourism certification requirements must all be examined.
No. A broad commercial classification does not automatically establish that the property can lawfully operate as a hotel. The zoning plan, approved architectural project and existing building documentation should be reviewed.
It may be. Where the approved building use is being changed, modification-permit and corresponding occupancy procedures may be necessary. The exact building and applicable planning documentation must be examined.
Current workplace-licensing rules require occupancy documentation and fire reporting for accommodation establishments within the applicable framework.
The tourism certification framework is a separate regulatory layer. The Ministry’s current process requires an appropriate workplace licence as part of tourism operation certification, and the facility must satisfy the qualifications applicable to its type and class.
It is the Ministry-issued tourism document for a completed and operating tourism facility that satisfies the minimum qualifications applicable to the requested type and class.
Potentially, but the condominium structure, independent sections, common areas, guest access, fire safety, elevators, planning position and licensing feasibility should be examined carefully.
Potentially. Seller liability may depend on the purchase agreement, warranties, disclosed information, previous permit applications and representations concerning hotel or tourism suitability.
The previous application and refusal should be obtained immediately. If the seller knew of a fundamental obstacle and represented the property as hotel-ready, the earlier administrative record may be highly significant.
Verify the zoning plan and hotel-use feasibility; identify the intended accommodation category; review the title deed, building permit, approved architectural project and occupancy documentation; compare the actual building with approved plans; determine whether change-of-use approval is required; conduct fire, structural, accessibility and mechanical feasibility; calculate lawful room capacity; investigate workplace licensing and tourism certification; check previous hotel applications and enforcement proceedings; and ensure that the purchase agreement protects the investor if the hotel conversion cannot lawfully proceed.
Hotel conversion can transform the value of a commercial property, but it can also expose a foreign investor to substantial losses if the acquisition is completed before zoning, change-of-use, fire-safety, workplace licensing and tourism certification requirements are investigated. A building that appears capable of accommodating a profitable hotel may ultimately support fewer rooms than expected, require major reconstruction or be unable to obtain the approvals required for the intended operation.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign investors and companies with hotel property acquisitions, commercial-to-hotel conversions, real estate due diligence, zoning and change-of-use issues, workplace licensing, tourism regulatory matters, administrative disputes and claims arising from inaccurate seller representations. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can examine the property and proposed hotel model before acquisition or after a regulatory problem arises to determine whether the conversion is legally feasible and which contractual or administrative measures can protect the investment.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr