Fraudster Uses a Foreign Owner’s Passport Details in a Turkish Real Estate Transaction: Emergency Legal Remedies (2026 Updated Guide)

A fraudster uses a foreign property owner’s passport details in a Turkish real estate transaction. Learn how to stop an unauthorized transfer, protect the title deed, obtain an interim injunction and challenge fraudulent registration.

A foreign property owner in Turkey may discover that passport details, identity information or copies of documents have been used without authorization in connection with a real estate transaction. The fraudster may attempt to impersonate the owner, combine stolen passport information with forged documents, present a false power of attorney or initiate a transaction involving the owner’s apartment, land, commercial property or other real estate.

This situation requires immediate action.

The legal strategy depends heavily on the stage at which the fraud is discovered. If the suspicious transaction has not yet been completed, the priority is preventing the title registry from changing. If the property has already been transferred, the priority shifts to protecting the property against further transfers or mortgages, obtaining the transaction file, challenging the allegedly unlawful registration and preserving evidence for civil and criminal proceedings.

A particularly dangerous mistake is to treat the matter only as identity theft and file a criminal complaint without examining the title deed.

When passport information is misused in a Turkish property transaction, the title registry itself must be protected immediately.

How Can Passport Details Be Used in Property Fraud?

Possession of someone’s passport details does not itself give the fraudster legal authority to sell or mortgage that person’s property.

However, stolen passport information can be combined with other fraudulent materials.

A scheme may involve:

a copied passport,

a manipulated passport image,

a counterfeit identity document,

a forged signature,

a forged power of attorney,

a falsified translation,

false contact information,

an impersonator,

or

another fabricated document presented as evidence of authority.

Official land-registry materials specifically recognize identity verification, forged powers of attorney and document manipulation as risks that must be addressed in preventing fraudulent title transactions.

A Passport Copy Is Not Authority to Sell Property

This distinction is fundamental.

A foreign owner may previously have provided a passport copy to:

a real estate agent,

translator,

property manager,

consultant,

bank,

seller,

buyer,

contractor,

or another intermediary.

Possession of that copy does not give the recipient authority to dispose of the property.

A legitimate title transaction must still satisfy the applicable identity, authority and registration requirements.

Why Foreign Property Owners Can Be Attractive Targets

Foreign owners may spend substantial periods outside Turkey.

A fraudster may believe that an owner living abroad will not immediately notice suspicious activity concerning the property.

The risk may be greater where the owner previously distributed passport copies and property documentation among numerous parties during:

purchase,

renovation,

leasing,

residence procedures,

citizenship procedures,

property management,

or resale preparations.

For this reason, property security should continue after the original acquisition is completed.

First Emergency Question: Has the Title Registry Changed?

This should be determined immediately.

The foreign owner should establish whether the property is:

still registered in the owner’s name,

subject to a pending transaction,

already transferred,

mortgaged,

subject to another registered right,

or transferred more than once.

Do not rely on an old title deed document.

The current registry position is what matters.

Possessing the Original Title Deed Does Not Mean the Property Is Safe

A foreign owner may say:

“I still have my title deed, so nobody could have sold the property.”

That assumption is dangerous.

The physical document retained by the owner is not a substitute for checking the current title registry.

If identity fraud is suspected, current registration information should be obtained immediately.

If the Fraudulent Transaction Is Still Pending, Intervention Is Urgent

The strongest position may exist before the transaction is completed.

If the owner becomes aware of:

an unexpected transaction notification,

an unknown application,

a suspicious telephone call,

a request to confirm a sale,

or

another indication of unauthorized activity,

the matter should be independently verified through official channels immediately.

The objective is to prevent an attempted fraud from becoming a completed title dispute.

Do Not Communicate Only With the Suspected Fraudster

A fraudster may claim:

“It was a mistake.”

“The transaction has been cancelled.”

“Nothing has happened.”

“The application was only preliminary.”

These statements should not be trusted without independent verification.

The current registry and transaction status should be checked separately.

Web Tapu Can Provide an Important Preventive Protection

The Web Tapu system contains an important anti-fraud mechanism.

Official TKGM material states that a property owner can establish a declaration requesting that no transaction concerning the property be performed unless the owner personally appears. The same material explains that this measure was introduced as protection against fraudulent attempts.

For foreign owners concerned that stolen identity details or an unauthorized representative may be used, this can be a particularly important preventive measure.

Foreign Owners Can Also Benefit From Web Tapu Protections

TKGM guidance specifically addresses foreign owners whose foreign identification numbers are associated with their real estate. It states that such foreign owners can use electronic land-registry services and may request that transactions concerning their properties not be carried out except upon personal appearance.

This can be especially useful for an investor who spends most of the year outside Turkey.

The Personal-Appearance Protection Must Be Managed Carefully

The security measure has a practical consequence.

If the owner later legitimately wants an attorney or another representative to perform a transaction under a power of attorney, the existing restriction must be considered.

Therefore, the protection should be coordinated with future transaction plans rather than activated and forgotten.

If the Property Has Already Been Transferred, the Case Changes Completely

Once the title registry has changed, stopping an application is no longer enough.

The foreign owner must determine:

how the transfer occurred,

which documents were used,

who appeared in the transaction,

whether a representative was involved,

who became the registered owner,

whether the property was transferred again,

and

whether any mortgage or other right was subsequently created.

At this point, the matter becomes both an evidence problem and a property-recovery problem.

A Criminal Complaint Alone May Not Restore Ownership

This is one of the most important points for foreign victims.

The misuse of passport information may potentially involve criminal conduct, including allegations relating to fraud or document forgery depending on the facts.

However, even if a criminal investigation is opened, the title registry does not necessarily return automatically to the victim.

The investor must separately examine the civil-law consequences of the disputed registration.

Criminal Investigation and Title Protection Should Proceed in Coordination

The two tracks serve different purposes.

The criminal investigation asks questions such as:

Who committed the fraud?

Who forged the document?

Who used the stolen identity information?

Who participated in the scheme?

The property-law strategy asks:

Who currently owns the property according to the registry?

Is that registration legally valid?

Can it be cancelled?

Can further transfers be prevented?

Can ownership be restored?

Both tracks may be necessary.

Obtain the Complete Title Transaction File

The documents underlying the suspicious transaction can be decisive.

The foreign owner should seek to identify and preserve materials such as:

identity documentation used,

power of attorney,

official transaction documents,

representative details,

signatures,

translations,

application information,

payment-related evidence,

and

other documents forming the basis of the transfer.

The objective is to reconstruct exactly how someone using the victim’s passport information was able to participate in the transaction.

Determine Whether the Passport Itself Was Forged

There is an important distinction between:

use of genuine passport information,

use of a copied passport,

alteration of a passport image,

and

creation of a counterfeit passport.

The evidence and participants may differ significantly.

The genuine passport should be preserved and compared with the documentation appearing in the transaction file.

Determine Whether a False Power of Attorney Was Used

A fraudster may not impersonate the owner personally.

Instead, the fraudster may create a document purporting to authorize another person to sell the property.

Official land-registry materials identify transactions involving forged powers of attorney, including fraudulent sales and mortgages, as recognized forms of title fraud.

The purported power of attorney should therefore be authenticated independently.

Examine the Entire Power of Attorney

Do not stop after determining that a document exists.

Review:

issuing authority,

date,

document number,

identity of the principal,

identity of the representative,

property authority,

sale authority,

mortgage authority,

authority to receive money,

substitution powers,

limitations,

and

any revocation history.

A genuine document can also be misused beyond its lawful scope.

Foreign Powers of Attorney Require Additional Verification

Where the document was allegedly executed outside Turkey, investigate:

the issuing authority,

notarial authentication,

apostille or legalization,

consular involvement where relevant,

translation,

dates,

and

the identity of the person who allegedly signed it.

A foreign owner who was never present in the country where the document was supposedly executed may possess powerful contradictory evidence.

Travel Evidence Can Be Extremely Important

Suppose the transaction file indicates that the foreign owner personally appeared for a transaction on a particular date.

But the owner was in another country.

Preserve:

passport movement records,

airline records,

boarding documents,

hotel records,

employment records,

bank activity,

telephone-location evidence where lawfully available,

and

other reliable evidence establishing the owner’s location.

This can materially strengthen the identity-fraud allegation.

Genuine Signature Samples Should Be Preserved

If the disputed documents contain a purported signature of the owner, expert examination may become relevant.

Useful comparison material may include genuine signatures from:

earlier title transactions,

bank documents,

notarial documents,

contracts,

official applications,

and

other reliable documents from approximately the same period.

The issue should be proved objectively rather than only by saying that the signature “looks wrong.”

Translation Records Can Reveal How the Fraud Was Organized

Foreign owners frequently use sworn translators during legal and property procedures.

If the fraudulent transaction involved translated documents, determine:

who prepared the translation,

what original document was presented,

who supplied it,

when the translation was prepared,

and

whether any records concerning the client remain available.

The translator may have encountered the impersonator or fraudulent representative directly.

Payment Evidence Can Identify the Beneficiaries

Investigate the financial side of the suspicious transaction.

Determine:

what purchase price was declared,

whether money was actually transferred,

who received it,

which accounts were used,

whether the money moved again,

and

whether the buyer and alleged seller had previous financial connections.

A transaction in which the supposed foreign seller receives no money can raise obvious evidentiary questions.

Emergency Interim Protection May Be Necessary

If the fraudulent transfer has already occurred, the immediate risk may be another sale.

A fraudulently registered person could attempt to:

sell the property,

mortgage it,

transfer it to a relative,

transfer it to a company,

or

create other rights over it.

Waiting until the final judgment may therefore seriously increase the difficulty of recovery.

An Interim Injunction Can Protect the Disputed Property

Turkish civil procedure provides for interim protection where a change in the existing situation could make obtaining the right substantially more difficult or impossible, or where delay may cause serious harm. HMK Article 389 establishes this basic standard.

In a suitable property dispute, the foreign owner may therefore seek an interim measure designed to preserve the disputed real estate while the case is pending.

An Interim Measure Can Be Requested Before the Main Case in Appropriate Circumstances

HMK Article 390 provides that an interim injunction can be requested before the main action from the court competent and authorized to hear the merits. Where immediate protection is necessary, the judge can also decide without first hearing the opposing party. The applicant must identify the reason and type of measure and establish the merits on an approximate-proof standard.

This can be particularly important where another title transfer appears imminent.

Evidence for the Injunction Should Be Prepared Quickly

Potential evidence can include:

current title records,

old title records,

genuine passport,

suspected forged documents,

travel evidence,

signature samples,

criminal complaint documents,

communications,

bank evidence,

and

transaction-file records.

The objective at this stage is not necessarily to prove the entire case finally but to demonstrate why immediate preservation is necessary.

Do Not Obtain an Injunction and Then Ignore Procedural Deadlines

Emergency protection carries strict procedural responsibilities.

Under HMK Article 393, implementation of the injunction must be requested within one week from its pronouncement or service to the requesting party; otherwise the measure automatically lapses even if the main case was filed on time.

This is an important practical deadline.

A Pre-Litigation Injunction Must Be Followed by the Main Action

Where the interim measure was granted before the main lawsuit, HMK Article 397 requires the requesting party to file the main action within two weeks from the date on which implementation of the measure was requested and to complete the prescribed procedural steps. Otherwise, the interim measure automatically terminates.

Emergency relief therefore needs disciplined follow-through.

Title Cancellation and Registration Proceedings May Become Necessary

If ownership has already been transferred on the basis of alleged impersonation, forgery or unauthorized representation, the victim may need to seek judicial correction of the title position.

Depending on the exact circumstances, proceedings may seek cancellation of an allegedly unlawful registration and restoration of ownership.

The case must follow the actual chain of registrations.

Map Every Transfer

Create a chronological ownership map:

True foreign owner → first disputed transferee → second transferee → current owner.

Then add:

mortgages,

attachments,

annotations,

and

other registered rights.

This provides the basic structure for analyzing the case.

The First Fraudulent Transfer and Later Transfers Are Not Always Legally Identical

A transaction directly involving the fraudster may present one set of issues.

A later purchaser who acquired the property from the registered owner may raise another.

This is because Turkish property law gives importance to the protection of good-faith reliance on the land registry in defined circumstances.

The longer the fraudulent registration remains unchallenged, the greater the possibility that additional parties may become involved.

Good-Faith Third Parties Can Create a Serious Recovery Risk

Suppose the foreign owner’s passport information is misused and the property is first transferred to Person A.

Person A immediately sells the property to Person B.

The dispute now requires analysis not only of the original fraud but also of Person B’s legal position.

This is one reason emergency title protection is so important.

Good Faith Should Be Investigated Factually

A subsequent purchaser’s statement that they were unaware of the fraud should not end the analysis.

Potential warning signs can include:

extremely low purchase price,

rapid successive transfers,

family or business relationships,

unusual payment arrangements,

continued possession by the original owner,

knowledge of the dispute,

or

other circumstances suggesting that the purchaser knew or should have known of the problem.

Evidence should be developed around the actual transaction.

Rapid Transfers Should Be Treated as an Emergency

If the property is transferred several times within a short period, immediately investigate whether the transfers are connected.

A pattern such as:

foreign owner → alleged buyer → relative → company

may require examination of the relationships among the parties.

Do not analyze each registration in isolation.

Mortgages Can Be Just as Dangerous as Sales

A fraudster may attempt to extract value from the property without selling it.

Check immediately whether the property has been:

mortgaged,

pledged through related rights,

subjected to another registered interest,

or

affected by enforcement proceedings.

A later lender’s legal position may create additional complexity.

The Registry Should Be Monitored Until Effective Protection Exists

Do not obtain one registry extract and assume the situation will remain unchanged.

Until an effective protective measure is registered or the risk otherwise ends, monitor for:

ownership changes,

new mortgages,

new annotations,

attachments,

and

other registered rights.

What if the Fraudster Has Only the Passport Number?

A passport number alone does not create ownership authority.

However, the owner should still investigate how the information was obtained and whether other documents have also been compromised.

If suspicious title activity exists, the issue should be treated as a property-security incident rather than merely a personal-data problem.

What if the Passport Copy Was Shared With a Real Estate Agent?

Sharing a passport copy for a legitimate transaction does not authorize unrelated transactions.

Preserve evidence showing:

why it was provided,

when it was provided,

to whom,

and

what authority, if any, was actually granted.

Do not delete the original communications.

What if the Passport Has Expired?

Expiration of the passport does not mean copied identity information becomes harmless.

Old identity information may still be combined with other documents in attempted fraud.

Owners should therefore continue protecting historical passport copies and transaction documents.

What if the Owner Has Renewed the Passport?

Preserve both old and new passport information if relevant.

Differences in:

passport number,

photograph,

signature,

issue date,

and

validity period

may become important when comparing genuine records with fraudulent documents.

What if the Foreign Owner Never Signed Any Power of Attorney?

That can substantially narrow the investigation.

If the transaction was purportedly performed through a representative, obtain the alleged power immediately and investigate its authenticity.

The victim’s genuine notarial and consular history may become relevant.

What if a Genuine Power of Attorney Was Previously Issued?

Do not assume the transaction was authorized merely because a genuine power once existed.

Determine:

whether it covered this property,

whether it authorized sale,

whether it authorized the relevant representative,

whether it remained effective,

whether it had been revoked,

and

whether the representative exceeded the granted authority.

Revoke Unnecessary Powers of Attorney

Where a foreign owner discovers identity misuse, all outstanding property-related authorities should be reviewed.

If an authority is no longer necessary, appropriate revocation steps should be considered.

The investor should also preserve proof of the revocation and relevant notifications.

Do Not Share e-Government or Web Tapu Credentials

A broker, purchaser, property manager or consultant should not need unrestricted access to the owner’s personal electronic government credentials.

Foreign owners should use lawful authorization mechanisms rather than giving third parties passwords.

Account credentials should be changed promptly if compromise is suspected.

Preserve Digital Evidence Before Blocking Accounts

If suspicious communications came through:

WhatsApp,

Telegram,

email,

SMS,

social media,

or

another service,

preserve the evidence before blocking the sender.

Keep:

full conversation history,

telephone numbers,

usernames,

profile details,

attachments,

documents,

voice messages,

timestamps,

and

payment instructions.

Isolated screenshots may omit important context.

Preserve Original Files

If the fraudster sent:

a passport image,

power of attorney,

title deed,

contract,

bank receipt,

or

other document,

retain the original digital file where possible.

Do not preserve only a screenshot.

File metadata and the original document may later become relevant to forensic analysis.

Report Suspected Fraud Promptly

Where the facts indicate impersonation, document forgery or fraudulent property conduct, criminal remedies should be evaluated without unnecessary delay.

The complaint should ideally identify:

the property,

current registry status,

suspected fraudulent transaction,

identity information misused,

documents involved,

known suspects,

financial transfers,

and

urgent evidence that may need preservation.

A generic complaint stating only “my passport was stolen” may fail to communicate the property risk adequately.

Request Preservation of Time-Sensitive Evidence

Some evidence can disappear with time.

Depending on the case, this may include:

camera recordings,

electronic transaction records,

banking information,

communications,

application records,

and

other technical data.

Evidence-preservation strategy should therefore begin immediately.

Avoid Publicly Accusing Suspects Before the Evidence Is Secured

Posting allegations on social media or confronting every suspected participant may alert the people involved before evidence is preserved.

The immediate priority should be:

protect the property,

secure evidence,

identify participants,

and

initiate appropriate legal procedures.

The Real Estate Agent’s Role Should Be Investigated

Determine whether the agent:

received the passport copy,

introduced the alleged buyer,

communicated with the impersonator,

prepared transaction documents,

handled payment information,

or

knew that the real owner was abroad.

The agent may be:

a witness,

an innocent intermediary,

or

potentially more directly involved.

The evidence should determine the conclusion.

Translators and Consultants May Also Hold Important Evidence

Foreign transactions frequently involve multiple intermediaries.

Identify everyone who handled:

passport copies,

title documents,

powers of attorney,

translations,

applications,

bank details,

and

transaction appointments.

A detailed document-custody chronology can help identify where the identity information was compromised.

State Liability May Need to Be Considered Separately

In certain circumstances involving the maintenance of the land registry, compensation issues concerning State responsibility may arise.

However, this should not be treated as an automatic remedy in every identity-fraud case.

The registry process, legal causation, actual loss and circumstances of the transaction must be examined individually.

The first priority usually remains preventing additional registrations and determining whether ownership can be restored.

Property Recovery and Compensation Are Different Remedies

The foreign owner may primarily want the property back.

That is different from claiming money for losses.

Depending on how the title chain develops, the case may involve questions concerning:

restoration of ownership,

compensation,

loss of property value,

loss of rental income,

or

other financial consequences.

These should be analyzed separately.

What if the Foreign Owner Was Planning to Sell the Property?

Pause the planned transaction until the identity issue is understood.

Confirm:

current ownership,

existing applications,

powers of attorney,

encumbrances,

and

electronic-account security.

Proceeding with another transaction while the identity problem remains unresolved can create additional confusion.

What if the Property Is Rented to a Tenant?

The tenant may possess useful evidence.

For example, the tenant may confirm that:

the original owner remained in control,

no new owner ever contacted them,

the alleged purchaser never visited,

or

rent continued to be paid to the true owner.

Possession and rental history can sometimes provide important factual context.

What if the Property Is Vacant?

Vacant investment property can require closer monitoring because there may be no tenant or local occupant to notice suspicious activity.

Foreign owners with vacant property should consider regular title and property-management checks.

What if the Fraud Involves Citizenship-by-Investment Property?

Additional consequences may arise where the property was acquired for an investment-based citizenship process.

An unauthorized title transaction could affect:

ownership continuity,

investment documentation,

registered restrictions,

and

other elements of the investment file.

Property and citizenship consequences should therefore be reviewed together.

Emergency 24-Hour Response Plan

When a foreign owner discovers suspicious use of passport information connected with Turkish real estate, the first response should focus on four areas.

Confirm the title position. Determine whether ownership or encumbrances have changed.

Stop further transactions. Evaluate available registry and judicial protections immediately.

Secure evidence. Preserve genuine passport documents, disputed documents, communications, travel records, bank evidence and the title transaction file.

Start the appropriate legal processes. Evaluate civil property proceedings and criminal measures without assuming that one automatically replaces the other.

Speed can materially affect the outcome.

First Seven Days After Discovery

After the immediate emergency is controlled, the investor should reconstruct the entire fraud.

Prepare a chronology showing:

when the passport information was originally shared,

who possessed it,

when the suspicious transaction began,

which documents were used,

who participated,

where the owner actually was,

what payments occurred,

and

how the registry changed.

The chronology should then be matched against documentary evidence.

Preventive Measures After the Incident

Once the immediate case is stabilized, the foreign owner should review broader security.

This can include:

changing compromised electronic credentials,

reviewing outstanding powers of attorney,

updating contact information,

monitoring title records,

using available Web Tapu security functions,

restricting future passport distribution,

and

maintaining a complete transaction archive.

A successful response should prevent a second attempt as well as address the first.

2026 Practical Legal Strategy

Where a fraudster uses a foreign property owner’s passport details in a Turkish real estate transaction, the first legal distinction is whether the suspicious transaction is pending or completed.

If the property remains registered to the genuine owner, the immediate objective is prevention. Current TKGM materials confirm that Web Tapu provides a mechanism through which an owner can request that no transaction be performed concerning the property unless the owner personally appears. TKGM materials also confirm that foreign owners whose identification information is properly associated with their property can use Web Tapu services and request this form of protection.

If the title has already changed, obtain the complete registration chain immediately. Identify the document used to establish authority, determine whether an impersonator or purported representative participated and examine every later transfer or mortgage. The case should be structured around the actual registry chain rather than the original fraud alone.

Third, consider emergency judicial protection. HMK Article 389 permits interim protection where changes in the existing situation could make realization of the right substantially more difficult or impossible or where delay may cause serious harm. Article 390 also allows urgent consideration before the opposing party is heard where immediate protection is necessary, subject to the applicable proof requirements.

Fourth, preserve procedural deadlines. An interim measure that is granted but not properly implemented can lose its effect. Where relief is obtained before the main lawsuit, the statutory steps for commencing the main proceedings must also be completed within the prescribed period.

Finally, coordinate the civil and criminal strategies. A criminal investigation can identify and prosecute those responsible, but it should not be assumed automatically to restore the title or prevent another registration. Title protection, ownership recovery, evidence preservation and criminal investigation should proceed as parts of one coordinated emergency strategy.

Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can examine the current title registry, disputed passport documentation, alleged powers of attorney, transaction file, subsequent transfers and available evidence to determine whether immediate registry protection, an interim injunction, title cancellation and registration proceedings, criminal measures or compensation claims should be pursued.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can someone sell my property in Turkey using only my passport details?

Passport details alone do not create legal authority to sell property. However, stolen identity information can be combined with forged documents, false powers of attorney or impersonation in an attempted fraudulent transaction.

What should I do first if my passport details are being used in a property transaction?

Immediately determine the current title status and whether a transaction is pending. If the property is still registered in your name, the priority is preventing completion of any unauthorized disposition.

Can Web Tapu help prevent an unauthorized transaction?

Yes. Official TKGM materials state that owners can establish a declaration requesting that transactions not be carried out unless they personally appear, providing an additional protection against fraudulent representative transactions.

Can foreign owners use this Web Tapu protection?

TKGM guidance states that foreign owners whose foreign identification numbers are associated with their properties can use Web Tapu services and request that transactions not be performed except upon personal appearance.

What if the property has already been transferred?

Obtain the complete title and transaction file immediately. Determine how the transfer occurred, identify the current registered owner and investigate any later sales, mortgages or other registered rights. Civil proceedings concerning the allegedly unlawful registration may be necessary.

Does filing a criminal complaint automatically freeze the title deed?

No. A criminal complaint should not be assumed automatically to prevent another title transaction. Separate property-protection measures may be necessary.

Can I obtain an urgent court order preventing another sale?

Depending on the circumstances, an interim injunction may be available. HMK Article 389 permits interim protection where a change in the existing situation could seriously endanger realization of the claimed right.

Can the court issue an interim measure without first hearing the suspected fraudster?

In urgent circumstances, HMK Article 390 permits the judge to grant interim protection without first hearing the opposing party where immediate protection is necessary, provided the legal requirements are satisfied.

What if the fraudster transfers the property to another buyer?

The dispute can become significantly more complex because the legal position of subsequent purchasers and questions concerning good-faith reliance on the title registry may arise. Immediate protection against additional transfers is therefore extremely important.

What evidence should a foreign owner preserve?

Preserve the genuine passport, old and new passport information where relevant, title records, suspected forged documents, powers of attorney, travel evidence, genuine signatures, bank records, complete messages and emails, original digital files, translator and broker information, and every document relating to the disputed title transaction.

Legal Support for Foreign Property Owners Facing Passport and Identity Fraud

Misuse of passport details in a real estate transaction can quickly develop from an identity-security problem into a major ownership dispute. If the fraudulent transaction is detected before completion, rapid intervention may prevent the title from changing. If the property has already been transferred, urgent protection may be required to prevent additional sales, mortgages or other registrations while ownership is challenged.

Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign property owners and investors with passport and identity misuse, forged powers of attorney, unauthorized title transactions, fraudulent property transfers, emergency interim measures, title cancellation and registration proceedings and related criminal complaints. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can review the title registry and transaction evidence immediately to determine how the property can be protected and which civil and criminal remedies should be pursued.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22

WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22

Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr