

Learn how foreign property owners can use a power of attorney for urban transformation in Turkey in 2026, including owner meetings, risky building objections, reconstruction agreements, title transactions and representation while living abroad.
A foreign property owner does not necessarily have to travel personally for every stage of an urban transformation process. Depending on the transaction and the authority granted, an owner can appoint a lawyer or another authorized representative to handle specific matters on the owner’s behalf.
For foreigners who live abroad, this can be particularly important because an urban transformation process can continue while the owner is outside the country. A building may be declared risky, statutory notification periods may run, an owner meeting may be held, a reconstruction agreement may be approved and proceedings affecting a dissenting owner’s share may eventually begin.
The current official framework expressly recognizes representation at important stages. A risky-building assessment may, for example, be requested by one property owner or that owner’s legal representative. An objection against a risky-building determination may likewise be submitted by an owner or legal representative.
A properly prepared power of attorney can therefore be an important practical tool. However, foreign owners should avoid assuming that one generic document should grant unlimited authority over every aspect of their property.
The key principle is simple: the authority granted should correspond to the actions the representative genuinely needs to perform.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign property owners with determining the appropriate scope of representation during urban transformation proceedings, particularly where the owner lives abroad and cannot personally monitor rapidly developing procedures.
Urban transformation can involve administrative, contractual, technical and property-related procedures.
A foreign owner may need someone to obtain documents, investigate whether the building has officially been declared risky, examine statutory notifications, submit an objection, participate in an owner meeting, review a contractor proposal, negotiate reconstruction terms or monitor proceedings concerning a dissenting ownership share.
Without representation, an owner living abroad may discover important developments only after significant time has passed.
This risk is especially important because current notification procedures do not necessarily depend on an international letter reaching the owner’s overseas address. Risky-building notifications can involve posting at the building, notification through the electronic government system and a fifteen-day local announcement.
A power of attorney can therefore help the foreign owner maintain active legal control over the process while remaining abroad.
Not simply because the property has entered urban transformation.
A foreign owner can personally handle matters for which personal action is legally and practically possible.
The reason for issuing a power of attorney is usually convenience, continuity and protection against missed procedural developments rather than a general rule requiring every foreign owner to appoint a representative.
However, where the owner expects to remain abroad for a substantial period, representation may become practically important because the process does not automatically stop until the owner returns.
The answer depends on the wording and scope of the authority granted.
A lawyer may be authorized, as appropriate, to obtain documents, submit applications, follow administrative proceedings, examine title-related information, submit objections, communicate with competent authorities, participate in relevant owner procedures, negotiate with contractors and pursue litigation.
Additional or specifically framed authority may be relevant where the intended transaction goes further, such as signing substantial contracts, making settlements, transferring property rights or carrying out particular title transactions.
Foreign owners should therefore decide what they actually want their representative to do before the power of attorney is prepared.
Yes, where the representative has the appropriate authority.
Official guidance expressly states that a risky-building assessment can be requested through the application of one property owner or that owner’s legal representative.
Unanimous participation of all owners is not required merely for one owner to initiate the risky-building assessment.
For a foreign owner, this means that personal travel is not necessarily required to initiate this part of the process where proper representation has been arranged.
Yes, where properly authorized.
Current official guidance states that property owners or their legal representatives can object to a risky-building determination within fifteen days from the final day of the relevant local announcement.
This is a particularly important reason for foreign owners to arrange representation early.
If the owner is outside the country when the determination becomes legally effective, waiting to return personally can create a serious risk of missing the objection period.
The representative should first establish the legally effective notification date and then determine whether the objection period remains open.
Yes.
This is often one of the first tasks required when a foreign owner discovers urban transformation late.
The representative can examine when the risky-building determination was made, how the notification procedure was carried out and when the statutory objection period began.
Under current official guidance, the prescribed record concerning a risky-building determination is posted at the building, owners are informed through the electronic government system and the matter is announced at the relevant local administrative office for fifteen days. The determination is deemed notified on the final day of that announcement.
Therefore, checking only whether a postal letter arrived abroad is insufficient.
Appropriate representation can also be useful after risky-building status becomes final.
The evacuation and demolition stage has a separate notification procedure. Current official guidance states that the relevant record is posted at the building, owners are informed through the electronic government system and the matter is announced at the relevant local administrative office for fifteen days. Owners and occupants may be given up to ninety days for evacuation and demolition.
If a foreign owner discovers the process at this stage, the lawyer can investigate the procedural history and determine what legal options remain.
The owner should not assume that appointing a lawyer automatically suspends demolition. Any challenge and any request for interim judicial protection must be evaluated according to the particular circumstances.
A foreign owner who cannot personally attend should consider representation before the owner decision-making process reaches an advanced stage.
The power of attorney should be reviewed to determine whether the representative has sufficient authority for the intended participation and decisions.
This became particularly important in 2026 because amendments published on February 4, 2026 introduced additional formal documents for owner meetings, including the Meeting Notification Form, the related meeting-notification record and the Meeting Information Note.
A representative monitoring the process can obtain and review these records where relevant and determine what decisions were taken while the foreign owner was abroad.
Foreign owners should not assume that every redevelopment decision requires unanimous consent.
Current official guidance states that once risky-building status has become final, owners can meet concerning the new development without waiting for the physical demolition of the building. Where unanimity cannot be achieved, the relevant decision can be taken by the simple majority according to ownership shares.
This makes representation particularly valuable for an owner who will be abroad during negotiations.
Physical absence does not necessarily prevent the majority from proceeding.
The answer depends on the legal authority granted and the particular act being performed.
A foreign owner who expects the lawyer to participate actively in an owner decision should ensure that the power of attorney is suitable for that purpose.
A document granting authority merely to obtain records should not automatically be assumed to authorize every substantive decision concerning redevelopment.
The owner’s instructions should also be clear.
For example, the owner may authorize the representative to attend and communicate a defined position without granting unrestricted authority to accept any reconstruction proposal offered by the majority.
Yes, where acting within the authority and instructions provided by the client.
This can be one of the most valuable aspects of representation.
A reconstruction agreement can determine which replacement apartment or commercial unit the foreign owner receives, whether an additional payment is required, when construction must be completed and what happens if the contractor defaults.
Negotiations may also involve temporary rent, construction specifications, parking, storage, future ownership shares, guarantees, delay consequences and title-transfer mechanisms.
The foreign owner should therefore consider legal review before accepting a contractor’s standard agreement.
Potentially, but the authority should be carefully examined before this is done.
Signing a reconstruction agreement can create substantial legal and financial obligations.
The document may define the owner’s future property, require additional payments, authorize particular transactions, regulate title transfers and restrict remedies in the event of a dispute.
A foreign owner should therefore distinguish between:
authority to review the agreement,
authority to negotiate it,
and authority to sign and bind the owner to it.
These are not necessarily the same level of authority.
Only if the foreign owner actually intends to grant that authority and it is required for the contemplated transaction.
An owner who merely wants a lawyer to monitor an urban transformation file does not necessarily need to grant unrestricted authority to sell the property.
The same caution applies to powers allowing extensive title transfers, mortgages or other dispositions.
Foreign owners should understand that urban transformation representation and unrestricted authority over valuable real estate are not synonymous.
The power of attorney should be tailored to the legal work actually required.
This deserves particular caution.
Some reconstruction arrangements contemplate title-related transactions as part of the contractor’s compensation or project financing structure.
However, transferring valuable property rights too early can expose owners to substantial risk if the contractor later becomes insolvent, abandons construction or materially breaches the agreement.
Before granting a representative authority to perform such transactions, the foreign owner should understand the reconstruction agreement, transfer schedule and security structure.
Where title transfers are genuinely necessary, staged performance and adequate contractual protection should be considered.
A reconstruction agreement may require the owner to contribute money where the replacement property or project structure creates an additional financial obligation.
A foreign owner should therefore know whether the representative is merely authorized to receive information or is also empowered to accept financial obligations.
Granting unnecessarily broad financial authority can create risks.
The amount, circumstances and limits of any payment authority should be understood before the document is issued.
The representative’s ability to communicate or formalize the owner’s position depends on the authority granted and the circumstances.
However, foreign owners should be cautious about treating rejection as a simple solution.
Under the current framework, if unanimity cannot be achieved, the relevant redevelopment decision may proceed through the simple majority according to ownership shares. Owners who do not join that decision can ultimately face the dissenting-share mechanism.
Accordingly, the owner should understand the consequences of remaining outside the majority arrangement before instructing the representative to reject it.
Representation can be particularly useful once the majority has approved the new development.
Current official guidance provides that the majority decision and the offer containing the agreement conditions, or information identifying where the offer can be examined, must be communicated to owners who did not join the decision.
The prescribed process includes notarial notification or a fifteen-day announcement at the relevant local administrative office. Where an electronic mail address has been provided to the title system, electronic communication is also made.
The representative can help the foreign owner identify when this stage has been reached and what response is required.
The legal consequence does not arise simply because a lawyer fails to answer an ordinary communication from the contractor.
The statutory procedure matters.
Where the required majority exists and the dissenting owner does not join the majority-approved arrangement after the prescribed notification process, the owner’s share can ultimately become subject to statutory sale.
Therefore, both the foreign owner and representative should distinguish informal contractor correspondence from legally significant notifications and deadlines.
Yes, subject to appropriate authority and the nature of the proceeding.
Once a share-sale process begins, the lawyer should obtain the underlying majority decision, meeting documentation, notification records, reconstruction agreement, ownership-share calculation, sale request, valuation and auction documentation.
The objective is to determine whether every prerequisite for the sale was satisfied.
This is a stage where delay can be particularly dangerous.
Potentially, where there is a concrete legal or procedural defect.
Issues may include the validity of the majority decision, incorrect ownership-share calculations, defective notification, representation problems, valuation disputes or irregularities affecting the statutory sale procedure.
The available remedy depends on the particular act and stage being challenged.
Appointing a lawyer only after title registration has already been completed may substantially reduce the practical options compared with intervention before the auction.
A foreign owner may also require representation in judicial proceedings arising from urban transformation.
The necessary authority should be determined according to the type of proceedings and the acts the lawyer may need to perform.
Potential disputes may involve administrative measures, contractual disagreements with a contractor, challenges relating to owner decisions or proceedings arising from a statutory share sale.
Where urgent judicial protection may be required, representation should be arranged before the disputed administrative or property transaction reaches its final stage.
Yes, a foreign property owner can arrange a power of attorney while abroad, provided that the document is prepared and authenticated in a form suitable for its intended use.
The exact formal route can depend on where the document is issued and what transaction the representative will perform.
For this reason, the owner should determine the required wording and authorities before completing the document abroad.
Otherwise, the owner may spend time and money obtaining a power of attorney only to discover during an urgent transformation proceeding that the document does not authorize the required transaction.
Where possible, yes.
The owner should first determine what the representative actually needs to do.
For example, does the owner need only document collection and administrative monitoring?
Is an objection against the risky-building determination required?
Will the representative attend owner proceedings?
Will the representative negotiate a reconstruction agreement?
Could litigation be necessary?
Will any title transaction potentially be performed?
Answering these questions before the document is executed can prevent both insufficient authority and unnecessarily broad authority.
A power of attorney prepared outside the country may require formal authentication and, depending on the issuing jurisdiction and applicable rules, additional steps before it can be effectively used.
The requirements can differ depending on the country where the document is issued, applicable international arrangements, the language of the document and the transaction for which it will be used.
Foreign owners should therefore verify the exact formal requirements for their particular document rather than assuming that every overseas power of attorney is automatically ready for use.
Where translation or other formal processing is required, this should be completed before a short urban transformation deadline creates urgency.
A bilingual document may be practically useful in some circumstances, particularly where the foreign owner wants to understand every authority being granted.
However, the decisive issue is whether the document satisfies the formal requirements for the intended transaction.
The owner should never sign a power of attorney containing powers that are not understood merely because the document has been presented as a standard form.
For valuable real estate, understanding the exact scope of authority is essential.
A broad power of attorney can give the representative substantially more authority than the owner originally intended.
Depending on its wording, it may extend beyond monitoring urban transformation and include significant powers relating to contracts, financial obligations, settlements or property transactions.
This can become particularly problematic where the owner believes the representative is authorized only to “follow the urban transformation process.”
Foreign owners should therefore review potentially sensitive authorities individually.
Special attention should be given to any authority involving property sales, title transfers, mortgages, financial obligations, settlement, waiver of claims or receipt of money.
A power of attorney can be structured around the intended representation rather than granting every possible authority.
This can be especially useful during the early stages of urban transformation.
For example, an owner may initially want the lawyer to investigate the risky-building file, obtain documents, check notifications and participate in administrative proceedings.
After the reconstruction proposal becomes clear, additional authority can be considered if a specific contractual or property transaction becomes necessary.
This approach can give the owner greater control over important decisions.
Granting representation should not mean that the owner stops participating in important decisions.
The owner and lawyer should maintain clear communication about the strategy.
Before a significant step such as accepting a reconstruction agreement, undertaking a major payment or agreeing to a property transaction, the owner should understand what is proposed and why.
The power of attorney provides legal authority. It should not replace informed decision-making.
Obtain a copy immediately.
Do not assume that an old power of attorney is either sufficient or harmless.
Determine whether it remains effective and what authority it contains.
A document issued years earlier for property management may contain broader powers than the owner remembers.
Conversely, it may not contain the authority required for a current urban transformation procedure.
If another person has already attended meetings or signed documents, determine precisely what they did and what authority they relied upon.
This can create a serious dispute.
The owner should obtain the signed agreement and the power of attorney allegedly authorizing the signature.
The analysis should compare the legal act performed with the actual scope of authority granted.
The owner should not accept a statement that “your representative signed, so you are bound” without reviewing the underlying authority.
The consequences will depend on the transaction, the document and the surrounding legal circumstances.
It can significantly improve monitoring, but it should not create a false sense of security.
Foreign owners should understand that the statutory notification mechanisms remain important.
Current official guidance confirms that risky-building determinations and evacuation and demolition notices can be communicated through building postings, the electronic government system and local announcements.
The representative should therefore actively monitor the administrative file rather than waiting for the owner to forward whatever arrives abroad.
The foreign owner should provide the current title documentation, identification information relevant to the representation, purchase documents, any previous power of attorney and all documents received concerning the urban transformation process.
If available, the file should also include the risky-building report, notification records, owner-meeting documents, meeting minutes, contractor proposal and reconstruction agreement.
Where the process is more advanced, evacuation and demolition records, majority-decision notifications, valuation documents and auction notices should also be included.
Messages from the contractor, building manager, other owners or tenant may also help reconstruct the factual timeline.
Foreign owners should be especially cautious about unnecessarily broad powers concerning sale or transfer of the property, creation of mortgages or other security, acceptance of undefined debts, receipt of substantial funds, settlement of major disputes or waiver of important rights.
This does not mean such powers should never be granted.
Some transactions may genuinely require them.
The issue is whether the owner understands why the authority is necessary and what the representative can legally do once it is granted.
A power of attorney should solve the owner’s representation problem without creating an avoidable property-control problem.
For a foreign owner living abroad, the first priority is determine the current stage of urban transformation before preparing the power of attorney. The required authority differs significantly depending on whether the matter concerns a risky-building objection, owner meeting, reconstruction agreement, demolition or statutory share sale.
The second priority is define the lawyer’s authority according to the actual work required. Avoid automatically granting unrestricted powers over valuable real estate.
The third priority is include sufficient authority for urgent administrative action where appropriate. Current official guidance expressly permits an owner’s legal representative to participate in the risky-building assessment and objection process.
The fourth priority is protect short deadlines. An objection to a risky-building determination is currently available within fifteen days from the final day of the relevant local announcement.
The fifth priority is authorize appropriate monitoring of owner meetings if the owner will remain abroad. The February 2026 amendments introduced additional formal meeting-notification documentation.
The sixth priority is separate authority to negotiate from authority to sign. Reviewing a reconstruction agreement does not necessarily require giving the representative unrestricted authority to bind the owner to every proposed term.
The seventh priority is review title-transfer powers particularly carefully. Any transfer to a contractor should be considered together with construction progress, security and contractor-default risk.
The eighth priority is monitor the majority and dissenting-owner procedure. Current official guidance permits relevant new-development decisions by the simple majority according to ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved and provides a statutory mechanism affecting owners who remain outside the majority arrangement.
The ninth priority is ensure the representative can respond quickly if a statutory share-sale procedure begins. At that stage, meeting records, notification documents, valuation and auction records should be reviewed without delay.
The tenth priority is prepare an overseas power of attorney before an emergency arises whenever possible. Authentication, translation and other formal requirements can take time, while urban transformation deadlines may continue running.
The central principle is:
A power of attorney can allow a foreign property owner to manage an urban transformation process without personally travelling for every procedural step. However, the document should be carefully tailored to the owner’s actual needs. Authority to obtain documents, submit objections, attend owner proceedings, negotiate a reconstruction agreement, conduct litigation and perform title transactions should not automatically be treated as one unrestricted package. The broader the authority over valuable property rights, the more carefully the foreign owner should understand and control what is being granted.
Yes. A foreign owner can arrange representation for appropriate stages of an urban transformation process, subject to the formal requirements applicable to the document and transaction.
Yes, where properly authorized. Current official guidance expressly provides that an owner or legal representative may submit an objection within the applicable fifteen-day period.
Appropriate representation can be arranged, but the power of attorney should contain authority suitable for the intended participation and decisions.
Potentially, where sufficient authority has been granted. Because signing can create substantial property and financial obligations, this authority should be considered carefully.
No. Authority should correspond to what you actually want the representative to do. Monitoring an urban transformation process does not automatically require unrestricted sale authority.
The document can be tailored to the intended representation. This can be preferable where the owner initially wants only document collection, administrative monitoring, objections or other defined actions.
Yes, subject to the formal requirements applicable to the jurisdiction where it is issued and the intended use of the document.
This is generally advisable. Determining the required authority in advance can prevent both insufficient authority and unnecessary powers over valuable property.
Possibly, depending on its continuing validity and scope. The actual document should be reviewed rather than assuming that it covers redevelopment transactions.
Determine the current procedural stage immediately, obtain the relevant title and urban transformation records, identify any running deadlines and arrange appropriate representation before the process advances to demolition, a binding reconstruction arrangement or a statutory share sale.
For a foreign owner, a carefully prepared power of attorney can make the difference between actively controlling an urban transformation process and discovering important decisions only after deadlines have passed.
The document should not be treated as a routine form.
Before issuing it, the owner should determine what stage the property has reached, what actions need to be taken immediately and what authority the representative genuinely requires. Particular caution should be exercised with powers relating to reconstruction agreements, additional financial obligations, property transfers and settlement or waiver of claims.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign property owners who need representation during urban transformation proceedings while living abroad.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign owners with determining the appropriate scope of powers of attorney, risky-building proceedings, objections, notification reviews, owner meetings, majority disputes, reconstruction agreements, contractor negotiations, evacuation and demolition proceedings, dissenting-owner procedures, statutory share sales, title-related issues and related judicial proceedings.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr