

Learn how a foreign property owner can sign an urban transformation agreement from abroad in 2026, including powers of attorney, representation, contractor agreements, owner meetings, title-transfer risks and dissenting-owner deadlines.
Yes. A foreign property owner does not necessarily have to travel personally in order to participate in an urban transformation process or arrange for an urban transformation agreement to be signed. Depending on the transaction, the form of the agreement and the authority required, the owner may be able to act through an appropriately authorized lawyer or representative.
However, signing from abroad should not be treated as a simple administrative formality.
An urban transformation agreement can determine which replacement property the owner receives, whether additional money must be paid, when construction must be completed, whether temporary rent will be provided, what happens if the contractor defaults and whether valuable property rights will be transferred during construction.
For this reason, a foreign owner should distinguish between three separate issues: reviewing the agreement from abroad, negotiating the agreement from abroad, and legally signing or authorizing another person to sign the agreement.
The current urban transformation framework expressly recognizes legal representation at important stages. It also allows relevant new-development decisions to proceed by a simple majority calculated according to registered ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved. This makes timely participation especially important for owners living outside the country.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign property owners who need to review, negotiate or arrange representation concerning urban transformation agreements while remaining abroad.
Not necessarily.
The fact that you are abroad does not automatically prevent you from participating in the redevelopment process through legal representation.
The practical solution will depend on the document that needs to be signed and the legal authority required for the transactions contemplated by that document.
This distinction matters because an agreement may contain more than a simple promise to reconstruct the building. It may also involve significant property transactions, additional payment obligations, future ownership arrangements or authority relating to title records.
Therefore, before preparing any power of attorney abroad, the actual reconstruction agreement should preferably be reviewed.
The power of attorney can then be designed around the transaction rather than issuing an unnecessarily broad document first and discovering its consequences later.
Potentially, yes, provided that the lawyer has legally sufficient authority for the relevant transaction.
The important issue is not merely whether the document is called a “power of attorney.” Its scope matters.
A foreign owner may authorize a lawyer to obtain documents and monitor the urban transformation file without necessarily authorizing that lawyer to enter into a major construction agreement.
Similarly, authority to attend an owner meeting should not automatically be assumed to include every power necessary to transfer property rights or undertake substantial financial obligations.
Before a representative signs, the power of attorney and the reconstruction agreement should therefore be examined together.
A foreign owner who remains abroad can arrange legal representation without necessarily returning personally merely to appoint a lawyer.
However, the formal requirements applicable to a document executed abroad depend on where and how the document is issued and the transaction for which it will ultimately be used.
This is why the wording should ideally be determined before the foreign owner completes the document.
If the representative only needs authority to investigate the file, the required scope may be relatively limited.
If the representative will sign a reconstruction agreement, undertake financial obligations or carry out property-related transactions, additional or more specific authority may be necessary.
Preparing the document according to the actual intended transaction can prevent delays at a later stage.
The safer sequence is generally to understand the agreement first.
A foreign owner may receive a document from the contractor together with a message stating that everyone else has signed and that the document must be completed immediately.
Do not allow that pressure to determine the legal strategy.
First obtain the complete agreement and all annexes.
Determine exactly what you are being asked to accept.
Then determine what authority a representative would need to carry out the transaction.
A power of attorney should support an informed decision. It should not be used to bypass review of the underlying agreement.
The first question is what replacement property you will receive.
The agreement should make the future independent unit identifiable. Important matters can include its area, floor, orientation, layout, parking, storage and technical characteristics.
The future ownership structure should also be examined.
If you are required to make an additional payment, the amount or calculation method should be clear.
The construction timetable should be realistic and legally enforceable.
Temporary rent provisions should be examined.
Delay consequences should be defined.
Contractor security should be evaluated.
The agreement should also address what happens if the contractor abandons construction, becomes insolvent or materially breaches the agreement.
These issues are considerably more important than merely finding a way to place a signature on the document from another country.
Yes. Physical absence does not prevent the owner from obtaining legal review and negotiating contractual terms through a representative.
This may be particularly useful where the owner disagrees with the proposed replacement unit, additional payment or title-transfer structure.
Negotiations should, however, begin before statutory deadlines create additional pressure.
Once the required majority has formally approved an arrangement and the dissenting-owner notification procedure begins, the owner may have substantially less time to decide whether to join the approved agreement.
Foreign owners should be careful about assuming that redevelopment requires unanimous agreement before anything can proceed.
Current official guidance states that where unanimity cannot be achieved, relevant decisions concerning the new development can be made by the simple majority of owners according to their registered ownership shares.
The majority calculation is therefore based on ownership shares, not simply on the number of people or apartments.
This has major consequences for a foreign owner living abroad.
Refusing to sign may not stop the redevelopment if the statutory majority exists.
Potentially, yes.
Physical absence does not automatically give a foreign owner a veto over the transformation process.
Current official guidance states that once risky-building status becomes final, owners can hold a meeting concerning the new development without waiting for physical demolition. The meeting and relevant decision operate through the applicable share-based majority rules.
The owner should therefore arrange monitoring rather than assume that no important decision can be made until the next visit.
This became particularly important in 2026.
An amendment published on February 4, 2026 introduced additional documentation for the owner-meeting process, including the Meeting Notification Form, the related notification record and the Meeting Information Note.
A foreign owner who learns that a meeting has already occurred should obtain these documents together with the meeting minutes and ownership-share calculation.
If representation had already been arranged, the lawyer can also examine the procedural records and determine what was decided during the owner’s absence.
The process does not necessarily remain suspended indefinitely.
Current official guidance states that the majority-approved decision and the offer containing the agreement conditions, or information identifying where the offer can be examined, must be communicated to owners who did not join the decision.
This can be done through a notary or through a fifteen-day announcement at the relevant local administrative office. Where an electronic mail address has been provided to the title system, notification is also made through that address.
This is the stage at which a foreign owner should distinguish between an ordinary contractor request and a legally significant statutory notification.
That can be risky.
Once the majority-approved decision and offer have entered the statutory notification process, failing to examine or accept the offer within the applicable period can lead toward the dissenting-owner share-sale procedure.
Therefore, an owner living abroad should not assume that the agreement can safely remain unanswered for several months.
If a statutory notice has already been issued, the relevant dates should be checked immediately.
Potentially, yes, but refusal to sign does not itself cause an immediate loss of ownership.
The statutory sequence matters.
A qualifying majority decision must exist. The agreement conditions must go through the prescribed notification procedure. The owner must remain outside the majority arrangement. The required sale procedure must then be initiated and processed.
Current official guidance confirms that shares of owners who do not join a valid majority arrangement can ultimately become subject to statutory auction.
Therefore, a foreign owner should neither sign blindly nor ignore the agreement.
The stage reached in the procedure is important.
Official guidance states that an owner demonstrating agreement within the applicable process must sign the contract prepared according to the majority decision and the documents signed by the majority owners without conditions or reservations.
This means that a foreign owner should not assume that a conditional response will necessarily be treated as joining the majority arrangement.
For example:
“I agree only if you move me to another floor.”
may be a negotiating position, but it should not automatically be assumed to have the same legal effect as unconditionally joining the approved arrangement.
If changes are desired, negotiations should therefore begin early.
Foreign owners should not assume that sending a scanned signature, clicking an electronic acceptance button or returning a signed PDF will necessarily satisfy every legal requirement connected with the redevelopment.
The required form depends on the agreement and the transactions it contains.
An ordinary construction-related agreement and a document involving particular title transactions or specifically regulated authorities may raise different formal requirements.
Before relying on a purely electronic signature method, determine exactly what document is being executed and what subsequent transactions depend upon it.
Where a representative will sign instead, the representative’s authority should likewise be confirmed before execution.
Do not assume so without examining the document and intended transaction.
A contractor may be willing to accept a scanned copy operationally, but that does not by itself resolve every question concerning legal form, proof, representation or later title transactions.
The safer approach is to identify the formal requirements before signing rather than attempting to correct the documentation after a dispute arises.
Physical delivery may be practically possible in some transactions, but the central issue remains whether the agreement has been executed in the legally appropriate form for everything it is intended to accomplish.
If the contract contains authorities or commitments connected with later title transactions, additional requirements may become relevant.
Foreign owners should therefore ask what the contractor expects to do with the signed agreement after receiving it.
The answer may reveal that the document has consequences far beyond construction itself.
Yes, this can be an effective way to retain control.
A foreign owner may authorize a lawyer to investigate the project, obtain meeting documents, negotiate contractual terms and report back before the owner makes the final decision.
This does not necessarily require giving the lawyer unrestricted authority to sign the agreement or transfer property.
For owners concerned about granting broad powers over valuable real estate, separating negotiation authority from final execution authority can be useful.
The scope of representation can be structured around the acts the owner actually wants performed, subject to the legal requirements of the intended transaction.
A foreign owner should therefore avoid the assumption that authorizing participation in urban transformation necessarily requires unrestricted authority to sell the property.
However, the reconstruction agreement must be examined carefully because some projects involve property-related transactions as part of the contractor arrangement.
If those transactions are genuinely necessary, the authority and safeguards should be considered expressly rather than hidden inside a broad general power.
This is one of the most important issues for a foreign owner signing from abroad.
Some redevelopment structures contemplate transfers of ownership interests to the contractor.
A foreign owner should understand precisely when any transfer will occur, what the contractor must accomplish first and what protection exists if construction stops.
Uncontrolled transfer of valuable property rights before meaningful construction performance can create serious exposure if the contractor later becomes insolvent or abandons the project.
The fact that the other owners accepted the arrangement does not eliminate the need to analyze this risk.
The agreement may require the foreign owner to contribute money toward construction.
Before signing, determine the total amount or calculation method, payment schedule, consequences of late payment and circumstances in which the contractor can request additional money.
Avoid provisions that allow substantial additional costs to be imposed without a sufficiently clear mechanism.
If the representative will have authority to accept or make payments, the power of attorney should also be examined from that perspective.
A promise that the owner will receive “a new apartment” is not sufficiently precise for a valuable redevelopment transaction.
The agreement should identify the replacement unit as clearly as possible.
Floor, orientation, size, layout, parking and storage can materially affect value.
The future land or ownership share should also be considered.
If commercial property is involved, frontage, accessibility and permitted use may be particularly important.
Foreign owners should avoid signing from abroad merely because they have been shown an attractive preliminary rendering.
A reconstruction agreement should address when the contractor must begin and complete the project.
It should also deal with the consequences of delay.
A foreign owner may be unable to monitor construction personally, making objective milestones particularly important.
The agreement should reduce uncertainty about whether a delay constitutes a breach and what compensation or other remedies may become available.
If the existing building must be vacated and demolished, the owner may lose the use of the property for a significant period.
The reconstruction agreement should therefore be reviewed for any contractor-funded temporary rent or similar obligation.
The amount, starting date, duration, payment date and consequences of delay should be clear.
These contractual arrangements should also be distinguished from any separate public assistance for which an eligible owner may qualify.
This risk should be considered before signing, not after construction stops.
The agreement should be reviewed for security, staged performance, termination rights and the treatment of property interests if the contractor defaults.
A foreign owner should be especially cautious where the contractor seeks valuable title transfers early while providing limited security in return.
The economic strength and project history of the contractor may also deserve independent investigation before the agreement is accepted.
Obtain a copy and review it immediately.
Do not rely on memory.
Determine whether the representative has authority relating to contracts, property transfers, sales, mortgages, financial obligations, settlements or receipt of money.
If the representative has already signed the reconstruction agreement, obtain the signed version and compare the transaction with the authority actually granted.
An owner living abroad should know precisely what has already been done in the owner’s name.
Obtain the allegedly signed agreement and the document relied upon as authority.
The fact that another person was a relative, property manager or trusted contact does not automatically establish authority to enter into a redevelopment contract.
The specific authority and transaction must be examined.
Where an unauthorized signature has materially affected the owner’s legal position, the issue should be addressed promptly, particularly if other parties are relying on that signature to proceed with further property transactions.
Do not sign a legally significant property agreement merely because someone has verbally summarized it.
The foreign owner should understand the provisions that determine the replacement property, payment obligations, deadlines, contractor rights, title transactions, default consequences and dispute mechanisms.
A translation can assist understanding, but contractual review should focus on the legally operative document.
The owner should know what the binding text actually requires before signing or authorizing a representative to sign.
First determine whether the deadline is contractual pressure or an actual statutory deadline.
A contractor may want signatures quickly for commercial reasons.
That does not automatically make the contractor’s requested deadline a statutory deadline.
However, there are genuine time-sensitive stages in urban transformation. For example, after a valid majority decision and prescribed notification, failure to join the approved arrangement can eventually lead toward the dissenting-share sale process.
The correct response is therefore not to ignore the request but to identify its legal basis immediately.
Request the official notification records.
The current framework requires the majority-approved decision and agreement conditions, or information identifying where the offer can be examined, to be communicated to owners who did not join the decision through the prescribed procedure.
If other owners claim that the statutory response period has already expired, determine exactly how and when the notice was made.
Living abroad does not automatically invalidate the notification, but the statutory procedure still matters.
The matter becomes urgent.
Obtain the current title record and the complete sale file.
The underlying majority decision, ownership-share calculation, meeting documents, notification of the agreement, sale request, official valuation and auction records should be examined.
Current official guidance confirms that once the sale request is accepted, an annotation concerning the statutory sale can be entered in the title record, restricting another sale or similar transfer while that procedure continues.
At this stage, deciding whether you want to join the agreement and determining whether there is a procedural defect should not be postponed.
The answer depends on the exact stage reached and whether the owner can still validly join the majority-approved arrangement.
Do not assume that sending a signature at the last moment automatically cancels every step already taken.
If a statutory sale proceeding has begun, obtain confirmation of the current administrative and title status and determine what action is legally required.
This is another reason why foreign owners should respond when the majority-approved offer is first communicated rather than waiting until an auction is imminent.
The signed contract defines the owner’s obligations.
For this reason, broad clauses allowing unilateral changes should be reviewed carefully.
The contractor should not be treated as having unlimited authority merely because the owner agreed to redevelopment.
The agreement should establish the parties’ respective rights and obligations with sufficient clarity.
The owner should also preserve the final signed agreement and every annex rather than relying on later summaries.
Revocation of representation and the legal consequences of a contract already validly concluded are separate issues.
Ending a representative’s authority does not necessarily undo transactions lawfully completed while that authority existed.
Therefore, a foreign owner who has concerns about an existing power of attorney should investigate both what authority remains and what actions have already been taken.
Simply revoking authority may not resolve an already executed reconstruction agreement.
Before making the final decision, the foreign owner should ideally obtain the current title record, risky-building documentation, relevant notifications, owner-meeting records, ownership-share calculation, majority decision and complete reconstruction agreement with all annexes.
If a power of attorney will be used, its proposed wording should also be reviewed.
If the owner is already considered a dissenting owner, obtain the statutory notification documents and determine whether any response period is running.
If a share-sale process has begun, obtain the valuation and sale records immediately.
The objective is to know both what you are signing and where the statutory process currently stands.
For a foreign owner signing from abroad, the first priority is obtain the complete reconstruction agreement before granting authority to sign it.
The second priority is determine the current procedural stage. Find out whether the owners are merely negotiating or whether a formal majority decision and statutory notification process have already occurred.
The third priority is verify the majority according to registered ownership shares. Current official guidance permits relevant new-development decisions by a simple majority based on ownership shares where unanimity cannot be achieved.
The fourth priority is check the owner-meeting records, including the additional meeting-notification documentation introduced in February 2026.
The fifth priority is prepare the power of attorney around the actual transaction rather than automatically granting unrestricted authority over the property.
The sixth priority is separate negotiation authority, signing authority and title-transfer authority wherever appropriate.
The seventh priority is review the commercial terms carefully, particularly the replacement property, additional payments, construction deadline, temporary rent, contractor security, default provisions and title-transfer schedule.
The eighth priority is check whether the majority-approved agreement has already been formally notified. The current framework requires the decision and offer to be communicated to non-participating owners through the prescribed procedure.
The ninth priority is do not ignore the dissenting-owner process. If the foreign owner remains outside the majority-approved arrangement after the statutory procedure, the ownership share can ultimately become subject to auction.
The tenth priority is complete overseas representation arrangements before an urgent deadline arises. Formalizing a power of attorney from another country can take time, while the urban transformation process may continue.
The central principle is:
A foreign property owner can participate in an urban transformation agreement without necessarily returning personally for every step. Representation from abroad can provide an effective solution, but the owner should first understand the contract and then grant only the authority needed to implement the intended decision. Signing from abroad should protect the owner’s property interests—not surrender control over them.
Yes. Depending on the transaction and formal requirements, you may be able to arrange execution through an appropriately authorized representative without personally returning.
Potentially, if the lawyer has legally sufficient authority for the particular agreement and transactions involved.
Yes, subject to the formal requirements applicable to the jurisdiction where it is executed and the transactions for which it will be used.
Not automatically. The authority should match the actions you actually want performed. Representation in an urban transformation process does not itself mean unrestricted sale authority is necessary.
Potentially, yes. Where unanimity cannot be achieved, current official guidance permits the relevant decision by a simple majority according to registered ownership shares.
Refusal does not automatically stop redevelopment. If the required majority exists and the statutory procedures are followed, a dissenting owner’s share can ultimately become subject to sale.
Yes. Issues such as the replacement unit, additional payment, construction period, temporary rent, guarantees and title-transfer arrangements should ideally be resolved before execution.
Any early title transfer should be examined carefully. The owner should understand the commercial reason, construction stage and security protecting the owner if the contractor fails to perform.
Obtain the signed agreement and the power of attorney allegedly authorizing that person. The representative’s actual authority should be compared with the transaction performed.
Immediately determine whether the deadline is merely imposed by the contractor or arises from the statutory majority and notification procedure. Obtain the agreement, meeting records and notification documents, review the power-of-attorney requirements and decide before the process advances toward a dissenting-share sale.
Foreign property owners do not necessarily need to interrupt their lives abroad and travel personally every time an urban transformation document requires attention. With properly structured representation, many important aspects of the process can be monitored, negotiated and handled without the owner being physically present.
The critical issue is not merely how to obtain a signature.
Before signing, the owner should understand what replacement property will be received, how much money may be owed, how long construction can take, what protection exists against contractor default and whether the agreement authorizes significant title transactions.
The power of attorney should then be prepared according to those actual needs.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign property owners who need to manage urban transformation agreements while living abroad.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya assists foreign owners with powers of attorney, owner-meeting procedures, majority decisions, reconstruction agreement reviews, contractor negotiations, notification analysis, representation during signing procedures, title-related risks, dissenting-owner notices, statutory share-sale proceedings and disputes arising from redevelopment agreements.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr