

Compare asset purchases and share purchases in Turkey. Learn the legal, tax, employment, regulatory, and commercial differences to determine which acquisition structure is safer for foreign investors in this 2026 Updated Legal Guide.
One of the most important decisions a foreign investor makes when acquiring a Turkish business is whether to purchase the company’s shares or only its assets. The chosen transaction structure affects legal liability, taxation, regulatory approvals, employment obligations, commercial contracts, intellectual property, financing arrangements, and post-closing integration.
There is no universally “safer” structure. The better option depends on the target company’s business, regulatory environment, tax profile, contractual relationships, and the buyer’s commercial objectives.
Turkey’s foreign direct investment regime is based on the principle of equal treatment. Foreign investors generally have the same rights as domestic investors when acquiring Turkish companies or establishing new businesses, subject to sector-specific legislation and merger-control requirements where applicable. (Invest in Türkiye)
This 2026 Updated Legal Guide explains the key differences between asset purchases and share purchases, the advantages and disadvantages of each structure, and how foreign businesses can select the most appropriate approach.
In a share purchase, the buyer acquires ownership of the company by purchasing part or all of its shares.
The legal entity continues to exist exactly as before.
Only the ownership changes.
The company generally retains:
The buyer therefore acquires the company together with both its opportunities and its historical risks.
In an asset purchase, the buyer acquires selected business assets instead of acquiring the company itself.
Typical assets include:
The selling company remains responsible for obligations that are not transferred, subject to applicable law, contractual arrangements, and any mandatory successor-liability rules.
The buyer acquires:
The buyer acquires:
The selling company generally remains in existence unless separately wound up.
Neither structure is automatically safer.
Generally:
A share purchase is often more efficient where the business depends on continuity of contracts, licenses, employees, regulatory approvals, and customer relationships.
An asset purchase may reduce exposure to certain historical liabilities because the buyer can negotiate which assets and obligations will transfer.
However, an asset purchase does not eliminate every legal risk.
Tax rules, employment law, environmental obligations, contractual provisions, and statutory successor-liability principles may still affect the buyer.
A share acquisition generally provides:
For established businesses, continuity is often commercially valuable.
The buyer may inherit exposure arising from:
These risks make comprehensive legal due diligence essential.
Asset acquisitions may allow buyers to:
This flexibility often appeals to strategic investors.
Potential disadvantages include:
In some industries, transferring contracts may be more difficult than transferring shares.
Employment issues differ significantly.
Employees generally remain employed by the same company.
Business continuity is preserved.
Depending on the transaction structure and applicable law:
Employment due diligence is critical in both structures.
Tax consequences differ substantially.
Potential issues include:
Each transaction should receive independent tax advice before signing.
Certain industries require regulatory review regardless of the transaction structure.
Examples include:
Industry-specific legislation may require approval before ownership changes or transfers of licensed assets.
Both asset acquisitions and share acquisitions may require merger-control review.
Whether notification is necessary depends on the nature of the transaction and the applicable turnover thresholds.
Foreign buyers should evaluate Turkish merger-control rules before signing and certainly before closing. (LEXPERA)
Commercial contracts often remain in force because the contracting company does not change.
However, buyers should review agreements for:
Contracts generally require individual review.
Some agreements:
Every material contract should be examined individually.
The treatment of intellectual property also differs.
The company generally continues owning:
Each IP right should be expressly transferred.
The agreement should specify:
Failure to transfer IP correctly may significantly reduce the value of the transaction.
Regardless of structure, buyers should review:
The scope of due diligence may differ, but it should never be omitted.
Foreign investors frequently choose:
Share Purchases when:
Asset Purchases when:
The optimal structure depends on the commercial objectives and risk profile of the transaction.
Foreign buyers frequently:
These mistakes often result in expensive post-closing disputes.
Choosing between an asset acquisition and a share acquisition requires expertise in:
An experienced Turkish M&A lawyer can:
Selecting the appropriate acquisition structure before negotiations begin often has a greater impact on transaction success than the purchase price itself.
Not necessarily. An asset purchase may reduce exposure to some historical liabilities, but it does not eliminate all legal, tax, employment, contractual, or regulatory risks.
A share purchase is often preferable when preserving contracts, licenses, employees, customers, and business continuity is commercially important.
Sometimes, but not always. Certain obligations may continue under applicable law, contractual arrangements, or sector-specific regulations.
Share purchases are commonly used for acquisitions of established operating companies, while asset purchases are frequently selected for carve-outs, distressed transactions, or acquisitions of specific business divisions.
Yes. The scope may differ, but comprehensive legal due diligence is essential regardless of the acquisition structure.
Yes. If the applicable merger-control thresholds are met, either structure may require prior clearance before completion. (LEXPERA)
Yes. Asset purchases and share purchases often have different tax consequences. Transaction-specific tax advice should always be obtained before signing.
A Turkish M&A lawyer can determine the most suitable acquisition structure, identify hidden risks, conduct legal due diligence, negotiate contractual protections, obtain regulatory approvals where necessary, and help ensure that the transaction is completed efficiently and in compliance with Turkish law.
Choosing the right acquisition structure is one of the most important decisions in any investment transaction. Whether you are acquiring shares in an established Turkish company or purchasing selected business assets, proper legal planning can significantly reduce post-closing disputes, regulatory risks, and unexpected liabilities.
Fırat Fesih Kaya and our legal team advise foreign investors, multinational corporations, private equity funds, family offices, entrepreneurs, and international businesses on share acquisitions, asset purchases, mergers and acquisitions, legal due diligence, transaction structuring, regulatory approvals, competition law, commercial contracts, and post-closing dispute resolution throughout Turkey.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey