Has your Turkish business partner transferred company assets to another company? Learn how foreign shareholders can challenge related-party transfers, protect company property, seek injunctions, claim damages and pursue director liability in Turkey.

A foreign shareholder who discovers that a Turkish business partner has transferred company assets to another company should act quickly. The transfer may involve real estate, machinery, vehicles, inventory, customer contracts, trademarks, receivables, cash or an entire operating business being moved from the company in which the foreign investor owns shares to another company controlled by the local partner. The critical legal question is not simply whether an asset transfer occurred. Turkish companies are generally permitted to sell or transfer assets in the ordinary course of business. The real questions are who authorized the transaction, whether the company received fair consideration, whether the receiving company is related to the controlling shareholder or director, whether the transaction served the company’s interests and whether the purpose or effect was to remove economic value from the company at the expense of other shareholders. Under the Turkish Commercial Code (TTK), directors and managers may face liability where they culpably breach duties arising from law or the articles of association and cause damage to the company, shareholders or creditors. (LEXPERA)

For a foreign shareholder, the most serious cases typically involve a pattern rather than one isolated transaction: valuable assets leave Company A → assets move to Company B controlled by the same partner → Company A receives little or no real consideration → customers and employees follow → Company A becomes commercially worthless → foreign shareholder is left holding shares in an empty company. In such circumstances, the legal strategy should focus simultaneously on evidence preservation, corporate records, asset tracing, interim protection and liability.

Is It Illegal for a Shareholder to Transfer Company Assets to Another Company?

Not automatically. A company may legitimately sell property, machinery, inventory and other assets.

The transaction becomes legally problematic where, for example, the person arranging it lacks authority, the transaction violates corporate governance rules, company assets are transferred without adequate consideration, management duties are breached or the transaction improperly benefits the controlling shareholder or another related entity.

The current consolidated Turkish Commercial Code remains the starting point for analyzing these corporate-law questions. (LEXPERA)

Example of a Potentially Abusive Asset Transfer

Consider a Turkish manufacturing company:

Foreign Investor: 40%

Turkish Partner: 60%

The company owns machinery worth approximately EUR 2 million.

The Turkish partner establishes another company that is wholly controlled by him.

The machinery is then sold to the new company for EUR 250,000.

No independent valuation is obtained.

The EUR 250,000 is never actually paid.

The machinery, employees and customers subsequently move to the second company.

The original company stops operating.

The foreign investor’s shares have technically not disappeared, but the economic value underlying those shares may have been stripped away.

This type of transaction requires immediate investigation.

The First Question: Who Owns the Asset?

Before challenging a transfer, establish that the property actually belonged to the company.

This sounds obvious, but disputes frequently arise over whether machinery, vehicles or intellectual property were owned by the company, leased to it or personally owned by one shareholder.

Obtain the Original Acquisition Documents

Preserve invoices, contracts, title records, accounting records and payment evidence demonstrating how the asset entered the company.

The Second Question: Who Authorized the Transfer?

Determine whether the transaction was authorized by the board of directors, company manager, general assembly or another authorized representative.

The required authority depends on the company type, articles of association, transaction and applicable Turkish Commercial Code provisions.

Anonymous Company Versus Limited Company

This distinction matters.

An anonim şirket (A.Ş.) and a limited şirket (Ltd. Şti.) operate under different governance provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code.

The analysis should therefore begin by identifying the company type.

Check the Articles of Association

The articles may contain rules concerning representation, signature authority, approval requirements or reserved matters.

Check the Trade Registry

Determine who had authority to represent the company when the transaction occurred.

Unauthorized Transactions

If a shareholder personally arranged the transfer without appropriate corporate authority, the validity and consequences of the transaction require separate examination.

Directors and Managers Have Duties Toward the Company

A person controlling a company does not automatically have unlimited authority to treat company property as personal property.

Company assets belong to the company.

This distinction is fundamental.

Majority Ownership Does Not Mean Personal Ownership of Company Assets

A shareholder owning 60%, 80% or even a larger percentage of shares does not personally own 60% or 80% of each machine, vehicle, bank account or property.

The company is a separate legal entity.

Majority Shareholder Cannot Simply Empty the Company

Corporate control must still be exercised within the applicable legal framework.

Where managers or directors breach statutory or contractual duties through culpable conduct, TTK Article 553 provides a basis for liability for resulting damage. (LEXPERA)

TTK Article 553 and Director Liability

This provision can become particularly important where company managers or directors participate in transferring valuable corporate assets to another entity under circumstances that damage the company.

Liability requires analysis of the duty breached, culpability, damage and causal connection.

It should not be assumed merely because a transaction produced a bad commercial result.

Business Judgment Versus Asset Stripping

A genuinely unsuccessful commercial decision should not automatically be characterized as misconduct.

Suppose management sells old machinery because the company needs liquidity.

The machinery is independently valued at EUR 500,000.

Several offers are obtained.

It is sold for EUR 510,000.

The full purchase price is paid to the company.

That is fundamentally different from transferring EUR 2 million of machinery to the director’s own company for EUR 100,000 without genuine payment.

Fair Market Value Is Critical

One of the first questions should therefore be:

What was the asset worth when transferred?

Obtain Historical Valuation Evidence

The relevant issue may be the value at the date of transfer, not today’s value.

Machinery Valuation

Specialist expertise may be necessary.

Real Estate Valuation

Comparable sales and professional valuation evidence can become important.

Inventory

Accounting and warehouse records may establish quantities and value.

Intellectual Property

Trademarks, software, licenses and other intangible assets may require specialized valuation.

Customer Portfolio

Sometimes the most valuable asset transferred is not physical property.

The controlling partner may move the company’s customer relationships to another business.

Business Diversion

For example:

Company A has 100 international customers.

The controlling shareholder establishes Company B.

Customers are told:

“From next month, send all orders to Company B.”

Company A then loses most of its revenue.

The foreign shareholder remains invested in Company A while the profitable business operates through Company B.

This requires detailed examination.

Employees Can Be Moved Too

Management may transfer key employees to the related company.

The sequence can demonstrate whether an operating business was systematically diverted.

Follow the Business, Not Only the Assets

A proper investigation should trace:

Assets → Employees → Customers → Contracts → Revenue → Bank Payments → Intellectual Property.

Related-Party Transactions Require Close Examination

The fact that the receiving company is controlled by the same shareholder or director is highly relevant.

It does not automatically make every transaction unlawful.

But it increases the importance of examining whether the transaction was conducted at genuine commercial terms and in the transferring company’s interest.

Map the Corporate Relationship

Prepare:

Company A → Shareholders → Directors → Company B → Shareholders → Directors → Common Persons → Family Connections → Business Relationship.

Newly Created Companies Are Particularly Important

Check when Company B was established.

If it was incorporated immediately before assets began leaving Company A, the chronology may be significant.

Check the Trade Registry History

Do not examine only the company’s current ownership.

Historical shareholder, director and representation information may reveal who controlled the receiving company at the relevant time.

The Partner May Use a Relative’s Company

The receiving company may formally belong to a spouse, sibling, child, employee or trusted associate.

Formal ownership therefore does not necessarily answer the entire factual question.

Look at Actual Control

Who negotiates contracts?

Who instructs employees?

Who controls banking?

Who communicates with customers?

Who receives the economic benefit?

These facts may become relevant depending on the legal claim.

Transfer Without Payment

A supposed sale is particularly suspicious where the accounting records show a receivable but no money actually enters the company’s bank account.

Follow the Purchase Price

Ask:

Sale Price → Invoice → Due Date → Payment → Bank Account → Accounting Entry.

Fake Payment

Sometimes accounting records show payment while funds are immediately transferred back.

The complete money flow should therefore be examined.

Circular Transactions

For example:

Company B pays Company A → Company A transfers same amount to shareholder → shareholder transfers money back to Company B.

Looking only at one transaction can create a misleading impression.

Transfer Below Market Value

Suppose an asset worth TRY 50 million is transferred for TRY 5 million.

The difference in value may represent a substantial loss to the company.

The circumstances and justification should be investigated.

Sale Immediately Followed by Resale

A particularly useful indicator can arise where Company A transfers property to Company B for TRY 5 million and Company B sells it to an independent third party two weeks later for TRY 45 million.

The subsequent sale can become relevant evidence concerning value and purpose.

Company Real Estate Transferred

Where valuable Turkish real estate is involved, title records become essential.

Determine:

Original Owner → Transfer Date → Buyer → Declared Consideration → Mortgage → Subsequent Transfer → Current Owner.

Request Urgent Protection Where Necessary

If remaining company assets are at immediate risk of transfer, waiting until the final judgment may seriously reduce the practical value of litigation.

Depending on the claim and statutory requirements, appropriate interim judicial protection should be evaluated.

Precautionary Injunction

A precautionary injunction (ihtiyati tedbir) may potentially be relevant where the statutory conditions are satisfied and the requested measure is appropriate to the disputed right.

The precise relief should be carefully framed.

Do Not Assume Every Shareholder Dispute Justifies Freezing the Entire Company

Courts examine the legal basis, evidence, urgency and proportionality of requested interim measures.

A targeted application supported by concrete documents is generally more meaningful than a vague request to “freeze everything.”

Identify the Remaining Assets

Create an urgent list:

Real Estate

Vehicles

Machinery

Inventory

Bank Accounts

Receivables

Company Shares

Trademarks

Licenses

Major Contracts

Then determine which assets are currently at risk.

Shareholder Information Rights

A foreign shareholder who suspects asset stripping should use the corporate information and inspection mechanisms applicable to the relevant company type.

The objective is to obtain documentary evidence rather than rely solely on verbal explanations from the controlling partner.

Request Accounting Records

Relevant records may include the general ledger, bank records, invoices, related-party accounts, asset registers and financial statements.

Request the Asset Sale Agreement

If management claims that machinery or property was legitimately sold, obtain the transaction documents.

Request Proof of Payment

An invoice alone does not establish that the purchase price was actually received.

Request the Valuation

Ask how the sale price was determined.

Request Corporate Approval Documents

Determine whether the board or other competent corporate body approved the transaction.

General Assembly Records

Minutes may reveal whether the transaction was disclosed to shareholders.

Board Decisions

Board resolutions can show who voted for the transfer and what reasons were recorded.

Signature Circulars and Representation Records

These can help establish who executed the transaction.

Refusal to Provide Documents

Repeated refusal to disclose relevant corporate information may itself affect the shareholder’s litigation strategy.

The appropriate information and inspection remedy depends on the company form and the particular right being exercised.

Special Audit

In appropriate circumstances involving an anonymous company, the Turkish Commercial Code’s special-audit mechanisms may become relevant where statutory requirements are satisfied.

A special audit can be particularly important where the shareholder suspects transactions that cannot be adequately investigated through ordinary information rights.

Independent Expert Evidence

A shareholder may need expert analysis of accounting records and transaction values.

Forensic Accounting

Complex asset-stripping cases often require reconstruction of related-party transactions across multiple companies.

Create a Transaction Matrix

Use:

Date → Asset → Seller → Buyer → Relationship → Book Value → Estimated Market Value → Sale Price → Invoice → Payment → Approving Person.

Create a Bank Matrix

Use:

Date → Company Account → Amount → Recipient → Recipient Relationship → Description → Subsequent Transfer.

Create an Asset-Stripping Timeline

For example:

January: Company B established.

February: Company A’s sales manager moves to Company B.

March: Machinery transferred.

April: Major customers begin paying Company B.

May: Company A’s warehouse lease terminated.

June: Company A reports major losses.

This type of chronology can be more persuasive than hundreds of unorganized documents.

Company Groups and Controlling Companies

Where the companies form part of a legally relevant group structure, the Turkish Commercial Code’s provisions concerning controlling and dependent companies may become important.

The analysis can differ from an ordinary transaction between unrelated companies.

TTK Article 202

The Turkish Commercial Code contains specific provisions addressing the exercise of control in company groups and consequences where a dependent company is caused to suffer loss.

Whether Article 202 applies depends on the actual corporate-control structure and facts.

Do Not Assume Calling the Companies “Sister Companies” Solves the Problem

Common ownership does not automatically justify transferring value from one company to another without proper commercial justification.

Each company has its own legal personality and economic interests.

Transactions With Directors

Turkish Commercial Code Article 395 also regulates certain transactions between directors and the company, including restrictions concerning transactions without general-assembly authorization in the circumstances covered by the provision. (LEXPERA)

Related-party transfers should therefore be examined not only economically but also through the applicable corporate-governance provisions.

Can the Foreign Shareholder Sue the Director?

Potentially.

TTK Article 553 establishes the statutory framework for liability of founders, board members, managers and liquidators where they culpably breach obligations arising from law or the articles and cause damage. (LEXPERA)

The correct plaintiff and nature of the recoverable damage depend on whether the alleged loss is suffered directly by the shareholder or primarily by the company.

Direct Damage Versus Company Damage

This distinction is extremely important.

If machinery belonging to the company is transferred for nothing, the immediate economic loss may primarily belong to the company.

The fact that the shareholder’s shares subsequently lose value does not automatically mean every part of that loss constitutes an independent direct shareholder claim.

Do Not Calculate the Case Simply as “My Shares Fell by EUR 1 Million”

The correct damage theory must be established legally and economically.

Company Can Have a Claim

Where corporate property was improperly transferred, restoration of value to the company may be central.

Shareholder Proceedings

The Turkish Commercial Code provides shareholder mechanisms that may allow proceedings concerning losses suffered by the company under the applicable statutory conditions.

Liability of the Receiving Company

Do not focus exclusively on the business partner.

Company B may itself be central to the disputed transaction.

Whether claims can be brought against the recipient depends on the legal basis, knowledge, transaction structure and relief sought.

Subsequent Purchasers

If Company B subsequently transferred the asset to another party, the rights of the later acquirer may become important.

Good Faith Matters

The legal position of an independent third-party purchaser can differ substantially from that of a related company knowingly participating in the transaction.

This Is Why Early Action Matters

Recovering an asset can become significantly more complicated after multiple subsequent transfers.

General Assembly Decisions

Sometimes the asset transfer is based on a general assembly resolution.

The validity of that corporate decision should then be reviewed.

Was the Meeting Properly Called?

Check notice procedures.

Was the Foreign Shareholder Allowed to Participate?

Improper exclusion can become important.

Was Voting Conducted Correctly?

Voting rights and potential conflicts should be examined.

Was the Decision Recorded Accurately?

Obtain the signed minutes.

Challenging General Assembly Resolutions

Depending on the company type and defect involved, annulment or nullity-related remedies may be available under Turkish company law.

Deadlines can be critical.

Do Not Wait for the Annual General Meeting

If assets are disappearing now, waiting months for the next meeting can be commercially disastrous.

Criminal Liability May Also Need Evaluation

Not every improper company transaction constitutes a crime.

Corporate misconduct and criminal liability must be distinguished carefully.

However, where company assets are intentionally appropriated, false documents are created, accounting records are manipulated or deceptive schemes are used, potential criminal-law issues may require separate assessment.

Breach of Trust

Depending on the precise facts, misuse or appropriation of property entrusted to another can require evaluation under Turkish criminal law.

Fraud

If deception was used to obtain property or cause financial loss, fraud provisions may potentially become relevant.

Forgery

Fake board resolutions, invoices, signatures or powers of attorney can create separate criminal-law issues.

False Accounting Documents

Accounting evidence should be preserved before records can be altered or lost.

Criminal Complaint Is Not a Substitute for Corporate Litigation

This is a major strategic point.

A shareholder should not automatically turn every company dispute into a criminal complaint.

The criminal route should be based on evidence satisfying the elements of an actual offense.

Likewise, Do Not Ignore Criminal Evidence

If forged documents or deliberate appropriation are genuinely involved, treating the matter only as a civil shareholder dispute can also be inadequate.

Foreign Shareholder Outside Turkey

A shareholder living in London, Dubai, Berlin, New York or another jurisdiction can still protect rights concerning a Turkish company.

Physical residence outside Turkey does not by itself prevent Turkish corporate litigation.

Power of Attorney

Appropriate representation can allow many steps to be taken without the foreign shareholder permanently remaining in Turkey.

Foreign Corporate Shareholder

If the shareholder is itself a foreign company, corporate authority documents may need to be prepared appropriately for use in Turkish proceedings.

Evidence Stored Abroad

Foreign bank records, emails and corporate approvals should be preserved in original form.

Translation

Documents submitted to Turkish authorities may require appropriate Turkish translations.

Foreign Shareholder Locked Out of Company Systems

This is often one of the first warning signs.

A shareholder suddenly loses access to accounting software, corporate email, bank reporting or internal systems.

Record when access disappeared.

Do Not Delete Old Access Records

Preserve screenshots, emails and authentication notifications showing previous access.

Company Bank Account Access Removed

Determine whether the change was legally authorized and when it occurred.

Signature Authority Removed

Trade registry history can become important.

Director Removed

If the foreign shareholder was also a director or manager, removal from management creates a separate governance issue from ownership of the shares.

Share Ownership Does Not Automatically Disappear When Management Authority Ends

These concepts should be kept separate.

Dividends Stop After Asset Transfer

A sudden disappearance of profits after related-party transfers can be a warning sign.

Compare historical financial statements.

Revenue Moves but Expenses Stay

One particularly damaging structure is:

Company A keeps employees, debts and expenses.

Company B receives customers and revenue.

Company A becomes structurally loss-making while Company B becomes profitable.

This pattern should be investigated closely.

Management Fees

Value may also be extracted through excessive management, consultancy or licensing fees paid to related companies.

Related-Party Loans

The company may lend large sums to entities controlled by the majority shareholder.

The commercial terms and repayment should be examined.

Guarantees for Another Company

Corporate guarantees can transfer substantial economic risk even where no physical asset moves.

Turkish company law contains specific rules relevant to company/director transactions and group-company relationships. (LEXPERA)

Intellectual Property Transfer

A trademark may be transferred to another company while the original company is then required to pay a license fee to use the same brand.

This can significantly reduce shareholder value.

Software and Source Code

Technology companies require particular attention because critical assets may be intangible.

Domain Names

A commercially important domain may be moved to another entity.

Social Media Accounts

Control of commercial accounts may also carry substantial value.

Customer Database

The transfer or diversion of customer information may create additional commercial and data-protection issues depending on the circumstances.

Foreign Shareholder Should Build Two Cases Simultaneously

The first is the liability case:

Who did what, why was it unlawful and what damage resulted?

The second is the recovery case:

Where are the assets now and how can value actually be restored?

Winning Liability Without Recovering Assets Is Not Enough

If the responsible person has transferred everything away, a favorable judgment may become difficult to enforce.

Asset Investigation Should Begin Early

Identify property owned by the relevant individuals and companies where legally possible.

Remaining Company Assets

Protecting what is still inside Company A may be as important as recovering what already left.

Bank Accounts

Unusual transfers should be traced through available corporate records and, where necessary, judicial procedures.

Receivables

Customers may owe substantial amounts to the company.

Determine whether those receivables were assigned to another company.

Assignment of Receivables

A controlling partner may divert receivables without transferring physical assets.

This can effectively strip working capital from the company.

Inventory

Conduct or request an inventory comparison.

Warehouse Records

Compare purchase, sales and stock records.

Machinery Serial Numbers

These can help identify transferred equipment.

Vehicle Registration

Company-owned vehicles should be mapped.

Real Estate

Historical title movements can reveal whether property was transferred.

Company Shares

The company may own interests in subsidiaries that were transferred to related parties.

Prepare an Emergency Evidence File

The file should contain corporate records, articles of association, shareholder agreements, trade registry history, board resolutions, general assembly minutes, bank statements, accounting records, invoices, asset registers, contracts, emails and WhatsApp communications.

First 24 Hours After Discovering the Transfer

Preserve every document currently available. Identify which assets have already moved and which remain at risk. Obtain corporate and registry information and prevent internal electronic evidence from disappearing where lawfully possible.

First 48 Hours

Map the receiving company, shareholders, directors and connections with the business partner. Determine the transfer value, consideration and payment status. Identify further transactions that appear imminent.

First 72 Hours

Evaluate information and inspection rights, corporate proceedings, director-liability claims and appropriate interim judicial protection. Where genuine criminal evidence exists, separately assess the criminal-law strategy.

Prepare an Asset Transfer Matrix

Asset → Original Owner → Transfer Date → Receiving Company → Relationship → Market Value → Sale Price → Payment Received → Current Location.

Prepare a Control Matrix

Company → Shareholders → Directors → Signature Authority → Actual Controller → Related Persons → Related Companies.

Prepare a Liability Matrix

Person → Position → Decision → Duty → Alleged Breach → Company Loss → Evidence → Potential Claim.

Prepare an Emergency Protection Matrix

Remaining Asset → Estimated Value → Transfer Risk → Evidence → Possible Interim Measure → Urgency.

Common Mistakes Foreign Shareholders Should Avoid

Do not assume majority ownership allows the local partner to treat company assets as personal property. Do not rely only on verbal explanations. Do not wait until the company is completely empty before requesting corporate records. Do not focus solely on physical assets while customers, contracts and revenue are being diverted. Do not assume every related-party transaction is automatically unlawful. Do not file an unsupported criminal complaint merely to pressure the partner. Do not ignore potential director liability. Do not overlook the receiving company. Do not wait months before investigating asset values and payment flows. Most importantly, do not pursue a final judgment without considering how the remaining assets can be protected during the proceedings.

2026 Legal Strategy for Foreign Shareholders Facing Asset Transfers in Turkey

The strongest strategy begins by reconstructing the company’s economic position before and after the disputed transfers. The foreign shareholder should identify every asset, customer relationship, contract, receivable and revenue stream that moved from the original company and determine where each item went. Corporate records should establish who authorized the transactions, while banking and accounting evidence should establish whether genuine consideration was paid. The ownership and management structure of the receiving company should then be mapped to identify related-party relationships and actual control. Independent valuation may be required where assets appear to have been sold below market value. The duties and potential liability of directors and managers should be assessed under the Turkish Commercial Code, including TTK Article 553 where culpable breaches of statutory or articles-based duties allegedly caused damage. (LEXPERA) Where a controlling-company structure exists, the specific company-group provisions may also require analysis. The consolidated TTK currently reflects amendments through May 2026, so current provisions should be used rather than outdated corporate-law summaries. (LEXPERA) The practical roadmap is therefore: identify transferred assets → identify remaining assets → obtain corporate records → reconstruct ownership → determine who authorized each transfer → identify the receiving company → establish related-party connections → obtain transfer agreements → verify invoices → trace actual payment → obtain historical valuations → trace customers and contracts → investigate diverted receivables → compare pre-transfer and post-transfer financial statements → evaluate shareholder information rights → evaluate special audit where applicable → challenge defective corporate decisions where appropriate → assess director and manager liability → evaluate TTK group-company remedies → seek proportionate interim protection where statutory requirements exist → investigate the receiving company’s role → assess genuine criminal conduct separately → pursue restoration, compensation or other appropriate corporate remedies → enforce any resulting judgment against available assets.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a majority shareholder transfer company assets to another company they own?

Not merely because they are the majority shareholder. A company is a separate legal person, and transactions involving its assets must comply with applicable corporate law, authority rules and management duties.

2. What if the assets were sold below market value?

A significant undervalue can be important evidence, particularly where the buyer is a related company. Historical market value, commercial justification, corporate authorization and actual payment should all be investigated.

3. Can a foreign shareholder stop the remaining assets from being transferred?

Potentially. Where the statutory conditions are satisfied, appropriate interim judicial protection may be requested. The specific measure depends on the disputed right and evidence of urgency.

4. Can the director be personally liable?

Potentially. TTK Article 553 provides for liability where directors or managers culpably breach duties arising from law or the articles and cause damage. The precise nature of the damage and claimant must be analyzed carefully. (LEXPERA)

5. Can I sue the company that received the assets?

Potentially, depending on the transaction, legal basis, recipient’s position and relief sought. The receiving company should therefore be investigated rather than focusing exclusively on the business partner.

6. What if the receiving company belongs to my partner’s spouse or relative?

The formal ownership structure should be established, but the factual and economic relationship between the companies and individuals should also be investigated.

7. Can I request access to company accounts and documents?

Foreign shareholders have corporate information rights under Turkish law, but the precise procedure and scope depend particularly on whether the company is an anonymous or limited company and the nature of the requested information.

8. What if customers were transferred instead of physical assets?

Customer and revenue diversion can be commercially more damaging than transferring machinery. Contracts, communications, invoices and bank receipts should be examined to determine whether the business itself was moved.

9. Is transferring company assets to another company automatically a criminal offense?

No. An improper corporate transaction is not automatically a crime. Criminal liability requires the elements of an applicable offense. Forgery, fraud or deliberate appropriation may require separate analysis where supported by evidence.

10. What should a foreign shareholder do first?

Preserve evidence and identify assets that remain at immediate risk. Once the company’s value has been transferred to multiple third parties, practical recovery can become significantly more difficult.

Legal Support for Foreign Shareholders in Turkish Company Asset Disputes

Foreign shareholders who discover suspicious transfers of company property may need immediate assistance concerning related-party transactions, company records, diverted assets, director liability, shareholder information rights, injunctions, special audits, general assembly disputes, asset tracing and compensation claims.

Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign shareholders, investors, international companies and executives involved in shareholder and corporate-control disputes in Turkey.

Fırat Fesih Kaya can assist with investigating suspicious company transfers, protecting remaining corporate assets, shareholder information and inspection procedures, director and manager liability claims, challenges to corporate decisions, interim measures and litigation aimed at restoring company value.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey