

TAREKS Delay in Turkey | Compensation and Urgent Legal Remedies
Learn what importers can do when TAREKS inspection takes too long in Turkey, including urgent applications, suspension of execution, customs remedies and compensation claims.
TAREKS inspections are designed to protect consumers and ensure that imported products comply with Turkish technical and safety rules. However, an inspection that takes too long can create serious commercial losses for importers and foreign manufacturers.
Every additional day may generate warehouse rent, demurrage, container detention, production interruption, missed delivery deadlines, contractual penalties and loss of customers. If the delay is caused by an unlawful administrative act, defective procedure or unreasonable inaction, the importer may have legal remedies.
The first step is to determine whether the delay is a normal risk-based inspection, a document deficiency, a laboratory-capacity problem, a system issue or an unjustified administrative delay.
TAREKS is Turkey’s electronic, risk-based product safety and technical compliance system. The Ministry of Trade explains that TAREKS identifies higher-risk shipments and concentrates physical controls on those products. The official TAREKS page lists Communiqué No. 2025/28 as relevant legislation for the current system.
A delay may occur because:
Being selected for inspection is not itself evidence of non-compliance. The legal issue arises when the process exceeds a reasonable period without a clear explanation or when the delay is caused by an unlawful administrative failure.
There is no single processing period that applies to every product and every TAREKS application. The time may depend on the product group, applicable communiqué, testing requirement, customs office, laboratory capacity, document completeness and risk level.
Importers should therefore avoid relying on informal estimates such as “TAREKS takes three days.” The applicable product-specific rules and any written request from the authority must be reviewed.
A delay becomes legally significant where:
A prolonged TAREKS inspection may result in:
The importer should calculate losses daily and preserve documentary evidence. A general statement that “the company suffered damage” is rarely sufficient.
Useful evidence includes:
Save the application number, current system status, electronic messages and all notification dates. Screenshots should show the date and time whenever possible.
Ask the relevant authority or inspection unit to state:
A written request creates an official record and helps establish whether the authority is inactive or whether a specific technical process is still pending.
The file may include:
Explain the consequences of delay objectively. Attach evidence of production shutdown, perishable goods, contractual deadlines or rapidly increasing demurrage.
The importer should examine whether the goods can lawfully be moved to temporary storage, transferred to another customs procedure, separated into compliant and disputed units, or subjected to an urgent second inspection.
Mitigation does not mean accepting an unlawful decision. It demonstrates that the importer acted responsibly to reduce avoidable losses.
The importer may submit a reasoned request for urgent examination or completion of the inspection. The request should identify the application, shipment, product and commercial urgency.
It should also list all documents already submitted and explain why no further information is needed. A clear chronological file often helps the authority identify where the process is blocked.
If the authority issues a formal refusal, detention decision or negative conformity finding, the importer may have an administrative objection route under the applicable product legislation or communiqué.
The objection should challenge both the substance and the procedure where appropriate, including:
If the delay results in a customs debt or penalty, Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458 generally provides a 15-day objection period from lawful notification. The exact deadline should be calculated from the official service record.
A TAREKS delay and a customs penalty are legally distinct matters. Challenging one does not automatically challenge the other.
A formal administrative act or unlawful refusal may be challenged before the competent administrative court. Many administrative actions have a 60-day filing period, but the applicable product rules and notification must be reviewed before relying on that period.
The court may be asked to annul the decision where the administration:
A lawsuit alone does not automatically release the goods. The importer may request suspension of execution when:
The application should explain the legal defect and quantify the urgency. Evidence may include:
A technically supported application is generally stronger than a submission based only on financial inconvenience.
Compensation may be considered where the delay resulted from an unlawful administrative action or service failure and caused proven loss.
The importer normally needs to establish:
Potentially recoverable losses may include storage, demurrage, replacement freight, documented contractual penalties and other direct expenses. Lost profits and reputational damage usually require stronger evidence.
Separate contractual claims may also exist against:
The responsible party cannot be identified without reviewing the contracts, shipment records and cause of the delay.
Foreign manufacturers should promptly provide:
All documents must describe the same product. Differences in model names, serial numbers, voltage, capacity, packaging or manufacturer information can create additional delays.
Foreign powers of attorney may require notarisation, apostille or legalisation and Turkish translation. The formal requirements should be checked before submitting documents.
For 2026, importers should verify the live Ministry portal and the product-specific communiqué applicable on the application date. TAREKS procedures are electronic, risk-based and dependent on product category.
The Ministry’s current online system and guidance emphasize firm identification, user authorization and electronic processing. Companies should therefore ensure that:
The Ministry may also publish planned system-maintenance notices. If an electronic interruption affects the application, preserve the official notice and system evidence because it may be relevant to a delay analysis.
When TAREKS inspection takes too long, the importer should:
1. Is there a fixed legal deadline for every TAREKS inspection?
No. The period may vary by product group, communiqué, testing requirement and authority. The applicable product-specific rule should be checked.
2. What should I do if TAREKS has not responded to my application?
Request the status and reason for inactivity in writing, submit any missing documents and create a complete record of all communications.
3. Can demurrage caused by TAREKS delay be recovered?
Potentially. Recovery depends on proving unlawful delay, direct causation, actual loss and reasonable mitigation.
4. Can I ask the court to release the goods urgently?
You may request suspension of execution if the decision appears unlawful and continued detention would cause serious or difficult-to-repair harm.
5. Does a TAREKS delay mean that the product is unsafe?
No. Risk-based selection and administrative delay do not by themselves prove that the product is unsafe or non-compliant.
6. Can a foreign manufacturer contact the Turkish authority directly?
The Turkish importer or authorized representative normally manages the application, but the foreign manufacturer can provide technical evidence and participate through authorization.
7. What is the customs objection deadline if a penalty is issued?
A customs debt or penalty objection generally must be filed within 15 days under Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458. Confirm the period from the official notification.
8. Can I re-export the goods while challenging the delay?
Re-export may be possible, but it can affect evidence, ownership, insurance and compensation claims. Obtain legal advice before taking that step.
9. Can a laboratory delay be challenged?
Yes, depending on the facts. The importer may examine laboratory capacity, sampling, test methodology, accreditation and the identity of the tested product.
10. What evidence is most important in a TAREKS delay case?
The application record, written requests, inspection status, customs documents, technical file, laboratory records and detailed proof of daily commercial losses are especially important.
This article is intended for general informational purposes only. To avoid any loss of rights, we recommend consulting your lawyer regarding your specific circumstances.
Avoiding commercial and legal losses requires timely specialist assistance. Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office advises foreign companies and importers on TAREKS delays, customs detention, product-safety procedures, administrative objections, suspension-of-execution requests and compensation claims.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal support throughout Turkey and in cross-border trade disputes.
Office: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile / WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
E-mail: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey