

Product Safety Retest in Turkey | TAREKS and Customs Remedies
Learn whether an importer can request a retest after a negative product safety result in Turkey, how to challenge sampling and laboratory errors, and which urgent legal remedies are available.
A negative product safety test can stop the release of imported goods in Turkey and expose the importer to storage fees, demurrage, production delays, re-export costs and administrative penalties.
In many cases, the importer may request a second analysis, additional examination or technical reassessment. However, there is no automatic retest right that applies identically to every product. The applicable product-safety communiqué, TAREKS procedure, laboratory rules and customs status must be reviewed immediately.
The most important point is timing: a retest request should normally be made before the goods are re-exported, destroyed, released to the market or the relevant administrative decision becomes final.
A negative result means that the tested sample was found not to comply with one or more technical, safety, quality or labeling requirements applicable to the product.
The result may concern:
A negative test result does not necessarily establish that every unit in the shipment is defective. The reliability of the result depends on the identity and representativeness of the sample, the laboratory method and the applicable legal standard.
Often, yes—but the procedure depends on the product group and the authority involved.
Possible forms of reassessment include:
The Turkish Ministry of Trade’s online payment platform refers to “second analysis” transactions, showing that second-analysis procedures exist in customs and product-control practice. Nevertheless, the exact eligibility, deadline, fee and laboratory route must be confirmed under the rules applicable to the particular product. The relevant TAREKS information page and current TAREKS application portal should be checked before filing.
A retest or second-analysis request is particularly important where there is evidence of:
The importer should not simply argue that the product “looks safe.” The request should identify the precise technical and procedural defect in the first analysis.
Request and preserve:
A short message showing only “failed” is not enough to evaluate the legal position.
Some product-specific procedures require a second-analysis request within a short period. The deadline may run from notification of the laboratory result, the inspection report or the administrative decision.
If a customs debt or penalty is issued, an objection under Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458 generally must be filed within 15 days of lawful notification. A separate administrative annulment action may have a different deadline, often 60 days for many official acts. The notice and applicable communiqué must be reviewed without delay.
The importer should ask whether a reserve sample exists and whether it has been sealed and stored properly. If the entire sample was consumed in the first analysis, the authority should explain how a repeat examination can be conducted.
Do not permit destruction, disposal or uncontrolled alteration of the goods before the evidentiary position is documented.
The foreign manufacturer should immediately provide:
A manufacturer’s internal test is useful supporting evidence, but it may not replace the official retest required by Turkish authorities.
A well-prepared request should contain:
The request should be technically specific. For example, it may explain that the laboratory tested the wrong voltage, used an outdated standard, examined a non-representative unit or failed to record the sample’s condition.
Usually, the authority determines the official laboratory or approves the laboratory route. The importer should not assume that a private foreign report will automatically overturn the official result.
An independent report can still be valuable for:
The laboratory should be appropriately accredited for the relevant product and test method. The report should identify the sample, standard, equipment, uncertainty and test conditions.
No. Filing a retest request does not automatically suspend customs control, prevent re-export or stop the accumulation of storage and demurrage.
The importer should expressly request that the goods remain preserved and that no irreversible action be taken until the retest or reassessment is completed, where the applicable rules permit such a request.
If the goods are perishable or commercially urgent, the importer may need to pursue an urgent administrative application or request suspension of execution from the competent administrative court.
A second negative result may lead to:
The importer should compare the first and second reports carefully. A second negative result may still be challengeable if both tests used the wrong standard, wrong sample or defective procedure.
The importer may request review of the result, especially where documents, sampling or laboratory methodology were misunderstood.
If the authority issues a written refusal, detention decision or penalty, the importer should use the objection route stated in the decision and applicable legislation.
An unlawful product-safety decision may be challenged before the competent administrative court. Possible grounds include:
Where continued enforcement would cause serious or difficult-to-repair harm and the decision appears unlawful, the importer may request suspension of execution. Supporting evidence may include:
A compensation claim may be considered if the negative result or refusal was unlawful and caused proven losses. The importer must generally establish:
Potential evidence includes storage invoices, demurrage statements, customer cancellation notices, replacement-purchase costs, production records and contractual penalty documents.
Separate contractual claims may exist against a supplier, carrier, customs broker, warehouse or testing body.
The Ministry’s current TAREKS page identifies Communiqué No. 2025/28 as part of the applicable framework. Because product lists, annexes and technical requirements may change, importers should verify the rule in force on the application date through the official Turkish legislation portal and the relevant Ministry page.
For 2026 shipments, companies should:
1. Is a retest automatically available after every negative product safety result?
No. Availability depends on the product-specific rules, sampling procedure, laboratory framework and stage of the TAREKS process.
2. How quickly should an importer request a second analysis?
Immediately after receiving the negative result. Some procedures impose short periods, and delay may make a reserve sample unavailable.
3. Can a foreign manufacturer request the retest directly?
The Turkish importer or authorized representative usually submits the formal request, while the foreign manufacturer supplies technical evidence and authorization.
4. Can the importer use a foreign laboratory report?
A foreign report may support the challenge, but the authority may require a retest through an approved or accredited laboratory in the applicable procedure.
5. Who pays for the retest?
The importer commonly pays the official second-analysis or laboratory fee, subject to the applicable rules. Contractual recovery may later be sought from a responsible supplier or other party.
6. Does requesting a retest stop demurrage?
No. Storage, terminal and demurrage charges may continue unless the contract or authority provides otherwise.
7. Can goods be released while the retest is pending?
Not automatically. Release may require a positive result, a court order, suspension of execution or another lawful customs procedure.
8. What if the first sample was destroyed during testing?
The authority should explain the sampling and retention procedure. The absence of a reliable reserve sample may become an important challenge ground.
9. Can a second negative result still be challenged?
Yes, if there are legal, procedural or technical defects in the second analysis, including wrong standards or non-representative sampling.
10. Can the importer recover losses caused by an incorrect test?
Potentially, if unlawfulness, actual damage and causation are proven. Storage, demurrage and commercial-loss records should be preserved.
This article is intended for general informational purposes only. To avoid any loss of rights, we recommend consulting your lawyer regarding your specific circumstances.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists importers and foreign manufacturers with negative product safety results, TAREKS retest applications, laboratory disputes, customs detention, administrative objections and urgent court proceedings.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides professional legal support throughout Turkey and for international trade disputes.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile / WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey