

Turkish franchisees may pay franchise, trademark, royalty, marketing and management fees to foreign brands. Learn when these payments can increase the customs value of imported goods and create additional customs duty exposure.
International franchise structures frequently involve several payments between a Turkish franchisee and a foreign brand owner.
A Turkish company may pay:
At the same time, the Turkish franchisee may import branded products, equipment, ingredients, packaging or merchandise from the franchisor or an approved foreign supplier.
This creates an important customs valuation question:
Must the franchise payments made to the foreign brand be added to the customs value of imported goods?
The answer is not automatically yes or no.
Under the Turkish customs valuation framework, royalties and licence fees not already included in the price may be added to customs value where they relate to the imported goods and must be paid, directly or indirectly, as a condition of sale. Additions must also be based on objective and quantifiable data.
The correct approach is therefore to analyze each payment separately rather than treating the entire franchise relationship as one customs-value item.
A payment does not automatically fall outside customs value merely because the agreement calls it a:
“Franchise Fee.”
Likewise, it does not automatically become dutiable simply because it is paid to the foreign brand owner.
Customs will examine the economic substance.
The critical questions include:
What right or service does the payment cover?
Does it relate to the imported goods?
Is payment required as a condition for obtaining those goods?
A franchise agreement may contain several economically distinct payments.
For example:
Initial franchise fee: EUR 500,000
Trademark royalty: 5% of turnover
Marketing contribution: 2%
IT fee: EUR 50,000 annually
Training fee: EUR 25,000.
Do not assume that all five payments receive identical customs treatment.
Each should be analyzed independently.
Suppose a Turkish franchisee imports branded merchandise from the foreign franchisor and pays 5% of Turkish sales for the right to use the same trademark.
This arrangement requires careful customs valuation analysis.
Current Ministry guidance contains specific rules concerning trademark-related royalties, including the relationship between the royalty, the imported merchandise and the buyer’s ability to obtain such goods from suppliers unrelated to the seller.
This is the first major test.
Suppose the franchise fee gives the Turkish company rights to:
Only part of the fee may have a connection with imported merchandise.
That distinction matters.
The second major issue is whether the Turkish franchisee must make the payment in order to purchase the imported goods.
Ask:
Could the Turkish company purchase these goods without entering into the franchise or licence arrangement?
If not, Customs may argue that the payment is connected with the sale of the imported goods.
Do not review only the franchise contract.
Analyze:
Franchise agreement
Trademark licence
Supply agreement
Approved supplier agreement
Distribution agreement
together.
The commercial relationship may become clear only when all documents are read as a package.
Suppose the franchise agreement states:
If the franchise agreement terminates, the Turkish company can no longer purchase branded goods.
That contractual link may become relevant when Customs considers whether franchise or royalty payments constitute a condition associated with the sale of imported goods.
Many franchise systems require franchisees to purchase:
from the franchisor or approved suppliers.
The more closely the franchise payment and mandatory sourcing system are connected, the more carefully the customs valuation consequences should be examined.
Current Ministry guidance gives particular attention, in the trademark context, to whether the buyer is free to obtain the relevant goods from suppliers unrelated to the seller.
Therefore, determine whether the Turkish franchisee genuinely has alternative sourcing rights.
A contract may technically allow purchases from other suppliers.
But ask:
Customs may examine commercial reality rather than contractual wording alone.
An initial franchise fee may cover:
It should not automatically be added to imported goods.
The company should determine which rights and services the initial payment actually purchases.
Suppose a EUR 1 million initial fee covers:
40% territorial rights
20% trademark licence
20% training
20% store-opening services.
If Customs valuation relevance exists only for a portion of the payment, the possibility of a supported allocation should be examined rather than automatically adding the entire EUR 1 million.
Customs-value additions should be based on objective and quantifiable information.
Therefore, any allocation should be supported by evidence such as:
Artificial percentages created only after an audit begins are much weaker.
A recurring franchise fee may be calculated as:
6% of Turkish turnover.
The fee might compensate the franchisor for an entire business system rather than simply for imported products.
The company should determine whether and to what extent the fee relates to imported merchandise.
A payment calculated according to sales revenue does not automatically become part of customs value.
The legal nature and commercial purpose of the payment remain important.
However, a sales-based calculation can attract Customs’ attention where the franchisee also imports the branded products generating that revenue.
Suppose a Turkish franchise restaurant pays 5% of total sales to the foreign franchisor.
Its products contain:
It would be inappropriate to assume automatically that the entire franchise fee relates exclusively to imported merchandise.
A detailed allocation analysis may be necessary.
A retail franchise may sell:
Imported products: 30%
Products manufactured in Turkey: 70%.
A royalty calculated on total sales should not automatically be allocated entirely to imported goods.
The customs analysis should identify the portion genuinely connected with the imports.
Franchisees frequently contribute to a global or regional advertising fund.
A marketing payment may finance:
Do not automatically treat such expenditure as a royalty.
Determine the contractual and economic substance.
Current Ministry guidance states that activities undertaken by the buyer on its own account, including certain marketing activities, are not treated merely as indirect payments to the seller and are not automatically added to customs value.
This distinction can be important in franchise structures.
A foreign franchisor may charge annual management fees for:
A genuine management service should not automatically be treated as consideration for imported goods.
But the company should maintain evidence that the service actually exists and is separately priced.
Training may concern:
Where genuine training is independently provided, its customs treatment should be analyzed separately from payments connected with imported goods.
Modern franchise systems often require payment for:
Do not automatically include these payments in imported-goods value merely because the technology is supplied by the franchisor.
The connection with the imported merchandise must be established.
A franchisee may be required to import:
Determine whether any franchise or licence payment relates specifically to that equipment.
A payment relating to the overall business system should not automatically be allocated entirely to imported machinery.
Franchise systems frequently require branded:
If these are imported, Customs may examine whether trademark payments relate to those goods.
Product-specific analysis is preferable to broad assumptions.
The highest-risk scenario may involve:
Foreign franchisor = intellectual-property owner = seller of imported goods.
In that structure, Customs may scrutinize whether the franchise or royalty payment forms part of the economic consideration for obtaining the goods.
Suppose:
Company A: foreign franchisor.
Company B: related foreign supplier.
Company C: Turkish franchisee.
The Turkish company pays Company A a franchise royalty and Company B for imported products.
The fact that the payments go to different group companies does not automatically determine the customs result.
The contractual and control relationships should be examined.
Current Ministry guidance addresses royalties paid to third parties and considers whether the seller or a person related to the seller requires the buyer to make the payment.
Therefore, third-party arrangements should not simply be treated as if the payment were made directly to the foreign seller.
The customs valuation rules distinguish certain payments made for distribution or resale rights.
Where such payment is not a condition of the sale for export to Turkey, Ministry guidance states that it is not added merely as a royalty or licence payment.
This can be particularly relevant to master franchise and territorial arrangements.
Payments for the right to reproduce imported goods in Turkey are also treated separately under the customs valuation framework.
Companies should therefore identify the exact intellectual-property right being licensed rather than using the general expression “franchise rights.”
A franchise fee may be paid:
Timing alone does not establish whether the payment belongs in customs value.
The underlying relationship with the imported goods is more important.
This commonly occurs where royalties are calculated as a percentage of sales.
Ministry guidance states that where an includable royalty or licence fee becomes determinable only after importation, the exceptional value declaration mechanism under the Customs Regulation may be relevant.
Companies with recurring franchise imports should consider this issue prospectively.
A franchisee should review customs valuation when the franchise structure is established, not years later when Customs discovers the payments in accounting records.
This is particularly important for recurring percentage-based fees.
During a post-clearance review, Customs may identify accounts such as:
Franchise Fees
Trademark Royalties
Licence Expenses
Brand Fees
Management Fees.
The authority may then compare those payments with historical import declarations.
For every payment to the foreign brand, identify:
| Payment | Recipient | Purpose | Imported Goods Connection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franchise fee | Franchisor | Business system | Review |
| Trademark royalty | Brand owner | Trademark use | High relevance |
| Marketing fund | Franchisor | Advertising | Separate analysis |
| IT fee | Technology company | Software | Separate analysis |
| Training fee | Franchisor | Staff training | Separate analysis |
This makes the customs review manageable.
Identify which payments potentially relate to:
One franchise fee may have different implications for different categories.
Where a payment partly relates to imported goods and partly to other rights or activities, the Ministry’s royalty guidance permits appropriate allocation based on objective and concrete data.
Possible allocation measures include:
A royalty or brand fee may already be incorporated into the supplier’s product price.
Before making any customs-value addition, determine whether the economic amount has already been included.
The same value should not be counted twice.
Many franchise structures involve related parties.
If the Turkish franchisee purchases goods from a group company at a discounted price while paying substantial franchise fees to another group company, Customs may examine the entire structure.
The company should therefore coordinate:
Transaction-value analysis
with
royalty/franchise-fee analysis.
Suppose a Turkish franchisee imported EUR 50 million of branded merchandise over five years while paying substantial annual royalties that were never analyzed for customs purposes.
A later audit can create material exposure.
Prepare a year-by-year review rather than waiting for individual assessments.
Where a payment is determined to affect customs value, allocate it appropriately and review:
Different imported products may generate different consequences.
Discovery of franchise payments does not establish that every payment should have been included.
First determine:
what the payment covers
→ whether it relates to imported goods
→ whether it is a condition of sale
→ whether allocation is required
→ whether it was already included.
Only then should correction strategy be considered.
Even where Customs concludes that a franchise-related payment should increase customs value, the administrative penalty should be examined independently.
Relevant issues may include:
Additional duty and penalty should not simply be treated as one question.
If Customs issues an additional assessment or penalty, immediately record:
Do not wait for the foreign franchisor to approve the response before protecting the Turkish importer’s procedural rights.
The file should contain:
This allows the company to respond rapidly during a customs audit.
When a Turkish franchisee imports goods and makes payments to a foreign brand:
List every payment
→ identify what each payment purchases
→ identify the recipient
→ review franchise and supply agreements together
→ identify imported goods connected with the payment
→ test whether payment is a condition of sale
→ review sourcing restrictions
→ separate royalties from marketing, management and technology services
→ separate imported from locally sourced goods
→ develop objective allocations
→ check whether amounts were known at importation
→ review exceptional value procedures
→ calculate historical exposure
→ analyze penalties separately
→ protect challenge deadlines.
No. Each payment must be analyzed according to its substance. For royalties and licence fees, the connection with the imported goods and whether payment is a condition of sale are central requirements.
No. Trademark royalties are subject to specific conditions. Among the relevant considerations are whether the imported goods are marketed under the trademark and whether the buyer has genuine freedom to source the goods from unrelated suppliers.
The different components should be identified. Where only part relates to imported goods, a defensible allocation based on objective evidence may be appropriate.
No. Genuine marketing payments require separate analysis. Ministry guidance also distinguishes certain activities undertaken by the buyer on its own account from payments forming part of customs value.
Mandatory sourcing can strengthen the connection between the licence arrangement and the imported goods and should therefore be analyzed carefully.
That can be particularly relevant in the trademark royalty analysis. The contractual right should also reflect genuine commercial sourcing freedom.
Later calculation does not automatically exclude an otherwise includable payment. Where the relevant royalty amount becomes known only after importation, exceptional value procedures may be relevant.
Not automatically. Payments for distribution or resale rights are treated differently where they are not a condition of the sale for export to Turkey.
Yes. Franchise and royalty payments identified during a post-clearance review can lead Customs to examine historical import declarations, subject to the applicable procedural framework.
Map the entire payment structure before the first import. The company should distinguish franchise rights, trademark royalties, marketing, technology, management and training payments; identify which payments relate to imported goods; review mandatory sourcing arrangements; and establish an objective customs valuation methodology before substantial historical exposure develops.
International franchise customs matters can involve:
Franchise fees
Trademark royalties
Foreign brand payments
Mandatory sourcing
Customs valuation
Related-party imports
Exceptional value declarations
Post-clearance audits
Additional customs duties
and customs penalties.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists international franchisors, foreign brand owners, multinational groups and Turkish franchisees where franchise, trademark or licence payments may affect the customs value of imported goods in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing franchise and supply agreements, analyzing foreign brand payments, determining whether royalties and licence fees should be included in customs value, developing allocation methodologies, reviewing historical declarations, and challenging additional customs assessments and penalties.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey