

A Turkish importer pays royalties or licence fees after imported goods are cleared through Customs. Learn when royalties must be added to customs value, how post-import payments should be declared, and how companies can manage additional duty and penalty risks.
A Turkish importer may purchase goods from a foreign manufacturer, clear them through Customs and only months later calculate and pay a royalty or licence fee.
This frequently occurs where royalties are calculated as:
The fact that the royalty is calculated or paid after importation does not, by itself, exclude it from customs value.
Under Turkey’s customs valuation framework, a royalty or licence fee not already included in the price may need to be added where, in particular, it relates to the imported goods and is payable as a condition of sale of those goods.
Therefore, the central question is not:
“When was the royalty paid?”
It is:
“Why was the royalty paid, what goods does it relate to, and was payment a condition connected with the sale of those imported goods?”
The existence of a licence agreement does not automatically create additional customs duty.
The royalty must be analyzed under the applicable customs valuation conditions.
The Ministry of Trade identifies two central requirements:
If those conditions are not satisfied, automatic inclusion would be inappropriate.
This is one of the most important practical points.
Suppose goods are imported in January.
The importer sells them during the year.
The royalty is calculated in December and paid in February of the following year.
The importer cannot simply argue:
“The royalty did not exist when the goods entered Turkey.”
If the obligation arose from the commercial arrangement applicable to the imported goods, the later calculation or payment date does not necessarily prevent customs-value inclusion.
The Ministry’s current guidance describes royalty and licence payments broadly in connection with rights such as:
The contractual label is therefore not decisive.
This requires a factual analysis.
For example:
Foreign parent owns Brand X
→ Turkish subsidiary imports Brand X products
→ products are sold in Turkey under Brand X
→ subsidiary pays 5% of sales as trademark royalty.
There may be a strong connection between the royalty and the imported merchandise.
But the result can be different where the payment concerns activities unrelated to the imported goods.
This is often the most contested issue.
Ask:
Could the Turkish importer purchase the goods without paying the royalty?
If the answer is genuinely yes, that may support exclusion.
If the commercial structure effectively requires the importer to enter into the licence arrangement to obtain the goods, Customs may argue that the royalty is a condition of sale.
Never analyze the royalty agreement in isolation.
Compare:
Supply agreement
with
Trademark/licence agreement.
Look for:
Two formally separate agreements may still be commercially connected.
The royalty may be paid to:
The identity of the recipient matters, but it does not always resolve the analysis by itself.
This is a relatively straightforward risk scenario.
Suppose:
Foreign seller sells branded products to Turkish importer
and
the same seller receives a 5% trademark royalty.
The company should immediately analyze whether the royalty relates to the goods and constitutes a condition of sale.
Multinational structures are often more complicated.
For example:
Company A: manufacturer and seller.
Company B: intellectual-property owner.
Company C: Turkish importer.
Company C pays Company A for the goods and Company B a royalty.
The fact that the royalty is paid to Company B does not automatically make it irrelevant.
The relationships and contractual structure should be examined.
Third-party royalty arrangements require separate analysis.
Current Ministry guidance specifically addresses payments to third parties and whether the seller or a person related to the seller requires the buyer to make the payment.
Therefore, a third-party payment should not automatically be treated in the same way as a royalty paid to the seller.
Trademark arrangements can be especially significant.
The Ministry’s guidance provides specific conditions concerning trademark royalties, including whether the imported goods are marketed under the relevant trademark and whether the buyer is free to obtain such goods from suppliers unrelated to the seller.
Sourcing freedom can therefore become a critical factual issue.
Ask:
Can the Turkish company purchase equivalent licensed goods from unrelated suppliers?
If the licence arrangement effectively forces sourcing from the foreign seller or its group, Customs may examine the royalty more closely.
Preserve evidence of genuine alternative sourcing rights where they exist.
A royalty may be paid for patented technology embodied in imported machinery or products.
Relevant questions include:
Avoid double counting.
A contract may call a payment:
“Technical know-how fee.”
But what does the fee actually cover?
It may concern:
Different components may require different customs treatment.
A royalty may relate partly to imported goods and partly to:
The Ministry expressly recognizes that where a royalty relates partly to imported goods and partly to other elements or post-import activities, an appropriate allocation may be made on the basis of objective and measurable data.
This can substantially reduce unnecessary customs exposure.
Suppose a Turkish company pays EUR 1 million annually.
Only 40% relates to imported finished products.
The remainder concerns locally manufactured goods and independent services.
The entire EUR 1 million should not automatically be treated as an addition to imported-goods value.
A defensible allocation methodology should be developed.
Customs-value additions must be supported by objective and measurable information. The Ministry’s guidance expressly emphasizes this requirement.
Possible allocation bases include:
A common arrangement is:
Royalty = 5% of net Turkish sales.
Because the amount cannot be calculated at importation, the importer may believe that no customs declaration is possible.
That conclusion is unsafe.
The customs rules provide mechanisms for valuation elements that become determinable after importation.
Official Ministry materials specifically state that where the amount of a royalty or licence fee that must be included in customs value will only become known after importation, an exceptional value declaration mechanism may be available under the relevant Customs Regulation provisions.
This should be considered before recurring imports begin.
Where the includable royalty amount is already determinable at the time of importation, official guidance states that it should be included in customs value at importation.
Deliberately postponing payment does not necessarily postpone the valuation obligation.
Where the royalty is calculated later, the company should establish a compliance procedure for:
import declarations
→ royalty calculation
→ allocation
→ final customs valuation
→ additional declaration/payment where legally required.
The process should not depend on someone remembering the issue at year-end.
For high-volume importers, prepare a declaration-level reconciliation.
For example:
| Declaration | Imported Value | Royalty Allocation | Revised Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | EUR 100,000 | EUR 5,000 | EUR 105,000 |
| B | EUR 200,000 | EUR 10,000 | EUR 210,000 |
| C | EUR 300,000 | EUR 15,000 | EUR 315,000 |
This allows accurate calculation of potential additional customs liability.
A royalty may cover hundreds of products.
Some may attract:
0% customs duty
while others may be subject to:
Allocation should therefore be product-specific where necessary.
Turkey’s current additional customs duty framework continues to impose additional duties on goods falling within specified tariff positions, subject to origin and other applicable conditions.
If an includable royalty increases customs value, value-based additional customs duty may also need to be recalculated where applicable.
Do not calculate exposure solely by multiplying the royalty by one customs duty rate.
Review:
The same royalty allocation may produce different consequences for different products.
A royalty may already be included in the supplier’s invoice price.
Before making any additional customs-value adjustment, determine whether the amount has already been captured.
Customs valuation should not include the same economic amount twice.
Multinational groups frequently make simultaneous payments for:
Trademark royalty
management services
IT services
technical support.
Each payment should be analyzed according to its actual substance.
Do not automatically combine all intercompany payments into the customs value.
The Ministry’s valuation guidance recognizes that certain separately identifiable post-import construction, installation, assembly, maintenance or technical-assistance expenses are not included in customs value.
Contracts should therefore distinguish genuine post-import services from royalty payments relating to the imported merchandise.
Official guidance distinguishes certain payments for rights to reproduce imported goods in Turkey from includable royalty payments.
The precise intellectual-property right being licensed therefore matters.
Payments for distribution or resale rights are not automatically included merely because they exist.
Official guidance indicates that certain payments for distribution or resale rights are excluded where they are not a condition of the sale for export to Turkey.
The underlying contractual restrictions should therefore be reviewed.
Royalty risks frequently arise when Customs examines:
A payment appearing under:
“Trademark Licence Fee”
can lead Customs to review several years of import declarations.
Prepare:
Year
Royalty recipient
Royalty amount
Calculation method
Relevant imported goods
Customs treatment
Declarations affected.
This allows management to understand potential exposure before responding to an audit.
If the company discovers that royalties were never analyzed for customs purposes, do not immediately assume every historical payment was dutiable.
First test:
If the legal review confirms an omitted customs-value element, the importer should examine available correction procedures and consequences.
Before acting, determine:
A blanket correction based on the entire royalty amount may be incorrect.
Additional customs duty and administrative penalties are separate issues.
If Customs determines that an includable royalty was omitted, review:
Do not assume that additional tax automatically determines the penalty result.
Where that is the company’s position, collect:
The argument should be supported by actual commercial behavior.
Where the seller, importer and intellectual-property owner belong to the same multinational group, Customs may examine whether formally separate agreements are economically interconnected.
The group structure should therefore be mapped clearly.
Transfer-pricing reports may explain that the Turkish subsidiary pays the foreign parent for:
Tax teams and customs teams should therefore review transfer-pricing documentation together.
Customs analysis should begin before a licence agreement becomes effective.
Review:
This allows the importer to design an administratively workable customs process.
For recurring imports:
Customs declaration data
= royalty allocation by imported product.
Automating this process can substantially reduce year-end compliance problems.
Licensing arrangements evolve.
A payment that initially concerned only locally produced goods may later extend to imported products.
The customs analysis should therefore be updated when:
If Customs adds the entire royalty to customs value without analyzing whether part relates to:
the importer should examine whether the assessment is overbroad.
Objective allocation evidence can become central to the challenge.
If Customs issues an additional assessment or penalty, record the notification date immediately.
Do not delay formal action while waiting for:
Prepare the technical evidence in parallel with protection of procedural rights.
The file should contain:
This allows the company to answer Customs coherently.
When a royalty is paid after importation:
Identify the licensed right
→ identify the goods concerned
→ review the supply and licence agreements together
→ determine whether the royalty relates to imported goods
→ determine whether payment is a condition of sale
→ identify the recipient and its relationship with the seller
→ review sourcing restrictions
→ separate imported goods from local products and services
→ develop an objective allocation
→ determine whether the amount was known at importation
→ review exceptional value procedures where applicable
→ allocate the royalty to declarations
→ calculate additional customs exposure
→ analyze penalties separately
→ protect objection or correction deadlines.
No. The applicable conditions must be examined. In particular, the royalty generally needs to relate to the imported goods and be payable as a condition of their sale.
No. Payment timing alone does not determine the result. A royalty calculated or paid later may still affect customs value if the substantive requirements for inclusion are satisfied.
Official Ministry guidance states that where an includable royalty amount becomes known only after importation, exceptional value declaration procedures may be available under the Customs Regulation.
The arrangement still requires analysis. The relationship among the seller, licensor and buyer, and whether the seller or a related person requires the payment, can be relevant.
No. Trademark royalties are subject to specific conditions. The way the goods are marketed and whether the buyer is free to source from unrelated suppliers can be particularly relevant.
An appropriate allocation may be possible where it is based on objective and measurable data.
Not automatically. The company should determine which portion actually relates to the imported merchandise and whether the conditions for customs-value inclusion are satisfied.
Potentially. Where an includable royalty increases the customs value of goods subject to value-based additional customs duty, the resulting liability should also be recalculated under the applicable regime.
Yes. Discovery of previously unanalyzed royalty payments may lead to examination of historical imports, subject to the applicable procedural and limitation rules.
Review the royalty agreement together with the supply arrangement before payment. Determine whether the royalty relates to imported goods, whether it is a condition of sale, whether part should be allocated to other activities, and whether a customs declaration or adjustment procedure is required.
Royalty-related customs matters can involve:
Trademark royalties
Patent and technology licences
Know-how payments
Post-import royalty calculations
Customs valuation
Exceptional value declarations
Additional customs duties
Related-party transactions
Post-clearance audits
and customs penalties.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists multinational companies, foreign licensors, manufacturers and Turkish importers where royalties or licence fees may affect the customs value of imported goods.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing royalty and supply agreements, determining whether licence payments must be included in customs value, developing objective allocation methodologies, analyzing historical declarations, calculating potential additional customs exposure, and challenging customs assessments and penalties.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey