

A foreign student allows a friend to use their Turkish bank account. Learn about fraud investigations, suspicious transfers, account freezes, criminal liability, evidence and defense options in Turkey.
A foreign student living in Turkey may believe that allowing a friend to receive or transfer money through their Turkish bank account is harmless. The explanation may sound ordinary: the friend does not have a Turkish account, is waiting for a bank card, needs to receive money from a customer, cannot complete an international transfer or simply asks the student to withdraw cash on their behalf. However, if the transferred money is later connected with online fraud, fake investment schemes, cryptocurrency fraud, marketplace scams, stolen bank accounts or another criminal activity, the foreign student’s account may appear directly in the financial trail investigated by Turkish police and prosecutors.
The fact that money passed through the student’s account does not automatically establish that the student knowingly participated in a crime. Nevertheless, the account holder may need to explain why the account was used, who controlled the transaction, whether the student knew the source of the money, what happened after the funds arrived and whether the student received any financial benefit.
Bank accounts create a traceable connection between the account holder and financial transactions. If a fraud victim sends money to a foreign student’s account, investigators may initially identify that student as the person who received the proceeds.
The investigation may then focus on whether the student was an innocent intermediary or knowingly participated in the criminal activity.
Statements such as “my account is blocked,” “receive this payment for me,” “withdraw this money and give it to me” or “send the money to another account” should be treated cautiously.
A person who repeatedly recruits other individuals’ bank accounts may be attempting to distance themselves from suspicious transactions.
No automatic conclusion should be drawn merely because suspicious money entered an account.
Criminal responsibility requires examination of the specific offense, the student’s conduct, knowledge, intent and other circumstances. The financial transaction is important evidence, but the entire factual context should be investigated.
Investigators may examine the sender of the money, amount, date, transfer description, subsequent transfer, cash withdrawal, ATM location, IP information, device records, messages between the student and friend and whether similar transactions occurred previously.
The student’s explanation will normally be compared against objective financial and digital evidence.
Messages showing how the friend requested use of the account may become highly important.
For example, conversations may establish that the student was told the money came from a legitimate source or that the friend controlled the entire transaction.
The complete conversation should be preserved rather than isolated screenshots alone.
Deleting conversations can make reconstruction of events more difficult and may remove evidence supporting the student’s explanation.
Preserve chats, emails, payment instructions, voice messages and other relevant communications.
A complete transaction history can help establish the flow of funds.
The defense should determine when the money arrived, whether it remained in the account, whether it was transferred elsewhere and whether the student personally retained any part of it.
That fact may help reconstruct what happened but does not by itself resolve criminal responsibility.
Investigators will want to know why the transfer occurred and what the student understood about the transaction.
Cash withdrawal can make the factual investigation more difficult because the subsequent recipient may not appear directly in bank records.
Evidence showing that the cash was delivered to the friend may therefore become particularly important.
Where cash was withdrawn, ATM location, timing and potentially available surveillance evidence may help determine who participated in the withdrawal or received the money afterward.
Time-sensitive evidence should be identified early because some records may not remain available indefinitely.
This creates an additional evidentiary issue.
Investigators may examine device information, login activity and transaction authentication. The student should explain accurately whether another person had access to the telephone, banking application or credentials.
The defense should be based on the actual events.
Claims that “someone hacked my account” can be tested against banking and device records. A false explanation can seriously damage credibility.
If money came from a person who claims to have been deceived, the investigation may concern fraud or aggravated forms of fraud depending on the alleged method.
The prosecution will need to determine the role, if any, played by the account holder.
Where funds allegedly originate from criminal activity and are transferred, withdrawn or moved through multiple accounts, authorities may also examine whether the transactions involve laundering of criminal proceeds.
The existence of multiple layers of transfers can attract particular scrutiny.
A single unusual favor for a known friend can present a different factual picture from repeatedly receiving money from unrelated people and forwarding it elsewhere.
Investigators may therefore review the entire history of the account rather than only the transaction mentioned in the complaint.
If the student received a percentage, fixed payment or other benefit for allowing use of the account, investigators may view that fact as potentially relevant to knowledge and participation.
The reason for any retained amount should be explained truthfully.
How the parties met can become important.
Was the person a long-term friend, classmate, employer, online acquaintance or someone recently met through social media? The nature of the relationship may help explain why the student trusted the request.
Individuals unfamiliar with Turkish banking and criminal procedures may agree to transactions without understanding their significance.
However, being a foreign student does not by itself eliminate potential criminal responsibility. The specific evidence remains decisive.
This can be relevant but is not necessarily conclusive.
Investigators will still examine why money from an unknown third party entered the student’s account and what instructions were given concerning the funds.
Payment descriptions can become part of the evidence. The defense should review the original bank records rather than relying on memory.
Where an account becomes connected with suspected criminal proceeds, restrictions or freezing measures may arise depending on the investigation and legal basis.
The account holder should determine precisely which authority imposed the restriction and which investigation it concerns.
Potentially. The appropriate application depends on the nature and legal basis of the measure.
Evidence concerning legitimate funds should be separated from the disputed transaction where possible.
Foreign students may receive tuition payments, scholarships, rent money or living expenses from relatives abroad.
If an account is frozen, preserve evidence establishing the legitimate source and purpose of these unrelated funds.
The defense should reconstruct suspicious transactions separately from legitimate personal funds.
A clear transaction-by-transaction analysis is generally more useful than a broad statement that “all money in the account was legal.”
The student should determine whether they are being called as a suspect, witness or for another procedural purpose.
The investigation file and allegations should be evaluated before giving a detailed statement where legally possible.
A foreign student who cannot adequately understand Turkish criminal proceedings should clearly state the need for an interpreter.
The student should not sign a statement they do not understand.
Where the student is being questioned as a suspect, obtaining legal assistance before explaining complicated financial transactions can be particularly important.
A chronological reconstruction of the transfers should ideally be prepared before the statement.
If the student does not remember why a particular transfer occurred, guessing can create contradictions with bank records later.
It is better to distinguish clearly between what is remembered and what requires examination of documents.
The telephone may contain messages and other evidence explaining the transaction.
Do not reset, destroy or unnecessarily modify the device after learning of an investigation.
A single message such as “send it now” may appear suspicious when isolated.
The complete conversation may show what the parties were discussing and why the transaction occurred.
Preserve all available identifying information, including telephone numbers, social-media accounts, photographs, bank details, university information and previous communications.
These records may assist authorities in identifying the person who instructed the transactions.
Such a statement can be important evidence, but investigators will still examine whether the student knew or participated in the underlying activity.
The entire factual relationship remains relevant.
If several unrelated victims transferred money into the same student’s account, the investigation can become considerably more serious.
Prepare a transaction matrix identifying each incoming payment and what happened to it afterward.
For every disputed payment, record:
date and time; sender; amount; reason communicated to the student; person who gave the instruction; subsequent transfer or withdrawal; amount retained by the student; and supporting messages or documents.
This can substantially improve the clarity of the defense.
The chronology in the messages should match the financial transactions.
For example, if a friend requested money to be forwarded at 14:00 and the bank records show the corresponding transaction shortly afterward, that sequence may help reconstruct the events.
Restitution can be legally and strategically relevant in some criminal cases, but repayment should not be treated as an automatic admission of guilt or an automatic method of ending an investigation.
The consequences should be evaluated according to the alleged offense and procedural stage.
The defense should focus on separating the student’s conduct from the friend’s alleged conduct.
Evidence concerning lack of knowledge, the reason for allowing account use, communications, absence of financial benefit and the subsequent destination of funds may become important.
A criminal investigation involving a foreign national can sometimes create separate immigration concerns depending on the allegations, measures imposed and later developments.
Criminal defense and immigration consequences should therefore be evaluated separately rather than assuming that one automatically determines the other.
Depending on the investigation and applicable judicial measures, restrictions affecting international travel may become relevant.
Any such measure should be identified from the formal judicial decision and challenged through the appropriate procedure where grounds exist.
The existence of an investigation does not automatically reveal whether a summons, warrant or other measure has been issued.
The status of the criminal file should be determined through appropriate legal channels before making assumptions about returning to Turkey.
The student should avoid deleting messages, fabricating explanations, asking witnesses to lie, creating false loan agreements, altering banking records or contacting alleged victims in a manner that could create additional legal problems.
The defense should rely on genuine contemporaneous evidence.
A foreign student whose Turkish bank account has been used by a friend and later linked to suspected fraud should immediately preserve the phone and messages, obtain complete bank statements, identify every disputed transaction, determine where the money went, document the relationship with the friend, preserve evidence of legitimate funds, determine the student’s procedural status, obtain an interpreter where necessary and prepare a consistent factual chronology before giving a detailed statement.
The criminal issue depends on the circumstances, including what the account holder knew, why the account was used and whether the account became part of criminal activity.
No. Receipt of money is important evidence, but criminal responsibility must be evaluated according to the particular offense and evidence concerning the account holder’s conduct and state of knowledge.
Preserve the transfer records and messages showing why the payment was made. The subsequent transfer is relevant but does not alone resolve the criminal investigation.
Any commission or benefit can become relevant evidence and should be explained accurately.
Digital communications may become relevant evidence in a criminal investigation subject to the applicable procedural framework.
Potentially, depending on the investigation and legal basis for the financial measure.
Evidence showing the legitimate source and purpose of scholarship, family or education funds should be preserved and used when evaluating available remedies concerning the restriction.
No. Messages may be important evidence explaining why the account was used and what the student actually knew.
A foreign suspect who cannot adequately understand Turkish proceedings should clearly request the necessary language assistance and should not sign a statement they do not understand.
Reconstruct the complete money trail. Bank records, messages, the relationship with the friend, the destination of the funds and any benefit received by the student should be examined together to determine the student’s actual role rather than relying solely on the fact that suspicious money entered their account.
A foreign student whose bank account becomes connected with suspected fraud may simultaneously face police questioning, prosecutor investigation, bank-account restrictions, digital-evidence examination, seizure measures and possible immigration consequences. Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign nationals facing criminal investigations in Turkey involving bank transfers, online fraud, account lending and alleged criminal proceeds.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing investigation files, preparing statements and defense evidence, analyzing bank transactions and digital communications, challenging relevant protective measures and coordinating criminal and immigration issues affecting foreign nationals.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey