

Foreign exporters seeking unpaid invoices or commercial debts in Turkey may need mandatory mediation before filing a lawsuit. Learn the procedure, documents, settlement strategy and litigation risks.
A foreign exporter that has supplied goods or services to a Turkish company but has not received payment may consider filing a debt recovery lawsuit in Turkey. Before starting litigation, however, one of the first procedural questions is whether mandatory commercial mediation must be completed before the lawsuit is filed.
Under the current Turkish framework, mediation is a condition for filing certain commercial lawsuits concerning claims for the payment of money and compensation. The Ministry of Justice confirms that commercial lawsuits involving monetary receivables and compensation claims are among the disputes for which mediation may constitute a mandatory pre-litigation requirement.
For foreign exporters, ignoring this requirement can create an immediate procedural problem. Where mandatory mediation applies and the claimant files directly in court without first completing the required mediation process, the lawsuit can be dismissed procedurally without examination of the underlying debt.
The fact that the creditor is incorporated outside Turkey does not by itself exclude mediation. Turkish Mediation Law expressly covers eligible private-law disputes containing a foreign element.
Accordingly, a foreign manufacturer, exporter, supplier, distributor or service provider seeking payment from a Turkish commercial counterparty may need to complete mandatory mediation before bringing a qualifying commercial monetary claim before a Turkish court.
Typical disputes can include unpaid sales invoices, unpaid purchase prices, outstanding contractual balances, contractual compensation claims, unpaid service fees, distributor debts, commercial agency receivables and certain damages arising from commercial agreements.
The exact characterization of the lawsuit remains important. Not every commercial dispute is automatically subject to mandatory mediation merely because two companies are involved.
The core rule under Article 5/A of the Turkish Commercial Code concerns specified commercial disputes involving receivables and compensation claims whose subject is the payment of money. Current Ministry of Justice materials continue to identify these commercial monetary disputes as subject to pre-litigation mediation.
For a foreign exporter seeking payment of unpaid invoices, this requirement should therefore be checked before preparing the lawsuit.
This can be a serious procedural mistake.
Article 18/A of the Mediation Law provides that where the claimant has not applied for mediation even though mediation is a condition for bringing the lawsuit, the court dismisses the case procedurally because the litigation requirement has not been satisfied.
Recent case-law materials published through the Ministry of Justice’s legislation and case-law system also confirm the significance of completing mandatory mediation before commencing a lawsuit subject to this requirement.
These are different problems.
If mandatory mediation was never initiated before filing the lawsuit, the consequence can be procedural dismissal.
If mediation was properly completed but the final non-settlement record was simply not attached to the statement of claim, Article 18/A provides a mechanism under which the claimant is given a definitive one-week period to submit it.
Foreign exporters should therefore preserve the final mediation record carefully.
No. The nature of the requested relief matters.
For example, recent Turkish case-law recognizes that disputes combining connected monetary and non-monetary claims can require a more detailed analysis rather than mechanically treating every aspect of the lawsuit as subject to mandatory mediation.
The claims should therefore be legally classified before the mediation application is prepared.
This is particularly important in international supply contracts.
Article 18/A of the Mediation Law provides an exception where a special law requires arbitration or another alternative dispute-resolution mechanism, or where the parties have an arbitration agreement.
A foreign exporter should therefore review the dispute-resolution clause before automatically beginning Turkish mandatory mediation.
Before taking action, examine the contract for governing law, jurisdiction, arbitration, payment obligations, delivery terms, default interest, notice requirements, limitation-of-liability provisions and dispute-resolution clauses.
A Turkish buyer’s failure to pay does not automatically mean that litigation before a Turkish commercial court is the correct remedy.
International jurisdiction should be analyzed separately from mandatory mediation.
The buyer’s location in Turkey may be important, but contractual jurisdiction clauses, place of performance and the nature of the dispute can affect the analysis.
International sales agreements frequently provide for institutional or ad hoc arbitration.
If a valid arbitration agreement covers the dispute, filing an ordinary Turkish commercial lawsuit may itself be inappropriate, independently of the mediation issue.
Mandatory mediation should not be treated as an informal telephone conversation.
The foreign exporter should prepare its claim as if litigation could begin immediately after the mediation process ends.
Important evidence can include the supply agreement, purchase orders, commercial invoices, delivery documents, customs records, bills of lading, warehouse records, account statements, payment correspondence, acknowledgment of debt, emails, messages and formal notices.
The objective is to establish both the existence and amount of the debt.
A Turkish debtor may accept that invoices exist but dispute whether goods were actually delivered.
The exporter should therefore connect invoices with purchase orders, shipment records and proof of delivery.
For international goods transactions, customs and transport records may provide strong evidence that the goods actually entered Turkey.
However, customs entry alone does not necessarily prove every contractual issue. The complete transaction should be documented.
A debtor may argue that the goods were defective, incomplete, delivered late or inconsistent with specifications.
Review complaints, inspection reports, replacement requests, credit notes and correspondence before mediation begins.
Prepare a calculation showing each invoice, invoice date, due date, original amount, payments received and outstanding balance.
Do not submit a vague claim stating only that the Turkish buyer “owes approximately” a certain amount where exact records are available.
Interest can become commercially significant in long-running international debt disputes.
Determine the contractual interest provisions and the legal basis for any additional default interest claimed. The correct calculation can depend on governing law and contractual terms.
International supply contracts may be denominated in euros, US dollars, pounds sterling or another currency.
The mediation demand should clearly identify the contractual currency and payment obligation.
Where a substantial period has passed since the original invoice became due, exchange-rate movements may materially affect the commercial value of the dispute.
Settlement negotiations should therefore consider both the legal claim and current economic consequences.
Depending on the contract and circumstances, a formal payment demand may be useful or legally significant.
The exporter should review whether the debtor must be placed in default and whether the agreement establishes specific notice requirements.
Keep delivery confirmations for formal notices, emails and other communications.
The date on which payment was demanded can later become important for interest and default arguments.
The foreign exporter can act through appropriate representation where Turkish law permits. In practice, foreign companies frequently coordinate the application through Turkish counsel because the dispute may proceed directly to litigation if no settlement is reached.
Confirm the Turkish company’s exact registered name before filing.
International groups frequently operate through multiple Turkish subsidiaries. An invoice issued to one company should not automatically be pursued against another group company.
Determine whether the debtor remains active, is in liquidation, has undergone a merger or has entered another restructuring process.
This can materially change the recovery strategy.
The practical structure of participation and representation should be arranged according to the specific mediation process and documentation.
Foreign companies should address representation and authority documents early rather than waiting until the meeting date.
Where Turkish counsel will act for the foreign company, prepare the required corporate authorization and power-of-attorney documentation sufficiently early.
Documents executed abroad may require formalities depending on the country and method of execution.
Turkish Mediation Law establishes confidentiality as a basic principle unless otherwise agreed.
This can make mediation particularly useful where the parties wish to discuss settlement without publicly disclosing sensitive commercial information.
No.
Mandatory mediation means that the required mediation process must be completed before the qualifying lawsuit is filed. It does not mean that the creditor is required to accept a settlement.
The parties retain control over whether an agreement is reached.
Commercial settlements may involve installments, partial immediate payment, guarantees, security, revised delivery obligations, return of goods or restructuring of the business relationship.
For foreign exporters, security for deferred payment can be particularly important.
A Turkish buyer may acknowledge the entire debt but request twelve or twenty-four months to pay.
Before accepting, consider bank guarantees, pledges, sureties or other legally effective security mechanisms appropriate to the transaction.
The agreement should clearly state the principal amount, currency, installment dates, interest, default consequences, security and treatment of litigation or enforcement costs.
Ambiguous settlements can create a second dispute.
Turkish law provides important enforceability consequences for mediation settlement documents. In commercial disputes, an agreement document signed by the lawyers and mediator can constitute an enforceable document without requiring a separate enforceability annotation in circumstances specified by law.
Settlement drafting should therefore receive the same attention as a court settlement.
Article 18/A provides that where the parties reach an agreement at the end of mediation, litigation generally cannot subsequently be brought concerning the matters covered by that agreement.
Foreign exporters should therefore ensure that the settlement accurately reflects what is being released.
The mediator prepares the final record establishing that no agreement was reached.
The exporter can then proceed with the appropriate lawsuit, assuming the other jurisdictional and procedural requirements are satisfied.
The final mediation record is an important procedural document.
Where mandatory mediation applies, Article 18/A regulates its submission with the statement of claim and the consequences of failing to provide it.
Turkish Mediation Law provides rules protecting limitation and forfeiture periods during the mediation process.
Nevertheless, exporters facing an approaching limitation deadline should obtain transaction-specific advice immediately rather than assuming that an informal negotiation with the debtor protects their rights.
Months of emails between the exporter and Turkish buyer do not necessarily satisfy a mandatory statutory mediation requirement.
The formal mediation procedure should be completed where legally required.
Winning a judgment and collecting money are separate problems.
Before spending substantial resources on litigation, investigate whether the Turkish debtor has assets capable of satisfying the claim.
A commercial debtor’s bank accounts, customer receivables, vehicles, real estate and other assets can become relevant during enforcement.
Recovery strategy should therefore be planned before the mediation concludes.
If there is a genuine risk that the debtor may dispose of assets, Turkish law may provide provisional remedies depending on the circumstances and legal requirements.
Mandatory mediation should therefore be coordinated with any urgent asset-protection strategy.
If the debtor participates only to gain time, the exporter should avoid allowing informal discussions to continue indefinitely after the statutory process ends.
Once the required mediation has been completed unsuccessfully, the next recovery step should be evaluated promptly.
The legal use of statements and proposals made during mediation is affected by the confidentiality and evidentiary rules governing mediation.
A creditor should not assume that every statement made during confidential settlement negotiations can later be used freely in court.
An acknowledgment made independently of the mediation process may have different evidentiary significance.
Preserve pre-existing emails, letters and account reconciliations separately from mediation communications.
Depending on the debt and available documents, enforcement proceedings may form part of the overall recovery strategy.
The relationship between enforcement, debtor objections, subsequent commercial litigation and mandatory mediation should be analyzed before selecting the procedural route.
A creditor should not wait until after failed mediation to discover that the Turkish company has transferred assets, ceased operations or accumulated multiple enforcement proceedings.
Early financial and corporate investigation can materially affect strategy.
For a foreign exporter pursuing an unpaid Turkish commercial debt in 2026, the practical sequence is generally to identify the debtor correctly, review jurisdiction and arbitration provisions, calculate the debt, collect contractual and delivery evidence, determine whether mandatory mediation applies, complete the mediation requirement where necessary and then proceed promptly with the appropriate litigation or enforcement strategy if no settlement is achieved.
The Ministry of Justice continues to classify mediation as a condition for filing specified commercial monetary claims, making this a central procedural issue rather than an optional preliminary negotiation.
Where the contemplated lawsuit falls within the commercial monetary receivables or compensation claims covered by the mandatory mediation rules, mediation must be completed before filing. The foreign status of the creditor does not by itself remove the requirement.
Where mediation is legally a condition for bringing the lawsuit and no application was made beforehand, the lawsuit can be dismissed procedurally without examination of the underlying debt.
No. The procedural obligation to participate in the required mediation process does not require the creditor to accept an unsatisfactory settlement.
Commercial claims seeking payment of outstanding invoices are typical monetary claims for which the mandatory mediation requirement should be examined.
Potentially. The applicable contractual and statutory basis for interest should be analyzed together with governing law and the payment terms.
Article 18/A expressly addresses cases involving an arbitration agreement or mandatory alternative dispute-resolution mechanism. The dispute-resolution clause should therefore be reviewed before starting mandatory mediation or court proceedings.
Yes. Turkish law provides mechanisms under which qualifying mediation agreements can have enforceable-document status.
As a general rule, matters covered by the mediation settlement cannot subsequently be litigated between the parties.
Yes. Contracts, invoices, shipment documents, delivery evidence, correspondence and debt calculations should be organized before negotiations begin.
Before filing a debt recovery lawsuit in Turkey, determine whether the claim is subject to mandatory commercial mediation and whether the contract contains an arbitration or jurisdiction clause. Completing the wrong procedure—or filing the lawsuit before satisfying a mandatory mediation requirement—can create unnecessary delay and procedural dismissal.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign manufacturers, exporters and international companies with unpaid invoices, commercial receivables, mandatory mediation, debt recovery litigation and enforcement proceedings against Turkish counterparties. Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing international supply agreements, preparing mandatory mediation applications, negotiating secured settlements, filing commercial lawsuits and coordinating enforcement and asset-protection measures in Turkey.
Phone:
+90 312 434 22 22
Mobile:
+90 532 769 22 22
Email:
info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address:
Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148
06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey