

Turkey introduces an additional customs duty after an international purchase contract is signed. Learn whether the buyer, seller or importer bears the extra cost and how Incoterms, contract clauses and change-in-law provisions affect liability.
An international purchase contract may be signed when the expected import cost is commercially acceptable, only for Turkey to introduce or increase an additional customs duty before the goods are imported.
The transaction can suddenly become substantially more expensive.
This creates an immediate question:
Who must bear the new customs cost—the foreign seller, the Turkish buyer or another party?
There is no universal answer.
The result generally depends on several issues considered together:
The starting point is therefore not simply who signed the contract first, but which party contractually assumed import duties and regulatory-change risk.
Obtain the complete agreement and review:
Do not rely only on the purchase order.
The agreed Incoterm can be highly important.
For example, responsibility for import clearance and import duties differs substantially between delivery structures.
The parties’ actual contract must nevertheless be examined because additional clauses may modify the commercial allocation.
Identify which entity will make the Turkish customs declaration.
The party legally responsible to Customs and the party economically responsible under the sales contract are not necessarily identical.
This distinction is essential.
Suppose Turkish Customs legally collects an additional duty from the importer.
That answers:
Who must pay Customs?
It does not necessarily answer:
Who ultimately bears the cost between buyer and seller?
The contract may permit reimbursement or price adjustment between the parties.
A clause stating:
“Total purchase price: USD 2 million, fixed and not subject to adjustment”
may materially affect the analysis.
But the entire contract must be read.
A fixed-price clause does not automatically determine who assumed newly introduced import duties.
Some contracts expressly state that:
An express clause usually provides the strongest starting point.
A well-drafted international contract may address legal changes occurring after the contract date.
The clause may cover:
Check whether the clause provides for price adjustment, renegotiation or termination.
Determine:
Contract date
Purchase order date
Shipment date
Arrival date
Customs declaration date
Date the new measure entered into force.
The applicable customs treatment depends on the governing customs rules rather than merely the commercial contract date.
A common assumption is:
“We purchased the goods before the additional customs duty was introduced, so the new duty cannot apply.”
That is not necessarily correct.
The relevant customs legislation must be examined for its effective date and any transitional rules.
When a new customs measure is introduced, examine whether transitional treatment exists for goods:
Never assume transitional protection exists.
Companies sometimes use “additional customs duty” generically.
The new cost may actually be:
The legal characterization can affect both customs and contractual analysis.
Before reallocating millions in additional costs, confirm that the goods actually fall within the tariff code covered by the new measure.
A classification error may create an apparent additional-duty problem that should not exist.
Additional customs treatment may depend on origin.
Check:
Do not assume the seller’s country is automatically the customs origin.
Prepare a clear comparison:
Original landed cost
versus
landed cost after new customs measure.
Include the effect on:
This establishes whether the change is commercially material.
If the contract clearly allocates import duties to the buyer, the buyer may face significant difficulty transferring the new cost to the seller merely because the duty was introduced after signing.
However, other contractual provisions may still need review.
Where the seller undertakes to deliver goods with import duties paid, the seller may potentially bear increased customs costs.
But examine:
Do not analyze the transaction solely by saying:
“It is CIF.”
or
“It is DDP.”
The contract may contain separate clauses modifying:
Read the documents together.
Under a DDP-type commercial structure, import-related obligations are generally allocated much more heavily to the seller than under many other delivery terms.
However, the legal ability of the foreign seller to act as importer and comply with Turkish import requirements must also be considered.
Under many commonly used structures, import clearance and import duties remain on the buyer/importer side.
The precise agreed Incoterm version and contractual modifications should be checked.
A master supply agreement may say:
Buyer bears customs duties.
A later purchase order may say:
Price includes all taxes and duties.
Determine which document prevails under the contract hierarchy.
The contract may be governed by:
The governing law can materially affect contractual remedies.
The contract may require:
This becomes important if one party refuses to absorb the new duty.
International sales transactions may fall within the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods depending on the parties, governing-law structure and contractual exclusions.
The CISG does not automatically answer every customs-cost allocation issue.
The contractual risk allocation remains highly important.
Usually, the mere fact that performance became more expensive should not automatically be described as force majeure.
Review the contractual definition.
Some contracts expressly include:
Others expressly exclude increased costs.
A dramatic customs increase may make performance economically much more burdensome without making delivery impossible.
In such cases, hardship or contract-adaptation concepts may be more relevant than classic force majeure.
Where Turkish law governs, Article 138 of the Turkish Code of Obligations may become relevant in extraordinary circumstances where unforeseen developments fundamentally disturb the contractual equilibrium and the statutory conditions are satisfied.
A new customs duty does not automatically satisfy Article 138.
The economic impact and contractual risk allocation must be examined carefully.
Ask:
Was the customs change genuinely unexpected when the contract was signed?
If the measure had already been:
an unforeseeability argument may be weaker.
A party may say:
“We could never have predicted this duty.”
But if the contract expressly allocated all import-duty changes to that party, the contractual wording may remain highly significant.
Suppose additional duty increases landed cost by 30%.
That may create a serious commercial problem.
But it does not automatically give either party a unilateral right to terminate.
Check:
A buyer may be tempted to abandon the goods at port.
That can create additional liabilities involving:
Analyze the entire exposure before refusing delivery.
A commercial dispute between buyer and seller does not stop:
The parties should simultaneously manage the customs situation.
In some disputes, the importer may decide that releasing the goods is commercially necessary while reserving contractual claims against the seller.
The wording and legal consequences of any reservation should be considered carefully.
Keep:
The timeline may determine the contractual outcome.
Emails may show which party understood it would bear:
Such evidence can become important if contractual language is ambiguous.
Some supply contracts provide automatic adjustment where:
Determine whether the formula covers the new customs measure.
Where both parties want the commercial relationship to continue, possible solutions include:
Document any amendment formally.
A customs-cost dispute should never be addressed through:
That can transform a contractual problem into a customs enforcement problem.
If the duty applies based on origin, companies may consider future sourcing alternatives.
However, genuine origin rules must be respected.
Routing the same goods through another country does not automatically change their origin.
Do not attempt to avoid a new customs measure through:
Commercial cost reduction must remain customs-compliant.
After experiencing a sudden customs increase, future contracts should expressly address:
Who bears new customs duties introduced after signing?
This can prevent major disputes.
A strong clause can address:
This is particularly important for long-term supply agreements.
For long-term relationships, the contract might specify that customs increases above a defined threshold are shared.
This can reduce uncertainty for both parties.
Before accepting a delivered-price obligation, foreign sellers should understand:
Otherwise, an apparently profitable sale may become loss-making.
A buyer accepting responsibility for import duties should model possible changes before signing long-term fixed-price purchase agreements.
Customs risk is part of landed-cost risk.
The recommended sequence is:
Obtain the contract
→ identify the delivery term
→ determine the importer
→ review customs-duty allocation
→ review change-in-law and hardship clauses
→ identify the new measure and effective date
→ check transitional rules
→ verify tariff classification and origin
→ calculate the additional cost
→ determine contractual responsibility
→ consider renegotiation or adaptation
→ protect customs and contractual rights.
There is no universal answer. The contract, delivery term, importer structure and allocation of customs and change-in-law risk must be examined.
Not automatically. The customs measure’s effective date and any transitional provisions determine whether the new duty applies.
Not necessarily. Customs may collect the duty from the legally responsible importer, while the contract may permit that party to recover the cost from the seller.
Generally, DDP allocates significantly more import-clearance and import-duty responsibility to the seller than many other Incoterms. The complete contract and local import requirements should still be reviewed.
That wording can strongly support allocating the additional customs cost to the buyer, although other contractual provisions, including change-in-law clauses, should still be examined.
Not automatically. Increased cost alone is generally different from impossibility of performance. The contract’s definition and governing law must be reviewed.
Potentially, depending on the governing law, contractual hardship provisions, foreseeability, magnitude of the change and allocation of risk. Under Turkish law, Article 138 may become relevant where its strict conditions are satisfied.
Potentially only where supported by the contract or applicable law. Refusing delivery without legal analysis can create contractual damages, storage and demurrage exposure.
Yes. The parties may commercially agree on cost sharing, price adjustment or another solution, which should be documented in a written amendment.
Determine whether the contract expressly allocated the risk of customs duties introduced or increased after signing. The answer may be more important than which party originally expected the duty to remain unchanged.
Unexpected customs increases can create disputes concerning:
Additional customs duties
International purchase contracts
Incoterms
Change-in-law clauses
Fixed-price contracts
Hardship
Contract adaptation
Import cost allocation
Anti-dumping and safeguard measures
and international commercial disputes.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign sellers, Turkish importers, multinational companies and international trading groups facing contractual disputes arising from new or increased customs duties in Turkey.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in reviewing international purchase contracts, determining customs-cost allocation, interpreting Incoterms and change-in-law clauses, analyzing hardship and adaptation remedies, negotiating contractual adjustments and handling related customs and commercial disputes.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey