

Received an exporter questionnaire in a Turkish anti-dumping investigation? Learn how foreign manufacturers and exporters should respond, prepare sales and cost data, protect confidential information, avoid verification problems and reduce anti-dumping duty exposure in Turkey.
Receiving an Exporter/Producer Questionnaire from the Turkish Ministry of Trade is one of the most important stages of an anti-dumping investigation for a foreign manufacturer or exporter selling goods into Turkey. The questionnaire should never be treated as an ordinary commercial survey or a routine request for information. The answers, supporting accounting records, transaction-level sales data, production costs, corporate structure and explanations provided by the exporter can directly affect the dumping calculation and ultimately the anti-dumping measure applicable to exports into Turkey. Current Turkish investigations continue to use detailed exporter/producer questionnaires alongside trader questionnaires, importer questionnaires and other interested-party submissions. For example, Ministry of Trade investigation files published in 2026 for solar glass, dental CNC machines, aluminum frames for photovoltaic panels and other products expressly include exporter/producer questionnaires as part of the investigation record. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)
A foreign exporter should therefore begin preparing its defense immediately after receiving the questionnaire. Waiting until the final days before the response deadline can create serious problems because anti-dumping questionnaires may require data from accounting, sales, production, purchasing, finance, export, logistics and related-company systems simultaneously.
An anti-dumping investigation examines whether goods originating in a foreign country are exported to Turkey at dumped prices and whether those imports cause or threaten material injury to the domestic industry under the applicable legal framework.
In simplified terms, dumping concerns exports to Turkey at prices below the relevant normal value determined under the applicable rules.
The Ministry’s materials describe dumping as export pricing below normal value and identify domestic-market prices, third-country export prices and cost information as potentially relevant to the analysis. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)
However, an anti-dumping investigation is considerably more complicated than simply comparing two invoice prices.
Adjustments may be necessary before prices can be compared fairly.
The Ministry needs company-specific information to investigate the exporter or producer.
The questionnaire can be used to establish matters including the company’s corporate structure, products, domestic sales, exports to Turkey, production costs, related-party transactions and other information relevant to the dumping analysis.
The Ministry’s 2026 investigation files demonstrate that exporter/producer questionnaires remain a central procedural instrument in Turkish trade-remedy investigations. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)
A company may initially think:
“Turkey represents only 3% of our exports. Why should we spend substantial resources answering this?”
That decision can have significant long-term consequences.
Failure to cooperate can deprive the exporter of the opportunity to establish its position using its own verified company information and can materially weaken its ability to challenge unfavorable findings.
Before preparing thousands of lines of financial information, determine exactly which goods are under investigation.
The investigation notice should be examined carefully.
Product descriptions and tariff classifications must be compared with the company’s actual products.
A tariff classification can help identify the investigation’s scope, but the legal product description is critically important.
A company may export multiple models under the same general tariff heading even though not every model necessarily falls within the investigated product definition.
Create a table such as:
Internal Product Code | Commercial Description | Technical Specification | HS/GTIP | Exported to Turkey? | Domestic Sales? | Investigation Scope?
This becomes extremely useful throughout the investigation.
The company’s exact role in the supply chain matters.
A manufacturer may produce and directly export the investigated goods.
Another company may manufacture but sell through a related trading company.
A trader may purchase goods from several producers and export them to Turkey.
These structures should be disclosed and explained accurately.
Foreign exporters should identify all related companies involved in:
production;
domestic sales;
exports;
distribution;
financing;
raw-material purchases;
intellectual property;
and Turkish sales.
Suppose:
Factory A manufactures the goods.
Trading Company B purchases them from Factory A.
Company C handles international invoicing.
Turkish Company D imports them.
If these entities are related, the Ministry may need information concerning more than one company.
Attempting to simplify the response by omitting a related entity can create serious credibility and verification problems later.
The corporate structure should be disclosed consistently with accounting and corporate records.
A questionnaire response usually cannot be prepared by one employee.
The company may need:
legal counsel;
finance personnel;
cost accountants;
sales staff;
IT personnel;
production management;
export department;
and senior management.
One person should control document collection and communications.
Without centralized coordination, different departments may provide inconsistent data.
Relevant records should not be deleted during the investigation.
This includes emails, accounting exports, sales databases, cost calculations and production records.
The questionnaire normally identifies the period for which information must be reported.
All datasets should be prepared consistently for that period.
A common problem occurs when the investigation period does not correspond exactly with the company’s fiscal year.
The company must carefully reconcile the requested period with its accounting system.
The Ministry may require detailed information concerning sales of the like product in the exporter’s domestic market.
This can involve transaction-level information.
Depending on the questionnaire, relevant fields may include:
invoice date;
invoice number;
customer;
customer relationship;
product code;
quantity;
gross price;
discounts;
rebates;
freight;
insurance;
commissions;
credit terms;
and net price.
Every relevant transaction to Turkey during the requested period should be identified.
The company’s export database should be reconciled with invoices and accounting records.
The company should compare:
sales database → commercial invoice → export declaration → shipping document → payment → accounting entry.
Inconsistencies should be investigated before submission.
ERP systems frequently contain fields that do not mean what outsiders assume they mean.
For example, “invoice date” may actually be posting date.
“Customer” may represent the distributor rather than final buyer.
“Freight” may be allocated automatically.
Every important field should be understood.
For each field explain:
what it means;
where it comes from;
how it is calculated;
and which accounting or ERP module produces it.
This can significantly improve the reliability of the response.
Anti-dumping calculations often require comparison between products with similar physical characteristics.
The questionnaire may establish product characteristics or product-control criteria.
The exporter should classify products carefully.
Suppose premium industrial machinery is incorrectly compared with a basic model.
The resulting price comparison may become commercially meaningless.
Technical personnel should therefore participate in product classification.
Manufacturers may be required to provide detailed production-cost information.
This can include:
raw materials;
direct labor;
energy;
factory overhead;
depreciation;
administrative expenses;
selling expenses;
and other relevant cost components.
A cost spreadsheet prepared solely for the anti-dumping response without connection to audited or ordinary accounting records can create serious verification difficulties.
The Ministry should be able to understand how the submitted figures connect to the company’s normal accounting system.
A strong cost response should ideally allow the reviewer to move from:
audited financial statements → trial balance → cost accounts → production records → product-specific costs.
If raw materials represent 70% of production cost, the Ministry may examine them closely.
Large fluctuations or related-party purchases should be explainable.
If important inputs are purchased from affiliated companies, the exporter should prepare evidence explaining the pricing structure.
Energy-intensive industries should reconcile electricity, natural gas and other energy costs with invoices and production records.
Many companies produce multiple products in the same factory.
Shared expenses therefore need allocation.
Possible allocation keys may include:
production volume;
machine hours;
labor hours;
turnover;
material consumption;
or another commercially reasonable basis.
The methodology should correspond with the company’s actual accounting practices wherever possible.
An artificial methodology created after the investigation begins can attract significant scrutiny.
Consistency with ordinary accounting practices is important.
SG&A expenses can materially affect calculations.
The company should determine how these expenses are recorded and allocated.
Interest and financing items may also require careful classification depending on the questionnaire and applicable methodology.
Where relevant under the applicable anti-dumping methodology, the authority may examine whether domestic sales occurred at prices below cost.
This makes cost reporting especially important.
The exporter should identify all discounts affecting domestic and Turkish export prices.
Examples include:
volume discounts;
early-payment discounts;
annual rebates;
promotional discounts;
customer-specific rebates;
and credit notes.
The company should be able to connect claimed adjustments with invoices, contracts or accounting records.
Transportation costs can affect price comparability.
The exporter should determine whether prices are:
EXW;
FOB;
CIF;
CFR;
DDP;
or another Incoterm.
Transportation from the factory to the export port may need to be identified separately.
Ocean, road, rail or air freight should be supported by logistics records.
Where separately identifiable, insurance costs should be documented.
Export-related handling and terminal charges may also require reporting depending on the questionnaire.
Sales commissions paid to agents or related companies should be identified accurately.
Different payment periods can affect price comparability.
The company should preserve payment terms and actual payment information.
Foreign exporters selling in multiple currencies should carefully review the applicable currency and exchange-rate methodology used in the questionnaire response.
Do not assume that a EUR 100 domestic sale and EUR 90 export sale automatically establish a 10% dumping margin.
Differences in commercial circumstances may require adjustments under the applicable methodology.
A domestic sale to a retailer may not be commercially equivalent to an export sale to a national distributor purchasing container quantities.
Large Turkish customers may receive lower unit prices because they purchase substantially greater quantities.
Document the commercial policy.
Different grades, dimensions, specifications and performance characteristics can explain price differences.
If the exporter sells to a related company in Turkey, the sales structure requires particular attention.
The authority may examine the relationship and subsequent resale structure.
The Turkish affiliate may need to cooperate closely with the foreign exporter.
Do not wait until late in the investigation to involve it.
Anti-dumping questionnaires can require commercially sensitive information.
This may include:
customer names;
individual sales prices;
production costs;
profit margins;
supplier information;
and internal pricing policies.
Companies should follow the applicable confidentiality procedures carefully.
Trade-remedy proceedings generally require appropriate handling of confidential submissions and non-confidential summaries.
Ministry materials expressly contemplate both confidential submissions and non-confidential summaries in the investigation process. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)
Confidentiality should be properly claimed and supported where required.
The non-confidential version should still provide meaningful information without revealing protected business secrets.
Before submitting the non-confidential version, perform a separate confidentiality review.
Spreadsheet hidden columns, formulas, comments and metadata should also be checked.
Anti-dumping investigations frequently involve extensive spreadsheets.
Do not convert everything into PDF if the questionnaire requires editable Excel information.
At the same time, check formulas carefully.
A single incorrect spreadsheet formula can affect thousands of transactions.
Perform independent checks before submission.
For every dataset calculate totals for:
quantity;
sales value;
discounts;
freight;
and other material fields.
Then reconcile those totals against accounting records.
If questionnaire sales total EUR 22.8 million but financial statements show EUR 24 million, explain the EUR 1.2 million difference.
For example:
EUR 700,000 unrelated products;
EUR 300,000 domestic services;
EUR 200,000 outside investigation period.
Unexplained differences create problems.
Corporate structure, accounting records, sales databases and cost data must all fit together.
Contradictions are dangerous.
Corporate response:
“We have no related Turkish customers.”
Accounting records:
“Receivable from Turkish Subsidiary A.”
Such discrepancies can seriously damage credibility.
Foreign exporters should assume that important information may be tested against underlying company records.
Therefore, never submit a number that cannot be traced back to its source.
For every important figure preserve:
source document;
ERP report;
accounting account;
calculation;
and explanation.
Select sample domestic and Turkish sales and trace them from beginning to end.
For example:
purchase order → invoice → delivery → payment → accounting record.
If your own team cannot trace the transaction, investigators may have the same difficulty.
Select several products and trace their costs back through material consumption, labor, overhead and accounting records.
The foreign company’s accounting documents may be in Chinese, Korean, German, Italian or another language.
Determine which documents may require translation and prepare them early.
Create a terminology table for important accounts and cost categories.
The exporter should immediately identify the response deadline stated in the investigation documents or questionnaire and calculate the internal timetable backward from that date.
Do not assume that an extension will automatically be available.
If the questionnaire cannot reasonably be completed within the applicable period, any extension request should be considered as early as possible and supported with concrete reasons.
Do not wait until the final hours.
If the official deadline is Day 30, management should aim to complete the substantive response several days earlier.
That allows time for reconciliation and confidentiality review.
Non-cooperation can significantly weaken the company’s position.
The exporter may lose the practical benefit of having the authority rely on complete company-specific information.
Submitting only easy sections while ignoring difficult cost or sales questions may not solve the problem.
The response should be assessed as a complete evidentiary package.
If information does not exist, explain why.
Do not manufacture data.
If the ERP contains an error, preserve the original information and explain any correction transparently.
This can turn an ordinary trade-remedy problem into a serious credibility issue.
Related-party structures can often be identified through corporate databases, financial statements and import records.
Disclosure and explanation are usually safer than concealment.
Yes, foreign exporters can participate in the investigation and present arguments concerning dumping calculations, product scope, methodology, injury, causation and other relevant issues depending on the procedural stage.
A company may argue that particular products should not fall within the investigation because of significant differences in technical or commercial characteristics.
Such arguments should be supported by technical evidence.
Anti-dumping measures do not depend solely on identifying dumping.
The investigation also examines injury to the domestic industry and the causal relationship between dumped imports and that injury.
Depending on the facts, relevant factors may include:
declining domestic demand;
raw-material increases;
energy costs;
currency movements;
domestic capacity problems;
imports from other countries;
technological change;
or the domestic industry’s own commercial decisions.
A comprehensive defense may address both dumping and injury.
Before a final determination, exporters should carefully examine the authority’s disclosed findings and identify factual or methodological errors within the applicable procedural framework.
Common errors can include:
incorrect currency;
wrong product matching;
duplicate transactions;
incorrect quantities;
misallocated freight;
or misunderstood accounting fields.
The exporter should not wait for the authority to perform every calculation.
Where possible, the company should model potential dumping outcomes using its submitted data.
Calculate how the result changes if:
certain domestic sales are excluded;
different product matching is used;
cost adjustments are made;
or particular allowances are rejected.
This helps management understand commercial exposure.
An anti-dumping measure can fundamentally alter the viability of the Turkish market.
The company should model possible duty scenarios.
For example:
5% duty → manageable
20% duty → substantial margin pressure
40% duty → distribution model may require restructuring
After an anti-dumping measure is imposed, routing goods through another country without genuine transformation can create separate circumvention risks.
Foreign exporters should communicate with their Turkish importers because the measure ultimately affects import costs and market access.
However, all participants should maintain consistent factual positions.
Anti-dumping and related trade-remedy investigations remain active in Turkey. Ministry records show that 2026 proceedings continue to involve detailed questionnaires for exporters/producers, traders, importers and domestic producers. Recent files include investigations concerning solar glass from China, Malaysia and Vietnam and completed proceedings involving Chinese and Korean flat-steel products, Chinese aluminum frames for photovoltaic panels and Chinese dental CNC machines. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)
For foreign manufacturers exporting significant volumes into Turkey, trade-remedy compliance should therefore form part of market-access planning rather than being treated only as emergency litigation after an investigation begins.
Immediately secure the questionnaire and opening notice, identify the response deadline, determine the investigation period, identify the product scope, notify senior management and establish an internal investigation-response team.
Do not begin filling spreadsheets before understanding the scope.
Map all relevant products and related companies, identify domestic and Turkish sales databases, locate cost-accounting records, determine whether Turkish importers are related and begin building reconciliations.
The legal and accounting teams should also identify potential weaknesses early.
Prepare preliminary domestic and export sales datasets, construct product-control mapping, reconcile sales with financial accounts, test production-cost data, identify necessary adjustments and establish confidential/non-confidential document procedures.
Before submitting anything, ask whether the data reveals:
very low Turkish prices;
domestic sales below cost;
large related-party transactions;
unusual rebates;
unexplained credit notes;
large year-end adjustments;
inconsistent product coding;
or unreconciled accounting differences.
These issues should be understood before the authority identifies them.
A foreign exporter receiving an anti-dumping questionnaire from Turkish authorities should treat the response as a major legal, accounting and commercial project. The company should first analyze the investigation notice, product scope, investigation period and procedural deadline. It should then map the corporate structure and identify every producer, exporter, trader and related Turkish importer involved in the investigated goods. Domestic sales, Turkish export sales and production-cost data should be extracted from ordinary company systems and reconciled with accounting records. Product characteristics should be mapped accurately to avoid distorted comparisons. Discounts, freight, commissions, credit costs and other potential adjustments should be supported by contemporaneous documents. Confidential information should be separated properly from the non-confidential version. Every material number should have a verification trail back to source records. The company should simultaneously analyze injury and causation arguments rather than concentrating solely on price calculations. Before submission, independent reconciliation and spreadsheet checks should be completed. The practical strategy is therefore: analyze the opening notice → identify the product scope → confirm the deadline and investigation period → establish the response team → map related companies → preserve documents → extract domestic sales → extract Turkish export sales → prepare cost data → reconcile everything with accounting records → classify products accurately → document adjustments → prepare confidentiality treatment → perform internal verification → calculate potential dumping scenarios → prepare injury and causation arguments → submit a complete and consistent response → prepare for verification → review final disclosure findings → challenge factual or methodological errors within the applicable procedures.
Where the company wants its own information and arguments properly considered in the investigation, active and timely cooperation is extremely important. Failure to provide requested information can materially weaken the exporter’s position.
Depending on the investigation, questionnaires can require information concerning corporate structure, investigated products, domestic sales, exports to Turkey, production costs, related companies and numerous price-comparison adjustments. Turkish Ministry investigation files routinely publish dedicated exporter/producer questionnaires. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)
Detailed commercial information may be required, but applicable confidentiality procedures should be used. Companies should carefully prepare confidential submissions and meaningful non-confidential versions or summaries where required.
The difference should be reconciled and explained before submission. Unexplained discrepancies between sales databases, questionnaire figures and financial records can create serious verification problems.
Any possibility of an extension depends on the applicable investigation and procedural requirements. If additional time is genuinely required, the issue should be raised early rather than assuming an extension will automatically be granted.
Yes. Production-cost information can be highly relevant to dumping calculations, particularly where the authority needs to examine normal value and the reliability of domestic sales information.
Product-scope issues can potentially be raised during the investigation. Technical distinctions should be supported by detailed product specifications, production information and commercial evidence.
Yes. Sales involving related producers, exporters, traders or Turkish importers can require additional analysis. The entire corporate and sales structure should therefore be disclosed accurately.
Yes. Every significant figure should ideally be traceable to underlying accounting, sales and production records. Building the verification file while preparing the questionnaire is considerably safer than reconstructing it later.
The outcome depends on the investigation, applicable legal framework and degree of cooperation. This is one reason a foreign producer/exporter should carefully evaluate the strategic importance of submitting complete company-specific information rather than remaining passive.
An anti-dumping questionnaire can require foreign exporters to disclose and reconcile extensive sales, pricing, production-cost, accounting, related-party and corporate information. Errors or incomplete responses can materially affect the company’s position and its future access to the Turkish market.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office provides legal assistance to foreign manufacturers, exporters, multinational companies and international corporate groups involved in anti-dumping and trade-remedy investigations in Turkey.
Fırat Fesih Kaya can assist with investigation-opening analysis, product-scope assessment, exporter questionnaire preparation, sales and cost-data review, confidential submissions, related-company structures, dumping and injury arguments, verification preparation, final disclosure responses and the applicable administrative and judicial processes.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey