

Are automatic renewal clauses in Turkish sports contracts legally enforceable? A 2026 guide for foreign footballers and athletes covering appearance-based extensions, club options, notice requirements, salary terms, TFF and FIFA disputes.
Automatic contract renewal clauses can create major problems for foreign professional athletes competing in Turkey.
A foreign footballer may believe that his contract expires on 30 June and begin negotiating with another club. The Turkish club may then claim that the agreement has automatically renewed for another season because a contractual condition was satisfied.
For example:
Initial Contract: 1 July 2025 – 30 June 2027
Automatic Renewal: One additional season if the player makes at least 25 league appearances during the 2026–2027 season.
The player makes 26 appearances.
The club then states:
“Your contract automatically continues until 30 June 2028.”
The player may respond:
“I never signed a new contract for another season.”
This creates an important legal question:
Can an automatic renewal provision legally bind a foreign athlete to a Turkish sports club without obtaining new consent when the original contractual period expires?
Potentially yes, but the existence of an automatic-renewal clause does not automatically make every extension enforceable.
The precise wording, objective trigger, duration, salary for the renewed period, clarity of the original agreement, applicable sports regulations and—in international football disputes—relevant FIFA and CAS principles can all become important.
An automatic renewal clause provides that the contractual relationship continues for an additional period when a predetermined condition occurs.
Unlike a traditional renewal, the parties do not necessarily sign a new agreement at the end of the initial contractual term.
The extension mechanism has already been incorporated into the original contract.
For example:
“If the player participates in at least 25 official league matches during the 2026–2027 season, the contract shall automatically extend until 30 June 2028.”
If the contractual condition is satisfied, the club may argue that the additional season became part of the employment relationship automatically.
This distinction is extremely important.
Consider these two provisions.
“The contract automatically extends for one season if the player makes 25 league appearances.”
“The club may extend the contract for one additional season at its discretion.”
The first depends on an agreed triggering event.
The second depends on a later decision by the club.
These mechanisms should not automatically receive identical legal treatment.
A third possibility is:
“The parties may extend the contract for one additional season by mutual agreement.”
This generally requires another agreement.
Neither party can simply impose the extension alone unless the contractual structure provides otherwise.
Turkish sports clubs may use automatic renewal provisions to protect continuity and avoid losing valuable athletes as free agents.
Athletes may also accept them in exchange for:
Higher Salary
Signing Bonus
Extension Bonus
Guaranteed Playing Opportunities
Release Clause
Automatic Salary Increase.
A properly structured renewal mechanism can therefore benefit both sides.
Problems arise when the trigger or financial consequences are unclear.
One of the most common mechanisms is based on match appearances.
For example:
20 League Appearances = One-Year Extension.
If the athlete reaches 20 qualifying appearances, the club may argue that the additional contractual season automatically becomes effective.
The first issue is whether the clause itself is enforceable.
The second is whether the player actually satisfied the trigger.
Suppose the player records:
17 Starting XI Appearances
plus
3 Substitute Appearances.
The club claims:
20 Appearances = Automatic Extension.
The player argues:
“The clause means 20 starts.”
The contract should be examined carefully.
An “appearance” and a “starting appearance” are not necessarily the same thing.
Suppose the player enters in the 89th minute.
Does that count?
If the contract merely refers to participation in an official match, it may create a different interpretation from a clause requiring:
Minimum 45 Minutes Played.
The precise contractual language matters.
Some agreements use playing time instead.
For example:
1,800 League Minutes = Automatic One-Year Extension.
This can reduce disputes concerning substitute appearances.
But the parties should still identify:
Which Competition Counts?
Is Added Time Included?
Which Official Record Controls?
A striker’s contract may provide:
15 League Goals = Automatic Extension.
If the player scores 15 qualifying goals, the club may claim that the next season automatically becomes contractual.
Official competition records can become decisive.
A goalkeeper may have:
15 Clean Sheets = One-Year Automatic Extension.
Again, the contract should define what qualifies.
Does a goalkeeper need to play the full match?
What if he leaves injured after 70 minutes without conceding?
What if the substitute goalkeeper later concedes?
Ambiguous sporting triggers can create contractual disputes.
This is another common structure.
For example:
“If the club is promoted to the top division, this contract shall automatically continue for the following season.”
Unlike discretionary club options, promotion is an objectively identifiable event.
But the renewed financial terms should still be clear.
A foreign footballer’s contract could provide:
Second-Division Salary: EUR 400,000
Automatic Renewal Following Promotion: EUR 700,000.
This gives both parties advance certainty.
The player knows that promotion extends the relationship but also increases his compensation.
A more problematic provision would say:
“If the club is promoted, the contract automatically extends for another year. Salary will be negotiated later.”
What happens if the club offers:
EUR 300,000
while the player demands:
EUR 800,000?
The contractual relationship is allegedly extended, but one of its most important economic terms remains unresolved.
That uncertainty can materially complicate enforceability.
A contract might state:
“Winning the league automatically extends the agreement by one season.”
The trigger is objectively measurable.
The athlete should nevertheless determine:
Renewed Salary
Renewal Bonus
Contract End Date
Release Rights
Bonus Structure.
An extension should not be analyzed only through duration.
Suppose the clause provides:
“Qualification for European competition automatically renews the player’s contract.”
What does qualification mean?
It could refer to:
Finishing in a Particular League Position
Entering UEFA Qualification Rounds
Reaching the League Phase.
Ambiguous triggers can create disputes.
A struggling club may negotiate:
“If the club remains in the top division, the contract automatically continues for another season.”
If the club avoids relegation, the extension may be triggered.
Again, the player should know the salary and other financial conditions of the additional season from the beginning.
The reverse structure is also possible.
For example:
Contract automatically renews unless the club is relegated.
The player should determine exactly when relegation becomes legally final and whether any notice is required.
Some agreements may attempt to link renewal to the player’s age or other objective criteria.
Any such provision should be reviewed against the applicable sporting and contractual framework.
The fact that a condition is objectively measurable does not automatically resolve every enforceability issue.
These provisions deserve particular caution.
For example:
“If the player suffers an injury causing more than six months of absence, the club may extend the agreement for an equivalent period.”
This is not necessarily a traditional automatic renewal clause.
It may instead operate as an injury-extension mechanism.
Medical evidence, proportionality and applicable sports regulations can become particularly important.
A contract may provide:
“If the player participates in 50% of the club’s official league matches, the agreement automatically extends.”
Now the calculation depends on both:
Player Appearances
and
Total Eligible Matches.
Postponed, cancelled or disciplinary-result matches may complicate the calculation.
Another clause could require:
Starting at least 60% of league matches.
The player should independently calculate the percentage.
Do not rely entirely on the club’s internal calculation where free-agent status depends on the result.
A foreign athlete should be able to understand when signing the contract:
What Triggers Renewal?
How Long Is the Extension?
What Salary Applies?
Which Competition Counts?
Whether Notice Is Required?
Whether Renewal Can Occur More Than Once?
Uncertainty surrounding these essential elements increases dispute risk.
This is one of the most important issues.
Suppose:
2026–2027 Salary: EUR 600,000
and the contract automatically renews for 2027–2028.
What salary applies?
If the contract expressly states:
2027–2028 Renewal Salary: EUR 800,000,
the position is clearer.
If it says nothing, a significant dispute may arise.
Foreign players should consider negotiating an increase during any automatic renewal period.
For example:
Initial Salary: EUR 600,000
Renewal Salary: EUR 800,000
plus
Renewal Bonus: EUR 100,000.
This creates a defined economic package for the additional contractual commitment.
Some contracts provide a specific payment once the renewal condition is satisfied.
Example:
25 Appearances → Automatic One-Year Extension + EUR 150,000 Renewal Bonus.
If the player makes the 25th appearance, both the contractual extension and bonus consequences may need to be analyzed.
Suppose the club says:
“You are under contract for another year.”
but refuses to pay the agreed:
EUR 150,000 Renewal Bonus.
The player should treat the unpaid bonus as a separate monetary claim.
A club cannot necessarily rely on the extension while disregarding the corresponding financial obligations.
A clause may state:
Current Salary: EUR 1 Million
Automatic Renewal Salary: EUR 700,000.
The athlete should understand this before signing.
An automatic renewal can therefore involve not only an additional year but also a major economic change.
In international football jurisprudence, extension mechanisms are not necessarily assessed solely by asking whether the player signed the document.
Relevant considerations can include contractual clarity, proportionality, predetermined remuneration, duration and whether the mechanism places one party excessively under the control of the other.
This becomes especially important with unilateral club-controlled options.
Recent CAS jurisprudence provides useful guidance for international football disputes.
CAS has emphasized that unilateral club extension options are not automatically invalid in every case. Their validity should instead be assessed individually.
Relevant factors can include:
Maximum Potential Contract Duration
Timing of Exercise
Predetermined Salary
Clarity of the Clause
Proportionality Between Initial and Extension Period
Balance Between the Parties
Number of Extension Options.
These factors are particularly useful when distinguishing a reasonable extension mechanism from an excessively one-sided arrangement.
Consider:
“Club may extend for two years whenever it chooses.”
“Contract automatically extends one year if player makes 25 league appearances.”
Clause B depends on an objective condition previously agreed by both parties.
That does not guarantee enforceability, but it can present a materially different legal structure from unlimited club discretion.
This is an important factor.
If the contract clearly states:
25 Appearances = One-Year Extension
and the player knowingly signs it, both parties can monitor the trigger throughout the season.
The arrangement provides greater predictability than an undefined option exercisable solely at the club’s discretion.
Foreign players should be particularly cautious where the same condition can repeatedly renew the contract.
For example:
25 Appearances Each Season = Automatic Additional Season.
Could this theoretically continue for:
two years?
three years?
five years?
The maximum potential duration should be identifiable.
A clause should not create uncertainty about whether the player could remain tied to the club indefinitely.
Contract duration is particularly important in professional football because FIFA and national association regulations regulate the permissible duration of player contracts.
The entire potential contractual period should therefore be reviewed.
Professional football contracts are subject to regulatory limitations concerning duration.
An automatic extension mechanism cannot be evaluated without considering whether the total potential contractual term complies with the applicable football regulations.
For foreign footballers, both the TFF framework and, where applicable, FIFA rules may become relevant.
The athlete should be able to determine:
Original Expiry Date
and
Possible Extended Expiry Date.
For example:
Original Expiry: 30 June 2027
Automatic Extension: Until 30 June 2028.
Vague language such as:
“Contract continues for another season where appropriate”
creates unnecessary uncertainty.
It depends on the contract.
A genuine automatic clause may provide that no additional club decision is required.
Example:
“Upon the player’s 25th league appearance, this agreement shall automatically extend until 30 June 2028 without further notice.”
In that structure, the club may argue that the triggering event itself causes the extension.
Another clause may state:
“The agreement automatically extends if the player makes 25 appearances, provided the club notifies the player by 31 March.”
Now both conditions may matter.
The appearance threshold alone may not be enough.
Suppose:
25 Appearances Achieved: 10 March
Notification Deadline: 31 March
Club Sends Notice: 15 April.
The player may argue that the contractual renewal procedure was not completed in time.
Every procedural condition should be checked.
Another club may send notice in February saying:
“If you reach 25 appearances, your contract will automatically extend.”
Whether that communication has independent legal effect depends on the original clause.
The contract—not the club’s later interpretation—should be the starting point.
Suppose the player makes his 25th appearance.
Nobody mentions renewal.
The player begins negotiating elsewhere.
Two months later, the club says:
“You have been under contract for next season since your 25th appearance.”
The player should immediately examine whether the clause truly operated without further notice.
This is where disputes become commercially serious.
The player believes:
Contract Expires 30 June.
New club believes:
Player Is Free.
Old club claims:
Automatic Renewal Until Following June.
The difference can determine whether the acquiring club must pay a transfer fee.
Suppose a new club is ready to sign the player without compensation.
The Turkish club claims the automatic extension was triggered and demands:
EUR 4 Million.
The player and acquiring club should determine contractual status before completing the new employment agreement.
A player should not simply assume:
“I disagree with the renewal, so I am free.”
If the extension is later found enforceable, joining another club may generate contractual-stability and compensation issues.
The clause should be challenged through the appropriate procedure where necessary.
The prospective club should request the complete existing contract.
It should check for:
Automatic Renewal
Club Options
Appearance Extensions
Promotion Extensions
Injury Extensions
Release Clauses
Outstanding Disputes.
A player represented as a free agent may actually have a disputed additional contractual season.
The issue should ideally be addressed months before contract expiry.
Waiting until the final week of the transfer window can make a manageable contractual issue much more difficult.
The player’s agent and legal adviser should calculate the trigger continuously.
An unusual dispute can arise where the club benefits from the automatic condition.
Suppose:
20 Appearances = Automatic Renewal.
The player has made 19 appearances.
He is not in the club’s future sporting plans.
Yet he is brought on for the final minute of the last match.
The club then claims:
“Twenty appearances. Contract renewed.”
The player may argue that the club deliberately manipulated the trigger.
The contractual wording and surrounding circumstances require careful examination.
Evidence may include:
Previous Playing Pattern
Coach Communications
Agent Discussions
Transfer Negotiations
Timing of the 20th Appearance
Statements by Club Management.
No single fact automatically resolves the dispute, but chronology can become important.
The reverse situation may arise where renewal benefits the player.
Suppose:
25 Appearances = Automatic Renewal at EUR 1.5 Million Salary.
The player reaches 24.
The club then excludes him from the squad specifically to avoid the expensive additional season.
If there is evidence that management deliberately prevented satisfaction of the condition, the player may have grounds to challenge the club’s conduct.
A contract might provide:
25 Appearances = EUR 100,000 Bonus
and
30 Appearances = Automatic Renewal.
The club’s decisions near the end of the season may affect both financial and contractual rights.
The player should preserve a detailed chronology.
Suppose:
25 Appearances = Renewal.
Player reaches 24 and suffers a season-ending injury.
If the clause strictly requires 25 appearances, the trigger may not have occurred.
The player cannot automatically assume that being close to the threshold is sufficient.
A different analysis may arise if the player is fit and available but is deliberately prevented from satisfying the condition for an improper contractual purpose.
Evidence of the club’s motive may then become significant.
Suppose a player misses the threshold because of a valid disciplinary suspension.
The player should not automatically treat those missed matches as qualifying appearances.
Again, the contractual condition must actually be satisfied unless another legal principle affects the result.
A club may argue that the employment contract automatically renewed.
The player’s competition registration must still comply with applicable TFF rules.
Foreign players should distinguish:
Contractual Employment Status
from
Competition Registration Status.
They are related but not identical.
A Turkish club may decide not to register a foreign player because of squad-planning rules.
That does not automatically mean the player’s renewed employment contract disappears.
If the contract remains valid, the club may still have financial and contractual obligations toward the athlete.
Example:
Automatic Renewal Triggered
Salary: EUR 1 Million
Club Leaves Player Outside Registered Squad.
The player should assess:
Salary Rights
Training Rights
Squad Exclusion Conditions
Potential Transfer Pressure
Other Contractual Breaches.
Non-registration should not be confused with contract termination.
If the athlete remains contractually bound but is excluded from the squad, the club must still comply with applicable TFF requirements concerning squad-excluded professional footballers.
The player should document training arrangements and any potentially abusive treatment.
A club may claim automatic renewal and then say:
“You are not in our plans, but we will release you for EUR 3 million.”
The player may believe the extension is being used solely to create transfer value.
That does not automatically invalidate the clause, but the complete circumstances may require legal analysis.
Suppose the renewal condition is satisfied, but the club already owes:
EUR 250,000 Salary
and
EUR 100,000 Bonuses.
The athlete should separately analyze the existing payment default.
An automatic extension does not erase outstanding financial obligations.
If the club owed salary before renewal, those receivables remain relevant.
Similarly, if the club committed another serious contractual breach, the existence of an extension mechanism does not necessarily remove the player’s available remedies.
Suppose the player validly terminates the employment relationship before the alleged renewal trigger becomes effective.
The club may not necessarily be able to resurrect the terminated contract through a later renewal claim.
Timing is therefore essential.
Suppose the contract expires on:
30 June.
On:
15 July
the club suddenly claims that a performance condition had automatically extended it.
The player should examine whether the extension genuinely occurred under the original clause or whether the club is attempting to create a renewal retrospectively.
A club cannot simply invent an automatic renewal after the original contract has expired.
The right must arise from the contractual framework already agreed between the parties.
The original signed documentation is therefore crucial.
A foreign player may discover that the renewal provision exists only in an additional protocol.
This requires careful review.
Current Turkish professional football rules regulate contractual documentation and supplementary agreements.
The player should determine whether the document forms part of the recognized contractual framework and whether it was properly handled under the regulations applicable when it was signed.
Foreign athletes frequently sign documents in both English and Turkish.
Suppose the English version states:
“The parties may renew.”
while the Turkish version is interpreted as:
“The contract automatically renews.”
This is a major discrepancy.
The governing-language provision should be identified immediately.
One word can change the entire legal effect.
Compare:
May Renew
Shall Renew
Automatically Renews
Club May Extend.
Foreign athletes should obtain independent review before signing bilingual sports contracts.
If a foreign athlete claims that he was never provided with the complete contract or relevant additional protocol, the factual situation should be documented immediately.
The athlete should obtain copies of all registered contractual documents and compare them with the documents originally signed.
If the player believes the renewal clause was inserted or altered after signature, the matter becomes substantially more serious.
Original copies, electronic drafts, agent correspondence and registration documents should be preserved.
The athlete should preserve:
Professional Contract
Registered Contract
Additional Protocols
Turkish and English Versions
Renewal Clause
Salary Schedule
Extension Bonus
Official Appearance Records
Minutes Played
Goals and Sporting Statistics
League Results
Promotion Records
Club Notices
Agent Communications
New Club Offers
TFF Registration Records
Bank Statements
Training Communications.
Most renewal disputes are document-heavy.
The player should prepare:
Contract Signed → Trigger Conditions → Sporting Events → Threshold Reached → Notice Sent → Contract Expiry → New Club Negotiations → Club Claims Renewal.
A clear chronology can reveal whether the alleged extension was properly triggered.
Foreign footballers should use the regulations applicable when the dispute occurs.
The TFF amended its Professional Footballers’ Status and Transfers framework in May 2026 and again in June 2026.
Accordingly, older contract templates or previous-season assumptions should not automatically be used to determine a player’s 2026 contractual status.
The current TFF framework should be reviewed together with the player’s registered contractual documents.
The TFF Arbitration Board considered challenges to the 2026 regulatory amendments in July 2026 and rejected relevant objections to the challenged provisions.
This reinforces the importance of using the current regulatory framework when analyzing contracts during the 2026–2027 period.
A foreign player’s employment dispute with a Turkish club may contain an international dimension.
Depending on the circumstances, the FIFA Football Tribunal and its Dispute Resolution Chamber may therefore become relevant.
FIFA’s Football Tribunal framework includes employment-related disputes between clubs and players of an international dimension.
However:
Foreign Nationality Alone Does Not Automatically Mean Every Dispute Must Be Filed Before FIFA.
Jurisdiction must be determined from the specific case.
The player should examine:
Nationality
International Dimension
Contractual Dispute Clause
Applicable TFF Rules
Applicable FIFA Rules
Nature of the Claim
Registration Consequences.
Filing before the wrong body can significantly delay resolution.
Where an international football dispute proceeds through the relevant FIFA route, CAS jurisprudence concerning extension clauses can become particularly important.
Recent CAS guidance confirms a crucial principle:
Unilateral extension options are not automatically invalid merely because one party controls the option.
Instead, validity should be assessed case by case.
This makes precise contract analysis essential.
Factors that may become important include:
Maximum Contract Duration
Length of Renewal Period
Number of Renewal Options
Salary During Renewal
Clarity of the Original Clause
Timing of Exercise Where Exercise Is Required
Proportionality
Overall Contractual Balance.
These are considerations, not a mechanical checklist guaranteeing validity or invalidity.
FIFA approved a new global regulatory framework in June 2026.
The new FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players are scheduled to enter into force on:
1 January 2027.
Therefore, a dispute arising in 2026 should not automatically be analyzed under provisions that only become effective in 2027.
The relevant regulatory version must be identified.
Contract states:
25 League Appearances = Automatic One-Year Extension
Renewal Salary = EUR 900,000
Renewal Bonus = EUR 100,000
Maximum Extension = One Season.
Player makes 27 qualifying appearances.
This provides a relatively clear contractual mechanism.
The player should nevertheless verify the applicable TFF registration and contractual framework before determining his final status.
Contract says:
“Contract may automatically continue depending on player’s performance.”
No performance standard is identified.
No salary is stated.
No extension duration is defined.
This clause creates substantial uncertainty and may generate serious enforceability questions.
Contract:
20 Appearances = Automatic Renewal.
Player:
19 Starts + 1 Substitute Appearance.
The parties dispute whether the substitute appearance qualifies.
Official match records and contractual interpretation become central.
Contract:
25 Appearances + Written Notice by 31 March = Renewal.
Player reaches 25 appearances.
Club sends notice on:
20 April.
The player may have grounds to challenge whether all contractual renewal requirements were satisfied.
Contract automatically renews for:
EUR 1 Million.
Club then fails to pay the player for several months.
The athlete should analyze overdue-remuneration remedies separately.
The club cannot rely on renewal to control the player’s contractual status while ignoring its own payment obligations.
The player reaches the automatic renewal threshold.
The club immediately tells him:
“You will not play next season. Bring us EUR 4 million and you can leave.”
The athlete should examine both the validity of the renewal and the club’s subsequent conduct.
Any transfer pressure or squad exclusion should be documented.
The player believes his contract expires on 30 June.
He signs another club in May.
The Turkish club produces an appearance-based automatic renewal provision.
A major contractual-stability dispute may follow.
This is why the complete existing contract should be reviewed before a foreign player signs elsewhere.
A foreign athlete facing an automatic renewal issue should generally follow this sequence:
Obtain Complete Contract → Identify Renewal Clause → Determine Whether Renewal Is Automatic or Optional → Identify Objective Trigger → Check Official Sporting Records → Determine Whether Trigger Was Satisfied → Identify Renewal Duration → Confirm Renewal Salary → Check Renewal Bonus → Review Notice Requirements → Check Maximum Contract Duration → Compare Turkish and English Versions → Review TFF Registration → Preserve Club Communications → Examine Outstanding Salary → Determine TFF/FIFA Jurisdiction → Resolve Contractual Status Before Signing Another Club.
The central objective is certainty.
The player should know whether he is contractually free before acting like a free agent.
A foreign athlete should seek legal review immediately where an automatic renewal clause contains no objective trigger, fails to identify the renewal salary, allows repeated extensions without a clear maximum duration, conflicts between language versions, appears only in an undisclosed side agreement, depends on disputed sporting statistics, requires notice that the club sent late, is invoked only after another club makes an offer, or is combined with unpaid salary, squad exclusion or transfer pressure.
These circumstances do not automatically invalidate the clause, but they can materially change the legal analysis.
Potentially yes. Enforceability depends on the contractual wording, trigger, duration, remuneration, applicable federation rules and overall legal circumstances. There is no safe rule that every automatic renewal is either valid or invalid.
Potentially, if the contract clearly and validly establishes 25 qualifying appearances as the automatic renewal trigger. The definition of an appearance must also be examined.
Not necessarily if a valid original contract genuinely provides for automatic extension without further agreement. However, the applicable registration requirements must still be considered.
Potentially, depending on the definition used in the contract. A clause referring simply to “appearances” may create a different result from one requiring starts or minimum playing time.
This can create a serious contractual uncertainty. Predetermined remuneration for the extension period is an important factor when evaluating renewal and option mechanisms.
Contractual extension and competition registration are separate issues. The club may still have contractual and financial obligations even if the player is not registered for competition.
Potentially, if the non-payment creates a valid termination right and the required procedure is followed. Automatic renewal does not eliminate the club’s payment obligations.
He should first obtain legal analysis and, where necessary, challenge the alleged renewal through the correct procedure. Joining another club while contractual status remains unresolved can create compensation and registration risks.
No. The international dimension, contractual framework and applicable TFF/FIFA jurisdiction rules must be analyzed.
The biggest mistake is waiting until the contract’s final weeks to discover that an appearance, promotion or performance condition may already have extended the agreement for another season.
Automatic renewal provisions can determine whether a foreign athlete becomes a free agent or remains contractually bound to a Turkish club.
That difference can affect:
Transfer Fees
Signing Bonuses
Salary
Registration
New Club Negotiations
Contractual Compensation
The Player’s Entire Career Strategy.
The correct legal analysis should determine:
What triggers renewal? Was the trigger actually satisfied? Is the renewed salary predetermined? How long does the extension last? Is notice required? Does the clause comply with the applicable sporting framework?
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign professional footballers and international athletes with contractual disputes involving Turkish sports clubs. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with automatic renewal clauses, unilateral club options, appearance-based extensions, promotion clauses, contract-expiry disputes, free-agent status, release clauses, transfer negotiations, unpaid salaries and bonuses, squad exclusion, contract termination, TFF proceedings and FIFA-related international disputes.
A foreign athlete should have any automatic renewal provision reviewed before signing with another club, declaring free-agent status, refusing to return to training or taking any unilateral step to end the existing contractual relationship.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey