Can a Foreign Owner Recover Property Transferred Through a Forged Power of Attorney in Turkey? – 2026 Legal Guide

A foreign owner’s Turkish property was transferred using a forged power of attorney. Learn about title deed cancellation, restoration of ownership, good-faith purchasers, interim injunctions, compensation, state liability and criminal remedies in Turkey in 2026.

A foreign national owns an apartment, villa, commercial property or land in Turkey but lives abroad. One day, the owner discovers that the property is no longer registered in his or her name. Someone allegedly appeared through a representative and transferred the property using a power of attorney that the foreign owner never signed. The signature may have been forged, the foreign notarial document fabricated, the apostille falsified, the Turkish translation manipulated or an entirely fictitious representative may have been created. The foreign owner immediately asks the most important question: “Can I recover my property?”

In many cases, potentially yes. A property registration based on a forged power of attorney can constitute a legally defective or wrongful registration and may potentially be challenged through a title deed cancellation and registration action. However, recovery is not automatic. The most difficult cases arise when the first fraudulent purchaser has already transferred the property to another person. Turkish property law places significant importance on the security of the land registry and can protect qualifying third parties who acquire registered rights in good faith. For this reason, a foreign owner who discovers a forged-power transfer must act quickly before the property is sold, mortgaged or transferred again.

1. What Is a Forged Power of Attorney Property Transfer?

A forged-power transfer occurs where a person purporting to act for the registered owner relies on authority that was never genuinely granted.

Examples include:

Owner’s Signature Was Forged

Entire Power of Attorney Was Fabricated

Fake Foreign Notary Document Was Created

Fake Apostille Was Attached

Existing Power Was Altered

Photograph or Identity Information Was Manipulated

Turkish Translation Was Fraudulently Expanded

Another Person Impersonated the Owner

or a genuine document was materially falsified before being used.

The fundamental issue is that the purported representative did not possess the genuine authority required for the transaction.

2. Forged Power of Attorney Can Produce a Wrongful Registration

Turkish land registry principles distinguish between a registration that reflects the genuine legal position and one that lacks a valid legal basis.

A registration based on a non-binding transaction or lacking a valid legal reason can constitute wrongful registration.

A transfer performed through a forged power of attorney is a classic example requiring examination under these principles.

The foreign owner’s case therefore concerns more than ordinary contractual breach.

It directly concerns ownership.

3. The Foreign Owner Did Not Sell the Property

This is an important distinction.

Suppose a French national owns a villa in Turkey.

The owner:

Never Advertised It

Never Agreed to Sell

Never Received Money

Never Appointed the Alleged Representative

and

Never Signed the Power of Attorney.

A fraudster nevertheless obtains a transfer.

This is fundamentally different from a dispute where the owner genuinely authorized a representative but later disagrees with the sale price.

4. Forged Power vs Misused Genuine Power

Foreign owners should distinguish these two cases immediately.

Forged Power

The authority never existed.

Genuine Power Misused

The authority existed, but the representative abused it.

For example, a genuine representative may have authority to sell but secretly sell to a relative for an unfair price.

The available arguments and the position of the purchaser can differ significantly.

5. Can the Original Owner Recover the Property?

Potentially yes.

If the current registered owner acquired through the fraudulent transaction and cannot rely on legally protected good faith, the original foreign owner may potentially seek:

Cancellation of the Wrongful Registration

and

Restoration of Ownership.

This is commonly pursued through a title deed cancellation and registration action.

6. Title Deed Cancellation and Registration Action

The objective of the action is not simply to obtain money.

The owner essentially asks the court:

“Cancel the legally defective registration and register the property back in my name.”

This distinction matters because a compensation claim and a property-recovery claim protect different interests.

7. First Purchaser Participated in the Forgery

Consider:

Foreign Owner → Forged Power → Fraudulent Purchaser.

If the purchaser participated in the scheme, knew the power was forged or otherwise acted in bad faith, the purchaser cannot simply rely on the appearance of the land registry to legitimize deliberate fraud.

Evidence of participation or knowledge can therefore be decisive.

8. First Purchaser Is the Fraudster’s Relative

Suppose the foreign owner’s EUR 700,000 apartment is transferred through a forged power to the fraudster’s brother for a declared EUR 150,000.

This does not automatically prove collusion.

However, the combination of:

Family Relationship

Suspicious Price

Forged Authority

Lack of Genuine Payment

and subsequent conduct can provide important evidence.

9. First Purchaser Is a Related Company

Fraudsters sometimes avoid taking title personally.

The property may instead be transferred to:

A Company They Own

A Company Owned by a Relative

A Business Partner’s Company

or another related entity.

The corporate relationship, beneficial ownership and payment trail should be investigated.

10. First Emergency Question: Who Owns the Property Today?

This should be determined immediately.

Do not rely on the paper title deed the foreign owner possesses.

Turkish ownership records are maintained through the official land registry.

The owner should determine:

Current Registered Owner

Transfer Date

Number of Transfers

Existing Mortgages

Attachments

Other Registered Rights

and whether another transaction appears imminent.

11. The Property May Already Have Been Sold Twice

A typical fraud structure can be:

Day 1: Forged power used to transfer property to Fraudster A.

Day 5: Fraudster A transfers property to Associate B.

Day 20: Associate B sells to Buyer C.

The foreign owner discovers the fraud three months later.

The legal position of A, B and C may need to be examined separately.

12. Why Subsequent Transfers Are So Important

A foreign owner may reasonably think:

“If the first sale was based on a forged document, every later sale must automatically be cancelled.”

Turkish property law is more complicated.

The protection afforded to qualifying good-faith persons relying on registered ownership can affect later transfers.

Therefore, a defective first transaction does not mean that every later registered acquisition can automatically be reversed without examining the subsequent purchaser.

13. Good-Faith Acquisition Can Become the Central Issue

Turkish Civil Code principles protect, in applicable circumstances, persons who acquire a real right in good faith by relying on the land registry.

This rule protects confidence in registered property ownership.

Consequently, the foreign owner’s ability to recover the physical property can depend heavily on whether the current owner qualifies as a protected good-faith purchaser.

14. Good Faith Is Not Simply What the Purchaser Says

The current owner may state:

“I knew nothing about the fraud.”

That statement alone does not necessarily resolve the issue.

The transaction circumstances should be investigated.

Potentially relevant questions include:

What Price Was Paid?

Was Payment Genuine?

How Did the Purchaser Find the Property?

Did the Purchaser Know the Representative?

Was the Purchaser Related to the Fraudster?

Was the Property Immediately Retransferred?

Were There Obvious Warning Signs?

15. Suspiciously Low Price Can Be Relevant

Suppose:

Market Value: EUR 1,000,000

Sale Price: EUR 200,000.

Price alone does not automatically establish bad faith.

But if the buyer is also the representative’s business partner and no credible payment evidence exists, the combined circumstances become significantly more suspicious.

16. Genuine Market-Value Purchase Creates a Different Case

Suppose the fraudulent first purchaser later sells the property for EUR 1 million to an unrelated purchaser.

The second purchaser:

Pays Through the Banking System

Uses Independent Financing

Has No Relationship With the Fraudsters

and sees the seller registered as owner.

This can create a much more difficult recovery case for the original foreign owner.

17. Immediate Interim Injunction Can Be Critical

If the property has been fraudulently transferred but remains with a purchaser whose title can potentially be challenged, the foreign owner should urgently consider whether an interim injunction can be obtained.

The objective is to preserve the property during litigation.

Without protection, another transfer can occur while the case is being prepared.

18. What Can an Interim Injunction Prevent?

Depending on the court order and circumstances, an injunction may help prevent further disposal of the disputed property.

This can be critical because the owner’s legal position may deteriorate each time another person enters the chain of registered ownership.

The procedural requirements must be satisfied; an injunction is not automatic.

19. Do Not Spend Weeks Negotiating With the Fraudster

A foreign owner may contact the alleged representative and receive responses such as:

“There has been a misunderstanding.”

“I will transfer it back next month.”

“Do not involve lawyers.”

“The buyer will cancel the transaction voluntarily.”

Meanwhile, the property may be transferred again.

Negotiation should not replace urgent protection of the land registry position.

20. Obtain the Power of Attorney Actually Used

The foreign owner needs the document that formed the basis of the transaction.

Compare it with:

Authentic Signature Samples

Passport

Previous Genuine Powers

Foreign Notarial Records

Apostille

Turkish Translation

and other relevant records.

Do not assume the forgery is obvious.

21. Sophisticated Forged Powers Can Look Genuine

Modern fraud can involve:

High-Quality Document Reproduction

Stolen Identity Information

Copied Signatures

Copied Photographs

Fabricated Stamps

and altered official-looking documents.

The issue should therefore be investigated through original records rather than visual inspection alone.

22. Verify the Foreign Notary

If the document supposedly came from another country, investigate:

Whether the Notary Exists

Whether the Document Number Exists

Whether the Notary Performed That Transaction

Whether the Date Matches

and whether the authentication is genuine.

This can quickly expose an entirely fabricated foreign power.

23. Verify the Apostille

Where an apostille is purportedly used, verify it through the appropriate official channels.

A forged power can be accompanied by a forged authentication document.

The appearance of an apostille should not end the investigation.

24. Compare the Turkish Translation

Sometimes the foreign document itself is genuine but its translation has been manipulated.

For example:

Original:

“Authority to manage the property.”

Translation:

“Authority to sell and transfer the property.”

This materially changes the authority.

Both versions must be examined.

25. Signature Examination

Where the owner states:

“I never signed this,”

forensic examination may become important.

Preserve genuine comparison signatures from relevant periods.

Possible examples include signatures from:

Passport Documents

Bank Records

Previous Notarial Documents

Earlier Powers of Attorney

and other authenticated records.

26. Foreign Owner Was Not in the Alleged Country

Travel evidence can also become useful.

Suppose the power says it was signed before a notary in Paris on 10 March.

But official travel records and other evidence establish that the owner was in Canada throughout March.

This can significantly support the forgery allegation.

27. Owner Never Met the Alleged Representative

This can also be important.

If the foreign owner has no relationship whatsoever with the person named as representative, the entire chain of authority requires investigation.

28. Property Was Transferred Without Genuine Payment

Follow the money.

A purported purchaser may claim to have paid EUR 600,000.

Ask:

Where Is the Bank Transfer?

Who Received It?

When Was It Paid?

Was It Withdrawn Immediately?

Did the Money Return to the Purchaser?

A fictitious sale price can provide evidence of a sham transaction.

29. Cash Sale Requires Particular Scrutiny

A fraudulent purchaser may say:

“I paid everything in cash.”

The absence of a bank trail does not automatically prove fraud, but it can make the alleged transaction more difficult to verify.

All surrounding evidence should be examined.

30. The Declared Price Is Far Below Market Value

Foreign owners should obtain appropriate evidence concerning market value at the time of the fraudulent transfer.

This can help evaluate whether the purchaser genuinely entered an arm’s-length transaction.

31. Can the Owner Recover From the First Fraudulent Purchaser?

Potentially, particularly where the first purchaser participated in the fraud, knew of the forgery or otherwise cannot rely on good-faith protection.

The exact title history and legal defect must be established.

32. Can the Owner Recover From a Second Purchaser?

Potentially, but the second purchaser’s status becomes particularly important.

If the second purchaser participated in the scheme or knew of the wrongful registration, title recovery may remain possible.

If the second purchaser qualifies for legal protection as a good-faith acquirer relying on the land registry, the owner’s position can be substantially more difficult.

33. What if the Property Cannot Be Recovered?

The foreign owner should not assume that failure to recover the physical property means there is no remedy.

The strategy may shift toward:

Compensation

Recovery of Property Value

Recovery of Fraudulent Sale Proceeds

Claims Against Responsible Persons

and, in appropriate circumstances, examination of liability arising from the maintenance of the land registry.

34. State Liability for Land Registry Losses

Turkish law recognizes state liability for losses arising from the maintenance of the land registry under the applicable conditions.

This can become especially important in forged-power cases where a wrongful land registry transaction ultimately causes the true owner to lose the property.

The existence and amount of any claim against the state require separate legal analysis.

35. State Liability Is Not Automatic in Every Fraud Case

The fact that fraud occurred does not automatically mean the state must pay every claimed loss.

The foreign owner must establish the applicable conditions, including the connection between the land registry process and the loss.

The precise procedural route should also be examined.

36. Turkish Case Law Has Addressed Forged Power Transactions

Turkish judicial practice has dealt with situations where property was transferred through forged identity documents and forged powers of attorney.

Such cases illustrate that fraudulent documentation can create both:

Title Recovery Issues

and

Compensation Issues

arising from the land registry process.

This makes it important to evaluate both remedies rather than choosing only one at the beginning.

37. Can the Foreign Owner Claim Against the Notary?

Potentially, depending on the circumstances.

If the alleged power was produced through a Turkish notarial transaction and negligence or wrongdoing in the notarial process contributed to the loss, potential liability may need to be investigated.

Foreign powers involve different authentication structures and therefore require case-specific analysis.

38. Can the Foreign Owner Sue the Fraudster?

Yes, appropriate civil claims may potentially be brought against persons responsible for the loss.

But the practical question is:

Does the fraudster have assets?

A successful judgment against an insolvent fraudster may have limited economic value.

Asset investigation should therefore begin early.

39. Precautionary Attachment

Where the foreign owner has a qualifying monetary claim and the statutory requirements are satisfied, precautionary attachment may potentially secure assets belonging to persons responsible for the loss.

This can be particularly important where fraudsters are rapidly transferring money and property.

40. Property Injunction and Asset Attachment Are Different

The owner may need both strategies.

Interim Injunction: protects the disputed property.

Precautionary Attachment: secures a qualifying financial claim.

Complex fraud litigation may require coordinated use of property and monetary remedies.

41. Trace the Fraudulent Sale Proceeds

If money genuinely changed hands, determine where it went.

Possible routes include:

Fraudulent Representative’s Account

Related Company

Relative

Foreign Bank Account

Another Property Purchase

or rapid cash withdrawal.

Financial tracing can reveal additional recoverable assets and participants.

42. Fraudster Purchases Another Property With the Money

Suppose the original apartment cannot be recovered from a protected third party.

But the fraudster used the proceeds to purchase another Turkish property.

That asset can become highly relevant to the compensation and enforcement strategy.

43. Criminal Complaint

Forging and using a false power of attorney can involve serious criminal conduct.

Depending on the facts, the investigation may concern:

Forgery

Fraud

Use of False Documents

Identity Fraud

and other offences.

The criminal investigation can help identify participants and obtain evidence.

44. Criminal Proceedings Do Not Automatically Return the Property

A foreign owner should pursue the correct civil remedies simultaneously where appropriate.

A prosecutor does not automatically cancel a registered title merely because a forgery investigation begins.

Likewise, a criminal complaint does not automatically prevent another sale.

45. Do Not Wait for the Criminal Expert Report Before Protecting Title

Forensic examination may take time.

If the property is at risk of another transfer, civil interim protection may need to be pursued before the criminal investigation reaches a final conclusion.

46. What if the Fraudster Mortgages the Property?

Suppose the fraudulent purchaser obtains title and immediately mortgages the property to a bank.

The dispute now involves another registered real right.

The bank’s legal position and good faith must be analyzed.

This can substantially increase the complexity of recovery.

47. What if the Property Is Subject to Enforcement?

A creditor may also place an attachment on property registered to the fraudulent purchaser.

The foreign owner must then evaluate the relationship between the wrongful registration and subsequent creditor rights.

Again, early intervention is preferable to dealing with multiple later registrations.

48. What if the Forged Transfer Happened Years Ago?

Do not assume that recovery is automatically impossible merely because several years have passed.

However, delay can create major practical and legal complications:

Evidence Disappears

Property Changes Hands

Fraudsters Dispose of Assets

Purchasers Create Mortgages

and limitation issues may arise for particular monetary claims.

The case should be analyzed immediately upon discovery.

49. Owner Lives Abroad and Discovered the Fraud Late

Foreign owners commonly discover unauthorized transfers much later because they do not regularly monitor Turkish land registry records.

Evidence showing when the owner actually learned of the transaction can become relevant to certain claims and limitation questions.

Preserve:

Discovery Emails

Web Tapu Records

Messages

Bank Communications

and the chronology of discovery.

50. Holding the Original Paper Title Does Not Protect Ownership From Fraud

A foreign owner may say:

“My original title deed document is still in my house in London. How could the property have been sold?”

The physical title deed paper is not the ownership system itself.

The official land registry determines registered ownership.

Possession of an old title document therefore does not prove that no later transaction occurred.

51. Web Tapu Can Help Foreign Owners Monitor Property

Digital land registry services allow property owners with appropriate access to view relevant property information and monitor transactions.

Foreign owners should use available official systems and maintain current contact information.

Periodic monitoring can reveal suspicious activity earlier.

52. SMS Notifications Can Be Important

Official land registry systems can use current contact information to notify owners concerning property-related activity.

Foreign owners should ensure that their registered mobile information remains current where applicable.

An old Turkish telephone number that has not been used for years may defeat an important fraud warning mechanism.

53. Existing Powers Should Be Reviewed

A foreign owner who discovers one fraudulent transaction should immediately identify whether other powers of attorney exist.

The fraudster may attempt to target additional properties.

Do not limit the investigation to the apartment already transferred.

54. Revoke Unnecessary Powers

A genuine old power can also create future risks.

Official land registry guidance indicates that a power does not necessarily become unusable simply because ten years have passed if no termination event or expiry applies.

Foreign owners should formally revoke authority that is no longer required rather than assuming age makes the document ineffective.

55. Forged Power Cannot Be “Revoked” in the Ordinary Sense

If the foreign owner never granted the power, technically there is no genuine authority to terminate.

However, the owner should still notify appropriate authorities of the fraudulent document and take preventive measures to stop its continued use.

This is different from revoking a genuine power.

56. Fraudulent Power May Be Used Against Multiple Properties

A broad forged document may purport to authorize transactions concerning all properties belonging to the foreigner.

After discovering one fraudulent sale, immediately check every Turkish property registered to the owner.

57. Fraudulent Representative May Try to Use the Same Power Again

Current land registry systems allow powers used in transactions to be stored and verified electronically in appropriate circumstances.

Therefore, once a fraudulent power is identified, the foreign owner should ensure that authorities are informed promptly so that the document cannot continue to be relied upon.

58. Preventive Measures for Foreign Property Owners

Foreign owners can reduce risk by:

Regularly Checking Property Records

Maintaining Current Contact Details

Avoiding Unnecessarily Broad Powers

Using Specific Property Descriptions

Limiting Sale Authority

Limiting Mortgage Authority

Avoiding Unnecessary Authority to Receive Sale Proceeds

Using Trusted Representatives

and formally terminating powers when no longer required.

59. Verify Representatives Independently

Do not grant high-value property authority solely because someone claims to be:

Lawyer

Real Estate Consultant

Developer Representative

Investment Adviser

or friend of another professional.

Professional identity and authority should be independently verified.

60. Social Media Property Fraud

Foreign investors can be targeted through:

Instagram

Facebook

WhatsApp

Telegram

and online property advertisements.

A fraudster may first establish trust through a legitimate-looking investment profile and later request a broad power of attorney.

A sophisticated online profile is not proof of professional legitimacy.

Practical Example: Direct Transfer Through Forged Power

A foreign owner holds an apartment worth EUR 600,000.

A forged foreign power is used to transfer it to Person A.

Person A participated in the fraud and still owns the apartment when the true owner discovers the transaction.

The owner may potentially seek cancellation of Person A’s wrongful registration and restoration of title, together with urgent interim protection.

Practical Example: Fraudster Transfers to Relative

A forged power is used to transfer a EUR 800,000 villa for EUR 200,000 to the fraudster’s sister.

No genuine payment can be demonstrated.

The relationship, price and financial trail can become significant evidence concerning the purchaser’s good faith.

Practical Example: Property Reaches an Unrelated Third Buyer

Fraudster A obtains the property through forged authority.

A then sells it at market value to Buyer B, who claims to have no connection with the fraud.

The foreign owner’s ability to recover the physical property may depend heavily on whether Buyer B qualifies for protection as a good-faith purchaser.

Practical Example: Fraudulent Purchaser Creates Mortgage

After acquiring through forged authority, Fraudster A mortgages the apartment to a bank.

The owner now has to analyze both A’s title and the bank’s registered mortgage rights.

Immediate action before the mortgage is created would have presented a considerably simpler case.

Practical Example: Forged Power Used for Several Properties

Foreign investor owns four apartments.

Fraudster creates a broad fake power.

One apartment is sold.

The owner discovers the fraud.

The correct response is not merely to litigate over that apartment. The other three properties should immediately be checked and protected.

Practical Example: Owner Cannot Recover the Property

A fraudulent registration ultimately results in the property reaching a purchaser whose acquisition receives legal protection.

The original owner may then need to pursue a compensation strategy against the responsible fraudsters and examine other available compensation mechanisms, including potential state liability where the statutory requirements are satisfied.

Evidence Checklist

A foreign owner alleging a forged power of attorney should obtain and preserve the current land registry record, complete transaction history, document used as the power of attorney, original genuine powers if any, passport and identity documents, genuine signature samples, foreign notarial records, apostille or legalization documentation, Turkish translation, travel records where relevant, bank and SWIFT records, alleged purchase-payment evidence, property valuation evidence, communications with alleged representatives and purchasers, corporate records showing relationships between participants, criminal complaint documents and all evidence showing when the owner first discovered the fraudulent transfer.

2026 Emergency Recovery Plan

A foreign owner who discovers a forged-power transfer should generally consider the following sequence: Check Current Title Immediately → Check Every Other Property Owned in Turkey → Obtain Complete Transfer History → Identify Current Registered Owner → Obtain the Exact Power Used → Verify Signature → Verify Foreign Notary → Verify Apostille or Legalization → Compare Turkish Translation → Identify Alleged Representative → Identify First Purchaser → Investigate Relationship Between Purchaser and Fraudster → Determine Whether Genuine Purchase Money Was Paid → Trace the Money → Identify Every Subsequent Purchaser → Analyze Good Faith Separately for Each Acquisition → Check Mortgages and Attachments → Consider Immediate Interim Injunction → Prepare Title Deed Cancellation and Registration Proceedings Where Available → Notify Authorities About the Fraudulent Power → Review and Revoke Genuine Outstanding Powers → Consider Criminal Complaint → Investigate Fraudster Assets → Consider Precautionary Attachment → Evaluate Compensation Claims → Examine Potential State Liability Where the Conditions Are Satisfied.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I recover Turkish property sold using a forged power of attorney?

Potentially yes. A registration based on forged authority can constitute a wrongful registration and may support a title deed cancellation and registration claim. The current owner’s legal position must also be examined.

2. What if I never signed any power of attorney?

That can substantially strengthen the allegation that the representative had no authority. The document, signature, foreign notarial records and authentication should be investigated.

3. What if the fraudulent purchaser still owns the property?

Recovery may be considerably more straightforward than where the property has already passed to additional purchasers, particularly if the current owner participated in or knew of the fraud.

4. What if the property was sold again?

The rights of every subsequent registered purchaser must be analyzed. Good-faith acquisition principles can materially affect whether the property itself remains recoverable.

5. Can an innocent purchaser keep property originally transferred through a forged power?

Potentially, depending on the circumstances and the application of Turkish land registry good-faith protection. This is one of the principal reasons immediate action is essential.

6. Can I prevent another transfer while the lawsuit continues?

Potentially. An interim injunction may be available where the legal requirements are satisfied and can be critical to preserving the disputed property.

7. Can I receive compensation if I cannot recover the property?

Potentially. Claims may exist against fraudsters and other responsible persons. Depending on how the loss occurred, potential state liability arising from maintenance of the land registry may also require examination.

8. Should I file a criminal complaint?

Where the evidence supports forgery or fraud, criminal proceedings may be appropriate. However, they should not replace urgent civil measures aimed at protecting the property.

9. Does having my original title deed prove that the sale was impossible?

No. The official land registry determines registered ownership. Holding an older paper title document does not prevent subsequent registration transactions.

10. What is the most important thing to do after discovering the fraud?

Determine the property’s current registered status immediately. If another transfer is possible, protecting the property before it reaches additional third parties can be more important than negotiating with the suspected fraudster.

Legal Support for Foreign Owners Seeking Recovery of Property Transferred Through Forged Powers in Turkey

A forged-power property case should be approached as both a title recovery problem and an asset recovery problem.

The central questions are: Was the power completely forged? Was the signature fabricated? Was the foreign notarial document genuine? Was the apostille authentic? Was the Turkish translation manipulated? Who obtained the property first? Did that person participate in the fraud? Has the property been transferred again? Is the current owner in good faith? Has a bank acquired a mortgage? Where did the alleged purchase money go? Can the property still be protected through an injunction? If title recovery is no longer possible, who can compensate the foreign owner for the loss?

Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign property owners and international investors with forged power of attorney disputes and unauthorized Turkish property transfers. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with title deed cancellation and registration proceedings, urgent interim injunctions, forged foreign powers of attorney, fraudulent apostilles and translations, good-faith purchaser disputes, fraudulent mortgages, compensation claims, precautionary attachments, asset tracing, potential land registry liability issues and related criminal complaints.

For a foreign owner, the difference between discovering the fraud before the next title transfer and after several additional transfers can fundamentally change the legal strategy. Once a forged transfer is discovered, obtaining current land registry information and evaluating immediate protective measures should therefore be treated as urgent.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey