Meta Title: Cargo Seized at a Turkish Port | Foreign Shipowner & Cargo Owner Remedies 2026

Cargo seized by Turkish customs or authorities? Learn the legal remedies available to foreign cargo owners, shipowners, carriers and international traders, including objections, release applications, customs disputes, criminal investigations and recovery of seized goods.

When cargo is seized at a Turkish port, the foreign cargo owner, shipowner, carrier, consignee and importer may suddenly face several overlapping legal problems. Containers can be blocked from delivery, customs clearance may stop, commercial documents can be examined, the goods may remain in storage while substantial costs accumulate, and in more serious cases prosecutors may open a criminal investigation for alleged smuggling, false declaration, prohibited imports or document fraud. The most important point is that cargo being “seized” does not describe one single legal procedure. Goods may be held under customs supervision, physically detained because clearance conditions have not been satisfied, seized as evidence in a criminal investigation, subjected to confiscation proceedings, or transferred into a liquidation process under customs legislation. Turkish practice expressly recognizes goods becoming subject to liquidation under both Customs Law No. 4458 and Anti-Smuggling Law No. 5607. (https://ticaret.gov.tr) For foreign businesses, the immediate objective is therefore to determine which authority has control of the cargo, the exact legal basis of the measure, whether the goods themselves are suspected of illegality, whether the owner is accused of wrongdoing, whether the carrier is implicated, what deadlines apply and which procedure can obtain release before storage costs and commercial losses become disproportionate.

Why Can Cargo Be Seized at a Turkish Port?

Cargo can become subject to official control for many reasons. Customs authorities may identify inconsistencies between the declaration and the actual goods, questions concerning customs value, tariff classification, origin or quantity, missing permits, prohibited or restricted goods, intellectual-property concerns, suspicious certificates, transit irregularities or circumstances suggesting an offense under anti-smuggling legislation.

The underlying reason matters because the legal remedy changes accordingly.

A disagreement about customs valuation should not be defended in the same way as an allegation that prohibited goods were deliberately concealed inside a container.

First Determine What “Seized” Actually Means

This is the most important first step.

Commercial parties frequently tell their lawyers that “Turkish Customs seized our cargo.” Legally, however, the goods may merely be undergoing inspection or awaiting completion of customs procedures.

Alternatively, there may be a formal administrative decision preventing release.

At the more serious end of the spectrum, prosecutors may have ordered or approved seizure as part of a criminal investigation.

The lawyer should therefore obtain the written document establishing the legal status of the goods before choosing a remedy.

Customs Hold and Criminal Seizure Are Different

A customs dispute can often be resolved through customs procedures, supplementary documentation, payment, security or administrative remedies depending on the issue.

Criminal seizure is different.

If authorities suspect smuggling or another criminal offense, the cargo may become evidence in an investigation and prosecutors or criminal courts can become involved.

Resolving the customs declaration alone may then be insufficient to recover the goods.

Who Ordered the Seizure?

The foreign company should identify whether the relevant measure originates from a Customs Directorate, another administrative authority, public prosecutor or criminal court.

This determines where the challenge must be directed.

Sending repeated commercial letters to the port operator will accomplish little if the goods are being held pursuant to a prosecutor’s criminal investigation.

Obtain the Written Decision Immediately

Foreign cargo owners should not rely solely on explanations provided by freight forwarders, customs brokers or local agents.

The legal team should obtain the seizure report, customs decision, inspection report, prosecutor’s order, court decision or other document establishing why the cargo cannot be released.

The date of notification should also be recorded because challenge periods may be short.

Is the Cargo Owner Being Accused of a Crime?

Not necessarily.

Goods can be seized during an investigation without the foreign owner ultimately being criminally responsible.

The authorities must distinguish between the physical goods and the persons allegedly responsible for an offense.

This distinction becomes particularly important where an innocent foreign purchaser has acquired goods from a supplier who allegedly provided false information.

Shipowner and Cargo Owner Are Different Parties

The ship carrying the goods does not normally own the commercial cargo.

The carrier may simply have transported containers tendered by the shipper.

Accordingly, cargo seizure should not automatically create criminal or customs liability for the shipowner.

The legal relationship between shipper, consignee, importer, carrier, customs representative and beneficial cargo owner must be separated carefully.

Containerized Cargo Creates Special Problems

Modern container shipping often means that the carrier has limited knowledge of what has been packed inside a sealed container.

If Turkish authorities discover undeclared or prohibited goods, the investigation should establish who packed the container, where it was stuffed, who sealed it, who prepared the cargo description and whether the carrier or crew had any actual knowledge of the irregularity.

The bill of lading and shipping instructions become crucial.

Incorrect Cargo Description

Suppose a shipper declares machinery parts but Customs discovers high-value electronic products.

The foreign carrier should immediately preserve the booking information, shipper’s declaration, bill of lading instructions, manifest and container-seal records.

The defense should establish who supplied the incorrect description.

A carrier should not automatically bear responsibility for a false declaration originating from another commercial party.

Customs Value Disputes

Cargo can also become commercially blocked because Customs disputes the declared value.

Turkey’s Ministry of Trade confirms that customs value is determined under a sequential valuation system. The transaction-value method is considered first, followed where necessary by the value of identical goods, similar goods, deductive value, computed value and the final method. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)

A foreign importer facing a valuation dispute should therefore collect the sales contract, commercial invoice, payment records, purchase orders, freight and insurance documents and evidence explaining any relationship between buyer and seller.

Low Invoice Allegations

Customs authorities may question an invoice that appears substantially below expected commercial value.

The importer should be capable of demonstrating why the transaction price is genuine.

A low purchase price can have legitimate explanations such as damaged goods, liquidation stock, volume discounts, obsolete products or a long-term commercial arrangement.

The explanation should be supported by evidence.

Do Not Create New Documents After the Investigation Begins

If Customs questions the original invoice, attempting to manufacture a new commercial explanation after seizure can make the situation significantly worse.

Original accounting and commercial records should be preserved.

The legal strategy should explain the genuine transaction rather than reconstruct it retrospectively.

Tariff Classification Disputes

The parties may disagree about the customs classification of imported products.

Classification can determine customs duties, additional financial obligations, permits and trade-policy measures.

A technical classification dispute should be supported by product specifications, composition information, catalogues, laboratory evidence and expert analysis where necessary.

Origin Disputes

Authorities may question the declared country of origin or documents used to obtain preferential tariff treatment.

The foreign company should obtain supplier declarations, certificates, production records and other evidence establishing origin.

The commercial chain should be reconstructed from manufacturer to importer.

Missing Import Licence

Some goods cannot be released merely by presenting a commercial invoice and transport document.

Products subject to licensing, conformity requirements or other restrictions may remain under customs control until the applicable requirements are satisfied.

The first question is whether the deficiency can lawfully be corrected after arrival.

Restricted Goods

The consequences become more serious where the cargo is subject to import restrictions.

The legal team should determine whether import is absolutely prohibited, permitted subject to authorization or merely subject to additional controls.

These categories should not be confused.

Dual-Use Goods

Cargo involving products with potential civilian and strategic uses can require particularly careful compliance analysis.

The company should establish technical specifications, intended end use, end user, export documentation and applicable authorization requirements.

A compliance misunderstanding should be separated from deliberate circumvention where the facts support that distinction.

Dangerous Goods

Where seized cargo involves dangerous goods, authorities may investigate both customs compliance and transportation documentation.

The shipper’s dangerous-goods declaration, classification, packaging, labelling and documentation should be preserved.

The carrier should establish what information was provided before loading.

Counterfeit Goods

Suspected counterfeit products can produce a separate layer of customs and intellectual-property proceedings.

The cargo owner should determine whether the goods are genuine, parallel imports, licensed products or actual counterfeits.

Purchase contracts, supplier invoices, authorization documents and supply-chain records become important.

Drugs or Narcotics Found in Cargo

This immediately transforms the matter into a serious criminal case.

The defense should determine where the container was loaded, who packed it, whether it remained sealed, where it was stored, who had access and whether any communications or financial evidence link the cargo owner, shipowner or crew to the illegal substance.

The mere physical presence of narcotics inside cargo does not establish that every commercial party knew of them.

Smuggling Investigation

Anti-smuggling allegations can result in seizure of goods and criminal investigation.

Turkish administrative practice confirms that goods can become subject to liquidation procedures under Anti-Smuggling Law No. 5607 as well as Customs Law No. 4458. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)

The possibility of liquidation makes rapid intervention especially important.

The foreign owner should not assume that the cargo will simply remain indefinitely in a warehouse while the dispute continues.

Cargo Can Eventually Become Subject to Liquidation

This is one of the largest commercial risks.

Goods that become legally subject to liquidation can eventually be sold or otherwise disposed of through the applicable statutory system. Ministry of Trade notices provide concrete examples of goods and vehicles becoming subject to liquidation under Customs Law No. 4458 and Anti-Smuggling Law No. 5607 and being offered for sale. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)

A foreign cargo owner should therefore determine immediately whether any liquidation timetable is running.

Perishable Cargo Requires Emergency Action

Food, agricultural products, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and other time-sensitive goods create a special problem.

Even if the owner ultimately wins the dispute, a judgment delivered after the goods have deteriorated may provide little commercial benefit.

The lawyer should therefore emphasize the perishable nature of the cargo and seek the fastest legally available preservation or release solution.

Storage Costs Can Become Enormous

Containers held at a port can generate terminal storage, demurrage, detention and related logistics costs.

The commercial loss can eventually exceed the customs dispute itself.

The cargo owner should document these charges from the first day.

The legal strategy should consider not only whether the company will eventually win but how quickly the goods can be released.

Demurrage and Detention Disputes

Cargo seizure can trigger secondary contractual disputes between cargo interests and carriers.

The cargo owner may argue that government seizure prevented return of the container, while the carrier may continue calculating contractual detention charges.

The applicable bill of lading and tariff terms should be reviewed immediately.

Does Government Seizure Automatically Stop Demurrage?

Not necessarily.

The answer depends on the contract and applicable legal framework.

Foreign cargo owners should therefore communicate with the carrier promptly and seek commercial arrangements concerning container charges while the legal dispute continues.

Shipowner’s Rights When Cargo Is Seized

The shipowner’s principal objective is usually to separate the vessel from the seized cargo.

If authorities only need to retain particular containers, the carrier should seek confirmation that the remaining cargo operations and vessel departure can continue where legally possible.

The seizure of one container should not automatically be assumed to require detention of an entire foreign vessel.

Can the Ship Leave Without the Seized Cargo?

Potentially, depending on the circumstances.

If the authorities lawfully discharge and retain the cargo and no separate restriction applies to the vessel, the carrier may seek to continue the voyage.

However, the master should never depart until port and customs clearance requirements have been formally satisfied.

Cargo Seizure and Vessel Detention Are Separate Measures

This distinction is essential.

A container may be seized while the ship is released.

Alternatively, both cargo and vessel may become subject to separate measures.

The legal team should therefore ask:

Is the restriction against the goods, the vessel, the crew or all three?

Each requires a separate remedy.

Cargo Owner’s Ownership Evidence

A foreign company seeking return of goods should be ready to establish ownership and commercial entitlement.

Useful documents may include the sales agreement, commercial invoice, payment records, bill of lading, packing list, insurance documents and correspondence.

Where ownership changed during transit, the chain of title should be established carefully.

Bills of Lading

The bill of lading is often central to the dispute but should not be examined in isolation.

The lawyer should compare it with the underlying sale contract, letter of credit, commercial invoice, booking information and customs declaration.

Differences between these documents may explain why authorities became suspicious.

CIF, FOB and Other Sale Terms

Commercial delivery terms can affect which party bears particular costs and risks, but they do not automatically determine criminal responsibility.

A CIF seller and FOB buyer may have different contractual obligations without either necessarily having knowledge of a customs violation.

Contractual risk allocation and public-law liability should be separated.

Customs Broker Liability

Foreign companies frequently rely heavily on local customs representatives.

If the declaration contains an error, the company should investigate who supplied the incorrect information.

Was the broker given the correct invoice and nevertheless entered the wrong tariff code?

Or did the foreign importer provide inaccurate documents?

The answer can materially affect responsibility.

Freight Forwarder Liability

A forwarder may also have played a role in documentation or transportation arrangements.

Emails, instructions and document transmission records should be preserved.

The cargo owner should identify exactly who prepared each document rather than treating the logistics chain as one entity.

Criminal Liability of Company Directors

Where prosecutors suspect intentional smuggling, managers or company representatives can potentially become subjects of investigation depending on their individual role.

Corporate position alone should not substitute for evidence of knowledge and participation.

The defense should establish who approved the transaction, who communicated with suppliers and who controlled the customs declaration.

Criminal Liability of the Captain

A ship captain should not automatically be treated as responsible for irregular commercial cargo.

The investigation should examine what information was available to the master and whether the captain had any legally relevant involvement in the alleged offense.

Containerized cargo cases often make this distinction particularly important.

Crew Investigation

Authorities may question crew members where contraband or suspicious goods are discovered onboard.

Each seafarer’s responsibility must be individualized.

Employment on the ship is not evidence of participation in smuggling.

Search of the Vessel

A cargo investigation can sometimes lead authorities to search additional parts of the ship.

The shipowner should obtain legal advice regarding the legal basis and scope of the search and ensure that records of seized documents, equipment or property are maintained.

Seized Phones and Computers

Investigators may also seek digital evidence where communications are suspected of connecting individuals to the cargo.

The defense should determine which devices were seized and ensure that the scope of examination remains connected with the lawful investigation.

Exculpatory messages and documents should also be preserved.

Application for Return of Cargo

Where the legal conditions for continued seizure no longer exist, the owner can seek return through the procedure applicable to the underlying measure.

The application should not merely state that the goods are expensive.

It should explain ownership, legality of the transaction, evidence already collected, lack of continuing evidentiary necessity and any disproportionate commercial harm.

Release Against Security

Depending on the type of customs dispute and applicable legal framework, the possibility of resolving the issue through payment or security should be examined.

This is particularly relevant where the dispute concerns a financial customs obligation rather than inherently illegal goods.

The precise availability of security must be checked for the specific procedure.

Payment Under Protest and Subsequent Challenge

In some commercial situations, a foreign importer may prioritize immediate release because the cost of delay exceeds the disputed amount.

Before making payment, the company should determine the legal consequences and preserve any available challenge rights.

A rushed payment should not unintentionally destroy a viable remedy.

Administrative Objection

Where the dispute arises from a customs administrative decision, the applicable administrative objection procedure and deadline should be identified immediately.

The written decision and notification date are crucial.

Foreign companies should never assume that negotiations with Customs suspend statutory challenge periods.

Administrative Litigation

Where the customs dispute remains unresolved after the applicable administrative process, judicial review may become available under the relevant rules.

The litigation strategy should challenge both the legal basis and the factual or technical findings where appropriate.

Criminal Court Remedies

Where the cargo has been seized in a criminal investigation, criminal-procedure remedies become relevant.

The lawyer should identify who ordered or approved the seizure and pursue the appropriate objection or return procedure.

The criminal route should not be confused with a customs-tax objection.

Parallel Customs and Criminal Cases

Some of the most difficult cases involve both.

Customs may assess duties and administrative consequences while prosecutors separately investigate alleged smuggling.

Winning one dispute does not automatically terminate the other.

The defense should coordinate both files to avoid contradictory positions.

Expert Examination

Technical cargo disputes often require experts.

Chemical composition, machinery specifications, product functionality, customs classification, authenticity or origin may be impossible to establish through legal argument alone.

Independent technical evidence can therefore be decisive.

Sampling

If the dispute depends on the physical characteristics of the goods, the manner in which samples were collected can become important.

The cargo owner should preserve information concerning sampling, laboratory analysis and chain of custody.

Where legally possible, independent testing may be appropriate.

Quantity Disputes

Authorities may allege that the physical quantity exceeds the declared amount.

The defense should examine loading records, weight certificates, packing lists, container data and survey evidence.

Minor measurement differences and substantial concealed excess quantities present very different legal issues.

Missing Goods

A customs inspection may reveal fewer goods than the manifest indicates.

This can generate questions concerning theft, transit irregularities, warehouse responsibility or unauthorized removal.

The carrier should reconstruct the chain of custody.

Container Seal Evidence

Seal numbers can become exceptionally important.

The legal team should determine the seal applied at origin, whether it remained intact, whether Customs replaced it, and whether any intermediate inspection occurred.

A documented seal chain can substantially affect responsibility.

Insurance Notification

Cargo insurers should be notified promptly.

Depending on coverage, seizure, delay, deterioration and related losses may raise insurance issues.

Late notification can create unnecessary coverage disputes.

P&I Notification for Shipowners

Where the seizure may involve carrier liability, crew investigation or vessel detention, the shipowner should notify relevant P&I interests promptly.

The insurer may assist with local correspondents and maritime response depending on coverage.

Evidence the Foreign Cargo Owner Should Collect

The company should preserve the sales contract, commercial invoice, purchase order, bank transfer records, bill of lading, packing list, certificate of origin, customs declaration, permits, licences, product specifications, inspection certificates, correspondence with the supplier, customs broker communications, freight-forwarder records and insurance documents.

If criminal allegations exist, digital communications should also be preserved.

Build the Entire Supply Chain

The most effective defense often reconstructs the transaction from beginning to end:

Manufacturer → Seller → Buyer → Freight Forwarder → Shipper → Container Packing → Seal → Carrier → Turkish Port → Customs Declaration → Inspection → Seizure.

This allows responsibility to be allocated correctly.

First 6 Hours After Cargo Seizure

The foreign company should obtain the written seizure or hold document, identify the authority controlling the cargo and determine whether the matter is administrative or criminal. The container numbers, seal numbers, goods, quantities and physical location should be confirmed. The customs broker and carrier should preserve all documentation and no relevant electronic communication should be deleted.

If the vessel is still in port, the shipowner should immediately determine whether the cargo seizure also prevents departure.

First 24 Hours

The legal team should reconstruct the transaction and identify the alleged irregularity. Ownership documentation, customs declarations, invoices, permits, bills of lading and payment records should be collected.

If prosecutors are involved, the identities and procedural status of company representatives or crew members should be established immediately.

For perishable goods, emergency preservation and release options should receive priority.

First 72 Hours

The company should have a clear legal strategy identifying the competent objection procedure, filing deadline, possibility of release, security options and risk of criminal prosecution.

Storage and demurrage costs should be calculated.

If technical classification, valuation, origin or product composition is disputed, expert evidence should begin immediately.

Do Not Allow the Cargo to Drift Into Liquidation

This deserves special emphasis.

Turkish customs practice includes statutory liquidation of qualifying goods under Customs Law No. 4458 and Anti-Smuggling Law No. 5607. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)

A company that spends months exchanging informal correspondence without checking the formal legal status of its cargo may discover that the case has progressed much further than expected.

Every deadline relating to objection, abandonment, storage and liquidation should therefore be monitored.

Common Mistakes Made by Foreign Cargo Owners

The most common mistakes are assuming the customs broker will solve everything, failing to obtain the written seizure decision, confusing administrative detention with criminal seizure, allowing appeal deadlines to expire, failing to preserve original invoices and communications, paying disputed amounts without understanding the procedural consequences, ignoring demurrage accumulation and failing to investigate whether the goods are approaching liquidation.

Another major mistake is allowing different lawyers or departments handling the customs and criminal proceedings to adopt contradictory factual positions.

Common Mistakes Made by Shipowners

Shipowners sometimes become unnecessarily involved in a cargo owner’s dispute by failing to distinguish carrier responsibilities from ownership of the goods.

The carrier should preserve the shipper’s instructions and cargo documentation and establish what information was provided before loading.

Where authorities no longer need the vessel, the shipowner should seek confirmation that the disputed cargo can remain ashore while the vessel continues its voyage.

Can the Foreign Owner Claim Compensation?

Potentially, depending on why the goods were seized, the eventual outcome and the legal basis of the measure.

However, a compensation claim requires evidence of actual loss and unlawful conduct or other applicable liability requirements.

The company should therefore document storage costs, deterioration, lost sales, contractual penalties and other measurable losses from the beginning.

Lost Profit Claims

Lost profits can be significantly harder to establish than direct expenses.

A cargo owner claiming that seizure caused loss of a resale contract should preserve the actual resale agreement, purchase orders, customer correspondence and evidence that the transaction would otherwise have been completed.

Speculative business opportunities are considerably more difficult to prove.

2026 Legal Strategy for Cargo Seized at a Turkish Port

The strongest response begins by identifying the precise legal status of the goods rather than relying on the generic description “cargo seized by Customs.” The foreign cargo owner should obtain the written measure, identify the responsible authority and determine whether the goods are merely under customs control, subject to an administrative decision, seized in a criminal investigation or already moving toward statutory liquidation. The underlying allegation should then be classified as a valuation, tariff, origin, licensing, documentation, prohibited-goods, smuggling or other issue. Ownership and the complete supply chain should be documented. The roles of the cargo owner, importer, consignee, shipper, customs broker, carrier, captain and crew must be separated. Where a financial customs dispute is involved, objection, payment or security options should be examined immediately. Where prosecutors are involved, criminal seizure remedies and individual defense strategies should proceed in parallel. Perishable goods require emergency treatment, while all cases require close monitoring of storage, demurrage and liquidation risks. The practical roadmap is therefore: obtain the seizure document → identify the authority → determine administrative or criminal status → identify the legal allegation → confirm cargo location → establish ownership → preserve invoices and payment records → secure bills of lading and manifests → verify container seals → review customs declarations → identify who prepared each document → obtain licences and certificates → preserve digital communications → separate cargo-owner liability from carrier liability → determine whether the vessel can depart → calculate storage and demurrage → identify objection deadlines → seek release where legally available → consider security where applicable → challenge unlawful seizure → defend any criminal investigation → prevent premature liquidation → seek return of the goods → pursue compensation where legally justified.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can Turkish Customs seize cargo belonging to a foreign company?

Yes. Goods entering or passing through the Turkish customs system are subject to applicable Turkish customs controls regardless of the nationality of the cargo owner.

2. Does seizure mean that the foreign cargo owner committed smuggling?

No. Seizure or detention of goods does not itself establish criminal guilt. The legal basis of the measure and the individual’s connection with any alleged offense must be examined separately.

3. Can seized cargo be released before the entire dispute ends?

Potentially, depending on the legal basis of the seizure, the nature of the goods and whether continued retention remains legally necessary. Financial customs disputes and criminal seizures require different procedures.

4. Can the vessel leave Turkey while cargo remains seized?

Potentially, yes. Cargo seizure and vessel detention are separate legal issues. If no independent restriction applies to the vessel and all departure requirements are satisfied, the carrier may be able to continue the voyage.

5. Is the shipowner responsible if prohibited goods are discovered inside a sealed container?

Not automatically. The authorities must examine who packed and declared the cargo, who controlled the container and whether the carrier or shipowner had legally relevant knowledge or involvement.

6. Can Customs challenge the value shown on the commercial invoice?

Yes. Customs value is determined according to the applicable statutory valuation methods, beginning with the transaction-value method where its requirements are satisfied. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)

7. Can seized cargo eventually be sold?

Goods that legally become subject to liquidation can potentially be disposed of through the statutory liquidation system. Turkish Ministry of Trade practice confirms liquidation of goods under Customs Law No. 4458 and Anti-Smuggling Law No. 5607. (https://ticaret.gov.tr)

8. What happens if the cargo is perishable?

Immediate legal action becomes especially important. The owner should document the risk of deterioration and seek any legally available expedited preservation or release measure.

9. Who should challenge the seizure: the shipowner or cargo owner?

It depends on the measure and legal interest involved. The cargo owner will usually have the strongest direct interest in recovering the goods, while the shipowner may need separate action where the seizure affects the vessel, containers, crew or carrier liabilities.

10. What should a foreign company do immediately after learning its cargo has been seized?

Obtain the written decision, identify the authority and legal basis, preserve the complete commercial and transport file, confirm applicable challenge deadlines, determine whether criminal proceedings exist and act before storage, demurrage or liquidation risks increase.

Legal Support for Foreign Cargo Owners and Shipowners in Turkey

Foreign cargo owners, shipowners, carriers, importers, exporters and international trading companies facing cargo seizure in Turkey may require urgent assistance with customs seizures, port investigations, anti-smuggling proceedings, detained containers, customs valuation and classification disputes, prohibited or restricted goods, criminal investigations, cargo release and prevention of liquidation.

Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign businesses and international maritime companies facing cargo and customs disputes in Turkey. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with identifying the legal basis of the seizure, challenging administrative or criminal measures, coordinating customs and maritime proceedings, protecting shipowners and crew from unsupported allegations, seeking release of cargo and pursuing available remedies against unlawful measures.

Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey