

A foreign athlete signs with a Turkish sports club but cannot be registered or play. Who is liable? 2026 guide covering club responsibility, TFF registration, foreign-player limits, ITC problems, salary, termination and compensation claims.
A foreign professional athlete may negotiate for weeks with a Turkish club, sign a multi-year employment contract, reject offers from other teams, relocate to Turkey and begin training—only to discover that he cannot participate in official competition.
The explanation may be:
“Your registration is not complete.”
“We have exceeded the foreign-player limit.”
“Your International Transfer Certificate has not arrived.”
“The federation rejected the registration.”
“We have a transfer restriction.”
“The coach changed his mind.”
“We need you to wait until the next registration period.”
This creates an immediate legal question:
Who bears the financial and contractual risk when a foreign athlete signs with a Turkish club but cannot play because of a registration problem?
The answer depends primarily on why registration failed, which party controlled the registration process, what the contract says, whether the athlete fulfilled his own obligations, and whether the problem could reasonably have been prevented by the club.
A registration problem does not automatically cancel a signed sports contract.
Equally, every failure to register does not automatically make the club liable for the entire remaining contract value.
The cause of the failure must be identified carefully.
The starting point is to distinguish:
Employment Contract
from
Federation Registration and Competition Eligibility.
A professional athlete can have a contractual relationship with a Turkish club while simultaneously being unable to participate in official competition.
In football, for example, the professional contract and the player’s registration under the Turkish Football Federation framework are connected but distinct matters.
This means:
Signed Contract ≠ Automatic Eligibility to Play
but also:
Failure to Register ≠ Automatic Cancellation of the Contract.
This distinction is critical for compensation claims.
Before discussing liability, identify the exact obstacle.
Possible causes include:
Club Failed to Submit Documents
Foreign-Player Limit
Squad List Restriction
International Transfer Certificate Problem
Transfer Ban
Registration Deadline Missed
Incorrect Documentation
Player’s Former Club Dispute
Work Authorization Problem
Medical Dispute
Player Eligibility Problem
Federation Sanction
Club Licensing Problem
Contractual Dispute with Former Club.
Different causes can produce completely different legal outcomes.
Consider a foreign footballer who signs:
Contract Duration: 3 Years
Annual Guaranteed Salary: EUR 900,000
Signing Bonus: EUR 150,000.
The player arrives in Turkey.
He completes the requested procedures.
He trains with the team.
The club then decides not to submit or complete the registration because management has changed its sporting plans.
This can create substantial contractual exposure for the club.
A club may say:
“The new coach does not want you.”
That may explain the club’s sporting decision.
It does not necessarily provide a contractual right to cancel an otherwise binding agreement.
Changes involving:
Head Coach
Sporting Director
Club President
Transfer Strategy
Budget
do not automatically erase existing contracts.
A Turkish club signs a foreign striker for:
EUR 1 Million per season.
One week later, the head coach is dismissed.
The replacement coach asks the club to sign a different striker.
Management then refuses to register the first player.
The club’s internal coaching change does not automatically transfer the economic consequences to the player.
Foreign-player regulations are particularly important in Turkish football.
For the 2026–2027 Süper Lig season, clubs may include a maximum of 14 players who are not eligible for the Turkish national team on the A Team List, subject to the applicable age structure.
For 10 of those players, no age criterion applies.
Where all 14 positions are used, at least four must satisfy the applicable 2003-or-later birth criterion under the current 2026–2027 framework.
A club can nevertheless have contracts with more foreign footballers than it can include on the A Team List.
Suppose a Süper Lig club has:
16 foreign players under contract.
The club chooses 14 for its A Team List.
Two remain outside the list.
Those players cannot participate in the relevant A Team league matches merely because they remain contractually employed.
But this does not automatically mean their contracts disappear.
Where the club knowingly signs more foreign players than it can use, the player’s argument can be straightforward:
The club knew or should have known the regulatory squad limits when it signed the contract.
The club may have sporting flexibility regarding which eligible players it lists.
However, its contractual obligations must still be analyzed separately.
Suppose management tells the player:
“We made a mistake. We do not have a foreign-player position available. Therefore, your contract is cancelled.”
The player should not automatically accept this conclusion.
A club’s squad-planning mistake and the legal validity of the player’s employment contract are separate questions.
The competition in which the player seeks to participate also matters.
The rules applicable to league competition are not necessarily identical to those applicable to every Turkish competition.
In August 2026, the Turkish football framework was adjusted so that certain players who could not be included on the relevant A Team list could nevertheless participate in Turkish Cup matches under the specific competition rules and conditions.
This illustrates an important principle:
“The player cannot play” must always be followed by the question: “Cannot play in which competition, and under which regulation?”
A foreign footballer may potentially face different eligibility rules for:
Süper Lig
Turkish Cup
European Competition
Other Official Competition.
The player’s actual sporting situation should therefore be checked competition by competition.
Suppose the player signs five days before the transfer and registration period closes.
The player submits every document requested from him.
The club’s administrative department fails to complete the process on time.
The athlete then cannot play until the next available registration opportunity.
This can create a serious club-liability issue.
For professional athletes, missing a registration deadline can mean:
Months Without Official Competition
Loss of Match Fitness
Loss of Bonuses
Loss of National-Team Opportunities
Reduced Transfer Value.
Therefore, the consequences can extend far beyond administrative inconvenience.
This question is often decisive.
Ask:
Who had to submit the documents?
Who knew the deadline?
Who had access to the federation registration system?
Who failed to act?
If the relevant action was exclusively within the club’s control, the club may have difficulty blaming the athlete.
The position changes if the player caused the registration failure.
Suppose the club repeatedly requests a mandatory document.
The player fails to provide it before the deadline.
The club may then argue that:
The Player Caused the Registration Failure.
Liability could shift substantially.
Foreign athletes should therefore respond promptly to requests involving:
Passport
Previous Registration Records
Required Declarations
Immigration Documentation
Medical Information
International Transfer Documentation
Federation Forms.
The player should preserve proof showing when documents were delivered.
For international football transfers, the International Transfer Certificate can become critical.
Suppose:
French Club → Turkish Club.
The player signs his Turkish contract.
However, an international registration dispute arises.
The player cannot immediately become eligible.
Now liability depends on why the ITC process is blocked.
Suppose the player previously terminated his French club.
The former club argues:
“The player terminated without just cause.”
The Turkish club nevertheless signed the player as a free agent.
An international registration dispute follows.
This is different from a case where the Turkish club simply forgot to submit registration documents.
Before signing a foreign player whose previous contract ended through unilateral termination, the Turkish club should investigate:
Previous Contract
Termination Notice
Reason for Termination
Outstanding Salary
Option Clauses
Automatic Renewal
Pending Disputes
International Registration Status.
The club should not simply rely on:
“The agent says the player is free.”
The player should not conceal a serious contractual dispute with his former club.
If the athlete represents that he is completely free when he knows the former club is actively disputing his termination, liability questions can become more complicated.
The new club should be given sufficient information to assess registration risk.
A particularly serious case arises when a Turkish club signs a foreign player even though it knows that a regulatory restriction prevents registration.
Suppose:
Contract Signed: 15 July
but the club already knows it cannot register new players.
The player rejects another offer and relocates to Turkey.
The club later says:
“Unfortunately, we cannot register you.”
The player’s claim may be significantly strengthened if the club knew about the restriction before signing.
Evidence of pre-contractual representations can become important.
For example:
“Registration is guaranteed.”
“Our transfer restriction will be removed tomorrow.”
“There is no regulatory problem.”
“You will be eligible for the first league match.”
If those statements were inaccurate, preserve them.
Depending on the facts, the dispute may involve more than simple contractual non-performance.
The athlete may argue that he entered the agreement in reliance on inaccurate information concerning the club’s ability to register him.
Evidence can include:
Emails
Messages
Agent Correspondence
Club Letters
Negotiation Documents.
Suppose the club tells the new foreign player:
“We will register you once Player X is transferred.”
Player X’s transfer collapses.
The club has no place for the new signing.
The contractual consequences depend heavily on whether the new player’s agreement clearly allocated this risk.
A contract might expressly state that it becomes effective only after a defined event.
But conditions must be analyzed carefully.
Questions include:
Was the condition clearly drafted?
Was it objectively measurable?
Who controlled it?
Did the club deliberately prevent it?
Was the player informed before signing?
A vague verbal statement may not have the same effect as a carefully drafted contractual condition.
Suppose registration is stated as a contractual condition.
The club nevertheless deliberately chooses not to apply for registration because it signs a more attractive player.
The club may face difficulty relying on the non-occurrence of a condition that its own conduct prevented.
A club may say:
“You failed the medical examination, so we cannot register you.”
This requires careful analysis.
In Turkish professional football, parties should not assume that a club can automatically escape a professional contract merely by characterizing medical approval as a condition after the agreement has already been concluded.
The current TFF contractual framework must be examined.
If the club claims the player is medically unfit, the athlete should obtain and preserve:
MRI Results
Specialist Reports
Independent Medical Examination
Previous Club Medical Records
Fitness Tests.
This becomes particularly important where the alleged medical problem appears only after the club changes its transfer strategy.
For example:
Monday: Player signs.
Tuesday: Club announces player.
Wednesday: Club signs another foreign player.
Thursday: Club suddenly claims the first player failed medical.
The chronology should be preserved.
Foreign professional athletes may also need to satisfy governmental immigration and employment requirements.
Sports registration and governmental authorization are not the same process.
A problem involving one does not automatically determine the other.
Again, contractual responsibility matters.
Did the contract require the club to arrange:
Work Authorization
Residence Documentation
Federation Registration
or related administrative procedures?
If so, club inaction can be important.
Conversely, if the athlete provides inaccurate documents or conceals a fact preventing lawful registration, the club may have contractual defenses.
Liability is not automatically one-sided.
Sometimes neither party deliberately causes the problem.
A federation may reject the registration because of a regulatory interpretation neither side anticipated.
The contract should then be examined for allocation of regulatory risk.
Questions include:
Is there a registration condition?
Who assumed the risk?
Is termination permitted?
Is salary payable during the delay?
Must the parties seek an appeal?
Even where the initial rejection was not the club’s fault, the club’s response matters.
Did it:
Appeal Promptly?
Correct Documentation?
Inform the Player?
Seek Available Registration Remedies?
Explore Alternative Squad Registration?
or simply do nothing?
Failure to respond reasonably can create a separate issue.
Where the problem involves Turkish football registration, the applicable TFF rules and procedures should be examined immediately.
The player may need to establish:
Valid Professional Contract
Eligibility
Club’s Failure to Register
Correct Documentation
Registration Deadline
Applicable Squad Rules.
Where an adverse TFF decision exists, the available review or appeal procedure should be identified without delay.
Where the registration problem has an international dimension, FIFA regulations may also become relevant.
Examples include:
International Transfer
ITC Dispute
Disputed Termination with Former Foreign Club
International Loan
Return from International Loan.
Depending on the circumstances, provisional registration or Football Tribunal proceedings may become relevant.
A Brazilian footballer signing a Turkish club does not automatically have a FIFA claim merely because he is Brazilian.
Jurisdiction depends on the actual international dimension and the applicable dispute-resolution rules.
TFF mechanisms may remain central in a purely domestic Turkish contractual dispute.
Suppose the player cannot participate in official matches.
Does the club still owe salary?
Potentially, yes.
If the contract provides:
Guaranteed Monthly Salary
the club’s registration problem does not automatically transform guaranteed remuneration into performance-dependent remuneration.
Contract:
EUR 100,000 per month guaranteed.
Player cannot play because the club failed to register him.
The club says:
“You did not play, so no salary.”
The player should examine the contract carefully.
Guaranteed salary and appearance-based remuneration are fundamentally different.
Suppose the player is entitled to:
EUR 10,000 per official appearance.
Because he is not registered, he cannot earn the fee.
Can he claim hypothetical appearance income?
This is more complicated.
The player would need to establish the legal basis, causation and potentially the likelihood that appearances would have occurred.
The payment trigger matters.
EUR 200,000 upon signature.
EUR 200,000 upon successful registration.
These clauses can produce different outcomes.
Every payment should be analyzed according to its contractual trigger.
The same distinction applies to:
Goal Bonuses
Assist Bonuses
Clean-Sheet Bonuses
Win Bonuses
Promotion Bonuses
Championship Bonuses.
Future performance remuneration is generally more difficult to claim than guaranteed salary because sporting outcomes are uncertain.
The contract may also guarantee:
Apartment
Vehicle
Flights
Health Insurance
School Fees
Relocation Benefits.
Non-registration does not automatically terminate these obligations.
Potentially—but not automatically.
A player should not assume:
“I cannot play, therefore I can leave today.”
The seriousness of non-registration depends on the complete circumstances.
Relevant factors may include:
Contractual Registration Promise
Reason for Non-Registration
Duration
Whether Salary Is Paid
Whether the Player Can Train
Whether Registration Can Be Corrected
Club’s Good or Bad Faith
Transfer Window Timing
Other Contractual Breaches.
The player’s case can become significantly stronger where the club:
Does Not Register
and
Does Not Pay Salary.
The overdue-remuneration issue should then be analyzed separately under the applicable TFF termination framework.
Foreign footballers should be particularly careful with unilateral termination.
Current Turkish professional football rules contain formal procedures for termination based on overdue remuneration and other contractual defaults.
Depending on the legal basis, formal notice, cure periods and proper notification can be decisive.
A message stating:
“You didn’t register me, so my contract is terminated.”
may create unnecessary risk.
The player should first determine:
Legal Ground
Required Notice
Cure Period
Formal Method
Competent Dispute Body.
A club may simultaneously:
Refuse Registration
Remove Player from First Team
Order Separate Training
Pressure Player to Leave.
The cumulative pattern should be analyzed.
Current TFF professional football rules contemplate squad-excluded players and impose obligations concerning training arrangements.
Therefore:
Separate Training ≠ Automatic Just Cause.
But abusive conditions can become relevant.
Record:
Training Location
Training Time
Coach Present
Facilities Available
Medical Support
Equipment
Access Restrictions
Written Instructions.
A daily training log can be extremely useful.
Unless advised otherwise based on the specific case, the player should avoid:
Unauthorized Absence
Refusing Training
Leaving Turkey Without Permission
Public Attacks on the Club
Signing Another Club Prematurely.
The objective is to prevent the club from creating a counterclaim.
Registration problems frequently end with the club saying:
“We cannot use you. Let’s terminate mutually.”
A mutual solution can be commercially sensible.
But the settlement amount should be calculated carefully.
Remaining guaranteed contract:
EUR 1.8 Million.
Club offers:
EUR 300,000.
Player has another club offering:
EUR 1.3 Million.
The player’s economic comparison is not simply:
EUR 300,000 vs EUR 1.8 Million.
The new contract, transfer deadline, litigation risk and mitigation must also be considered.
If the club commits a serious breach and the player validly terminates, potential monetary claims may include:
Outstanding Salary
Accrued Signing Bonus
Accrued Match or Performance Payments
Other Mature Benefits
and, depending on the applicable rules,
Termination-Related Compensation.
Suppose:
Remaining Salary: EUR 2 Million.
It would be unsafe simply to state:
“The player automatically receives EUR 2 million.”
Compensation can be affected by:
New Employment
Mitigation
Applicable Football Regulations
Contractual Provisions
Nature of Breach.
If the player later earns:
EUR 1.4 Million
from another club during the same period, that income may be relevant to the compensation analysis.
The player should preserve all subsequent employment documentation.
Timing matters.
If the registration problem becomes known on the final day of the transfer window, the athlete may have no realistic opportunity to find another team.
That can materially increase the practical damage caused by the club’s conduct.
Preserve evidence of:
Alternative Offers
Negotiations with Other Clubs
Rejected Offers
Agent Communications
Registration Deadline
Reason Other Deal Failed.
Hypothetical damages can be difficult to prove, so contemporaneous evidence matters.
A foreign athlete may have already moved:
Family
Household Goods
Children
to Turkey.
He may have paid:
Flights
Temporary Accommodation
Moving Costs
School Deposits
Other Relocation Expenses.
Whether these losses are legally recoverable depends on the circumstances, but they should be documented.
This can be especially serious.
Suppose the club knew:
It Had No Available Foreign Slot
or
It Was Subject to a Registration Restriction
but nevertheless told the player:
“Everything is clear. Sign now.”
The player’s reliance on that representation can become important in the overall liability analysis.
The club is not always the only possible responsible party.
An agent may potentially become relevant where, for example, the agent:
Misrepresented the Player’s Contractual Freedom
Concealed a Registration Obstacle
Failed to Communicate a Known Restriction
Exceeded Authority
or breached applicable contractual/professional duties.
Agent liability must be assessed separately from club liability.
The athlete may also contribute to the registration failure.
Examples include:
Providing False Documents
Concealing an Existing Contract
Signing Two Clubs
Failing to Cooperate
Missing Mandatory Procedures
Providing Incorrect Eligibility Information.
This can reduce or defeat claims against the Turkish club depending on the circumstances.
In international transfers, a former club may also become relevant where it wrongfully obstructs the international registration process.
However, a former club genuinely disputing an allegedly unlawful termination is different from a club acting without any contractual basis.
The underlying dispute must be analyzed.
Registration cases can often be organized as follows:
Where it knowingly failed to register, missed deadlines, exceeded squad planning, or signed despite a known restriction.
Where he concealed an existing contract, provided incorrect documents or failed to cooperate.
Where an international contractual dispute blocks or delays the transfer.
Where the dispute arises from interpretation or application of registration rules.
Where mistakes by several parties contributed to the outcome.
The evidence should establish exactly who caused each stage of the failure.
Foreign players should pay particular attention to the current season.
The TFF amended the professional football transfer framework in May 2026 and again in June 2026.
The 2026–2027 foreign-player rules also directly affect squad registration planning.
Therefore, older advice or previous-season regulations should not automatically be applied to a current registration dispute.
Under the 2026–2027 Süper Lig framework, the A Team List can include up to 14 players not eligible for the Turkish national team, subject to the current age criteria.
A club may contract with more foreign players than it can place on that list.
This makes contractual drafting particularly important for foreign players.
Before signing, foreign athletes should consider contractual language addressing:
Club Obligation to Register
Registration Deadline
Foreign-Player Eligibility
ITC Cooperation
Work Authorization
Salary During Registration Delay
Termination Right if Registration Fails
Compensation
Alternative Loan or Transfer.
These clauses can prevent expensive disputes.
A professionally drafted arrangement might address:
Club must take all required registration steps by a defined date.
If registration fails for reasons attributable to the club:
Salary continues
and/or
Player receives specified termination rights
and/or
Club must cooperate with an alternative transfer.
The exact wording must be tailored to the sport and regulatory framework.
A broad clause saying:
“Contract subject to successful registration”
can create significant uncertainty.
The player should ask:
What if the club deliberately does not apply?
What if the club signs too many foreign players?
What if registration is delayed rather than rejected?
Who bears ITC risk?
When does the condition expire?
Ambiguous clauses create disputes.
A foreign athlete unable to play after signing a Turkish club should collect:
Signed Contract
All Contract Versions
Registration Clause
Salary Schedule
Signing Bonus Clause
Federation Forms
Passport Documents
Medical Reports
Work Authorization Documents
ITC Records
Club Registration Communications
Foreign-Player List Information
Squad List
Transfer Restriction Information
Club Messages
Agent Correspondence
Official Signing Announcement
Training Records
Alternative Club Offers
Relocation Expenses
Bank Statements
Transfer Deadline Information.
For example:
1 July – Contract Signed
3 July – Player Rejects Another Offer
5 July – Player Arrives in Turkey
6 July – Medical Completed
8 July – Training Begins
20 July – Club Signs Additional Foreign Player
10 August – Player Learns He Will Not Be Registered
12 August – Club Requests Salary Reduction
15 August – Player Refuses
18 August – Club Offers Mutual Termination.
A chronology like this can substantially clarify responsibility.
Foreign player submits every required document.
Club administrator misses the registration deadline.
Player cannot play for several months.
The club may face substantial contractual exposure because the relevant failure was within its own administrative responsibility.
Club signs its fifteenth or sixteenth foreign player.
It later chooses other players for the A Team List.
The excluded player remains under contract.
The club’s squad-selection problem does not automatically eliminate guaranteed remuneration.
Player tells Turkish club:
“I am a free agent.”
In reality, his former club contract remains valid for another year.
The ITC becomes disputed.
The Turkish club may have defenses or claims depending on what the player represented.
Club knows it cannot register new players.
It nevertheless signs a foreign athlete and promises immediate eligibility.
The player rejects another club and relocates.
The club’s prior knowledge can become particularly important in determining liability.
The Turkish club acts promptly.
The player’s former foreign club challenges his earlier termination.
The ITC dispute delays registration.
The Turkish club’s liability may be very different from a case where it simply chose not to register the player.
Even if the initial ITC problem was not caused by the Turkish club, the situation can evolve.
If the club refuses to cooperate with available registration procedures or simply abandons the process, its later conduct may become relevant.
A foreign player is outside the applicable A Team league list but may fall within a separate competition eligibility framework.
The parties should not simply describe him as:
“Completely unable to play.”
Competition-specific eligibility should be verified.
Player remains unregistered but receives:
100% Salary
Housing
Professional Training.
The player may still have a serious career concern.
However, the termination analysis can differ significantly from a case involving:
Non-Registration + No Salary + Abusive Isolation.
The club refuses registration.
It also stops paying.
The player trains separately under poor conditions.
Management pressures him to sign a zero-compensation termination.
The cumulative conduct can create a much stronger contractual dispute.
A foreign athlete who has signed but cannot play should generally:
Obtain Complete Contract → Identify Exact Registration Problem → Determine Who Controlled the Failed Step → Obtain Federation Status → Check Foreign-Player Rules → Check ITC Status → Verify Registration Deadline → Preserve Club Communications → Continue Professional Compliance → Demand Written Explanation → Calculate Guaranteed Remuneration → Preserve Alternative Offers → Assess TFF/FIFA Remedies → Review Termination Procedure → Consider Settlement or Transfer → Avoid Signing Broad Waivers.
The Turkish club should:
Identify Registration Obstacle Immediately → Inform Player Transparently → Complete Correctable Procedures → Preserve Salary Compliance → Explore Alternative Registration → Consider Loan or Transfer → Avoid Coercive Salary Reduction → Negotiate Settlement Where Necessary → Document the Resolution Properly.
A registration problem that might initially be manageable can become an expensive contractual dispute if the club responds improperly.
A foreign athlete should obtain urgent legal advice where the Turkish club knew it had a registration restriction before signing, signed more foreign players than it could use without explaining the risk, missed the registration deadline, refuses to submit documents, claims the contract automatically disappears because registration failed, stops paying guaranteed salary, demands a salary reduction in exchange for registration, uses non-registration to force a transfer, invents a medical objection after changing its sporting plans, or pressures the athlete to waive all claims immediately before the transfer window closes.
Particularly serious cases often involve:
Non-Registration + Salary Default + Squad Exclusion + Pressure to Terminate.
No. Contractual validity and sporting registration are separate issues. The contract and cause of the registration failure must be analyzed.
Where the player has fulfilled his obligations and the registration failure results from the club’s administrative error, the club may face significant contractual liability.
Squad-registration restrictions do not automatically cancel contracts with foreign players left outside the A Team List. Guaranteed contractual obligations may continue.
Not automatically. Guaranteed salary must be distinguished from appearance-based or performance-based remuneration.
If the athlete concealed another contract, failed to provide required documents or supplied inaccurate information, the club may have significant defenses or potential claims.
It depends on why the ITC process is disputed. The Turkish club, player, former club or underlying contractual dispute may each be relevant. International registration problems require separate FIFA analysis.
Not necessarily. The seriousness of non-registration and the applicable termination procedure must be assessed before unilateral termination.
The remaining value is important but does not automatically equal the final compensation award. New-club earnings, mitigation, accrued remuneration and applicable sports regulations may affect compensation.
Possibly where the dispute has the required international dimension and falls within FIFA jurisdiction. Foreign nationality alone does not automatically make FIFA competent.
Obtain a written explanation of the registration problem, secure the complete contract and federation documentation, determine who caused the failure, preserve salary and training evidence, and assess available registration, termination and compensation remedies before the relevant transfer period closes.
A foreign athlete who signs with a Turkish club but cannot play should not focus only on the question:
“Why am I not registered?”
The more important legal questions are:
Who caused the registration failure?
Could the problem have been prevented?
Is the contract still binding?
Does guaranteed salary continue?
Can the athlete terminate?
Can another club register the athlete?
Does TFF or FIFA have jurisdiction?
What compensation can be recovered?
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign professional footballers, athletes, agents and international clubs with sports contract and registration disputes involving Turkish clubs. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with TFF registration disputes, foreign-player eligibility problems, ITC disputes, club registration restrictions, non-registration claims, unpaid salary, contract termination, compensation claims, mutual termination negotiations and FIFA-related international sports disputes.
Because registration problems can prevent an athlete from competing for months, the issue should ideally be reviewed immediately after the club states that registration cannot or will not be completed, rather than after the transfer period has closed.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey