

A foreign parent company sells goods to its Turkish subsidiary at a discount. Learn when Turkish Customs may question the discounted price, what evidence should be submitted, and how multinationals can reduce customs valuation and penalty risks.
A foreign parent company may legitimately sell goods to its Turkish subsidiary at a discounted price. However, because the buyer and seller are related parties, Turkish Customs may examine whether the relationship influenced the price and whether the discounted invoice amount can be accepted as the customs transaction value.
The central issue is not simply:
“Was there a discount?”
The more important questions are:
Why was the discount granted?
Would a commercially comparable independent buyer receive a similar discount?
Was the discount established before importation?
Does the declared value reflect the amount actually paid or payable for the imported goods?
Under Turkey’s customs valuation framework, a buyer-seller relationship does not automatically require rejection of transaction value. The decisive issue is whether the relationship influenced the price. If Customs has grounds to consider that it did, the importer should be given an opportunity to respond.
A Turkish subsidiary does not necessarily have to purchase goods from its foreign parent at the same price charged to every unrelated customer.
Commercial differences can justify different prices.
Examples include:
The issue is whether the discount can be commercially and legally substantiated.
Suppose:
Independent distributor price: EUR 100 per unit
Turkish subsidiary price: EUR 65 per unit.
Customs may ask why the Turkish company receives a 35% discount.
The importer should be prepared to demonstrate the commercial explanation rather than merely stating that the price was determined under the group’s transfer-pricing policy.
Contemporaneous documentation is particularly important.
The company should preserve:
A discount documented only after Customs begins an investigation may attract greater scrutiny.
The agreement should make clear whether the Turkish subsidiary receives:
Avoid vague contractual language where substantial discounts are routinely granted.
A Turkish subsidiary purchasing significantly larger quantities than independent customers may legitimately obtain lower unit prices.
For example:
Turkish subsidiary: 100,000 units annually.
Independent buyer: 2,000 units annually.
The price difference should therefore be analyzed together with quantity.
Customs valuation rules recognize quantity and commercial-level differences as relevant when comparable transactions are examined.
A strong file might show:
1–5,000 units: EUR 100
5,001–25,000 units: EUR 90
25,001–50,000 units: EUR 80
50,001+ units: EUR 70.
This is much stronger than simply saying:
“Our subsidiary gets a group discount.”
A parent company may sell directly to:
A Turkish subsidiary acting as the national distributor may receive a substantially lower price because it performs additional functions and bears additional costs.
Commercial-level differences should therefore be documented.
The Turkish company may independently finance:
These functions can help explain why it purchases at a lower wholesale price.
Where available, prepare a comparison between:
Foreign parent → Turkish subsidiary
and
Foreign parent → unrelated distributor.
Compare:
The comparison should not focus solely on the invoice amount.
Suppose an independent customer pays EUR 100 but buys only 500 units.
The Turkish subsidiary pays EUR 75 but buys 50,000.
The EUR 100 price should not automatically be treated as the appropriate customs value.
Relevant differences should be examined and, where permitted, supported adjustments should be considered.
Make sure Customs is not comparing:
Premium model
with
standard model
or
current-generation product
with
discontinued inventory.
Model, specifications, quality and commercial reputation can materially affect price.
The parent may use different pricing strategies in different markets.
Relevant commercial factors may include:
However, general statements about market conditions should be supported by evidence.
A foreign group entering Turkey may deliberately reduce prices temporarily to establish market share.
This can have a legitimate commercial rationale.
Preserve:
A foreign parent may discount:
Document the reason.
A discounted obsolete product should not automatically be compared with a new current-generation model.
One customer may receive:
180-day payment terms
while the Turkish subsidiary pays:
100% in advance.
Those transactions may not be commercially equivalent.
Preserve evidence of payment conditions.
The declared customs value should correspond with the commercial reality.
Prepare:
Invoice
→ bank transfer
→ intercompany account
→ accounting entry
→ customs declaration.
If the invoice shows EUR 700,000 but the Turkish subsidiary ultimately transfers EUR 1 million, Customs will reasonably ask what the additional EUR 300,000 represents.
Multinational groups often settle multiple invoices through current accounts.
A direct one-to-one payment may therefore not exist.
Prepare a reconciliation showing exactly how each import invoice was settled.
A parent may invoice goods at a discounted amount but separately charge the subsidiary for:
Some of those payments may be entirely separate.
Others may have customs-value consequences.
Their substance must be reviewed individually.
Certain royalties or licence fees relating to the imported goods and payable as a condition of sale may need to be added to customs value under the applicable rules.
A low product invoice combined with a substantial royalty payment can therefore attract scrutiny.
The Turkish subsidiary may provide the foreign manufacturer with:
Where the statutory conditions are satisfied, qualifying assists may affect customs value.
These arrangements should be disclosed and analyzed separately rather than hidden within the discount explanation.
A transfer-pricing report may explain:
This can support the customs defense.
But it should not be treated as automatically conclusive.
A corporate tax analysis may conclude that the Turkish subsidiary should earn a particular operating margin.
Customs asks whether the import price satisfies customs valuation rules.
These two analyses overlap factually but are not identical.
The multinational should coordinate them carefully.
Suppose the subsidiary purchases goods throughout the year at a 30% discount.
At year-end, the parent issues a debit note of EUR 2 million to adjust the Turkish company’s profitability.
That adjustment may create a customs question:
Does the EUR 2 million relate to the imported goods?
The answer should be established from the agreements and calculation methodology.
A year-end credit note may reduce the economic price ultimately borne by the subsidiary.
Determine whether it relates to:
Do not treat every credit note as irrelevant to customs valuation.
In related-party cases, qualifying transaction values involving identical or similar goods sold to unrelated buyers can be relevant when assessing whether the relationship influenced the price.
The company should therefore identify its own strongest independent comparables before Customs selects one.
An important distinction is that qualifying test values are used to examine whether the related-party transaction value is acceptable; they are not simply an automatic substitute for the invoice price.
This can be significant where Customs identifies a higher unrelated sale and immediately seeks to impose that price.
When comparing transactions, examine:
A comparable should not be used mechanically without considering supported differences.
If transaction value cannot legally be accepted, the customs valuation framework proceeds through prescribed alternative methods, including transaction values of identical and similar goods before later valuation methods.
Customs should not simply select an arbitrary higher value because it considers the related-party discount excessive.
The importer should identify the exact concern.
For example:
“The discount is unavailable to unrelated buyers.”
“The transfer-pricing adjustment shows that the invoice was provisional.”
“The Turkish subsidiary’s purchase price is significantly below comparable imports.”
The response should address the actual allegation.
A strong submission can contain:
This is substantially stronger than submitting the invoice alone.
Do not argue:
“The price is correct because it is our transfer price.”
That does not explain why the price is acceptable for customs purposes.
Instead explain:
how the price was calculated and why the relationship did not distort it.
Useful parent-company evidence may include:
These documents may become important during a post-clearance audit.
If Customs concludes that the parent-subsidiary discount reduced customs values, the issue may expand beyond one shipment.
Prepare a declaration-level database showing:
Date
Product
Invoice price
Discount
Quantity
Customs value
Year-end adjustment.
Calculate potential:
Management should know the potential range before deciding litigation and correction strategy.
A Customs suspicion does not establish that the historical values were wrong.
First determine:
Then determine the appropriate response.
If Customs rejects the discounted transaction value and issues an additional assessment, review:
The challenge should address both legal methodology and factual assumptions.
The company may argue:
Primary position: The discounted transaction value was valid.
Alternative position: Even if Customs adjusts the value, the asserted penalty is legally or mathematically incorrect.
Do not treat additional duty and penalty as inseparable.
Record the notification date of every:
Internal approval from the foreign parent should not delay protection of the Turkish subsidiary’s procedural rights.
The customs team, tax team and group transfer-pricing team should coordinate factual explanations.
For example, the group should avoid simultaneously asserting:
Tax position: The parent intentionally lowered the goods price to manipulate the Turkish distributor’s profit.
and
Customs position: The relationship had no effect on the goods price.
Factual inconsistencies can damage credibility.
Determine what the customs broker knew about:
A multinational’s internal information may never have reached the broker preparing the declarations.
For future related-party imports, substantial discounts should have:
This creates contemporaneous evidence before any customs investigation begins.
A discount that was commercially justified five years ago may no longer reflect current market conditions.
Periodically review:
Update the customs valuation file accordingly.
Whenever the group issues:
the customs team should be notified.
The company should determine whether the adjustment has consequences for imported goods before year-end accounts are finalized.
The file should contain:
Group structure
Intercompany agreement
Pricing policy
Discount documentation
Independent comparables
Payment records
Transfer-pricing analysis
Royalty agreements
Year-end adjustments
Historical declarations.
This can significantly improve the company’s position during a customs audit.
The recommended sequence is:
Identify Customs’ concern
→ protect procedural deadlines
→ document the parent-subsidiary relationship
→ explain the discount methodology
→ prove the commercial reason
→ compare unrelated sales
→ adjust for quantity and commercial level
→ reconcile invoices and payments
→ review royalties and assists
→ review year-end adjustments
→ coordinate tax and customs documentation
→ quantify historical exposure
→ challenge unjustified assessments and penalties
→ improve future related-party valuation controls.
Yes. A related-party discount is not automatically invalid for customs purposes. The key question is whether the relationship influenced the price and whether the declared transaction value satisfies the applicable customs valuation requirements.
No. The buyer-seller relationship alone is not sufficient to reject transaction value. The circumstances surrounding the sale and the effect of the relationship on price must be examined.
Intercompany agreements, pre-existing discount policies, quantity commitments, independent comparable sales, payment records, transfer-pricing documentation and contemporaneous pricing correspondence can be important.
Yes. Quantity differences can be relevant in customs valuation comparisons, particularly where the importer can demonstrate a genuine volume-discount structure.
Not necessarily. Transfer-pricing documentation can support the case, but customs valuation requires its own analysis under customs rules.
Potentially. The company should determine whether a debit note, credit note or true-up relates to the price actually paid or payable for imported goods.
Yes. Certain royalties and licence fees may require inclusion in customs value where the applicable statutory conditions are satisfied.
Yes, qualifying unrelated transactions may be relevant. However, differences in quantity, commercial level and other relevant factors should be properly considered.
Yes. A valuation issue discovered in one shipment can lead to examination of historical declarations using the same related-party pricing structure.
The company should demonstrate that the discount has a genuine, documented commercial basis. It should connect the intercompany agreement, pricing methodology, independent comparables, quantity and commercial-level differences, payments, transfer-pricing documentation and year-end adjustments into one consistent customs valuation defense.
Parent-subsidiary valuation disputes can involve:
Related-party discounts
Transaction value
Transfer pricing
Volume discounts
Intercompany pricing
Year-end adjustments
Royalties and licence fees
Post-clearance audits
Additional customs assessments
and customs penalties.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists multinational groups, foreign parent companies and Turkish subsidiaries where Turkish Customs questions discounts or other related-party pricing arrangements used for imported goods.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in defending discounted transaction values, reviewing transfer-pricing documentation, analyzing comparable transactions, examining royalties and year-end adjustments, challenging customs assessments and penalties, and managing historical related-party import exposure.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey