

A foreign buyer discovers undisclosed customs duties and penalties after acquiring a Turkish company. Learn how to challenge the customs assessment, enforce SPA warranties and indemnities, recover losses from the seller and protect the acquired company.
A foreign investor may acquire a Turkish company after extensive financial, tax and legal due diligence, only to discover months after closing that the target has substantial historical customs exposure.
The problem may arise from old imports involving:
This is a significant acquisition risk because Turkish Customs can review historical transactions after the goods have already been released. The risk is particularly relevant in 2026: the Ministry of Trade reported that secondary controls and post-clearance audits during the first eight months of 2026 resulted in approximately TRY 10.1 billion in additional assessments and penalties.
For the buyer, the dispute usually has two separate legal tracks:
Customs defense: Can the assessment or penalty itself be challenged?
M&A recovery: Can the buyer recover the resulting loss from the seller under the share purchase agreement?
Both tracks should normally be pursued simultaneously.
This distinction is fundamental.
If the buyer acquired shares in the Turkish company, the target generally remains the same legal entity.
Its shareholders changed.
The company did not disappear.
Therefore, historical customs liabilities belonging to the target can remain liabilities of the same company after closing.
Before demanding reimbursement from the seller, examine the customs assessment itself.
Customs may be wrong about:
A buyer should not automatically accept a multimillion-lira assessment merely because the SPA contains an indemnity.
This is one of the most important practical rules.
Negotiations with the seller do not protect the target company’s customs-law deadlines.
If Customs issues an assessment or penalty, immediately identify:
The buyer should preserve the target company’s customs defenses while separately pursuing the seller.
Turkish Customs continues extensive secondary-control and post-clearance review of historical declarations. In the first eight months of 2026, secondary controls covered 142,768 declarations, while post-clearance audits covered 160 companies; the Ministry reported TRY 10.1 billion in additional assessments and penalties from the two mechanisms combined.
Accordingly, a clean closing date does not guarantee that historical customs exposure will not emerge later.
For every affected customs declaration, determine:
Import date
Declaration date
Closing date
Assessment date
Penalty date
Notification date.
This establishes whether the underlying transaction belongs to the pre-acquisition period.
This distinction is critical.
For example:
2024–2025 imports: before acquisition
2026 imports: after acquisition.
If the same customs practice continued after closing, part of the exposure may relate to the buyer-controlled period.
Do not automatically characterize the entire assessment as the seller’s responsibility.
The SPA should be examined for:
The exact wording can determine whether the buyer can recover.
Some SPAs define “Tax” broadly enough to include:
Other agreements treat customs liabilities separately.
Never assume a general tax indemnity automatically covers every customs liability.
Typical warranties may state that:
A historical assessment may potentially constitute a breach of one or more warranties.
Suppose due diligence identified uncertainty concerning the tariff classification of imported machinery.
The parties may have agreed:
Seller will indemnify Buyer for customs liabilities arising from historical classification of the machinery.
A specific indemnity can provide significantly clearer protection than a general warranty.
The seller may argue:
“The buyer knew about this risk before closing.”
Review:
Whether disclosure defeats or limits the claim depends on the SPA wording and applicable law.
Do not rely only on the original due diligence report.
After the customs problem becomes known, search the acquisition data room specifically for:
Documents that appeared insignificant before closing may become highly important afterward.
Prepare a simple comparison:
| Seller Representation | Post-Closing Discovery |
|---|---|
| All duties paid | Additional duty assessed |
| No investigation | Historical audit existed |
| Correct classification | Customs alleges wrong tariff |
| Valid origin documents | Preferential treatment rejected |
This helps identify potential warranty breaches quickly.
An SPA may allow different survival periods for:
A customs claim may have a longer or shorter contractual period than other claims.
Do not confuse the customs objection deadline with the SPA claim deadline.
Follow the contractual notice procedure exactly.
A notice may need to identify:
An informal message may not satisfy the SPA.
The SPA may allow the seller to:
Failure to follow these provisions can complicate indemnity recovery.
The acquired company is the entity facing Customs.
The buyer should ensure that the customs defense protects the target’s interests rather than merely minimizing the seller’s contractual exposure.
A settlement may reduce immediate exposure but affect:
Review the SPA before accepting a settlement.
Obtain:
Do not rely solely on the seller’s former customs broker.
Historical exposure frequently arises from whether additional payments should have been included in customs value.
Review:
Examine:
Origin problems can create additional duties and penalties long after importation.
A historical classification or origin issue can sometimes result in anti-dumping exposure considerably larger than the ordinary customs duty.
Therefore, quantify each import measure separately.
Prepare:
Additional customs duties
Additional import taxes
Administrative penalties
Late-payment amounts
Legal and expert costs
=
Potential acquisition loss.
This calculation should then be compared with the SPA’s liability limits.
The SPA may cap seller liability at:
But specific customs or tax indemnities may have different caps.
Read the provisions together.
Some warranty claims cannot be brought unless:
Determine whether customs claims are subject to these limitations.
High-risk transactions sometimes exclude certain historical tax or customs liabilities from the general liability cap.
This can materially increase potential recovery.
If part of the purchase price remains in escrow, determine whether the buyer can make a claim against those funds.
Review:
Act before the funds are automatically released.
Where the buyer retained part of the purchase price, the customs claim may potentially be set against the retained amount depending on the SPA.
Do not release funds without reviewing known customs exposure.
If the acquisition included warranty and indemnity insurance, notify the insurer promptly.
Review:
Late notice can create unnecessary coverage disputes.
Suppose evidence shows that the seller knew about a customs investigation but expressly represented that no investigation existed.
This may raise issues beyond an ordinary warranty breach.
Preserve:
Do not alter or destroy historical electronic records.
The seller may argue that the buyer’s advisers could have discovered the issue during due diligence.
Whether this defeats a claim depends on:
A due diligence failure does not automatically eliminate every contractual remedy.
Suppose Customs assesses TRY 20 million but the target has a strong legal defense.
If the buyer simply pays without challenging the assessment, the seller may argue that the loss was unnecessarily increased.
The customs defense should therefore be commercially reasonable and documented.
Former employees may know:
Identify key individuals before institutional knowledge disappears.
Obtain the historical broker file.
Determine:
Broker responsibility may constitute a separate recovery avenue depending on the facts.
Potential responsible parties can include:
Claims should be analyzed separately to avoid losing recovery options.
This is particularly important.
If the buyer learned of the problem but continued using the same:
post-closing exposure may increase.
Correct future declarations where legally necessary.
Changing customs treatment for future imports does not automatically determine the legal outcome of historical declarations.
Document why the prospective approach changed.
A single customs assessment may indicate a broader systemic problem.
If Customs challenges one declaration, examine all imports involving:
The true exposure may be substantially larger than the first assessment.
A focused review should examine:
This can identify liabilities before another official audit.
In September 2026, the Ministry reported that during the first eight months of the year, secondary-control examinations resulted in TRY 8.3 billion and post-clearance audits in TRY 1.8 billion of additional assessments and penalties.
Foreign investors acquiring import-intensive Turkish businesses should therefore treat customs exposure as a material M&A due diligence category rather than a routine compliance item.
The fact that the seller sold the company does not itself determine statutory personal liability.
Potential liability of:
requires a separate analysis under applicable public-debt rules.
Do not confuse statutory liability with contractual indemnity liability.
A hidden customs case may involve:
Layer 1 — Target company: liability to Customs.
Layer 2 — Individuals: possible statutory liability under public-debt rules.
Layer 3 — Seller: contractual liability to the buyer under the SPA.
These layers can operate independently.
For each liability, record:
Declaration
Import date
Customs issue
Assessment
Penalty
Pre/post closing
Relevant warranty
Indemnity
Seller notice deadline
Customs challenge deadline.
This prevents procedural mistakes.
The two disputes should not be handled independently.
A statement made in the customs proceeding may affect the seller claim.
A settlement with the seller may affect how the customs case is funded or controlled.
Use one coordinated strategy.
The recommended sequence is:
Obtain the customs assessment
→ identify affected historical declarations
→ protect customs deadlines
→ verify classification, value and origin
→ separate pre-closing and post-closing exposure
→ review the SPA
→ identify warranties and indemnities
→ review disclosure
→ send contractual notice
→ preserve seller participation rights
→ check escrow and insurance
→ quantify the full exposure
→ review related declarations
→ correct future customs practices where necessary
→ pursue customs defense and seller recovery simultaneously.
Yes. Historical declarations can be reviewed through secondary control and post-clearance audits. Turkish authorities continue significant historical customs enforcement activity in 2026.
Where the target company made the historical imports and remains the same legal entity after the share acquisition, the company’s customs liability must first be analyzed. The buyer-seller contractual allocation is a separate issue.
Potentially. Recovery may arise under customs warranties, tax warranties, specific indemnities or other SPA provisions.
Non-disclosure may strengthen a contractual claim depending on the SPA, representations made, disclosure standard and governing law.
That does not automatically eliminate every remedy. The effect of buyer knowledge depends heavily on the SPA and applicable law.
Not necessarily. First determine whether the assessment is legally correct and whether administrative or judicial remedies should be pursued.
The SPA may give the seller participation or defense rights. The exact contractual procedure should be followed without compromising the target company’s interests.
Potentially, depending on the policy. Customs and tax exclusions, known-risk provisions and notification requirements should be checked immediately.
Pre-closing and post-closing declarations should be separated. The buyer should also correct future customs treatment where necessary rather than allowing exposure to continue.
Protect the target company’s customs challenge deadlines while immediately preserving the buyer’s SPA claim against the seller. A strong indemnity claim cannot compensate for losing an avoidable customs case because the administrative deadline was missed.
Hidden customs liabilities after an acquisition may involve:
Post-clearance customs audits
Historical customs duties
Administrative penalties
Share purchase agreement claims
Customs warranties
Seller indemnities
Escrow claims
Warranty and indemnity insurance
Misrepresentation
and cross-border M&A disputes.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign investors, international buyers and multinational companies when undisclosed Turkish customs liabilities emerge after acquiring a company.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya provides legal assistance in challenging historical customs assessments, investigating undisclosed customs exposure, reviewing SPA warranties and indemnities, preserving claims against sellers, coordinating warranty and indemnity insurance notifications and pursuing contractual recovery alongside Turkish customs proceedings.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, Office No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey