

Learn who pays passenger injury compensation after a car accident in Turkey in 2026, including compulsory traffic insurance, permanent disability, loss of earnings, seat belt issues, taxis, uninsured vehicles and foreign passengers.
Passengers injured in traffic accidents are often uncertain about who should pay their compensation. Unlike drivers, passengers generally do not control how the accident occurs, yet they may suffer some of the most serious consequences of a collision.
A passenger can suffer fractures, spinal injuries, traumatic brain injuries, internal organ damage, nerve injuries, permanent disability or even death. The victim may also be unable to work for months or may never fully return to their previous profession.
This creates an important legal question:
Who is liable for an injured passenger’s compensation after a traffic accident in Turkey?
Depending on the circumstances, compensation may potentially be pursued against the compulsory traffic insurer of the vehicle in which the passenger was travelling, the insurer of another vehicle involved in the accident, the at-fault driver, vehicle operator, vehicle owner, employer or other legally responsible persons.
Where more than one driver contributed to the accident, the liability structure can become more complicated.
Foreign tourists, expatriates, international students and business travellers injured as passengers in Turkey may also potentially claim compensation. Foreign nationality does not itself eliminate rights arising from a traffic accident in Turkey.
Potentially, yes.
A passenger who suffers bodily injury because of a traffic accident may have significant compensation rights.
Depending on the facts, potential losses can include:
However, not every category of legally recoverable damage is necessarily payable by compulsory traffic insurance.
The first task is therefore to identify who caused the accident and which insurance policies and responsible persons are involved.
The answer depends primarily on fault and the vehicles involved.
Consider three common situations.
Situation One: The Driver of the Passenger’s Own Vehicle Is at Fault
The passenger may potentially pursue covered bodily injury compensation against the compulsory traffic insurer of the vehicle in which they were travelling.
Situation Two: Another Vehicle Is at Fault
The compulsory traffic insurer of the other responsible vehicle may potentially be liable for covered losses.
Situation Three: Both Drivers Are at Fault
Where multiple vehicles contributed to the accident, compensation responsibility may need to be allocated according to the applicable liability rules, fault findings and insurance coverage.
The passenger should therefore avoid assuming that only the insurance company of the vehicle they were travelling in can ever be responsible.
Potentially, yes.
This point is frequently misunderstood.
A passenger may be injured because the driver of the same vehicle drives negligently.
For example, the driver may:
Speed
Lose Control
Run a Red Light
Follow Another Vehicle Too Closely
Make an Unsafe Overtaking Maneuver
Use a Mobile Phone
Drive While Distracted
The passenger’s relationship with the driver does not automatically eliminate the potential insurance claim.
The applicable compulsory motor liability insurance framework must be examined according to the specific accident.
SEDDK maintains the current Compulsory Motor Liability Insurance General Conditions within its official insurance legislation.
Being a friend of the driver does not automatically eliminate compensation rights.
The same applies where the passenger is:
A Colleague
A Neighbor
A Boyfriend or Girlfriend
A Business Associate
A Guest
However, the precise legal circumstances should be examined carefully, particularly where issues concerning gratuitous transportation or contributory conduct are raised.
The passenger should not assume that travelling without paying the driver means that no compensation can ever be claimed.
Family relationship alone does not necessarily eliminate all compensation rights.
A passenger may be:
Driver’s Spouse
Child
Parent
Sibling
Other Relative
and still suffer bodily injuries because of a traffic accident.
The particular insurance coverage, identity of the claimant and nature of the compensation sought must be evaluated.
The 2026 compulsory traffic insurance limits are particularly important for seriously injured passengers.
For the period from 1 January 2026 through 31 December 2026, SEDDK’s official limits for motor vehicles used to transport persons provide:
Health Expenses: TRY 3,600,000 per person
Permanent Disability and Death: TRY 3,600,000 per person
Health Expenses: TRY 18,000,000 per accident
Permanent Disability and Death: TRY 18,000,000 per accident.
These limits are particularly relevant where several passengers are injured in the same accident.
The TRY 3.6 million amount is a coverage ceiling per person, not an automatic compensation payment.
Permanent disability compensation can become one of the largest components of a serious passenger injury claim.
A passenger may suffer:
Spinal Cord Damage
Brain Injury
Loss of Limb
Nerve Damage
Permanent Joint Restriction
Loss of Vision
Neurological Impairment
Severe Orthopedic Injuries
The compensation calculation may take into account factors including:
Age
Permanent Medical Impairment
Income
Working Capacity
Fault and Causation
Applicable Actuarial Methodology
Insurance Limits
A medical disability percentage should therefore not be viewed in isolation.
No.
This is a common misconception.
The 2026 insurance limit should not simply be multiplied by the passenger’s disability percentage.
For example:
25% × TRY 3,600,000
is not automatically the passenger’s compensation.
The legally relevant loss must first be calculated. The applicable compulsory insurance limit then operates as a maximum ceiling on the insurer’s responsibility within the relevant coverage.
Potentially, depending on the nature of the loss and legal basis of the claim.
An injured passenger may be unable to work for weeks or months.
For example, the passenger may be:
Employee
Company Executive
Doctor
Engineer
Lawyer
Business Owner
Freelancer
Foreign Professional
Income evidence can therefore become extremely important.
Relevant documents may include:
The claimant should distinguish between losses covered by compulsory traffic insurance and additional civil damages that may need to be pursued against responsible persons.
A permanent reduction in working capacity can have significant long-term consequences.
For example, a surgeon suffering permanent hand damage or a construction worker suffering serious spinal injury may technically retain some working capacity while losing the ability to continue their previous occupation.
The claim may therefore require analysis of:
Pre-Accident Profession
Income
Permanent Injury
Future Working Capacity
Age
Career Consequences
The economic consequences of a serious injury can extend for many years.
Traffic accident medical expenses are governed by the applicable insurance and social security framework.
For 2026, the compulsory traffic insurance coverage table provides TRY 3.6 million per person for health expenses.
However, the institutional payment mechanism for medical expenses should be distinguished from other bodily injury compensation claims.
The passenger should preserve all medical evidence, including hospital reports, surgery records, imaging results, prescriptions, rehabilitation records and specialist evaluations.
Failure to wear a seat belt does not automatically mean that the passenger loses every compensation right.
However, it may create a contributory fault or causation dispute.
The critical question may be whether failure to wear the seat belt caused or materially increased the particular injuries.
For example, the legal and medical analysis may examine whether the injuries would have occurred:
Even With a Seat Belt
or
Were Significantly Worsened Because No Seat Belt Was Used
A blanket reduction without examining causation may therefore require challenge.
This can create a more complicated contributory-fault dispute.
If a passenger knowingly enters a vehicle driven by a person who is obviously intoxicated, the opposing party may argue that the passenger voluntarily exposed themselves to a known danger.
However, this does not automatically mean that all compensation rights disappear.
The specific circumstances must be examined, including:
Driver’s Level of Intoxication
Passenger’s Knowledge
Accident Causation
Passenger’s Own Condition
Other Vehicles’ Fault
The insurer’s obligations toward an injured third party and any possible recourse rights should also be distinguished. Current General Conditions contain specific recourse provisions concerning accidents involving alcohol, lack of a valid licence and other circumstances; those recourse grounds do not automatically permit an insurer to delay the injured beneficiary’s compensation process.
This does not automatically mean that an innocent injured passenger has no compensation rights.
The current General Conditions contain insurer recourse provisions concerning vehicles driven by persons without the required licence or whose licence has become invalid.
The important distinction is between:
The Injured Passenger’s Right to Compensation
and
The Insurer’s Possible Right of Recourse Against the Insured or Responsible Person
These should not be confused.
Again, this does not automatically eliminate the injured passenger’s claim.
The current General Conditions contain recourse provisions concerning bodily injury accidents where the insured or persons for whom the insured is responsible leave the scene without a legally justified reason. Importantly, the General Conditions state that the insurer cannot delay the compensation process by relying on recourse grounds or demand related recourse documents from the beneficiary.
This distinction can be particularly important for seriously injured passengers.
Multi-vehicle collisions can create complex liability questions.
Suppose:
Vehicle A Driver: 60% Fault
Vehicle B Driver: 40% Fault
A passenger in Vehicle A may have suffered no personal fault whatsoever.
The passenger’s compensation strategy may therefore require examination of both drivers, their vehicle operators and their insurers.
A claimant should not assume that the fault percentage assigned to the driver of the passenger’s vehicle automatically becomes the passenger’s own fault.
Potentially, but passenger fault is different from driver fault.
Examples might include situations involving:
Failure to Use a Seat Belt
Knowingly Accepting an Obvious Serious Risk
Interfering With the Driver
Dangerous Conduct Inside the Vehicle
Any reduction should be based on the passenger’s own conduct and its causal relationship with the damage.
The driver’s negligence should not simply be transferred to the passenger.
A passenger injured in a taxi may potentially have compensation rights against relevant insurers and legally responsible persons depending on the cause of the accident.
The fact that the passenger paid for transportation does not reduce the need to establish:
Fault
Insurance Coverage
Vehicle Operator
Driver
Nature of Injury
Economic Loss
Taxi passengers should preserve payment records and trip information where available because these can also help establish the circumstances of the journey.
Bus and minibus accidents can involve multiple injured passengers and potentially multiple insurance mechanisms.
The claimant should investigate:
Vehicle’s Compulsory Traffic Insurance
Nature of Passenger Transportation
Operator
Transport Company
Driver
Other Vehicles
Additional Applicable Insurance
Mass-casualty accidents also make aggregate insurance limits particularly important.
For 2026, vehicles used to transport persons have aggregate compulsory traffic insurance limits of TRY 18 million per accident for health expenses and TRY 18 million per accident for permanent disability and death.
The employer or company relationship may create additional issues.
Suppose an employee is travelling in a company vehicle during business activities when the driver causes an accident.
The case may potentially involve:
Traffic Accident Compensation
Compulsory Insurance
Employer Liability
Work Accident Issues
Social Security Rights
The accident should therefore be examined beyond the traffic insurance policy alone.
Potentially, yes.
If the employee was travelling for work purposes when the accident occurred, the incident may also qualify for consideration under occupational accident rules.
This can create parallel issues involving social security benefits, employer responsibility and traffic accident compensation.
Double recovery for the same loss is not permitted, but different legal mechanisms may protect different rights.
An uninsured vehicle does not automatically leave the injured passenger without a remedy.
Where the statutory requirements are satisfied, the Turkish Insurance Guarantee Account may potentially become relevant for qualifying bodily injury claims caused by an uninsured vehicle.
The passenger should also investigate potential direct claims against:
Driver
Vehicle Operator
Vehicle Owner
Employer
Other Responsible Persons
The absence of insurance is therefore the beginning of the legal analysis, not necessarily the end of the compensation claim.
Hit-and-run accidents can create additional problems.
Evidence should be preserved immediately, including:
CCTV
Dashcam Footage
Witness Statements
Partial Registration Plate
Vehicle Description
Police Records
Where an unidentified vehicle caused qualifying bodily injury, the Turkish Insurance Guarantee Account may potentially provide statutory protection.
Potentially, where the applicable legal requirements are satisfied.
A serious traffic accident may cause pain, psychological suffering and substantial disruption to the victim’s life.
However, moral damages should be distinguished from compensation payable by compulsory traffic insurance.
A claim may exist against the driver or another legally responsible person even though that particular category is not covered by the compulsory insurer.
Potentially.
A passenger may lose or damage:
Mobile Phone
Laptop
Glasses
Watch
Luggage
Clothing
Professional Equipment
The claimant should photograph damaged property and preserve invoices or other evidence of ownership and value where available.
Property damage must be analyzed separately from bodily injury.
A fatal passenger accident can give rise to significant compensation claims.
Persons deprived of the deceased passenger’s economic support may potentially claim loss-of-support compensation.
Potential beneficiaries can include:
Spouse
Children
Parents
and potentially other persons who can establish a legally recognized support relationship.
The compensation calculation may consider age, income, family circumstances, support relationship and applicable actuarial methodology.
For 2026, compulsory traffic insurance provides up to TRY 3.6 million per person for permanent disability and death, subject to the applicable aggregate limits.
No.
Loss-of-support compensation is based on the economic support lost because of the victim’s death.
Inheritance concerns succession to the deceased person’s estate.
Therefore, being an heir and being entitled to loss-of-support compensation are legally distinct questions.
Potentially, subject to the applicable legal requirements.
These claims should be distinguished from compulsory traffic insurance death compensation.
A complete fatal accident analysis may therefore involve claims against the insurer as well as direct claims against legally responsible persons.
Potentially, yes.
Foreign nationality does not itself prevent a qualifying traffic accident compensation claim.
Foreign passengers may include:
Tourists
Expatriates
International Students
Foreign Employees
Business Travellers
Foreign Investors
Diplomatic or Consular Personnel
The applicable Turkish liability and insurance rules should be examined according to the accident.
Potentially, yes.
A foreign passenger does not necessarily need to remain in Turkey throughout the entire compensation process.
Before leaving Turkey, the claimant should preserve:
A Turkish lawyer may potentially continue the process under an appropriately prepared power of attorney.
Yes.
Foreign accident victims frequently receive emergency treatment in Turkey and continue rehabilitation or surgery abroad.
Foreign medical evidence should clearly demonstrate continuity between the Turkish accident and subsequent treatment.
Depending on the intended legal use, foreign documents may require certified Turkish translation, apostille or other authentication formalities.
Potentially, where income is legally relevant.
Foreign passengers should preserve objective income documentation such as:
Employment Agreements
Payslips
Tax Returns
Bank Records
Employer Confirmation
Business Accounts
Professional Contracts
The actual evidentiary and calculation rules should be assessed case by case.
The passenger should not evaluate the offer only by looking at the final number.
The calculation should be examined for possible errors involving:
Permanent Disability
Income
Age
Medical Causation
Fault
Actuarial Method
Insurance Limits
Missing Documents
A low settlement can potentially be challenged if the underlying calculation is incorrect.
Not before understanding its consequences.
Serious injuries may take months to stabilize.
A passenger initially diagnosed with fractures may later develop permanent joint restriction, chronic neurological problems or reduced working capacity.
Before signing a final release, the passenger should understand:
What Claims Are Being Settled?
Is Permanent Disability Known?
Is the Payment Final?
Which Future Claims Are Waived?
Does the Settlement Cover Only the Insurer or Other Parties Too?
This is particularly important for foreign passengers who may not understand Turkish-language settlement documents.
Potentially, where the applicable procedural requirements are satisfied.
Insurance arbitration may be available for qualifying disputes involving:
Permanent Disability Compensation
Rejected Insurance Claims
Underpaid Compensation
Coverage Disputes
Calculation Errors
The claimant should preserve the original application to the insurance company, proof of delivery, insurer’s response and supporting documents.
Potentially, yes.
The insurer is not necessarily the only party against whom compensation can be sought.
Depending on the accident, legally responsible parties may include:
Driver
Vehicle Operator
Vehicle Owner
Employer
Other Responsible Persons
This can become particularly important where legally recoverable damages exceed insurance coverage or include categories outside compulsory insurance protection.
Several regulatory developments are relevant to passenger injury claims in 2026.
SEDDK published amendments to the Compulsory Motor Liability Insurance General Conditions on 12 June 2026. On 17 June 2026, Circular No. 2026/13 concerning submission of beneficiaries’ contact numbers in compulsory motor liability compensation claims was issued.
A new Insurance Experts Appointment Regulation was also issued on 19 February 2026, and the Insurance Information and Monitoring Center Regulation was amended on 23 June 2026.
In July 2026, SEDDK introduced Circular No. 2026/21 establishing the Alo 193 Insurance Claim Notification and Complaint Line and Circular No. 2026/22 concerning motor vehicle insurance damage applications through the Common Claim Notification Center.
These developments form part of the current 2026 insurance claims environment. Passenger accident victims should therefore rely on current procedures rather than older online information.
A strong passenger injury compensation file may include:
The exact documents depend on the nature and seriousness of the injuries.
Common mistakes include assuming that passengers cannot claim against the insurance of the vehicle they were travelling in, accepting an early settlement before permanent injuries are established, failing to preserve medical records and income evidence, assuming the driver’s fault becomes the passenger’s fault, and failing to investigate all responsible vehicles in a multi-vehicle collision.
Another major mistake is assuming that the compulsory insurer is responsible for every possible consequence of the accident.
Insurance coverage and broader civil liability must be analyzed separately.
Potentially, yes. If the driver of that vehicle caused the accident, the vehicle’s compulsory traffic insurance may potentially cover qualifying passenger bodily injury claims within the applicable legal framework.
Potentially, yes. The responsible vehicle’s compulsory traffic insurer may be liable for covered losses.
The passenger’s claim may require examination of both vehicles, drivers, operators and insurance companies. Fault attributed to the passenger’s driver should not automatically be treated as fault of the passenger.
The compulsory traffic insurance limit for permanent disability and death is TRY 3,600,000 per person in 2026. For vehicles used to transport persons, the aggregate limit is TRY 18,000,000 per accident.
Potentially, yes. Failure to use a seat belt may create a contributory-fault issue if it caused or increased the particular injury, but it does not automatically eliminate all compensation rights.
Potentially, yes. The injured passenger’s rights and the insurer’s possible recourse rights against the insured should be distinguished. The current General Conditions contain specific insurer recourse rules for such circumstances.
Potentially, yes. Foreign nationality does not itself prevent a qualifying traffic accident compensation claim.
Potentially, yes. A foreign claimant may authorize a Turkish lawyer to handle relevant proceedings subject to appropriate power-of-attorney and documentation requirements.
Potentially, yes. Persons deprived of the deceased passenger’s economic support may have loss-of-support compensation claims, subject to the applicable legal requirements.
Potentially, yes. The calculation can be reviewed for issues involving disability, income, medical causation, fault, actuarial methodology, policy limits and supporting documentation.
Passengers injured in traffic accidents can face serious medical and financial consequences even though they had no control over how the vehicle was driven.
Determining compensation requires more than simply identifying the vehicle in which the passenger was sitting. The legal analysis should examine which driver caused the accident, whether multiple vehicles were at fault, which insurance policies apply, the passenger’s permanent injuries, income and working capacity, and whether additional responsible persons can be pursued.
For accidents occurring in 2026, compulsory traffic insurance provides up to TRY 3.6 million per person for permanent disability and death, subject to the applicable legal requirements and aggregate limits. The insurance ceiling should not, however, be confused with the passenger’s automatically payable compensation or the total potential civil liability of all responsible persons.
Our law office provides professional legal assistance concerning passenger injury compensation, permanent disability claims, serious traffic accident injuries, fatal passenger accidents, loss-of-support claims, uninsured vehicle accidents, multi-vehicle collisions, Insurance Arbitration Commission proceedings and foreign passenger accident claims in Turkey.
Fırat Fesih Kaya assists Turkish and foreign accident victims with identifying responsible insurers and parties, reviewing fault assessments, evaluating permanent disability, calculating compensation and challenging rejected or underpaid insurance claims.
Foreign tourists, expatriates, employees and international visitors injured as passengers in Turkey may also receive assistance with foreign medical documentation, overseas income evidence, powers of attorney and compensation proceedings continuing after they return home.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower No: 148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
For professional legal support concerning passenger injury compensation after a car accident in Turkey in 2026, you may contact our law office for a case-specific assessment of liability, insurance coverage, permanent disability, compensation calculations and available arbitration or litigation remedies.