

Must royalties paid to a foreign parent company be added to customs value in Turkey? Learn the condition-of-sale test, evidence, transfer-pricing risks, penalties and appeal options in 2026.
Royalty and licence payments between a Turkish importer and a foreign parent company can create significant customs valuation risks. Turkish Customs may investigate whether a royalty paid for trademarks, technology, patents, software or know-how must be added to the customs value of imported goods.
A royalty is not automatically included in customs value. The decisive questions are whether the payment relates to the imported goods, whether the buyer must pay it as a condition of sale and whether the amount was already included in the price actually paid or payable.
The Turkish Ministry of Trade explains the treatment of royalties and licence fees in its official customs valuation guidance.
A royalty or licence fee may generally be added where:
All five elements should be examined together. A payment to a parent company is not automatically dutiable simply because the parties are related.
Turkish Customs may review payments described as:
The label used in the contract is not decisive. Customs may examine the substance of the agreement, the payment formula and its connection to the imported products.
The most important issue is whether the buyer must pay the royalty in order to purchase the imported goods.
Evidence that may support a condition-of-sale finding includes:
Conversely, the payment may be less likely to be added where:
The contract should be reviewed together with the actual commercial relationship.
Not necessarily.
A trademark payment may be added if:
A trademark royalty may be treated differently if it relates only to the importer’s domestic advertising, retail network or post-import sales activity.
The importer should prepare a product-by-product analysis rather than applying the same conclusion to every payment.
Technology and patent payments may create customs issues where the imported goods could not be produced, supplied or sold without the licensed technology.
Customs may examine:
Software payments require special care. A payment for software embedded in imported equipment may raise different questions from a subscription for software used by the importer’s employees after importation.
The treatment of intellectual-property payments depends on their legal purpose.
A payment for the right to reproduce imported goods in Turkey may be treated differently from a royalty connected to the goods themselves. Similarly, a payment for distribution or resale may not be added where it is not a condition of the sale for export to Turkey.
The importer should separate:
Combining all payments under a single “royalty” account increases customs uncertainty.
Payments to a foreign parent company are frequently reviewed because the parent may:
Related-party status alone does not establish that the royalty must be added. Customs must examine the contractual and economic connection between the payment and the imported goods.
The importer should maintain separate agreements for:
A royalty may be calculated as:
The importer should determine which portion relates to imported goods and which portion relates to:
A reasonable allocation method may use:
The method should be documented and applied consistently.
A customs valuation file should include:
The importer should provide a clear explanation of why the royalty is included or excluded and identify the supporting documents.
Royalty payments are often reviewed by both tax authorities and Customs. Transfer-pricing rules may require an arm’s-length royalty, while customs rules ask whether the payment must be included in customs value.
These are separate analyses.
A royalty accepted for corporate-tax purposes may still be added to customs value. Conversely, a payment that is commercially justified may not be dutiable if it does not relate to imported goods or is not a condition of sale.
Companies should coordinate tax, customs and accounting positions to avoid contradictory explanations.
If Customs concludes that an omitted royalty should have been included, the importer may face:
A post-clearance review may cover several years and multiple product categories.
If the importer voluntarily identifies a potential omission, it should obtain legal advice before making a correction or disclosure, because the timing and wording may affect penalty exposure.
In 2026, Customs increasingly compares:
A company should maintain a digital royalty register showing the agreement, products covered, calculation method, payments and customs treatment.
The importer may argue that:
Under Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458, an objection is generally filed within 15 days from lawful notification of the customs decision.
If the objection is rejected, proceedings may be brought before the competent tax court within the applicable procedural period. Filing an objection or lawsuit does not automatically suspend collection. A separate suspension-of-execution request may be necessary where immediate payment would cause serious and difficult-to-repair harm.
Settlement may be available for certain customs debts and penalties, but the importer should compare settlement with litigation and contractual recovery.
Companies should:
1. Are royalties paid to a foreign parent company automatically added to customs value?
No. The payment must relate to the imported goods and generally be a condition of sale, among other requirements.
2. Does related-party status make the royalty dutiable?
No. A parent-company relationship alone does not establish that the payment must be added.
3. Can trademark royalties be excluded?
Possibly, if they relate only to domestic marketing, distribution or post-import activity and are not a condition of sale.
4. Are patent and technology fees always included?
No. The actual agreement, use of the technology and connection with imported goods must be examined.
5. Can software licence fees be added?
Potentially. The result depends on whether the software relates to the imported goods and whether the payment is required for the sale.
6. What if one royalty covers imported and locally manufactured products?
The importer should prepare a reasonable, documented allocation separating the relevant portions.
7. Can Customs inspect the parent company’s royalty records?
It may request supporting records through the importer, exporter or customs-verification process.
8. Can Customs reassess royalties after the goods are released?
Yes. Post-clearance audits may result in additional duty, import VAT, interest and penalties.
9. What is the objection deadline for a royalty assessment?
An objection is generally filed within 15 days from lawful notification under Article 242 of Customs Law No. 4458.
10. Can a royalty assessment be challenged in court?
Yes. After the administrative objection stage, tax-court proceedings may be available within the applicable procedural period.
This article is intended for general informational purposes only. To avoid any loss of rights, we recommend consulting your lawyer regarding your specific circumstances.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office advises international groups, foreign parent companies, Turkish subsidiaries, importers, manufacturers and distributors on royalty-related customs valuation issues.
Lawyer Fırat Fesih Kaya can assist with licence agreements, condition-of-sale analysis, royalty allocation, transfer-pricing coordination, customs audits, additional-duty assessments, administrative objections and tax-court proceedings.
For urgent legal support:
Mobile / WhatsApp: +90 532 769 22 22
Office: +90 312 434 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yıldırım Tower, Balgat, Çankaya / Ankara, Turkey