

A Turkish property seller demands extra money before transferring the title deed. Learn whether a foreign buyer must pay, how to enforce the agreed price, recover deposits, stop a second sale and protect property rights in Turkey in 2026.
A foreign buyer agrees to purchase an apartment, villa, commercial property or off-plan property in Turkey for EUR 400,000. The buyer signs the contract, pays EUR 100,000 or even the entire purchase price and prepares for the title deed transfer. Shortly before completion, the seller suddenly says: “Property prices have increased. Pay another EUR 50,000 or I will not transfer the title.” In other cases, the developer invents a new “title fee,” “currency difference,” “completion payment,” “investment adjustment,” “citizenship charge” or “administrative fee” that does not clearly appear in the original agreement. For foreign buyers, this can create enormous pressure because substantial money has already been paid. Under Turkish law, however, a seller generally cannot simply rewrite an agreed property price because the market has increased. Whether the foreign buyer can force the transfer at the original price, terminate the transaction, recover money, claim damages or prevent a sale to another buyer depends particularly on the legal form of the contract, the exact price clauses, the buyer’s performance, the seller’s ownership, title status and whether the agreement satisfies the mandatory requirements applicable to Turkish real estate transactions.
Generally, a seller cannot unilaterally change a fixed contractual purchase price merely because the seller later believes the property is worth more.
Suppose the contract clearly provides:
Property: Apartment A-15
Purchase Price: EUR 400,000
Deposit Paid: EUR 50,000
Balance at Title Transfer: EUR 350,000.
The seller cannot ordinarily transform the agreement into EUR 450,000 simply by sending the buyer a message demanding another EUR 50,000.
The starting point is the agreement between the parties.
This is one of the most common explanations.
Seller says:
“You signed six months ago. The apartment is now worth EUR 500,000.”
But the agreed price was EUR 400,000.
An increase in market value does not automatically create a contractual right to charge the buyer the difference.
Otherwise, a fixed-price property contract would have little commercial meaning.
Another common scenario is:
Buyer A agrees to EUR 400,000.
Before title transfer:
Buyer B offers EUR 500,000.
Seller tells Buyer A:
“Pay EUR 100,000 more or I will sell to someone else.”
The foreign buyer should treat this situation urgently because the issue is no longer only additional money. There may also be an immediate risk of a transfer to a third party.
Foreign buyers sometimes pay because they fear losing:
Deposit
Apartment
Citizenship Application
Exchange Rate Advantage
or money already invested.
Before paying, determine whether the additional amount has any contractual basis.
Once an undocumented extra payment is made, recovering it can become considerably more difficult.
The first question is simple:
What does the contract actually say?
Look for provisions concerning:
Fixed Purchase Price
Price Adjustment
Currency Adjustment
Taxes
Title Deed Fees
VAT
Construction Costs
Additional Works
Delivery Expenses
Utility Connections
Agency Commission
and other charges.
The seller may have a legitimate contractual claim for certain separately agreed expenses. That is different from simply increasing the purchase price.
A contract may state:
“Total Purchase Price: EUR 400,000.”
That generally presents a very different situation from a contract containing a legally effective price-adjustment mechanism tied to specified circumstances.
Foreign buyers should therefore determine whether the seller is:
Demanding an Existing Contractual Amount
or
Inventing a New Amount After Signing.
Some developer contracts contain language giving the seller broad powers to change prices or costs.
Such clauses should not automatically be assumed enforceable in every circumstance.
Depending on the transaction, consumer status, standard-term rules and the precise wording, unilateral clauses creating an unfair imbalance may require further legal examination.
Suppose the price is clearly agreed as:
EUR 400,000.
The seller later says:
“The Turkish Lira lost value, so you must pay EUR 40,000 extra.”
If the agreement genuinely fixed the obligation at EUR 400,000, currency movement does not automatically permit the seller to increase it to EUR 440,000.
The contractual currency and payment mechanism should be examined.
A different analysis may apply where the contract fixes a Turkish Lira amount.
The seller cannot simply replace a fixed TRY price with a new amount because the seller wishes the property had been priced in euros.
The actual contract remains the starting point.
Changing the label does not necessarily change the legal nature of the demand.
For example:
Original Price: EUR 500,000
New Demand: EUR 50,000 “Exchange Difference.”
Ask:
Which Contract Clause Creates This EUR 50,000 Obligation?
If no clear answer exists, the buyer should not assume the payment is mandatory.
Off-plan buyers sometimes face demands such as:
“Construction costs increased by 30%.”
The developer therefore demands another EUR 75,000 before delivery or title transfer.
Whether this is permissible depends on the contract and applicable law.
A developer cannot automatically transfer every increase in its business costs to the buyer where the transaction was concluded at a fixed price.
Inflation may create commercial pressure, but it does not automatically permit one party to disregard the agreed price.
Any extraordinary legal remedy based on changed circumstances is different from a unilateral message saying:
“Pay more or you get no title.”
The seller must have a legally supportable basis.
Title deed expenses should be distinguished from the purchase price.
Under the current general framework, title deed fees are calculated separately for buyer and seller at the applicable statutory rate on the legally relevant declared transfer value.
The parties may have contractual arrangements concerning who economically bears transaction expenses.
The buyer should therefore check the contract before paying an alleged “title deed charge.”
Some contracts provide that the buyer will economically bear both sides’ title deed fees.
Other contracts do not.
The seller should not automatically assume the buyer must pay every expense simply because the buyer is foreign.
Review the contractual allocation.
Foreign buyers sometimes receive demands that do not correspond clearly with an official charge.
For example:
“Title Transfer Service: EUR 20,000.”
Ask for:
Legal Basis
Invoice
Contractual Basis
and an explanation of whether the amount is an official fee, brokerage fee, legal fee or additional seller charge.
Do not confuse a private fee with a government charge.
Depending on the seller and transaction, VAT treatment can be relevant.
The buyer should determine whether the agreed price was:
VAT Included
or
VAT Excluded.
This should ideally be stated clearly before signing.
A genuine VAT obligation should not be confused with an arbitrary last-minute increase.
Foreign buyers may structure certain qualifying first acquisitions from developers around applicable VAT exemption rules.
If the seller later demands VAT, the buyer should determine whether the exemption conditions were actually satisfied rather than relying on earlier marketing statements.
This is a tax question separate from an arbitrary purchase-price increase.
A real estate agent may suddenly say:
“You must pay another 3% before title.”
The buyer should review the brokerage agreement.
The seller’s obligation to transfer the property and the agent’s commission claim are legally distinct issues.
An undocumented agency demand should not automatically be treated as part of the property price.
Foreign investors purchasing property for Turkish citizenship may be particularly vulnerable.
A developer may say:
“Pay EUR 25,000 more or we will not provide the documents for citizenship.”
The buyer should identify whether the amount was contractually agreed and what actual service it represents.
A seller cannot simply create an unlimited citizenship surcharge because the buyer depends on the transaction.
The current real-estate route to Turkish citizenship generally involves qualifying property investment of at least USD 400,000, together with the required restriction on disposal and satisfaction of the other applicable conditions.
A private seller or developer cannot guarantee governmental approval merely by charging an additional fee.
Suppose the buyer agreed to purchase for USD 450,000.
The seller later realizes that the buyer needs the property for citizenship and demands USD 50,000 more.
The buyer’s immigration objective does not itself give the seller a contractual right to increase the agreed price.
The seller may say:
“Pay the additional EUR 50,000 or your EUR 30,000 deposit is forfeited.”
The buyer should not automatically accept this.
Whether the seller can retain the deposit depends on:
Contract Terms
Reason Transaction Failed
Form of Agreement
Buyer’s Performance
Seller’s Conduct
and applicable mandatory law.
This is strategically important.
Suppose the buyer is ready to pay the agreed remaining EUR 300,000.
Seller demands another EUR 50,000.
Buyer refuses.
Seller then says:
“Buyer failed to complete the transaction.”
The buyer should create clear evidence that he or she was ready and willing to perform the agreed obligation and that the seller conditioned completion on an additional disputed payment.
The buyer should preserve evidence of:
Available Funds
Bank Arrangements
Scheduled Title Appointment
Written Confirmation of Willingness to Pay Contractual Balance
and formal communications demanding transfer.
This can help distinguish seller breach from buyer default.
A properly structured notice may state that:
Buyer Rejects the Unauthorized Price Increase
Buyer Remains Ready to Pay the Agreed Balance
Seller Is Requested to Complete Title Transfer
and appropriate legal remedies will be pursued if the seller refuses.
The notice should be tailored to the actual contract and remedy.
A foreign buyer may become angry and stop responding.
This can create unnecessary ambiguity.
The seller may later claim:
“The buyer abandoned the transaction.”
The buyer’s position should instead be documented clearly.
Suppose the buyer is ready to complete but the seller refuses to attend unless more money is paid.
Evidence of the scheduled transaction and refusal can become important.
Preserve:
Appointment Information
Messages
Emails
Notices
and other records showing why completion failed.
Potentially in some circumstances, but not automatically.
This is where the legal form of the agreement becomes decisive.
A foreign buyer should not assume:
“I signed a contract and paid money, therefore the court must give me the apartment.”
Whether compulsory transfer can be pursued depends on formal validity and the particular transaction.
A privately signed document may create important contractual and monetary rights without necessarily satisfying the formal requirements required to compel transfer of Turkish real estate.
A properly structured preliminary real estate sale agreement in the legally required form can create a materially different position.
Therefore, contract form should be analyzed before selecting the remedy.
Suppose:
Purchase Price: EUR 400,000
Buyer Paid: EUR 400,000
Seller Demands Another EUR 100,000
Title Still in Seller’s Name.
The seller’s conduct may create substantial legal claims.
However, full payment alone does not automatically convert every privately signed agreement into registered ownership.
Property rights and monetary claims must be distinguished.
Where the foreign buyer has a properly structured preliminary agreement satisfying applicable formal requirements, the buyer may be in a significantly stronger position when seeking enforcement.
The exact document and title status should be reviewed.
Where an enforceable preliminary sale right has been appropriately annotated in the land registry, that registration can provide important protection against later transactions.
Foreign buyers should not wait until a dispute begins to investigate whether contractual rights can be registered or otherwise protected.
This is an urgent scenario.
The buyer should immediately check:
Current Registered Owner
Mortgages
Attachments
Annotations
and whether a new transfer is imminent.
The possibility of interim judicial protection should then be considered.
Where the legal conditions are satisfied, an interim injunction may potentially be requested to prevent the disputed property from being transferred or otherwise altered while litigation proceeds.
An injunction is not automatic.
The buyer must establish the legal basis and urgency required by procedural law.
Consider:
Monday: Seller demands EUR 100,000 more.
Tuesday: Buyer refuses.
Wednesday: Seller advertises the apartment again.
Friday: Seller transfers title to another buyer.
Waiting several weeks before obtaining current title information can materially worsen the foreign buyer’s position.
The dispute becomes substantially more complicated.
The earlier buyer’s rights do not automatically defeat the later buyer merely because the earlier contract was signed first.
The legal analysis can include:
Earlier Contract Form
Any Registered Annotation
Later Buyer’s Registration
Later Buyer’s Good Faith
Knowledge of the Earlier Sale
and the circumstances of the second transaction.
Turkish property law gives important significance to registered title and good-faith reliance on the land registry in applicable circumstances.
Therefore, an earlier buyer who delays protecting the transaction can potentially lose the practical opportunity to obtain the property and be left primarily with monetary claims against the original seller.
This is why urgent protection can matter.
Suppose the seller demands more money.
Buyer refuses.
Seller then transfers the property to:
Spouse
Sibling
Child
Business Partner
or a related company.
The relationship, consideration, timing and transferee’s knowledge should be investigated.
A related-party transfer may raise different evidentiary questions from an ordinary arm’s-length sale to an unrelated purchaser.
The seller may not transfer the property but may mortgage it after receiving the buyer’s money.
This can also threaten the buyer’s position.
Current land registry information should therefore be checked immediately once a dispute begins.
Even if the seller personally intends eventually to transfer title, delays can expose the property to creditor enforcement.
The buyer may have paid 90% of the price but still face an attachment registered against property that remains legally in the seller’s name.
Again:
Payment ≠ Registered Ownership.
Suppose the buyer discovers a mortgage that the seller promised to remove.
Seller says:
“Pay EUR 50,000 more so I can repay the bank.”
The buyer should not simply increase the purchase price.
A safer structure may involve verifying the mortgage debt and coordinating any legitimate creditor payoff directly with title transfer and release.
If part of the existing contractual balance is being directed to a bank or creditor to release an encumbrance, document:
Creditor
Exact Debt
Property
Release Conditions
Payment Allocation
and how the payment reduces the buyer’s outstanding purchase-price obligation.
This is especially common in projects affected by construction delays.
Developer says:
“Material costs increased. Every buyer must pay another EUR 30,000.”
Foreign buyers should review:
Fixed Price Clause
Price Adjustment Clause
Project Specifications
Delivery Obligations
Consumer Status
and any standard terms allowing unilateral changes.
A group-wide demand does not automatically make the increase lawful.
Where the transaction qualifies as prepaid housing under Turkish consumer legislation, mandatory consumer protections may apply.
The seller cannot simply ignore those protections by describing the additional demand as:
“Project Contribution”
or
“Completion Fee.”
The substance of the payment matters.
This can indicate financial distress.
The buyer should investigate whether the developer is:
Temporarily Seeking Additional Financing
or
Approaching Insolvency.
Paying more money to an insolvent developer can increase the buyer’s unsecured exposure.
Check:
Project Progress
Project Land
Current Title Encumbrances
Mortgages
Attachments
Developer Corporate Status
and any evidence of broader payment problems.
A demand for unexpected additional money can be an early warning sign.
If dozens of foreign buyers are suddenly asked to pay additional amounts, coordinate evidence.
Common communications can show that the demand is a systematic developer policy rather than a unique contractual adjustment.
However, each buyer’s contract and payment position still requires individual analysis.
This is dangerous.
The buyer should not transfer an additional EUR 50,000 based solely on a promise that documentation will follow.
If a legitimate price modification is voluntarily agreed, it should be properly documented before payment.
Not every additional payment is unlawful.
The parties may genuinely renegotiate.
For example, the buyer may agree to pay EUR 30,000 more in exchange for:
Larger Apartment
Higher Floor
Additional Parking
Furniture Package
Private Garden
or another genuine additional benefit.
The revised agreement should clearly identify what the buyer receives.
Suppose the buyer requests:
Custom Kitchen
Premium Marble
Smart Home System
Additional Bathroom
and substantial design changes.
These can legitimately create additional payment obligations if properly agreed.
They should not be confused with an arbitrary increase in the underlying property price.
This is the central warning sign.
If:
Property Is the Same
Contract Is the Same
Specifications Are the Same
Seller’s Obligations Are the Same
but the price suddenly increases, the buyer should require a clear legal and contractual explanation.
The seller may argue that the written price was accidentally entered incorrectly.
A genuine contractual mistake requires legal analysis.
The seller cannot simply label an unfavorable bargain a “mistake” because the property later became more valuable.
Evidence of negotiations, advertisements, payment schedules and previous installments can help establish the true agreement.
A developer may argue:
“Our agent was never authorized to sell for EUR 400,000. The real price is EUR 500,000.”
The buyer should investigate:
Agency Authority
Developer Communications
Invoices
Reservation Documents
Payments Accepted by Developer
and whether the developer previously confirmed the price.
Suppose the developer accepted:
EUR 50,000 Deposit
EUR 100,000 Second Payment
EUR 100,000 Third Payment
all calculated under the EUR 400,000 agreement.
Later, immediately before title transfer, it claims the actual price should have been EUR 500,000.
The developer’s previous conduct and payment acknowledgments can become highly relevant.
This is particularly serious.
If the buyer can prove the full agreed price was paid, the seller should not be permitted simply to characterize an invented amount as an “outstanding balance” without legal basis.
The buyer should demand written confirmation explaining the alleged debt.
Do not accept:
“You owe another EUR 40,000.”
Request:
Contractual Clause
Calculation
Invoice
Tax Basis
Payment History
and identification of exactly what the amount represents.
An undocumented demand becomes easier to challenge when the seller is forced to explain it.
The seller may say:
“Sign this balance confirmation or we will cancel tomorrow’s title transfer.”
Signing a document acknowledging an additional debt can significantly change the evidentiary position.
Foreign buyers should obtain independent advice before signing.
The seller may replace the original agreement with a new one shortly before closing.
The new contract may contain:
Higher Price
New Penalty
Waiver of Refund
Release of Previous Claims
Different Property
or different delivery obligations.
Compare every version.
Never surrender the only original contract in exchange for a revised document.
Preserve:
Original Signed Agreement
Email Transmission
Annexes
Payment Plan
and every amendment.
Messages such as:
“Final price EUR 400,000, no additional payment.”
or
“We confirm you have paid EUR 350,000 and EUR 50,000 remains at title.”
can become important evidence.
Preserve the complete conversation rather than isolated screenshots.
Bank transfers can show that the buyer paid installments exactly according to the agreed schedule.
The transfer references should be preserved together with SWIFT records and seller receipts.
This can help defeat a later allegation that the buyer failed to perform.
This is powerful evidence.
If the seller later demands another EUR 100,000, the buyer should preserve any receipt, invoice or statement confirming that the agreed purchase price was fully paid.
Potentially.
If the seller refuses to perform unless the buyer pays an unauthorized additional amount, the seller’s conduct may provide grounds for contractual remedies depending on the agreement and applicable law.
Potential remedies can include termination or avoidance of the contractual relationship and recovery of amounts paid.
The correct remedy must be selected carefully.
Where the transaction fails because the seller refuses to complete at the agreed price, the seller cannot automatically treat the buyer as the defaulting party and retain the deposit.
The nature of the payment and contract terms must be examined.
If the buyer has already paid the entire price and title transfer fails, recovery of the purchase funds can become the primary remedy where property transfer cannot be compelled.
The buyer should also investigate seller assets before relying on a future judgment.
Where the seller is legally required to repay the buyer and fails to do so, interest can become relevant.
The applicable rate, currency and commencement date depend on the legal basis and circumstances.
Depending on the case, the buyer may potentially claim additional provable losses caused by the seller’s breach.
Examples may include:
Financing Costs
Alternative Accommodation
Certain Transaction Expenses
or other directly connected financial losses.
Recoverability depends on legal basis, causation and proof.
Suppose:
Contract Price: EUR 300,000
Current Property Value: EUR 500,000.
The seller refuses to transfer unless the buyer pays EUR 500,000.
The EUR 200,000 appreciation may be economically central to the dispute.
However, the buyer should not automatically assume that the entire appreciation is recoverable as damages. The applicable remedy, contract form, causation and proof determine the result.
If the buyer chooses or is forced to pursue a monetary recovery claim, precautionary attachment may potentially help secure qualifying claims where the statutory requirements are satisfied.
This is particularly important where the seller appears to be disposing of assets.
Foreign buyers should understand the distinction:
Interim Injunction: generally aimed at preserving the disputed property or legal situation.
Precautionary Attachment: generally aimed at securing a qualifying monetary claim.
The correct tool depends on whether the buyer primarily seeks the property or the money.
This can affect strategy dramatically.
If the buyer immediately abandons the property claim and seeks only repayment, but the seller has already spent the purchase money, eventual collection may become difficult.
Asset investigation should therefore occur before major strategic decisions.
An unexpected demand for additional money can indicate liquidity problems.
If insolvency appears likely, investigate:
Bankruptcy
Restructuring Proceedings
Attachments
Project Mortgages
Other Buyer Complaints
and available security.
A buyer should not automatically send more money merely to “save the project.”
The seller may exploit the buyer’s immigration objective:
“Pay another EUR 50,000 or your citizenship process will fail.”
Property-law and immigration consequences should be analyzed independently.
The buyer should not allow immigration pressure to eliminate contractual protections.
A request such as:
“Send EUR 50,000 to my brother and do not put it in the agreement”
is a serious warning sign.
The buyer can later face difficulty proving the payment, explaining its purpose and recovering it.
All material payments should be transparently documented.
Cash creates additional risk.
If the buyer nevertheless made a cash payment, preserve:
Signed Receipt
Messages
Cash Withdrawal Evidence
Witness Information
and any acknowledgment from the seller.
Do not make additional undocumented payments.
An additional payment demand is not automatically criminal fraud.
However, criminal issues may arise where the evidence shows intentional deception, such as:
Seller Never Intended to Transfer
Same Property Sold Repeatedly
Fake Title Documents
Fake Seller
Forged Power of Attorney
Buyer Money Diverted
or systematic deceptive demands.
Intentional deception must be distinguished from an ordinary contractual dispute.
Even where fraud is suspected, a criminal complaint does not itself:
Transfer Title
Cancel a Second Sale
Return the Deposit
or
Award Civil Compensation.
Property and monetary remedies should be pursued through the appropriate legal mechanisms.
The foreign buyer should generally consider this sequence: Do Not Immediately Pay → Obtain Written Demand → Identify Exact Contract Price → Identify Contractual Basis Claimed for Extra Amount → Calculate All Payments Already Made → Preserve Bank and SWIFT Records → Preserve Seller and Agent Communications → Obtain Current Land Registry Information → Check Seller Still Owns Property → Check Mortgages, Attachments and Annotations → Determine Whether Buyer Has a Formally Enforceable Property Right → Document Readiness to Pay the Agreed Balance → Reject Unauthorized Price Increase Appropriately → Send Formal Notice Where Necessary → Evaluate Title Transfer Claim → Consider Interim Injunction if Second Sale Is Threatened → Evaluate Termination and Refund as Alternative → Investigate Seller Assets → Consider Precautionary Attachment for Money Claims → Calculate Interest and Potential Damages → Coordinate Citizenship or Residence Issues Where Relevant.
Foreign buyer signs at EUR 400,000 and pays EUR 200,000. Six months later the property is worth EUR 500,000.
Seller demands another EUR 100,000.
Market appreciation does not automatically amend the agreed price. The buyer should document readiness to pay the contractual EUR 200,000 balance and evaluate enforcement if the seller refuses to transfer.
Buyer A agrees at EUR 350,000.
Buyer B offers EUR 450,000 before title transfer.
Seller tells Buyer A:
“Match EUR 450,000 or I will sell.”
Buyer A should immediately investigate title status and potential interim protection rather than treating the matter only as a price negotiation.
Foreign investor buys an off-plan apartment at EUR 300,000.
After receiving EUR 250,000, developer demands another EUR 50,000 because construction costs increased.
The buyer should review whether the contract genuinely permits that adjustment and whether mandatory consumer protections apply.
Buyer has bank records proving payment of the entire EUR 500,000 purchase price.
Seller nevertheless demands EUR 75,000 before attending the title deed office.
The buyer should demand the legal basis in writing, preserve proof of full payment and determine whether compulsory transfer or alternative refund and damages remedies are available.
Seller promised clean title but property has a EUR 100,000 mortgage.
Seller demands another EUR 100,000 from buyer.
The buyer should not automatically increase the price. If a creditor payoff is appropriate, it should be coordinated with the existing purchase-price balance, verified mortgage release and title transfer.
Foreign investor has already paid USD 400,000-plus for a qualifying acquisition.
Seller demands an additional USD 50,000 because the buyer urgently needs completion for the citizenship process.
The buyer’s immigration objective does not itself create a new contractual payment obligation. Property and citizenship strategy should be coordinated without accepting an unsupported demand.
A buyer facing an additional-money demand should preserve the original purchase agreement, reservation agreement, preliminary sale agreement, all amendments, property advertisement, price quotation, payment plan, invoices, receipts, SWIFT records, bank statements, foreign-exchange documentation, title deed information, appraisal documents, WhatsApp and Telegram messages, emails, voice messages, title appointment records, agent communications, citizenship-related documents and every written acknowledgment of the agreed price and amounts already paid.
Before paying a deposit, the contract should clearly address the total purchase price, currency, taxes, title deed fees, VAT where applicable, agency commission, payment schedule, price-adjustment mechanism if any, additional works, delivery expenses, title transfer date, consequences of seller default, refund obligations and restrictions on unilateral changes.
The buyer should also minimize the period between substantial payment and title registration.
The greater the amount paid while the seller remains registered owner, the greater the buyer’s exposure.
Generally, a seller cannot simply change a fixed agreed price because the property became more valuable. The contract must be reviewed to determine whether any legitimate adjustment mechanism exists.
Document the demand and your willingness to perform the original agreement. Depending on the form of the contract, remedies may include enforcement, termination, refund, damages and interim protection.
Potentially in some cases, but not every private property contract gives the buyer an automatic right to compulsory registration. Contract form and property status are critical.
No. Full payment is important evidence of performance, but it does not itself replace the mandatory legal requirements for transferring ownership.
Not automatically. If the buyer was ready to perform the agreed transaction and the seller introduced an unauthorized additional condition, the reason for non-completion must be examined.
Act quickly. Obtain current land registry information and evaluate whether an interim injunction or another protective measure is available.
The later buyer’s registered rights and good faith can become decisive. The earlier contract, any annotation and evidence that the later purchaser knew of the earlier sale should be investigated.
Potentially, depending on the seller’s breach and contractual structure. Refund, interest and potentially additional damages may be available.
Potentially relevant damages may be considered in appropriate circumstances, but the entire appreciation is not automatically recoverable. Legal basis, causation and evidence matter.
Do not assume that you must. The seller’s contractual entitlement and the citizenship requirements should be analyzed separately before any additional payment is made.
A foreign buyer who receives a last-minute demand should not immediately choose between “pay the extra money” and “lose the property.” There may be other legal options.
The critical questions are: What price was actually agreed? Does the contract contain a valid adjustment clause? How much has already been paid? Is the buyer ready to pay the original balance? Does the contract satisfy the form required for the property remedy being sought? Does the seller still own the property? Is a second sale imminent? Are mortgages or attachments appearing on the title? Is the seller financially distressed? Would the buyer be better protected by seeking the property or securing a refund claim?
Firat Fesih Kaya Law Office assists foreign individuals and international investors with Turkish property sale disputes. Firat Fesih Kaya can assist with seller refusal to transfer title, unauthorized price increases, additional payment demands, deposit disputes, off-plan developer disputes, compulsory transfer claims where legally available, interim injunctions, purchase-price refunds, precautionary attachments, double sales, citizenship-related property disputes and real estate fraud.
Where a seller demands more money immediately before title transfer, time can be as important as the contract itself. If the seller is trying to obtain a better price from another buyer, create a mortgage or dispose of the property, early title investigation and appropriate protective measures can determine whether the foreign buyer ultimately fights for the property itself or only for recovery of the money already paid.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No: 221, Yildirim Tower, Balgat, Cankaya / Ankara, Turkey