

Solar EPC Contract Disputes in Turkey: Legal Rights, Claims and Remedies for Foreign Investors (2026)
Learn how foreign investors can resolve solar EPC contract disputes in Turkey. This 2026 legal guide explains delay claims, defective work, performance guarantees, liquidated damages, arbitration, litigation, contract termination, and compensation rights.
Turkey has become one of the fastest-growing renewable energy markets in the region, attracting significant investment in utility-scale solar farms, rooftop photovoltaic systems, industrial self-consumption projects, hybrid generation facilities, and energy storage-integrated projects.
Most solar investments are delivered through Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contracts. These agreements determine how the project will be designed, supplied, constructed, tested, commissioned, and handed over to the project owner.
For foreign investors, however, the EPC contract is often the single largest source of legal risk. Delays, defective workmanship, underperforming photovoltaic systems, grid connection failures, technical acceptance problems, warranty disputes, cost overruns, and contractor insolvency can significantly affect the profitability of a solar investment.
A well-drafted EPC agreement can reduce these risks, while a poorly negotiated contract may expose the investor to years of litigation and substantial financial losses.
This 2026 guide explains the most common EPC disputes in Turkey, the legal remedies available under Turkish law, and the practical steps foreign investors should take to protect their investments.
A solar EPC contract is a comprehensive construction agreement under which the contractor undertakes responsibility for:
Unlike ordinary construction contracts, EPC agreements generally allocate substantial technical and commercial risks to the contractor.
Solar EPC contracts are primarily governed by:
If the contract contains an arbitration clause, procedural issues may also be governed by:
A professionally drafted EPC contract usually includes:
Foreign investors frequently encounter disputes involving:
Construction delay is one of the most common EPC disputes.
Typical causes include:
The first legal issue is determining responsibility for the delay.
Most EPC contracts provide predetermined compensation for late completion.
Delay liquidated damages usually:
The employer should verify whether the agreed amount constitutes the exclusive remedy or whether additional damages remain recoverable.
The EPC contractor often guarantees:
Disputes commonly arise where:
Independent technical experts are frequently required.
Typical construction defects include:
The employer may demand:
Equipment-related disputes may involve:
The investor should determine whether responsibility lies with:
Many disputes concern electricity generation lower than expected.
Possible causes include:
The employer must distinguish between contractual performance guarantees and optimistic financial projections.
A project cannot normally begin lawful commercial operation until technical acceptance has been completed.
Acceptance may be delayed due to:
Responsibility depends on the EPC allocation of obligations.
Common disputes include:
The EPC contract should clearly allocate responsibility for obtaining and maintaining grid connection.
During construction the employer may request:
Each variation should be documented.
Failure to follow the contractual variation procedure often results in payment disputes.
Common disagreements include:
The contractor should never assume that verbal approval authorises additional work.
Foreign investors commonly require:
Disputes often arise regarding:
Warranty periods frequently range between two and five years depending on the obligation.
Separate manufacturer warranties may extend much longer.
Claims commonly concern:
Some defects appear only after several years.
Examples include:
Turkish law may provide remedies even after completion where legal conditions are satisfied.
Financial distress may leave the project unfinished.
Employers should evaluate:
Termination may arise because of:
Termination procedures should strictly follow the contract.
Improper termination may expose the terminating party to significant damages.
Force majeure clauses commonly address:
The clause should clearly define:
Many EPC contracts limit:
Foreign investors should carefully review whether these limitations undermine meaningful compensation.
Solar projects usually require:
The interaction between insurance recoveries and contractual damages should be addressed before litigation begins.
Most EPC disputes require technical evidence.
Experts commonly analyse:
Expert reports frequently determine the outcome of litigation.
Where arbitration has not been agreed, disputes are generally heard by Turkish Commercial Courts.
Possible claims include:
International investors frequently prefer arbitration because it offers:
Popular institutions include:
The employer or contractor may seek urgent court measures to:
Recoverable damages may include:
Foreign investors should:
Yes. Claims may generally be brought before Turkish courts or through arbitration, depending on the dispute resolution clause.
Potentially yes, provided the contractual and legal termination requirements have been satisfied.
Generally yes, provided they comply with Turkish law and the contract.
Possibly. Recovery depends on the contract, the cause of the underperformance, and the evidence establishing the loss.
Responsibility depends on the contract and whether the defect originates from manufacturing, procurement, installation, or design.
Yes. Many international EPC agreements use ICC, ISTAC, SIAC, or other institutional arbitration.
Usually yes, if the contractual conditions for making a demand have been satisfied.
Construction records, correspondence, technical reports, commissioning documents, performance data, expert opinions, and contractual notices are usually decisive.
Yes. Turkish law may provide remedies for latent defects, subject to contractual provisions and statutory requirements.
The most common mistake is signing a contractor-friendly EPC agreement without allocating responsibility for delays, performance guarantees, grid connection, technical acceptance, and defect liability.
Solar EPC disputes require legal expertise in construction law, commercial contracts, energy regulation, project finance, insurance, and dispute resolution.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office advises foreign investors, renewable energy developers, EPC contractors, lenders, manufacturers, and international companies involved in solar projects throughout Turkey.
Our legal services include:
For project-specific legal advice, early legal intervention can significantly reduce financial losses and improve the prospects of a successful resolution.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile Phone: +90 532 769 22 22
Email Address: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Office Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every EPC dispute should be evaluated according to its specific contractual terms, technical circumstances, and applicable law.