

Learn how Incoterms® 2020 interact with Turkish commercial law, customs rules, the CISG, transport contracts, insurance, risk transfer, and dispute resolution. A practical 2026 guide for foreign companies trading with Turkey.
Incoterms® rules are essential tools for foreign companies buying goods from, selling goods to, or transporting products through Turkey. Terms such as EXW, FCA, FOB, CIF, CPT, CIP, DAP, DPU, and DDP determine where delivery takes place, when the risk of loss transfers, which party arranges transportation, and who bears particular logistics and customs-related costs.
However, an Incoterms® rule does not replace a properly drafted international sales contract. It does not independently determine ownership of the goods, payment conditions, product quality standards, contractual penalties, governing law, jurisdiction, or the legal remedies available after a breach.
Foreign businesses therefore receive the strongest legal protection when Incoterms® 2020 are used together with carefully drafted contractual provisions and the applicable rules of Turkish commercial, obligations, customs, transport, insurance, and private international law.
As of 2026, Incoterms® 2020 remains the current ICC version. It consists of 11 internationally recognised rules governing the allocation of delivery obligations, costs, and risks between sellers and buyers.
Incoterms® are standardised trade terms published by the International Chamber of Commerce. They are commonly incorporated into domestic and international contracts for the sale of goods.
Their principal function is to allocate responsibilities concerning:
The Turkish Ministry of Trade also recognises standard delivery codes such as EXW, FCA, FAS, FOB, CFR, CIF, CPT, CIP, DAP, DPU, and DDP in Turkish customs and foreign-trade practice.
No. Incoterms® do not apply merely because a transaction concerns international trade or involves a Turkish company.
The parties must incorporate the selected rule into their sales contract, purchase order, framework agreement, or another binding commercial document.
The recommended formulation is:
FCA Istanbul Airport Cargo Terminal, Turkey, Incoterms® 2020
A complete Incoterms® clause should specify:
A clause that states only “FOB Turkey” or “CIF Europe” may be too vague. The contractual delivery point determines when risk transfers and may also affect storage, handling, demurrage, customs, and transportation costs.
Foreign businesses often make the mistake of assuming that an Incoterms® rule governs the entire commercial relationship.
Incoterms® do not generally determine:
The ICC expressly explains that Incoterms® are not substitutes for a sales contract, do not decide the passing of title, and do not select the governing law or dispute-resolution method.
For example, risk may pass to the buyer when goods are delivered to a carrier, while ownership may remain with the seller until the purchase price is fully paid. These are legally distinct issues and should be separately regulated.
The Turkish Code of Obligations regulates fundamental matters arising from sales contracts, including:
Where the parties have validly incorporated an Incoterms® rule, that rule helps define contractual delivery and risk allocation. Turkish statutory provisions may continue to govern issues that fall outside the scope of the selected Incoterms® rule.
The Turkish Commercial Code applies to commercial businesses and commercial transactions and contains important provisions concerning:
Under the Turkish Commercial Code, commercial provisions, commercial customs, and general private-law rules may operate together when resolving business disputes.
The selection of an Incoterms® rule does not eliminate the potential application of mandatory Turkish commercial, transportation, customs, or insurance provisions.
International sales involving a Turkish business may also be affected by the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, commonly known as the CISG, where its conditions of application are satisfied and the parties have not effectively excluded it.
The CISG provides a uniform framework for international contracts involving the sale of goods, including contract formation, seller and buyer obligations, conformity of goods, damages, avoidance, and other remedies.
Incoterms® and the CISG perform different functions:
A contract may therefore be simultaneously governed by the CISG, an Incoterms® 2020 rule, and supplementary national law.
The following rules may be used for road, rail, air, sea, or multimodal transport:
The following rules are intended only for sea or inland waterway transportation:
Using FOB, CFR, or CIF for containerised multimodal shipments may create practical difficulties because containers are frequently delivered to a terminal before they are loaded onto the vessel. ICC guidance highlights FCA as a potentially more suitable rule where containerised goods are handed over to a carrier before loading on board.
There is no universally safest rule. The appropriate choice depends on the seller’s logistics capacity, bargaining power, customs position, payment method, transport arrangements, and willingness to assume destination-country risks.
Under EXW, the seller generally makes the goods available at the named location, usually its premises. The buyer assumes substantial transportation responsibilities, costs, and risks from that point.
EXW may appear attractive to a foreign seller purchasing goods from Turkey or to a Turkish seller seeking minimal logistics obligations. However, it can create difficulties where the buyer cannot effectively complete export formalities or obtain evidence that the goods left Turkey.
Potential problems include:
For cross-border exports, FCA is often more practical because the seller handles export clearance.
Under FCA, the seller delivers the goods to the carrier or another person nominated by the buyer at the agreed location and generally handles export formalities.
FCA may be appropriate where:
The contract must clearly indicate whether delivery occurs at the seller’s premises or at another named place because loading responsibilities differ.
Under CPT and CIP, the seller arranges and pays for carriage to the named destination. However, the risk usually transfers when the goods are delivered to the first carrier, not when they arrive at the destination.
This distinction is frequently misunderstood.
A foreign buyer may see “CIP Munich” or “CPT London” and assume that the Turkish seller retains risk until arrival. In fact, the buyer may bear the transportation risk from an earlier delivery point even though the seller pays freight to the destination. ICC guidance confirms that under “C” rules, the place where the seller pays transportation costs may differ from the point where risk transfers.
CIP also requires the seller to arrange insurance according to the applicable Incoterms® requirements. Nevertheless, the buyer should review:
Under DAP, the seller bears costs and risks until the goods are placed at the buyer’s disposal at the named destination, ready for unloading.
The buyer generally handles:
DAP may protect a foreign buyer that wants the seller to control transportation to a precise destination but is prepared to manage Turkish import procedures itself.
DPU is the only Incoterms® 2020 rule requiring the seller to unload the goods at the named destination.
The seller should not accept DPU without determining:
Under DDP, the seller generally assumes extensive responsibility, including transportation to the destination and import clearance.
Foreign sellers should use DDP for deliveries into Turkey only after confirming that they can legally and practically:
ICC guidance warns that DDP may create serious regulatory difficulties where a foreign seller cannot directly complete import formalities in the destination country. In such circumstances, DAP or DPU may be more practical.
A foreign buyer purchasing from a Turkish supplier may prefer a destination-based rule such as DAP or DPU because the seller retains transportation risk for a longer period.
However, this does not always mean that a D rule is commercially superior. The buyer may have:
A buyer using EXW, FCA, FAS, or FOB obtains greater control over the main carriage but assumes transportation risk earlier.
The most protective term is therefore the one aligned with the party’s operational capabilities and supported by appropriate insurance and contractual remedies.
“FOB Turkey” is not sufficiently precise.
The contract should identify the exact port and, where necessary, the precise terminal or delivery point:
FOB Port of Mersin, Turkey, Incoterms® 2020
A vague location may lead to disputes over inland transportation, terminal handling, storage, delivery, and risk transfer.
Under CFR, CIF, CPT, and CIP, the seller pays carriage to a named destination, but risk may transfer at the place of shipment or when the goods are handed to the carrier.
CFR and CIF are restricted to sea and inland waterway transport, and the risk structure under these terms must not be confused with arrival-based D terms.
Incoterms® do not determine legal title.
The contract should separately state when ownership passes, for example:
Retention-of-title clauses should also be reviewed under the governing law and the law of the place where the goods are located.
The selected delivery rule must be coordinated with:
For example, an L/C may require an onboard bill of lading while the contract uses FCA and delivery occurs before goods are loaded onto the vessel. Incoterms® 2020 introduced practical adjustments addressing onboard bill-of-lading needs in certain FCA transactions, but the sales contract and L/C must still be carefully coordinated.
Only CIF and CIP expressly require the seller to arrange insurance under the Incoterms® structure.
For other rules, the party bearing transportation risk must decide whether to obtain coverage.
Even where insurance is arranged, the policy may not cover:
Incoterms® 2020 also provides different default insurance expectations for CIF and CIP, reflecting the different commercial uses of these terms.
An Incoterms® clause cannot override mandatory Turkish customs legislation.
The contract should identify:
A DDP clause does not automatically make a foreign seller legally capable of completing Turkish import formalities.
Incoterms® allocate some costs, but they may not resolve every consequence of:
The contract should separately determine which party bears costs caused by its own delay, error, missing documents, or regulatory non-compliance.
Incoterms® do not fully allocate responsibility for product compliance.
Contracts involving imports into Turkey should address:
The party responsible for import clearance should receive all information needed to satisfy Turkish technical and customs requirements.
Neither an Incoterms® rule nor a transport document eliminates sanctions risk.
Foreign businesses should screen:
The contract should also specify the consequences of blocked payments, denied licences, carrier refusal, or changes in sanctions laws.
Incoterms® determine responsibilities between the seller and buyer. They do not replace the contract of carriage between the shipper and carrier.
A cargo claim may therefore involve several separate questions:
Transport may be governed by Turkish commercial legislation or applicable international conventions concerning road, sea, air, or rail carriage.
Foreign businesses should preserve:
Incoterms® do not choose the governing law or dispute-resolution forum. These must be addressed separately.
An international contract involving Turkey should contain provisions covering:
Depending on the nature of the claim, a dispute may involve Turkish commercial courts, enforcement proceedings, interim injunctions, mandatory pre-litigation commercial mediation, or international arbitration.
A basic delivery clause may be drafted as follows:
Delivery shall be FCA Seller’s Warehouse, [full address], Turkey, Incoterms® 2020. The Seller shall complete export customs formalities. Risk of loss or damage shall pass in accordance with the FCA rule. Legal title shall pass only upon full payment of the purchase price. The allocation of customs duties, taxes, transportation costs, and insurance shall be governed by this Agreement and the incorporated Incoterms® rule. In the event of inconsistency, the express provisions of this Agreement shall prevail to the extent legally permitted.
This clause must be adapted to the actual shipment, payment mechanism, governing law, and commercial relationship.
As of 2026, Incoterms® 2020 remains the latest ICC edition and continues to provide 11 rules for allocating delivery obligations, costs, and transportation risks.
No new Incoterms® edition has replaced Incoterms® 2020. However, developments in digital trade, electronic transport documents, sanctions compliance, customs controls, supply-chain security, cargo insurance, and electronic bills of lading increasingly affect how these rules are implemented.
Foreign businesses should therefore avoid relying on template clauses prepared years earlier. Every transaction should be checked against:
Before signing a Turkish sales contract:
Yes, when they are validly incorporated into the parties’ contract. The clause should identify the selected rule, named place, and applicable edition.
No. They regulate particular delivery, cost, risk, transport, customs, and documentation responsibilities. Turkish law continues to govern matters outside their scope and mandatory legal requirements.
There is no single safest rule. FCA may be practical for exports and containerised shipments, while EXW offers limited seller obligations but can create export-clearance and documentation difficulties.
DAP or DPU may keep transportation risk with the seller until the destination. However, the buyer must consider import clearance, unloading, cost, and control over transportation.
No. Under CIF, the seller pays freight and arranges required insurance to the named destination, but risk generally transfers when the goods are placed on board at the port of shipment.
No. A DDP clause does not override Turkish customs, tax, licensing, representation, or product-regulation requirements. The seller must verify that the structure is legally and operationally possible.
No. Transfer of title must be regulated separately in the contract and may also be affected by applicable property law.
They are designed for contracts involving the sale and delivery of goods. They are generally not suitable as the primary legal framework for pure service contracts.
FCA is often more appropriate where containerised goods are handed over at a terminal before loading onto the vessel. The correct choice depends on the actual delivery process.
Yes, where Turkish courts have jurisdiction under the contract or applicable private international law. The parties may also agree to arbitration or another legally valid forum.
The selection of an Incoterms® rule can significantly affect transportation risk, customs responsibility, insurance coverage, and the cost of an international transaction. However, foreign businesses are protected only when the delivery term is coordinated with payment, ownership, product conformity, customs, transport, insurance, governing law, and dispute-resolution provisions.
Fırat Fesih Kaya Law Office advises foreign buyers, exporters, importers, manufacturers, distributors, logistics companies, and international investors on Incoterms® clauses, Turkish commercial contracts, customs responsibilities, cargo claims, international sales disputes, and cross-border litigation.
Phone: +90 312 434 22 22
Mobile: +90 532 769 22 22
Email: info@firatfesihkaya.av.tr
Address: Mevlana Boulevard No:221, Yıldırım Tower, No:148, 06520 Balgat, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. The appropriate Incoterms® rule and applicable law must be determined according to the specific goods, transport route, customs structure, payment arrangement, and contractual relationship.